So GBA is 15 years old now, and I make a thread on /vr/ asking if it's Retro yet, hoping to start a discussion on when a system should be considered Retro, and the thread gets deleted and I receive a warning.
That's kinda dumb, and I don't think threads discussing the rules of a board should be deleted like that.
>>474416
That's why they keep this board around.
>>474427
So people can bring up issues mods will never care about?
inb4
>>474429
It gives you an opportunity to vent without getting banned for shitting up the board you came from.
swaglord is the only mod I've seen on here lately. If the others come here, they only post as Anonymous.
Hiro drops by at random but you shouldn't count on him caring. I think he's more apathetic about this kind of stuff than people realize.
>>474416
Hiro said in another thread as long as people dont complain en masse, he gives 0 fucks about the rules.
Just make your GBA thread and let the /vr/ community decide for itself
Nothing said here even matters.
>>474427
If that was true, I feel as though OP's thread would have been moved here rather than deleted.
>>474433
Cancer /co/shit
Anyway, I think these gens can be a part of /vr/. These systems are flea market fare. Many of them can be emulated now.
I don't know what absurdist decided on such rigid rules. As it stands I won't use /vr/ because I'm long past things like N64 emulation.
>>474767
/qa/ born and raised, baby.
>>474433
this is hilarious but it doesn't apply
>>474869
This is a good thread then. I'm happy that /qa/ didn't just tell OP they were a faggot and then OP didn't just accuse them all of being buttmad mods.
>>474610
he lives to serve anon
on a similar note, the general deifying/lionization of the Constitution of the USA actually signals a fundamental distrust of the US people
