I would like to propose m00ts law:
>m00t's law is an Internet adage asserting that "As a 4chan discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Reddit or tumblr approaches 1"
>>478689
just fuck off you cringeworthy faggot.
twitter is the new reddit. didn't you faggots get the memo?
I already found an example of it in action
This thread will end badly
>>478689
We already have a moot's law: Yotsuba is always on topic.
>>478695
I hate this shit. Rick and Morty is funny, a couple cringey moments aside
t. non-redditor
>>480787
Please don't prescribe the will of anons everywhere to that single faggot.
rick and morty is NOT good
>>480915
LOOK OUT, GUYS! HE'S GOT AN OPINION!
Truth be told I don't like it either.
As any discussion carries on, the likelihood of anything being mentioned approaches 1. That's just how probability works.
rick and morty sucks dick
>>480983
Well that depends on what you're allowed to include as "anything". Like if the anything was an infinite string of letters, there's a few ways you can make it so the probability of that string being mentioned does not converge to 1.
>>480839
Okay, the point still stands.
