Clarification of global rule 3 on /ic/
- Home
- Board: /qa/ - Question & Answer
- Reading: Clarification of global rule 3 on /ic/
I don't usually main /ic/ but I'd like a response or at least a clarification from mods or someone.
There's been a huge amount of shit-flinging recently after a bunch of images containing either loli, shota, or furry content were deleted from /ic/'s porn thread.
So is it completely against the rules to draw loli and have it critiqued on /ic/? If so, where can such artists ask for critique?
Thanks.
Not a mod, but pedo, and furry shit is consistently against the rules, because of the combination of party van, and unmanagable internet bitchfests that both of those attract.
Moderation as always, is inconsistent, so it's not surprising if a borderline underage or dozen pictures pass by with nobody noticing, especially if they're not accompanied by fighting, or say, big pink letters announcing their pedoness.
>If so, where can such artists ask for critique?
I'm not going to insult your intelligence by suggesting you ask /b/ for advice. Personally, I'd just throw it in the trash and hope for the best.
>>473759
>and unmanagable internet bitchfests that both of those attract.
Then why allow politics at all?
>>473743
Just end your post with 'the character depicted is over the age of 18 unless stated otherwise by the creator of this image'.
>>473766
For the same reason why 4chan doesn't ban porn.
And in addition, it's been tried at least twice, and both times it made shit worse.
