So mods on /v/ are mass censoring and swiftly deleting threads about Overwatch and it's recent Censorship controversy.
This is outright disgusting. The thread is about recent video game news and is video game related. Why are they being swifty removed and pruned without warning?
Threads in question:
https://boards.fireden.net/v/thread/332345014/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/thread/332344157/
https://boards.fireden.net/v/thread/332339821/
Because it's the same fucking post and the same fucking picture every time. Stop spamming you fuckwit.
>>480301
Mootwo, if you didn't get the memo, this faggotry is why people move to other chans.
Tell your faglord mods to do their fucking job properly.
does hiro have a contact email like moot did?
>>480301
Because the mods on /v/ are SJW babies and will ban anything that doesn't fit into their agenda.
>>480301
The threads weren't spilling over at all, it was contained and people were debating the issue for a while, then it was deleted out of nowhere.
I don't understand why mods on /v/ are consistently so stupid.
>>480301
GG crusading was and should still be bannable.
>>480301
There's no actual video game discussion, it's just thread upon thread to circlejerk over outrage. No different then making a thread to dump porn on a blue board.
>>480306
or the mods could stop deleting it every time he posts it.
that way he doesn´t need to spam it
>>480307
This, and it's not just threads like this.
It's people with attitude like this who don't even seem to play games and are there just for the latest controversy to shitpost about.
>>480311
How is this GG crusading? It's disgusting recent video game censorship. It has nothing to do with GG
Why can't they just let us discuss things in peace?
If it really bothers people can't they hit the "hide thread" button?
Who the hell do you people think you're talking to? The guy who owns 4chan doesn't speak english, and the mods get hired in blind waves.
Why not just shout your complaints into a local Canadian goose for all the good it will do you.
>>480306
mods deleted a single 450~ post thread then deleted any more that popped up, so now we have a bunch of threads being spammed due to either people wondering where the thread went trying to innocently make their own thread or spamming out of spite
auto deleting shit without reason always leads to spam, dumb newfag
>>480313
It wouldnt be like that if the threads werent deleted in the first place though, obviously
>>480306
They wouldn't be reposting it if the threads weren't being deleted you dipshit.
>>480306
Because the original thread was deleted for no reason you intentional dumbass
>>480313
>video game censorship is not a video game related topic
yeah what ever fit´s your narrative
Watch this thread get spammed by OP and the likes though, now that this thread got linked to /v/.
>>480313
>There's no actual video game discussion
This. It's purely focused derived semantics far removed from anything that actually has to do with games.
>>480313
You're an idiot. If talking about what food you eat while playing videogames is considered a secondary (allowed) thread than discussing a recent controversy about a videogame's character pose is primary as fuck.
>>480327
That shouldn't be allowed either.
>>480324
Well maybe if these fuckiwit mods and mootwo responded..
yeah those threads are related to vidia. someone stop the assblasted mod
>>480325
>video game censorship does not concern video games
wat?
The more you keep deleting threads the worst it gets. Just let a thread exist that people can hide if they're that anally perturbed.
>>480327
>If talking about what food you eat while playing videogames is considered a secondary (allowed)
It doesn't get spammed like this though.
>>480329
But it is, you dumbass.
>instead of having one thread to discuss a recent development in a beta, we now have multiple threads about it where the bulk of the discussion is now complaining about the shit moderation
B R A V O
>>480334
It's spammed because it's being deleted.
I feel like you're being retarded on purpose?
I think it would be better to just remove /v/ entirely. The entire board is one gigantic shitpost gone wrong, throwing gigantic fits about meaningless bullshit because "muh oppression and censorship" anytime they can.
This thread should just migr8 to /trash/, since mods will probably delete this one here too :^(
>>480311
>le GG boogerman
>>480301
I hope this thread gets deleted desu
>>480336
Don't play dumb, you know how it would turn out. If they don't delete it, you'd just make a part two, three, etc and it turns into a non-stop general unless it's cut off from the start.
>>480339
If you don't like /v/ then don't visit /v/.
>>480301
Kill yourself for wanting to post shitty /pol/ shit on /v/.
Janitors are doing their job and you shout GTFO 4chan if you don't like it.
Fake controversy used for viral marketing.
>>480301
So they removed an animation/pose that shows that she has no ass and you guys are going ape-shit over it? wew
/v/ is the worst when it comes to retarded mod decisions. I've seen more vidya discussion shot down than I've seen shitposting shot down. I didn't realize how bad it was until I started exploring other boards.
>>480343
Yeah how dare people talk about something!
>>480347
>So they removed an animation/pose that shows that she has no ass and you guys are going ape-shit over it?
Not even, they just removed that exact fucking picture. That's literally all.
>>480349
Something that has little to do with actual videogames, the same way all generals devolve into waifufaggotry, and anything other than the game they are meant to discuss.
>>480338
>my unnecessary thread was deleted
>I know, I'll make another one!
Why not just ban these people? Obviously no one wants posters like that here.
>>480353
Is Overwatch a video game?
Y/N?
Not trying to witch hunt the mods or anything here, I just think to keep shitposting down and keep discussions going, there should be 1 thread allowed up.
Mods/Janitors can still prune GG and SJW shitposting, just allow discussion of it.
It'll be forgotten in a day anyway. Why go out the way to prune threads and make the shitposting actually worse?
Ban OverWatch from 4chan already. All the boards. Global rule on OverWatch. Nobody wins.
>>480358
that entire post reeks of reddit nigga
>>480355
>unnecessary
Are you not allowed to talk about videogames?
and before you start acting like a fucking retard again, let me remind you that it was the first thread regarding the issue, so it wasn't a spam or General issue at that point.
>>480357
I bet you think porn spam of a video game character constitutes video games discussion.
>>480363
In the thread(s) that were already made.
You're not allowed to spam duplicate threads.
>>480365
Answer my question. Is Overwatch a video game,
Y/N
If the answer is yes, why is discussing a video game on /v/ not allowed?
The site would be 100x better if mobile posting was banned.
If you want another gamergate why don't you just go to the designated gamergate chan
Or reddit
>>480367
I'm not talking about the new threads being made to replace the deleted ones, I'm talking about the fact that the first thread was deleted for no reason.
>>480370
gamergate is still happening and still being deleted on sight.
>>480348
I remember, like, two days ago I was posting a bunch of non-spoilered porn in a thread on /v/. It 45 minutes before mods deleted them. I actually ran out of images before they deleted the thread. I wasn't even banned.
>>480368
There's no discussion of video games though.
The discussion was about some internal drama on Blizzard's part.
>we discuss these people and their political stance and view on what is socially acceptable and not
>because they make video game
Secondary as fuck.
>>480311
lol?
>>480343
You're the dumbass in this equation. Things like this blow off in a day or two on their own since people would have nothing new to talk about on the subject. It's literally people blowing off some steam. If you try to put a lid on it you'll only get a blown out pot and havoc in the kitchen. That's the attitude that let GG blow out to the ludicrous proportions that it had
mods are still triggered from gamergate lol
>>480370
>If you don't like Amerikkka you kin just giiiiit out!
>>480371
This thread is about the threads that got deleted for being duplicates. Use the catalog next time instead of looking like a drooling newfag - there were more threads.
>>480368
Because what you want to discuss has little to do with the actual game, and everything to do with issues outside of it. Where's the discussion of the mechanics, the gameplay, the graphics, or even the character lore? No, what you want to discuss is political garbage, no different than someone spamming /v/ with an image of Trump, asking "what games let me do x related to Trump."
>>480376
By the words of mods on /v/, Secondary is allowed.
>>480376
The discussions are about a decision in a VIDEO GAME made by VIDEO GAME DEVELOPERS.
Therefore it belongs on /v/.
I'm sorry discussion causes your anus to gape in discomfort.
>>480376
new?
didn't see the sticky the mods posted that defined what is and isn't allowed on /v/ that was up a few years ago?
>playing shit game
your loss
>>480370
so we can't talk about censorship in video games because of gamergate?
fuck off
>>480374
Isn't that what OP is complaining about?
>>480390
if its videogames its /v/
>>480339
>The entire board is one gigantic shitpost gone wrong, throwing gigantic fits about meaningless bullshit because "muh oppression and censorship" anytime they can.
You've just described all the boards on 4chan.
>>480376
>video game devs have an internal discussion with a member of their user base
>that causes them to make a decision that directly affects the content in the video game
>people want to discuss that change
Please explain why that's not allowed on /v/, the video games board, and also give a suggestion as to where you think it should be discussed instead.
>>480382
>freedom of speech
>private website
>>480383
I was talking about the main thread from the start of the reply chain. Just because the OP references the duplicate threads being deleted doesn't mean everything in this thread is about that, I thought this was pretty clear when you decided to reply.
>It was thread upon thread
Wrong, it was one thread at the time of the deletion, you drooling fucking moron.
I've been in like 4 threads that weren't even being spammy but were actually discussing it and then abrupt deletion
Do the mods on /v/ not understand the Streisand Effect?
You niggas need to learn what censorship actually is and isn't. I'm not taking sides on this shit.
>>480393
That's right.
You reactionary whiners really shot yourselves in the foot with that one. Still do, every time. You've learned nothing.
>>480405
>reactionary
>>>/GamerGhazi/
>>480403
>the practice of officially examining books, movies, etc., and suppressing unacceptable parts.
Isn't that exactly what's going on? Someone thought Tracer's but was unacceptable and got it suppressed.
>>480403
can you teach me
>>480403
that meme is /r/me_irl which is facebook tier
>>480398
>people want to discuss that change
No, people want to shitpost for attention.
There was no actual discussion taking place, just shitposting about things not related to video games.
>>480403
Private censorship is still censorship, it's just not unacceptable.
BUT WHY ARE THERE SJWS ON 4CHAN OF ALL PLACES
AND WHY ARE THE MODS SJWS????
gamergate is videogames!!!!!
>>480405
Are people not allowed to react to anything anymore? Is reactionary supposed to be an insult? It's a basic human action. You could argue that the ability to articulately react is what makes humans human. What would this website be if we couldn't react to things?
>>480410
>attention on an anonymous imageboard
do you hear yourself?
>There was no actual discussion taking place
were you there?
>just shitposting about things not related to video games.
read the thread
>>480387
>>480386
>promoting tertiary discussion
Social problems like Tracer being viewed as sexist stem from outside of video games and should not be discussed on /v/.
The problem affects video games but it's not affected by video games and therefore has nothing to do with /v/ which is the place for those.
>>480410
>for attention
>on an anonymous website
>>480421
>do you hear yourself?
How else would you keep your thread up?
>>480418
>implying anyone is actually infringing your rights and forcing shit to be censored
Nice drama queen homo.
>>480422
Look instead of making yourself look even more of an idiot by reaching so hard, why don't you just admit the truth that you don't like this kind of discussion and thats why you want it gone, instead of trying to come up with a pathetic "tertiary discussion" excuse.
>>480423
Since OP bump removal, the only way to keep any discussion going has been to make a major clickbait for posters to get replies.
That's why posting anything that gathers attention on /v/ is extremely effective.
>>480405
>replying to his post
That's a reaction, you reactionary shitlord.
>>480425
>I have no idea what pandering is: The Post
>>480425
>implying censorship is okay just because it isn't technically breaking the law
just because there are no legal ramifications to being a massive faggot doesn't mean you aren't a massive faggot.
>>480427
But that's not garnering attention. The OP doesn't have an account that gets more fame because they made that thread.
>>480431
>that consist
*that is posted
>>480427
>A thread on a topic of interest to people on /v/ gets many replies since it's something they want to talk about it
>"it's bad mkay?"
>>480433
Why would he need an account? How does "account" and "attention directed at post/thread" correlate?
All he needs is one OP post to gather attention, that's the point. Try to keep up.
>>480418
>>480426
You don't care about actually discussing video games, and never did. You've just come over to take advantage of the latest outrage because your chan is dead and has little traffic compared to here. You are no different than fucking furfags entering a thread and derailing a vidya discussion when anything vaguely related to a non-human character is present.
>>480427
But the first thread was just an image of the Developer quote along with a link to what happened, how else are you supposed to format it?
>>480301
>He think /v/ has any integrity left.
FYI, they ban stuff once enough people complain about it. That's literally it.
>>480436
>This shitposter was annihilated trying to argue on anonymous imageboard, but you will NEVER believe what happened next when the moderators saw his post!
>>480425
censorship is bad
legal or not, it's bad.
>>480431
>>480438
How about you stop assuming things? I'd perfectly like to discuss it, but some mod or janitor has deemed it not suitable for discussion for some reason, and is just making things worse.
I'd be fine with just one thread and deleting extra threads, but we can't even have one.
Why? No one is being doxxed or organizing any protests.
>>480435
You're right, there's nothing wrong with pandering, but you're an idiot if you don't expect the people to get upset because devs start pandering to things they don't like. If the devs started sexualizing the characters further, your sentence would be just as valid as it is now. It's not even an argument.
>>480443
>Why? No one is being doxxed or organizing any protests.
Yet.
>>480369
how so?
>>480442
>host a server
>some furries enter it
>start to ERP and shit
>ban them
>this evil and unethical because censorship is always le bad
>>480441
If you talk about this particular thread, it's exactly on point. Mods on /v/ are garbage and have been for many years, censoring the threads that are against their political agendas. Shit like this is what led to GG becoming as big as it has been, they should know better than closing down video-game related discussion on hot topics.
>>480332
>ur a special little snowflake, we want u 2 feel special
>so fuck everyone else
I just don't understand many things anymore. Why do people even care about this shit, let alone a father. This faggot must've not heard about this thing called the ESRB.
I'm not sure how much longer I can deal with this kind of stupid shit.
>>480437
Because they don't gain attention, people just discuss the topic in the thread. Nobody says "Wow, OP, you're so great, please let me suck your dick", and once the thread 404's, that's it. The fame doesn't carry over.
Do you have the slightest understanding as to how this website works?
>>480445
>you're an idiot if you don't expect the people to get upset because devs start pandering to things they don't like
So is /v/ the idiots expecting feminists not to get upset, then?
>>480301
Even when you reach hard as fuck it's secondary.
>b-but it's about social politics!
No, it's about Jeff being a pussy again and caving into demands that only positively affect a tiny vocal minority. (This time being literally 1 person)
I don't care if you're for or against "censorship" in gaming, you need to leave /v/ because you don't care about talking about the game in question, you only care about the real world politics surrounding it. Not vidjer, leave MY /v/ alone. Go somewhere else.
>>480443
New or trying to play stupid, doesn't matter.
Stuff gets deleted for a reason and certain discussion is actually prohibited - very directly in the rules if you can understand what they mean.
>>>/v/rules/3
>>>/global/rules/3
>>480447
I hope mods delete this thread then, i'm scared someone might post a dox on it. Its a matter of time!
>>480445
Thing is, the people who get upset as just as statistically insignificant as the SJWs who complain about this shit, they are a minority, Blizzard doesn't care, they know millions of blizzdrones will buy their fucking game anyway.
Look at fire emblem fates, all that fucking wishful thinking, "it won't sell because censored", "they rejected their only audiece" etc, and then it sold well as fuck, a niche game.
And people think Blizzard will give a shit about this? top fucking kek
>>480449
false equivalence
talking about vidya news on /v/ is relevant, ERP on a game server is not playing the game
>>480453
>I have no idea why anyone would troll others if they do it anonymously
I genuinely no longer remember being this green.
>>480457
The initial thread violated none of those rules.
>>480448
Almost all shitposters use phones to spam.
Ruggarell, that 8gag autist who spams twitter shit, etc.
>>480454
No. My argument is that if feminists are allowed to complain about certain pandering in games like Dead or Alive, then /v/ should equally be allowed to complain about certain pandering in games like Over Watch.
Why does it become bad as soon as /v/ does it.
>>480457
the janitor and mods are the ones breaking rule 3.
>>480450
You're always welcome to head to that bastion of free speech, reddit. I mean, that's what you did last time. I'm sure they have some lively discussion on the topic already. Probably the old familiar subreddit. Just don't bring them back here this time, and just stay gone.
>>480457
Too bad that this whole site has hundreds of flamewars going off at any particular time with little to no mod interference. If I call you a huge faggot is that a flame attempt? Should I be banned, and this topic locked?
So, where the fuck is hiro anyway?
has he done anything in the last few months?
>>480464
>making SJW threads on /v/
>not flamewars
Sure, Ahmed. All in the holy name of vidya.
>>480463
Attention whoring and trolling are two completely different things. Wanting to discuss a change in a game is not trolling.
>>480466
/v/ does it on /v/ where it shits up the place.
>>480461
>false equivalence
You said censorship is always bad.
I presented a situation in which it's not.
Stop moving the goalposts.
Also video games are mass media products for entertainment, they are not works of art, they get changed all the time before and after release because suits think it will sell better, if you're going to complain about it then pretty much every game ever is censored.
Is changing shit to suit the market unethical?
>>480412
Because of Moot and Anita and Zoe crying like bitches.
>>480474
Oh, so that's when censorship becomes okay? Great.
Also, it wouldn't shit up the board if the mods weren't retarded and people didn't beg for the threads to be deleted. You delete a thread of angry fans for no good reason in the middle of that thread, and more threads will pop up like hydra heads. The proper response is to let them stay in one thread.
>>480473
Who mentioned attention whoring? You need attention for both.
/v/ really has conditioned you heavily if it caused you to mix two things this hard.
>>480476
Censorship is more along the lines of not allowable anywhere, whereas banning from a game server because of ERP is more like
>go do this on an ERP server where it isn't bothering everyone
not
>ERP shouldn't be allowed anywhere
>>480412
Because you're more annoying than SJWs and you're either with you or against you, apparently.
>>480472
The first thread was about discussing the pose removal, are we not allowed to make videogame threads?
>>480472
>topic discussing Overwatch and how pathetic Blizzard deals with moronic criticism
>"it's a SJW thread guiz!"
>>480484
What about all the rest of the threads?
Stop trying to censor /v/'s mods, you authoritarian scum. They won't cave to your demands.
>>480489
Attention whoring is seeking positive attention.
"Shitpost for attention" by definition is looking for negative attention.
You really have no clue.
>>480480
>Oh, so that's when censorship becomes okay? Great.
You're free to discuss it, somewhere else.
did i deserve it?
>>480488
at least half of the other threads deleted were the same exact format of Blizzard deleted pose! with picture of forum post
>>480476
>they get changed all the time before and after release because suits think it will sell better
Except we know this is certainly not the case because the change didn't come from a suit who wants the game to sell, it came from a user on the forum who gets triggered by butts.
So you're dead wrong.
>>480488
See >>480480
When mods delete a hot topic in the middle of the thread for no good reason, more of them pop up because multiple anons from that threads make new threads at the same time. They usually say something like "Why'd the mods delete the thread?". After so many thread deletions, they start to feel censored, and that complaint eventually turns into "FUCKING SJW MODS".
tl;dr - if the mod team wasn't totally fucking retarded and knew how to actual interact with their own damn website, they wouldn't have half the problems the community gives them.
>>480499
Yes. Good job helping to spam the board with threads that are more about general politics than video games.
>>480498
But why not on /v/? It's video game related.
THIS ONLY PROVES THAT /v/ TRULY IS THE MOST AUTISTIC BOARD.
>>480499
I saw at least 4 of the same thread, so yes.
Faggot.
>>480507
The initial topic may be, the threads aren't, really.
>>480488
Hey man, the first thread was deleted. That's the primary problem for me.
>what about the rest?
there wasn't even discussion because the rest were deleted 5 minutes after being made.
>>480512
Now all the threads are either actively discussing overwatch and blizzard (those are both video games) or about the mods banning them for talking about those things (the things that are video games (on the video games board))
>>480512
The original thread was about the initial topic. They only started to devolve because mods were idiots and deleted an otherwise contained and on topic thread.
>>480512
You weren't there and are just making yourself look like an ass with each post.
>>480498
>You're free to discuss it, somewhere else.
I don't think you realize that people tend to congregate in certain areas of the internet. All you have to do is say "this discussion isn't allowed on these four websites" and it'll be like there is no discussion, period.
Imagine if someone said, "oh, you don't like Trump? Well you're not allowed to say that in The New York Times, The Chicago Tribune, or The Los Angeles Times." Well suddenly it seems to the casual observer that no one dislikes Trump anymore, because who's going to get a subscription to Young Man's Fancy Magazine to read about Trump criticism?
>>480507
The base discussion in those threads is about politics in general.
How to make a thread on /v/:
Is the base level of discussion in the thread about video games? No?
Does your thread have a seemingly innocent OP that it totally on-topic, but you know people will end up talking about something other than games?
Then don't post it on /v/. Especially when it's /pol/ trash.
>>480525
>Is the base level of discussion in the thread about video games? No?
Excuse me? Blizzard made a change to a game they produce, how the hell is that NOT a discussion about a video game? Am I being baited?
>>480530
>but you know people will end up talking about something other than games?
Excuse me? You should know exactly what /v/ does in situations like this..
A freak out because of ass removal, and censorship is brought up and dominates all discussion.
The video game part of it becomes a mostly irrelevant point.
Go make a thread about censorship in general on /pol/. Maybe you can talk about it there.
>>480537
this guy is a master troll
9/10 I almost got mad
>>480525
It's about a change inside of a video game. The basis for the change may have been political, but humans are easily swayed by politics. If every topic from every board that slightly involved politics needed to be taken to /pol/, there wouldn't be any actual political discussion there.
>>480537
You're arguing with
>muh feels
Just hope you realize this.
Whatever mod is deleting shit has been deleting shit all day. Hell, a Stardew Valley thread got deleted for no reason earlier
This thread is now pointless because mods stopped deleting the threads.
Congrats /qa/, you won.
>>480313
I don't understand this "logic" that outrage threads shouldn't be allowed.
Who gives a fuck if a post is "angry" on 4chan?
I mean, if Gaben came out tomorrow and said everyone's licenses for games they own on Steam were being revoked and they'd have to repurchase all their Steam games - how do you think /v/ would react? Full of anger and outrage right? Surely no one thinks such threads should be deleted.
>literally had 20-50 MGSV/Fallout 4/Undertale/hot & popular game of the month
>mods do nothing while people beg for some consolidation
>literally 2-5 Tracer threads made (after first one was unfairly)
>RED ALERT TO THE MODERATOR BATTLESTATIONS PURGE EVERYTHING
I just don't understand sometimes
>>480609
Hiding a shitposting general under the "MUH CENSORSHIP" tag does not make the shitposting general allowed.
There is nothing to discuss, everything that needed to be said was said in the first thread.
>It was censored
>Oh no I hate censorship
>I hate Blizzard
>Fucking Jeff KEKlan
>Hey look this woman is against the change
>Activision >2016
What more is there to add. It's over, it's been discussed.
>>480339
I support this
t. /a/
>>480422
>Social problems
Which ended up directly impacting the game itself, retard.
When morons who exist under the "the political is personal" mindset are able to take their dislike of the way a character appears in a video game and bitch about it, causing a huge gathering of pathetic white knights to defend the bitching, and it results in the character being permanently altered, despite what the actual fan/willing customers think about it, then yeah, it becomes a primary point of discussion.
Why scum like you goes out of their way to censor /v/ when no of you give a fuck about people talking about movie reviews and the like on /tv/, or interviews with directors or talking about voice actors on /a/, is beyond me. Although I have a hunch, and that hunch is you are part of the problem-glasses group of morons who are desperate to turn video games into a big safespace.
>>480468
You're the outsider here, mate.
>>480499
So why aren't anons being banned for posting one of the three dozen meme threads for the nth time? The catalogue is constantly littered with these shitty spammed template threads and mods never delete them. Talk about fucking inconsistent.
>>480589
>Congrats /qa/, you won.
So the mods started doing their jobs properly?
The only people who won here are the anons who care about their board, so don't make this out like it was a negative thing.
The anons trying to get people to stop discussing this don't fucking belong on /v/.
>>480645
End yourself you censorious faggot.
>>480669
>End yourself you censorious faggot.
There's the intelligence you can expect form a MUH CENSHOPSHIP /v/ user.
Go ahead, give an example what more there is to be discussed on the matter.
You won't though, because there isn't anything. You just want another 1500 spots of circle jerking repeating the same 5 things over and over.
VROOM VROOM
>>480301
Mods on /v/ actively defend censorship because they want to do anything that GamerGate might not like. Basically they're a bunch of SJWs
>>480316
Because not agreeing with SJWs = GamerGate. Just like having an opinion on Video Games is GamerGate.
>>480369
why
Oh boy, it's another 8gag thread!
You GG lot sure are oppressed huh?
>>480301
Ups looks like you posted on the wrong website. Looks like you wanted to use 8gag instead of 4chan.
No problem just make sure to post on the correct site next time.
>>480333
>giving the cancer a breeding ground
No you fuckwit you need to burn them all out till they all stop being fucking children.
>>480301
First controversy, huh? Yeah, you get used to it. It's why I like /v/. I can talk about video games without having to deal with this shit reddit talks about all day.
>>481307
Me too! I love being able to put my head in the sand and pretend everything's okay. Based mods make sure I only see things that suit MY worldview
>>481741
It's a fucking pose in a video game, you melodramatic child.
>>481757
What? I was agreeing with you. Video games are lame and only nerds care about them, so when we ask for things to be changed they should just do it! Fucking nerds, ugh. I just can't.
>>481759
Sarcasm and strawmanning only makes you look like a bigger retard.
>>481773
Doesn't make him look retarded when he's right. The consumer has a right to complain about this. Stop trying to tell me I can't be angry about where my money goes.
>>481773
What's the problem? We're on the same side. I'm sick as hell of all the Gobblegobbles trying to take over /v/ and complain about things. If they don't have anything nice to say they shouldn't say anything at all. The best thing they can do is sit down, shut up, and play their vidya, because /v/ is for vidya.
>>481787
Nobody's forcing you to buy it, nerd. Unless it's something you have to buy, you have no right to bitch about what a private company spends their money on.
>>481802
>hurr durr le nobody's forcing you to buy it argument
If they want to make money off their product then they will do everything in their power to satisfy the consumer. You know what happens if nobody buys your game? IT FUCKING FAILS.
>>481807
Then just stop talking about it if you think it will fail. Oh but you know it will succeed unless you harass devs and innocent women, don't you gobblegobble? Literally a terrorist.
>>481809
I'll talk about whatever the fuck I want and you have no power to stop me, retard.
>>480301
autism, incompetence, ocd, generalized stupidity
>>481931
>Madokaposter was being something else.
An idiot?
>>481937
Different.
>>481941
That's the most polite way of calling someone a retard I've seen on this site in a long time.
mods are deleting alison rap threads too. isnt this fucked up hiro?
>>482058
Can confirm. Mods are deleting these threads left and right now. Hiro they are specifically breaking the first rule of /v/
All posts should pertain to video games, their consoles, and video game culture.
Hiro, you must take action now! Enough is enough. Get these mods in line
>>481799
Fuck off Westacuck! You're kind is shitting up /v/ and you little fucktards don't know when to leave.
Because it's not video games. It really doesn't matter in any way. If you really wanted to jerk off to tracer, you could find more than enough material with a simple google search. And don't give me any bullshit about "oh, it's taking away resources from bugfixing and important issues!" They've said that they were already on the fence about the pose and had made a new one. It's not that it was more important than other issues, it's that it was easier and faster to implement than others.
>>482109
>overwatch isn't a video game
!!!
>>480301
Christ I'm amazed your parents haven't killed themselves for having failure shitstains crying about their video toys.
>>480301
>The thread is about recent video game news and is video game related.
Mhm, I'm sure it's only about videogames. It definitely won't devolve into a giant SJW/feminist hate-fest sponsored by /pol/. Of course not. No political ideology involved, this should be discusson /v/, after all, the conversation will only be about videogames and nothing else :^)
Yeah how about no.
>B-but it's just about videogames
pic heavily related
>>482232
Overwatch is a video game. What people are discussing isn't
>>482308
>le truth is in le middle xD
This is a top story on gaming news sites. And has even made mainstream news sites.
I fully understand deleting threads that have launched into full retardation, or deleting shit just for fun. But it seems odd to claim this topic doesn't belong on /v/ in the first place, as an anon or two here seem to insist.
>>482255
>sponsored by /pol/
Oh no. Don't pin that on us. /v/'s cancerousness is all its own.
WE DISAVOW WE DISAVOW WE DISAVOW
>company wants to delete something from a game in beta after a request was submitted that was fairly kind, if a bit stupid
>company does this in order to seek the widest possible market and earn the most possible money from a game
>this is apparently censorship
>>482368
You sure showed me.
>>480301
>threads
keyword. you must keep it in one thread, but instead you created duplicate of the screenshot and posted it ten time in a row.
