Why doesn't /aco/ allow loli?
Die pedo
>>472123
Global rule 3. If you want to allow loli you also have to allow furry and guro. Sorry, Anon.
Because pedos should be hanged
>>472141
Seems like it would be easy to make an exception for just loli. Furry has /trash/ and the number of people who fap to guro is pretty close to 0.
Better question, why the fuck doesn't /trash/ allow loli?
Don't say "hurr because loli isn't trash" either, I really want to know.
>>472182
Simply because they're scared of the potential repercussions of having a place to post loli. With furry porn nobody really cares whether you have it or not.
>>472205
But /trash/ is an unlisted board and it's already posted on /b/. Are the people who run this site just chicken shits of the highest caliber?
>>472182
It eventually escalates to CP. It's happened to every place that allows loli porn.
>>472251
That isn't even remotely true.
>>472123
why can't you just go on /b/
im pretty sure they have threads for your shit tier fetish
>>472267
>shit tier fetish
It's loli, not diapers
>>472260
Hey anon just stopping by to tell you CP and advertising were the 2 reasons /l/ got deleted years ago so you're wrong to think it doesn't.
Because it means lots of party van attention. And then you have bullshit like actual cp with just enough filters for plausible deniability, or photorealistic art where you waste mod time looking at the shit and asking, "hey is this actual cp or just a drawing?"
>>472304
How long ago was /l/? It's gotta be at least 10 years.
>>472271
Lets not play "Hey, at least it's not _________". There's NO winners in that game.
>>472322
Almost 13 years and it lasted about a month before it got deleted when retards started posting CP constantly.
>>472205
What about b? There's loli threads there all the time
>>472178
there's notable namefig on the forest who has a lot of guro she posts
it's actually quite concerning
the more i see the more i like it
>>472325
It's the single thread on a high traffic random board that keeps it moderately clean. When you create a separate space for the sole purpose of posting drawn little girls is when you end up attracting pedotrash and start having more problems.
>>472178
Thing is, /trash/ isn't /fur/, it was meant for just retarded bullshit in general.
fact is you DO find loli and guro thread in /trash/.
>>472570
Which is funny since trash's sticky specifically prohibits loli/shota.
>loli board gets removed
>/aco/ is made, loli isn't allowed
>/trash/ is made, feels like people who like loli will finally have somewhere to post
>loli not allowed on /trash/
>go to /b/ last place here that allows loli to be posted
>thread gets spammed with spiderman
Why do they have it worse then every other fetish? Hell even scat is posted in /gif/
>>472719
It might be because nobody wants lolicon fetishists on 4chan except for lolicon fetishists.
>>472719
Laws.
In most of the western world, loli and shota are outright illegal, and in the US it varies by state. Pair that with 4chan's history of having people spam real CP, and it just becomes too much of a liability.
>>472721
That can be said about many fetishes that are posted on other boards
>>472725
Completely true. Any reason I might have for why loli is hated more than other fetishes would be a quality judgement about loli based on my own worldviews and experiences. However, I think it's safe to say that the same is true for all loli haters, and that there are a lot of them, and they exist within the 4chan staff.
>>472123
http://chartsbin.com/view/q4y
Here is a list of countries you can move to and then enjoy all of the CP you want.
>>472123
*tips pedora*
jacking off at the speed of light, desu.
>>472723
How many states have loli laws? I was under the impression it was just legal here.
>>472787
It's illegal in about half the U.S
>>472123
>Why doesn't /aco/ allow loli?
Why would it be allowed? It's not allowed on /e/, /h/, /u/ or even /d/ and most lolishit comes from Japan.
>>472744
No it isn't child pornography and loli's are two different things whether you like it or not
>>472800
So? Some people want to look at Child Pornography. There's a list of countries where it's legal to possess, distribute, watch, etc.
>>472803
This thread isn't about child pornography and no one in this thread has stated they want to look at it, so why are you bringing it up
>>472805
It's a free country! Or, you know, the ones on this list http://chartsbin.com/view/q4y are.
>>472123
Because it's not futa.
>>472787
It's kind of grey. A lot of it is based on court precedent which will go back and forth. Usually the issue is with importing stuff though.
>>472719
Because, as stated earlier, it becomes a slippery slope that results in CP.
>>472719
>spammed with spiderman
Really? I had no idea about that, does it happen all the time?
Really funny if you ask me.
>>472852
>double-chan has a board for something
>therefore there's no need for a similar board here
I'm sure 4chan would only improve if it axed all boards except /ic/, /hm/ and /soc/.
>>472123
People who can't discern reality from fiction. For each person calling you a pedophile for liking loli, there is an actual pedophile who agrees with him. Neither of them can tell the difference.
>>472260
Given that /trash/ has threads for real bestiality, such an outcome wouldn't be a surprise.
Some "moralfags", at least half of whom only started giving a shit about one aspect of morality after they had a daughter, started imposing a law meant to close loopholes on people who knew damn well they were looking at photos, live-acted videos and other obvious recordings of real minors being made to do porn onto everything. Their reactions to every other upsetting or stomach-turning thing in fiction range from.
>LOL! UMAD?!!
to
>FIRST AMENDMENT, MY HANDS ARE TIED. FOR THE GREATER GOOD OF FREE SPEECH!
Oh, but seizing on that single thing isn't hypocritical at all for some reason.
>>472379
Also, /b/'s speed makes it not worth bothering to give 4chan shit over it to The Feds and 4chan has a major
>FREEEE SPEEEEECH!!!!!
attitude with /b/.
>>472251
you know, except all the chans that currently host loli
>>472123
the only reason is because
>advertising
but even that doesnt make sense, as /b/ has constant loli threads.
not much point in /aco/ without loli, since 99% of the cartoons (even those currently posted) are under 18. But since they dont ''look loli'' (whatever that means) are fine.
>>473755
to expand, all of these feature characters who, in show, are under 18:
>>>/aco/397467
>>>/aco/369831
>>>/aco/390650
>>>/aco/373978
>>>/aco/438844
>>>/aco/434606
>>>/aco/451322
but because these underaged characters dont have the ''loli'' body type they are fine. It doesnt make sense.
>>472123
/aco/ is western porn
more like /d/
>>473762
Mods have enough shit to do without carding ids on cartoon characters.
Nobody expects the mods to know the cannonical age of various fictional characters, and even if they did, it doesn't mean that the depiction is the same age as they exist in the TV show.
And besides, the objective isn't perfect enforcement. It's closer to whatever will torque off a jury.
So, obviously the mods are just going to eyeball it. That means some stacked hot alien vs predator action where both characters are actually less than 72 hours old is likely to pass, and a flat as a crepe 25 year old gets deleted without warning.
Not THAT hard to understand, no?
>>473790
its easy to understand that reasoning, but its bullshit reasoning. for the same reason /b/ can have a loli thread, /aco/ and even /h/ would be allowed one.
and the 'cp' argument doesnt hold, as that doesnt happen on /cake/ or any of the other sites that allow that sort of content.
>>472123
>check Vanellope's Japanese voice actor
>my Aikatsu waifu
What an excellent choice. Why did they get Sarah fucking Silverman in English?
>>473762
Loli stage always has been 4 - 11 years old. Your jailbait characters have nothing to do with this.
>>472123
Because they have shit taste?
>>472843
That's one law in my country that I don't understand.
Even if you think loli is creepy like I do, I still think it should be legal, since it's harming literally no one.
Hell, arguments could be made that it's an outlet for those who are attracted to children.
>>476232
/thread
