Can we start permabanning tripfags who show consistently low

Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 3

Anonymous
2016-03-21 21:39:13 Post No. 473643
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: Anon gets tricked tw(...).jpg (1 KB, 16x125) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-03-21 21:39:13 Post No. 473643 [Report]

Can we start permabanning tripfags who show consistently low quality posts already? It's technically a violation of the rules.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-21 21:50:46 Post No.473647
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-03-21 21:50:46 Post No.473647 [Report]

File: qurupecodeviljho.jpg (238 KB, 467x3587) Image search: [Google]

238 KB, 467x3587

>>473643
Maybe.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-21 21:58:27 Post No.473651
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-21 21:58:27 Post No.473651 [Report]

>>473643

I'm more for either:

1. Banning a trip and not the ip(s)
or
2. Just forcing full anonymous except for an optional trip for OP or maybe for certain boards like /o/

Still, I think we need to cut the wheat from the chaff and bring back .js spam to clear the newfags.

>>

Anonymous 2016-03-21 22:00:21 Post No.473652
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-03-21 22:00:21 Post No.473652 [Report]

only if anons who show consistently low quality posts get permabanned as well.

>>

>thisthread 2016-03-22 00:55:31 Post No.473774
[Report] Image search: [Google]

>thisthread 2016-03-22 00:55:31 Post No.473774 [Report]

File: Funny mexican boy trick (...).jpg (3 KB, 125x100) Image search: [Google]

3 KB, 125x100