Will /pol/ ever be moderated properly?
- Home
- Board: /qa/ - Question & Answer
- Reading: Will /pol/ ever be moderated properly?
I was banned from /pol/ for posting a GET picture in a thread about Americans shitting their pants in walmart.
I am not complaining - I have broken the rules and deserve this ban.
But I did not do it with bad intentions, you see, /pol/ is getting worse by the day, and when such a shitty was thread is made and not deleted, I couldn't hold myself and decided to implement some vigilance justice and derail it.
Every single day threads are made, the same god damn threads, day after day, every day. What is that if not spam?
Every single day a poster decides to post something, that goes against the boards popular opinions, without arguments, only to enrage the board. What would you call that, if not baiting?
We have banned/spam filtered the use of the phrase "go back to r e d d i t", didn't we? Then why you can go around spewing memes like "drumpf" endlessly just to annoy and derail?
Why?
Let's review the forbidden formulas from the sticky:
>Red pill me on X. (with no extra content or input of your own)
>Are X white?
>Is X degeneracy?
>How come X girls love Y guys so much?
>If X is true, then how come Y? Checkmate Z.
How is this different than
>Trump stumped
>/pol/ btfo
>a political comic without text
>/pol/ on suicide watch
I thought it was a containment board. Don't you want us contained?
Why won't /pol/ be moderated properly? What needs to be done?
I hope this is OK to post here. This is a question and a plea.
The pant shitting thread was of course not deleted, and went down to the archive peacefully.
>>474077
Two points I forgot:
1)I'm not talking about well thought out arguments supporting an ideology I dislike. Those are obviously perfectly fine, good even.
2)This thread is NOT for political discussion.
>>474077
Nope, just like all other boards, you have to self moderate it, this is why I like /pol/ they stick with their ideology (e.g sharing common view of hating niggers but compromises enough to respect certain black persons). /pol/ current moderation is fine as it is even with shitpost threads, it's a double-edged sword. stand and fight your own battles, you got to outjew the jews, stop acting like a libtard who's whining about safe space, like G.E Trump said "We're not babies.".
If politically incorrect gets "moderated" will it still be "politically incorrect", one way or another, mods political view may affect the moderation, it could results on removal of trump threads or /pol/ is right again, it's essentially the same only in different aspect of circlejerking.
>>474083
But what is self moderation if not derailing shit threads with GET images? If it's self moderation let it be, but not the inbetween it is now.
We also cannot tell people to sage or report, and newfags never read the rules. How do you suppose we self moderate when we can barely call out illegal content?
Not replying does not work if as little as two outsiders decide to bump each others threads.
>>474077
I don't care about any of that stuff. I just want the breitbart interns to go away. When they aren't shilling Milo's videos for views (which is most of the time), they are constantly spamming outrage clickbait for adsense shekels. They used to spam Ben Shapiro's videos too but he got fired, thank god.
That and the tinfoilfags, they should go back to /x/.
Those are the major problems with /pol/ imho, not the repeating generals or the stupid temporary "drumpf" meme.
>>474077
>>Are X white?
But the question is, are X white?
Yeah, /pol/ is pretty shitty but I can't help but view it as anything other than /b/ but with normalfags.
