Mods, please. Stop /pol/ from shitting up all the boards with their threads.
Link to one such thread.
>>472928
Not OP but sure.
>>>/tv/67260235
>>>/v/331486810
>>>/b/675008881
They already have a general on /pol/
>>472927
Are you implying that you would like to concentrate these users into some sort of camp? I might be able to think up a solution for you, but it might be final.
>>472933
Kek
>>472927
I keep seeing threads like this on /qa/ and I don't understand why people think the rest of the internet is devoid of all politics that these people couldn't possibly have come from somewhere else other than /pol/. I'm just saying that I think it's pretty funny that a lot of people seem to think every racist or every poster that wants to talk about politics is automatically from /pol/.
>>472933
>Are you implying that you would like to concentrate these users into some sort of camp?
not him, but no, a containment board is enough
pretty much like /mlp/
>>472938
Nein. We must act swiftly and with force. These damned /pol/acks are ruining our once great website!
>>472927
>Reddit upset that leftism isn't the dominant culture here
just fuck off m8
>>472937
Nobody hates /pol/ because "they're racist" or whatsoever. People hate /pol/ because they can't keep to themselves. Pic related.
>>472938
This. /pol/ is the new bronies.
>>472944
Yes but that's exactly my point. The only thing saying those people are "From /pol/" are your preconceptions about /pol/ users.
http://strawpoll.me/7141215/
>>472949
>become
>>472937
>every racist or every poster that wants to talk about politics that these people couldn't possibly have come from somewhere else other than /pol/
Nothing in politics is black or white, no matter how hard you americans try to believe it
Still, a normal person from our society is easily able to tell whenever something is racist, extremist, contrarian or just a legitimate political argument.
Nobody will tell you you're from /pol/ if you try discussing the relationship between two states, taxes, climate change, current political events about Kurds, Kyoto Protocol, corruption of Cuba's politicians, G-20 leaders' chair rotation or whatever.
People will tell you to go back to /pol/ if you start ranting about some secret global cospiration of all the jews against the white race, denying historical events, claiming the inferiority of blacks while saying they're stealig our women because of some worldwide indoctrination, and so on.
Really, it's not that complicated.
>>472952
>>472952
>Nobody will tell you you're from /pol/ if you try discussing the relationship between two states, taxes, climate change, current political events about Kurds, Kyoto Protocol, corruption of Cuba's politicians, G-20 leaders' chair rotation or whatever.
Bull fucking shit. I cant even talk about certain video games on /v/ without Reddit faggots screaming "go back to /pol/!"
I still wager that /pol/ should be deleted if Trump loses.
Wont matter anymore anyway.
I feel like all boards are shitting up other boards! The off-topic rule should be enforced harder.
>>472954
Go back to /pol/.
>>472954
They never said that to me.
Coincidently, I don't usually talk about topics that can be linked or are related to /pol/. Because that's a board about fucking videogames.
If you aren't able to discuss anything without people telling you belong to /pol/, maybe you just actually need to go back to /pol/.
>>472960
I came here to call you a fag and if I left I couldn't do that.
>>472961
Good. That's the fuckin spirit. Join in the chaos, don't fucking whine about it. Someone is acting like a dumbass? Call them that and whatever else tickles your fancy. Someone says something you don't agree with? Ridicule them and explain why your view is superior. Do anything but whine like little fuckin pussies about "waaaaaaah gb2/pol/ leave me and my safe space alone :(((((((((((".
>>472965
>wahhhhhhhh people aren't explaining why i'm from /pol/ how did they know
>>472960
>I mean really guys, the fuck did you come to 4chan for?
Anon, I posted on this website for the first time 9 years ago. I was a kid, now I have a job.
Do you actually think I'm not here forever?
The actual question here is, you know you don't really have to follow the stereotyped hivemind of the moment?
Come on anon, do you think 7-8 years ago there was this much posting against jews, for example? Do you think people even knew what reddit was? Do you think tumblr was remotely relevant? Do you think SJWs were even a thing? That feminazis existed?
We had other "enemies", anon.
This shit won't last forever, almost nothing did. Everything changed and will keep changing.
And ultimately, none of these useless ideological online "wars" was actually relevant, nothing was important, everything died.
No need to get this much serious and politically involved in something like this; you don't need to get brainwashed by a bunch of contrarian underages claiming they know the world they live in better than everybody else, without actually ever leaving their mom's basement.
It will just make you more and more bitter and irl/online people will gradually find you more and more unpleasant. And you'll regret the way you're thinking right now, in a few years you'll be ashamed and disappointed.
It's not worth it.
It's nothing serious man, it's discussing on the rotting corpse of a shitty japanese-inspired website that died so many times it's not even fun.
Just chill, have fun.
>>472975
>Come on anon, do you think 7-8 years ago there was this much posting against jews, for example?
Yeah actually, because the first time I came here was around since probably 2006. I don't give a fuck what you have faggot. If you have a job and a child to worry about, and you're so worried about the content of this site, why don't you just leave? You don't have to "be here forever", as a matter of fact I have left for a few years because I started partying and such but you know what? Me coming back was MY choice, just like you coming back is yours. So once more, the fuck are you coming here for man? Especially the meta board if you're so above this shit.
>>472974
Literally didn't address any of that but it was a cute little try I guess. I can give you 2/10 but that's about it.
>>472975
Get out, faggot. 4chan has always been right-wing and politically incorrect. You don't like it - leave. We don't fucking want pussies like you here.
>>472974
>anon says to stop whining
>you whine more
>>472978
>the first time I came here was around since probably 2006
Then you know the evil jew meme started in late 2011. Before that, it was just casual racism like calling people niggers, stereotyped jokes, black humor and such, nothing actually political. Not at these levels.
We now reached the point where spontaneous edgyness created by a free speech environment populated by nerdy anime fans evolved into what's basically a huge cult following of proto-stormfrontfags acting more or less like an intrusive fandom. It's basically the bastard son of /x/ and /mlp/, and if nothing changed in the last few months, then it's like this since 3-4 years.
>why don't you just leave?
I did.
It's the first time I'm here in a few months, a friend sent me a link to a thread and I simply scrolled the board.
>So once more, the fuck are you coming here for man?
Anon, you just asked why people tell you to go back to /pol/.
I explained it to you. That other guy tried doing the same. And your reply is to stop using 4chan.
>>472996
>Then you know the evil jew meme started in late 2011. Before that, it was just casual racism like calling people niggers, stereotyped jokes, black humor and such, nothing actually political. Not at these levels.
I'll give you the political part, but not the racism one. There were nigger hate threads even then, but really, you think you're the only one who grew up here?
>We now reached the point where spontaneous edgyness created by a free speech environment populated by nerdy anime fans evolved into what's basically a huge cult following of proto-stormfrontfags acting more or less like an intrusive fandom. It's basically the bastard son of /x/ and /mlp/, and if nothing changed in the last few months, then it's like this since 3-4 years.
I don't get what you're referring to here. Are you talking about /pol/ or 4chan in general?
>I did. It's the first time I'm here in a few months, a friend sent me a link to a thread and I simply scrolled the board.
So you're here for what exactly? To try and enforce your morality on a place you don't use? Get fucked.
>Anon, you just asked why people tell you to go back to /pol/. I explained it to you. That other guy tried doing the same. And your reply is to stop using 4chan.
I didn't ask anything. I'll identify all my posts from top to bottom:
>>472933
>>472941
>>472945
>>472953
>>472960
>>472965
>>472978
>>472979
That's all of them. Now show me where I asked? All I said was I wish I could knock some sense in to those 2 asshole s that don't understand who the outsiders here are. You fags are the outsiders.
>>473000
I didn't ask anything like that*
My b dawg.
>>473000
>you think you're the only one
How many of your friends that lurked 4chan a decade ago are still here?
Out of 100 anons, how many underage people you think you can count?
Do you realize how many people invaded this place in 2011, and then again in 2014-5 (after the whole mediatic shitstorm happened)?
Think about it. This place is fucking HUGE compared to what it was.
By the numbers alone, even if every single anon that posted here with regularity before 2010 was still posting here every day, you'll have very few chances of writing directly to them.
>I don't get what you're referring to here. >Are you talking about /pol/ or 4chan in general?
I would say /pol/, but it's still unclear if the worst parts of rest of the website slowly followed their behavior or if it's just /pol/ spreading their shitposting everywhere.
>Get fucked
It's hard to believe you're not underage of you keep using their finely crafted arguments.
>I'll identify all my posts
You realize you flooded the whole thread right?
I mean I thought it was two different /pol/tards, not a single one.
>Now show me where I asked?
If you didn't ask, then why are you replying? I was talking to that guy from /v/.
And anon
Being an "outsider" of 4chan is commonly perceived as a really positive thing, it's not like you're insulting me.
Mostly because you're right, this shithole isn't my website anymore.
But you can obviously keep getting your posts and data sold from the japmoot to the highest bidder, if you love it so much.
Enjoy your Sheeky forum.
>>473016
I will cocksmoker. Enjoy the rest of your life.
>>473019
You are literally a moralfag.
I don't give a fuck whether you're railing against racism or immigration, Obama or Trump, or any of that shit. That's not the purpose nor spirit of this site. It was created as a clone of a Japanese website in order to discuss topics mostly related to Japanese media.
/pol/ was a mistake. The only thing we can do now is delete the whole goddamn board and consign it to /b/ where they can wallow in irrelevance, or better yet, go back to plebbit or stormfront where they belong.
>>472945
>pursuits of the flesh
lmao
most /pol/acks are weeb faggots
>>473029
This is sadly very, very true
>>473023
I don't need to be condescended to about the spirit of an anonymous image board by a fucking tripfag, alright champ? You're opinion is worse less than shit once you become vain enough to believe people give a damn about some faceless names opinion.
>>473023
You are a parody of yourself.
>>473029
>>473033
Literally nothing but the weakest ad-homs possible. Shitposting is cool when it's funny guys. Y'all need to step your game up.
>>473029
They have an insatiable hunger for it
>>473029
>most /pol/acks are weeb faggots
That's because most people that use 4chan are "weeb faggots" you fucking retard.
>>473050
What's your home board so I can avoid it?
>>473050
As usual tripfags bring nothing to the discussion. Not even good shitposts. Keep exposing yourself though m8. Really helps your cause.
>>473023
Why getting angry? /pol/ is literally a joke.
"Go back to /pol/" is the new "go back to /x/". And it's becoming the new "go back to /b/".
Most of the website is able to recognize the intrinsic antithesis of a bunch of underage middle class white virgins wanting the whole world to surrender to 70 years old ideologies inherited by an occult-obsessed methanphetamine addict with flatulence problems that the rest of the world consider basically as the political equivalent of stereotyped evil incarnated.
>>473053
/a/, please do thank-you-very-much
>>473058
:)
>>473057
Literally still on the board in a thread asking if /pol/ is satire.
>>472927
Mods aren't here. Did you have a goddamned question, faggot?
>>473037
How can you not do ad-homs when we're talking about an ideology where the actual appearance, daily activities, procreation and health of a person are considered fundamental? An ideology where race is more important than arguments and ideas?
What about all the times you argued about how blacks are inferior because of their race, and jews are all equally the cancer of the world because /pol/ said so?
Doesn't look like you discussed their ideas. Wasn't that ad hominem?
You asked for argumentum ad hominem anon, because it's all you ever do.
And it's all your political views are about.
>>473062
>Literally "we r legion" 2.0
So it's true that /pol/ is neo-/b/
>>473065
Lemme help you out champ:
>ad ho·mi·nem
>ˌad ˈhämənəm
>adverb & adjective
>(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
Arguments against jews? There are many that are way more in depth than "dem durty jewzz!!1!2!", pic related being one. Arguments on how blacks are inferior? I've personally never made that case but to not acknowledge the differences is ridiculous. But no. You won't respond to any of these arguments put in front of you. You'll just close your eyes, clog your ears, and start screaming racist or bigot. Ignorance IS bliss after all.
>>473067
That's not what it translates to at all. Nice try though. See >>473065 ? Now that's an ad hominem statement.
>>473072
>and I forgot my pic.
Whoops. My b.
>>473072
>That's not what it translates to at all.
But it is, lel
>See kid, we aren't racist bigots stuck in the 40s. "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction", and we are that reaction, nothing is true, everything is permitted. We are the saviour of this ridiculous world, we r legion, lurk moar. nothing personnel kid
I mean even /b/ stopped believing in this shit around 2008-9.
>>472996
I'm pretty sure
>Jews
>Kikes
Posting was around since 2009 easily.
>>472946
/pol/acks are basically the jews of 4chan
>>473077
Literally worthless. Thanks for trying though I guess. You guys are just exposing to the upper echelons like Hiro who come across these threads to how you retarded fucks who want /pol/ gone think.
>>473081
You want to back that up? Or is this a "literally hitler" type deal where you just try to annoy some people? If it's the latter, here's your (you).
>>473072
>directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
...Aaaand that's basically what /pol/ does every single day.
And when someone tells you your MS paint pic that tries really hard to justify your outdated moral views isn't really disproving history, you start acting like /x/ when you tell them their favorite conspiracy isn't real.
While -just like /x/- you keep acting as the real seeker of truth, the illuminated redpilled looking from above.
I hope your life gets better, you clearly aren't having a good time.
>>473086
See? I already said you would ignore any arguments, and you just completely skimmed past the picture. I know I gave you the out on accident but you should of been able to guess I would call you out on it.
>>473087
>and you just completely skimmed past the MS paint picture that I didn't even post!
See? I already said you would ignore any arguments, acting like /x/ when you tell them their favorite conspiracy isn't real. I know I gave you the out on accident but you should of been able to guess I would call you out on it.
>>473089
Not even MS Paint. It's a graph and scripture, both very easy to verify. But you won't do that.
>>473074
These misquotes and fabrications come straight from the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan web site. Some cannot be explained simply because the quotes do not exist in the Talmud. Some references are to a book that does not exist in Talmud or any Jewish literature. Others are taken seriously out of context, or add words or thoughts that are not in the original.
>Sanhedrin 59a says nothing about murdering the heathen, nor does it relate the death of a gentile to the death of a wild animal.
It says "R. Johanan said: A heathen who studies the Torah deserves death, for it is written, Moses command us a law for an inheritance; it is our inheritance, not theirs." The tractate goes on to refute this statement by discussing the laws about eating blood. Even in this statement, if accepted, there is no mention of murdering the heathen. "Worthy of death" implies a judicial sentence, not murder.
>Abodah Zara 26b is taken seriously out of context.
What the original says is "but minim [idolatrous priests, whether Jewish or gentile], informers, and apostates [specifically Jewish] may be cast in [a pit], and need not be brought up." This says nothing about killing, and much less about killing gentiles. If it says anything about killing, Jews are included. The discussion, however, is whether a gentile may circumcise a Jew. The argument about who may be thrown into a put, pulled out but not thrown in, etc., concludes by saying that the pit should be covered so that nobody goes in.
>>473074
>>473074
>>473093
>Sanhedrin 59a does say, recording a conversation between two teachers, that one of them zealously said that a heathen who looks into the Law (the Torah, not the Talmud) should be guilty of death.
It goes on to say, however, that the other teacher destroyed his argument, showing instead that a heathen who pries into the Law becomes as a High Priest. So this quote is taken out of context, just like some political candidates take their opponent’s comments out of context for their own ads.
>Libbre David 37 is a pure fabrication.
There is no such tractate in Talmud, nor any such book or portion of a book in all of Jewish literature.
>Yebhamoth 11b says nothing about intercourse with a little girl.
Actually, the reference should be Kethuboth 11b, concerning betrothals. "When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing, for when the girl is less than this, it is as if one puts the finger into the eye." A footnote to that passage says that if a man were to have intercourse with a three year old she should not suffer the consequences of loss of virginity when she become eligible for marriage. The comment is actually a defense of victim’s rights. The man who did such thing would be punished, but the victim shouldn’t be.
>>473074
>>473093
>>473094
>Sanhedrin 105a talks about Balaam (of talking donkey fame), and does claim that he fornicated with his ass (presumably a Jenny Ass, not a jackass).
"Balaam was blind in one eye, as it is said, [and the man] whose eye is open . . .45 He practised enchantment by means of his membrum. For here it is written, falling, but having his eyes open; whilst elsewhere is written, And Haman was fallen on the bed whereon Esther was. It was stated, Mar Zutra said: He practised enchantment by means of his membrum. Mar the son of Rabina said: He committed bestiality with his ass. The view that he practised enchantment by means of his membrum is as was stated. The view that he committed bestiality with his ass is because here it is written, He bowed, he lay down as a lion and as a great lion." It says absolutely nothing about Jesus. In fact, nothing is said about Jesus in the entire Talmud, much of which was written before Jesus was born or during his lifetime.
>>473096
>>473074
>>473093
>>473094
>>473096
>Gittin 57a tells of Balaam and some Jewish heretics suffering such fates.
"He then went and raised Balaam by incantations. He asked him: Who is in repute in the other world? He replied: Israel. What then, he said, about joining them? He replied: Thou shalt not seek their peace nor their prosperity all thy days for ever.1 He then asked: What is your punishment? He replied: With boiling hot semen." It does not mention Jesus or Christians. The heretics mentioned were probably the Sadduccees.
>Shabouth Hag 6b doesn’t exist in the Talmud.
Hag Shavuot is the Hebrew for the Feast of Weeks (Pentecost). There is no Talmudic tractate specific to that festival.
>Zohar 1, 160a and Hilkoth Akum are not part of Talmud.
There is no such reference as Zohar 1, 160a. (Zohar references don’t have letters in them, like Talmud references do.) I could find no passage in Zohar about deceiving Christians. In fact, the Zohar considered any deceit (no matter to whom it was directed) to be wrong. Maimonides (not the Talmud) wrote varous Hilkot, but none is named Hilkot Akum.
>>473074
>>473093
>>473094
>>473096
>>473097
>Choschen Ham 388, 15 and 266,1 are not part of Talmud.
There is no such book or tractate as Choschen Ham. It may be an abbreviation of Choshen HaMishpat, which is not part of Talmud. If it is Choshen HaMishpat that is intended, there is no such quote. If it is the Choshen Mishpat section of Rabbi Josef Karo that is intended, the passages in question are taken seriously out of context. The first one actually says that if a Jew owes a debt to a non-Jew then he must repay it, but if the non-Jew would not accept repayment he might use deceit to give the money back.
The compilers of this list clearly had an agenda to push, and were not hesitant to lie and misrepresent in order to push it. It is similar to lists other groups have put forth to try and discredit the Jews or others, and end up showing themselves to be foolish instead.
Here you go.
Now go back to /pol/
>>473094
>>473093
>>473096
>>473097
>>473099
You guys are merely putting in annotations added in way after the fact. This is the base on which one of the oldest religions was founded on. Some random rabbi putting in readers notes doesn't change jack shit. Plus, refer to >>473072 in response to the fact that there are many reasons why jews might not be the greatest people ever. Or would you like to run down the list of why they were kicked out of each of those countries? Is everyone anti-semetic? If so then maybe it IS the jews who are a problem. None of this matters though. You'll pat yourself on the back and go back to ignoring anything you deem "problematic" so it's chill.
>>473074
>/pol/ getting completely and brutally butt annihilated anal raped by facts
>>473103
>annihilated
Walls of text are just gates to keep impatient people out and seem intelligent.
>>473101
>You guys are merely putting in annotations added in way after the fact.
Nope, you're just blindly following a bad translation of all the "it will look bad if we add some nasty words" misquotes from books that partially never even exist. Some of this shit is completely made up and you can easily see the stuff in your pic is wrong by actually reading the jewish sacred books, instead of being brainwashed by some Paint picture made with KKK dot com contents. But you didn't do that, did you? You trusted a single board like a christian trusts his priest.
>Or would you like to run down the list of why they were kicked out of each of those countries?
Why don't you start explaining why adding a pic full of wrong and fake quotes to your list of countries that hated jews? Then I'll tell you why these countries kicked out them.
But it's allright, I know you won't do that. You'll pat yourself on the back and go back to ignoring anything you deem "problematic".
>>473105
Woah woah woah lets get one thing straight. I haven't ignored one person in this thread who directed something at me besides a kek at the start. Second I don't really give two shits how you see my view on the jewish people. It is one of the oldest religions and most insular tribes this world has ever seen. Is that a bad thing? No, it most definitely isn't. But because they have had so much time to accumulate power and wealth as a tribe (not talking individuals here) that at this point in the timeline the top can do almost anything they want, and they decide to fuck with countries that aren't theirs. Look at George Soros. He pulled out of Femen as soon as he heard they were going to start campaigning in Israel. He knows what they do is stupid superficial bullshit but he'll fund it in everyones country but his own. Finally, I didn't add anything, that pic has been around for at least 5 years. Your turn.
>>473108
>I don't really give two shits how you see my view on the jewish people
Good, because I don't really give two shits about your view on the jewish people.
>Finally, I didn't add anything,
Yeah, KKK dot com did all the work.
>that at this point in the timeline the top can do almost anything they want, and they decide to fuck with countries that aren't theirs.
I'm not saying this isn't right. I never even said I like or respect jews, because in fact, I don't. I was just pointing out your flawed logic.
>I haven't ignored one person in this thread who directed something at me besides a kek at the start
Then don't ignore the fact your post is full of lies, but it's still something you believe in. At the point you're using it to prove /pol/ is not attacking jews at hominem.
>>473113
Nah come on tough guy, go through the list and tell me why the jews were kicked out of all those reasons. You were so full of gumption before.
>stop coming to /qa/ because it's nothing but shitposting and reddit bitching about stuff
>2 weeks later
>come back to /qa/
>thread bitching about /pol/ on the first page
>>473114
>reasons
Regions*, not reasons. My b once more.
>>473114
>through the list and tell me why the jews were kicked out of all those reasons
As I already said,
>Why don't you start explaining why adding a pic full of wrong and fake quotes to your list of countries that hated jews? Then I'll tell you why these countries kicked them out.
I'll tell you, but you still have to answer me.
You can't throw a bunch of fake quotes as proof you're right, getting them disproved, then completely ignoring it to swith to some other facts.
It doesn't work like that.
>>473084
They're a bunch of miserable faggots do their best to sink their grubby little paws into every board they can get their hands on and corrupt its culture.
>>473119
I did answer, I didn't add them and I wouldn't be able to tell you why whoever did it did if I tried. There's no weaseling out of this son. Either do it or don't, makes no difference to me.
>>473121
Close but no cigar. Maybe posters from other boards, wait for it, go to /pol/ and then come back? Maybe they learned something yeah?
>>473123
Those people were /pol/acks all along, just lost for a little while. They come back to act as a fifth column.
>>473123
>maybe they learned something
Is that what /pol/tards tell themselves at night?
I spent at least 3-5 months primarily on /pol/, and all I learned from it was the extent of human retardation, and that's really all /pol/ can teach anyone.
>>473114
I mean it's fucking funny because even if you're right, even if all the states were right when they kicked the jews out, you're still wrong because that doesn't disprove the fact you were arguing in the first place. Because /pol/ would still be attacking jews at hominem.
I'll still keep my promise and tell you why those states kicked them out; but first
>I did answer, I didn't add them
But you posted them claiming they were proof. It was YOU, an hour ago, not some kkk 6 years ago.
Why did you do that?
Did you believe what's written in the pic you have posted? If you didn't, then why posting it? Why acting like you were the keeper of the absolute truth that everybody else ignore, if your source are already disproved hoax pics with fake informations made as a form of internet propaganda years and years ago?
Are you going to tell you didn't actually believe in all these fake facts?
ittt: cheated on
lmaooooooooooooo
>>473130
I stated it in >>473101 why I don't care about annotations. This is what it was built on. And if you want to say it's all lies, I'd say the religion that has figured out how to disguise itself as a race (or even vice versa, if you prefer) is pretty damn good at twisting facts. So now that you've backed out should we just agree to disagree?
>>473128
>See no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil
So what point are you trying to make with your clichéd Chinese sayings?
If anything, it's a good explanation of why I still watch /pol/: to make sure you microcephalics don't go and do anything retardedly dangerous IRL.
>>473132
>why I don't care about annotations. This is what it was built on
Don't ignore my posts, anon. You do KNOW a lot of the points in that picture are from books that are completely made up.
And pretty much every single quote is disproved by the context and the actual words used in the books.
Annotations have nothing to do with this; your post is the nearest thing to annotations, since it just take random jewish passages, misquoting it and reworking them to follow your own agenda.
And you can't quit by just saying "b-but they're jews, I mean come on they lie, right? You can never be sure".
Because you're making your positions even weaker.
THE PERUVIAN: DURING
HIS CHILDHOOD HE'S FORCED
TO MILK GOATS, COWS... CLEAN BARNS
"THE PERUVIAN" "SOWS" POTATOES, ONIONS" AND HE DOES AGRICULTURAL WORK!!
the PERUVIAN DOESN'T BATHE, DOESN'T STUDY,
DOESN'T GO TO SCHOOL, DOESN'T GO TO UNIVERSITY. HE'S A THICK IGNORANT, CLOSED,
BRUTE, STUPID, PROFANE, DISGUSTING
WHAT IS PERUVIAN IN LATIN???
*``INDIUS HEDIONDUS MONUS``
HOW TO RECOGNIZE A PERUVIAN IS THE EASIEST THING, HERE WE LIST SOME OF THEIR CHARACTERISTICS
0- THEY'RE UGLY, HORRIBLE, ABYECT, INSIGNIFICANT... HEINOUS
1- THEY'RE BROWN, THE COLOUR OF POOP, SIMILAR TO COPPER, RESEMBLING TURDS
2- THEY'RE DRWAVES, 1,50 TO 1,60, LIKE ANDEAN GNOMES
3- THEIR LEGS ARE SHORT, BOW-LEGGED, TRUE ABOMINATIONS OF NATURE
4- THEY DON'T HAVE ASSES, NOT THE MEN NOR THE WOMEN
5- THEY DON'T HAVE NECK, THEY RESEMBLE WORMS WITH MUD
6- THEY HAVE HUGE NOSES LIKE CONDORS OR TUCANS
7- THEIR EARS ARE HUGE, EVEN THE SPANISH CALLED THEM THAT
8- THEY'RE LIKE CHINESE AND THEY DON'T HAVE EYELIDS
9- THEY HAVE PROTRUDING CHEEKBONES
10- THEIR FACES ARE ROUND AND BLOATED, THESE GUANACO FACE
>>473135
>microcephalics
wew lad. If you weren't such a pleb you might have gotten the underlying issue. How can you see anything when you shut yourself down?
>>473136
>Because you're making your positions even weaker.
Listen man, this shit is really transparent. Even all the way back up at >>473089 it didn't work.
There are better ways to get points back that don't make you look like an ass.
As for the content of your post, you mentioned it yourself that the quotes either didn't exist (which why would I believe you? One of the ones that "doesn't exist is about lying for your religion) or there were annotations that later "corrected" the others. It's (at least) the "corrected" ones they were built off, and I'll still stand by my point. I'm not lying, I'm stating how I see it as eloquently as I can. Unlike whatever imaginary jew haters you talk to in your head, I've thought long and hard about shit like this, and my positions are ever evolving as I learn new things, as should anyones.
>>473103
>JIDF shilling this hard
>>473103
Go away Shlomo
>>473138
>One of the ones that "doesn't exist is about lying for your religion
Anon.
I'm a christian. I met the fucking pope when I was a child. Almost everybody here is christian and conservative as fuck.
>or there were annotations that later "corrected" the others.
read
>>473136
>There are better ways to get points back that don't make you look like an ass.
Yeah. Like not using old internet fake propaganda as facts to prove you're right.
>and my positions are ever evolving as I learn new things
Like the fact not everything from /pol/ is actually the sacred and golden truth, after being totally disproven by a complete stranger that actually know what he's talking about? Yeah, learning new things is awesome
>why would I believe you?
You are the one that presented that proof. And I'm supposed to prove it's not horseshit, when it is?
What about checking on the source?
Oh wait, your source is that pic. Which source is /pol/. Wich source is some old KKK website. Which sources are their own asses.
Now, you actually have sources in your pics, go check them. I even already said which ones were completely made up and which ones are just misquotes that totally change the actual original content.
You aren't really desperate enough use the "I don't believe you" card against facts?
It would be just pathetic anon.
>>473147
>I'm a christian. I met the fucking pope when I was a child. Almost everybody here is christian and conservative as fuck.
Do you honestly believe you saying that matters? I don't know you, you typing some words on 4chan won't make me believe shit.
>You aren't really desperate enough use the "I don't believe you" card against facts?
It would be just pathetic anon.
You're doing exactly what I just warned against man. See how I picked it out? That's the transparency.
>Like the fact not everything from /pol/ is actually the sacred and golden truth, after being totally disproven by a complete stranger that actually know what he's talking about? Yeah, learning new things is awesome
Of course it's not you fucking twit. Point out one post I made that stated it was.
>read >>473136
Refer to point one in this post.
You can keep trying if you like dude. It's 12:30 am here but I don't mind. Keep trying to rack those points. Just remember you lost a lot by admitting defeat on the countries they've been kicked out of.
OP here. Please see>>472944
Stop shouting "RACIST!"
>>473149
>I don't know you, you typing some words on 4chan won't make me believe shit.
And that's why /pol/ is often compared to /x/.
Your lack of arguments won't change my baptism.
>You're doing exactly what I just warned against man
"why would I believe you?"
Actual quote from your post, trying to prove facts wrong by simply not believing in them
>Of course it's not
Not when you have to butthurt, no.
>Point out one post I made that stated it was.
You can see the full denial since all the posts that disprove your sacred MS paint picture. And now please, there's no need to add even more denial by denying it.
>Just remember you lost a lot by admitting defeat on the countries they've been kicked out of.
But I was just waiting, anon.
>>473154
>>473149
I mean I just wanted to see if /pol/fags are actually ever able of admitting they're wrong, since I never saw one doing so.
Looks like I was right, they aren't.
By the way, everybody kicked out the jews because they're basically the only kind of people in history that was unable of doing a single thing, the most important thing you had to do to survive outside your country: integrating. They never deeply changed religion, custom and traditions, language, hell, even they way they dress, all over those millennia. If you can't get integrated, you'll never get trusted. You'll always be the different one, it's your choice. You make yourself "different" than everybody else, you keep adoring a different god and talking a different language, even dressing in a different way.
Some cultures allow this, many other don't. It's not a problem to some culture, then it suddenly is after a few centuries.
Also, every single country or nation has to fall soon or later, and when a nation is in deep shit and it's not other countries' fault, they usually blame the current crisis the different ones, the most suspicious ones, the "not part of us" people of the society. The same people that meanwhile become really fucking rich because of their apparently endless history, adding hate to their already dangerous situation.
I'm awake since around 20 hours ago, now I'm going to get drunk until I pass out, wake up on 6pm and get back to my work
see ya space /pol/tard
>>473159
Whoda thunk it. Take care broski. Must be hard living blind but I hope you make out alright.
>>473162
In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is king. Too bad all of /pol/ is deaf and dumb to boot.
Funny though how instead of realizing their blindness, they simply insist that all vision is really a collective hallucination. It's like trying to use their own disability to actually feel superior.
>>473424
>all of /pol/
>they
>their own
Not this shit again.
>>473065
>claim to be moral, traditional, proud of your race, not interested with carnal pleasures etc
>actually just a bunch hedonist weebs who would gladly racemix with an azn women and are as masculine as your average nu-male
>can't point out extreme hypocrisy because "muh fallacy"
>Hiro will never destroy /pol/
>He will never spend enough time on here to understand how big a cancer they are.
>>473154
Nice edit weeaboo
>>473453
>thinking greentext is only for literal quotes
>>473449
>destroy /pol/
kek, good luck with that
>>473460
dumb tripcuck
>>473462
Close board
mop up the butthurt refugees, preferably with rangebans (and again when they whip out the proxy/VPN/phones)
>>472984
No.
4chan was started up as a way for people to discuss anime. As time went on, more and more boards were added for different interests. However, there is 1 word that has been at the hear and soul of every discussion on 4chan, and that is "lulz".
Lulz come in many forms from anime to vidya to TV shows to religion to cats to frogs to politics to just about everything. Philosopher D is pic related pretty much sums up what happened to 4chan as time went on.
Once social media and normal-fags boomed around 2007-2010, people with strong opinions on things realized they could spread their ideologies outside of emails that they sent to each other. However, since most people don't care about politics, they were forced to retreat from larger sites like Facebook and more unknown sites like Reddit and 4chan (Reddit was till unknown at that time period). In fact, if you go back far enough, you'll realize that this whole Red Pill thing started out on Reddit. And being the cancer that it is, Reddit eventually came here along with it's shitty ideologies and fucked the whole thing up.
Now, like every other political ideology, /pol/tards are trying to rewrite history in the way the see it as opposed to how it actually happened. I am tired of faggots like you trying to say that this entire website is in love with Donald Trump when in reality it's a small, loud minority causing a shitstorm that nobody else wants to deal with or cares about.
Go back to /pol/, faggot
>>473501
but your a fag though
>>473501
Fuck me, forgot the D
>>473504
We're all faggots, anon. The only difference is that most of us are willing to admit we're faggots, while other /pol/fags try to make it seem like they're above everyone else.
On 4chan of all places...
>>473509
Back to your containment board
>>473508
what a cuck
>>473495
>Close chamber
>gas the jews, preferably with Zyklon B
>>473511
>>473515
oy vey
>>473515
Yes, a shitposter holocaust is exactly what 4chan needs.
>>472944
this isnt true. half the 'go back to pol' (usually just like that, without the /__/) are in response to typical chan culture like
>op is a nigger faggot
>OMG GO BACK TO POL
or any post that isnt facebook safe. the other day on /a/ someone posted
>I dont like dark elves
and it devolved into a shitstorm after some idiot posted 'go back to pol'. as if every contrarian opinion is /pol/ on this site.
>>473507
For those who care, here is the actual origin of the quote:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1012082
/pol/ might as well be renamed /r/trumpcirclejerk
>>473023
take off your trip and kill yourself
we dindu nuffin #gasthekikes
>>472945
That sort of braindead delusional traditionalism bullshit would never have fostered itself on 4chan if it wasn't overrun with normalfag Ameriburgers during 2007-2008.
That nation is nothing but fucking cancer.
>>473453
First day here uh?
>>473750
>every contrarian opinion is /pol/ on this site
Nope. But every contrarian opinion is ON /pol/.
The problem is when it starts spreading to other boards, while only /pol/, /v/ and relatively /tv/ and /b/ may actually be interested.
