![1421163988869[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/5zjKDBW.jpg "1421163988869[1].jpg")
Is anyone else really upset with how much /pol/ has ruined 4chan?
>X has ruined my anonymous shitposting forum!!!
>>469136
nope, it's just you.
>>469136
"Is anyone else REALLY UPSET by meaningless events on a dumb website?"
No. Only you are so emotionally fragile.
>>469143
>mfw the userbase of /pol/ would mass suicide, or commit some shooting if it got shut down
>this guy has the balls to call me unstable
>>469155
>/pol/ would mass suicide, or commit some shooting if it got shut down
lol where do you triggered faggots get these insane fantasies?
It's like your stereotypes about /pol/ are worse than /pol/'s usual stereotypes.
>>469159
>lol where do you triggered faggots get these insane fantasies?
Uh, from reading /pol/? It's not a fantasy -- you are free to scroll the catalog. The userbase is not a healthy one.
>>469166
Oh excuse me, i didn't know we had a qualified medical professional here to make broadly generalized stability assessments about thousands of people who browse /pol/. My apologies, Dr. Faggot.
>>469166
Like you. Who fucking cares? It's A FUCKING WEBSITE.
>>469174
Hey, aspie. I'm telling you this from a place of human empathy.
Humans and hate are not a good combination. Turn that chimp part of your brain off and start thinking logically.
Common sense dictates that /pol/ is literally catering to the lowest-common denominator of 4chan. Think about it for like 2 seconds.
>>469179
You're the one interpreting mild banter as "hate", it's you who has something wrong with them Anon.
Common sense dictates that /s/ and /hm/ and [s4s] and /r9k/ are literally catering to the lowest common denominator, and if you think /pol/ is somehow even close to that low then you don't know what a lowest common denominator is.
>>469182
>gas the kikes
>mild banter
either kill yourself or get therapy. i'm going to suggest the latter, since i'm not as sociopathic as the rest of the aspies on this site.
>>469185
>hurr durr aspie get help
Your lashing out at me for revealing why you're wrong about /pol/ is far more telling about your own fragile mental state than you know.
>>469187
What? How the fuck is anything from a neo-nazi political standpoint "mild banter"? I'm looking at the catalog right now, and I see several posts that could reasonable be considered hate-speech. (It's a real thing -- sorry if you're "redpilled" and have forgotten how to behave normally in a social society.)
You really can't be serious. I've been coming here since 2006 before 4chan was primarily a conservative news discussion forum, by the way. Believe it or not, most /pol/ users who disagree with me are probably comparatively newfags.
>>469189
>What? How the fuck is anything from a neo-nazi political standpoint "mild banter"?
How do you justify labeling every single person who posts on /pol/ as a neo-nazi?
>I"m looking at the catalog right now
Well then there's your first problem, you don't know how to not look at things you can't handle.
>I see several posts that could reasonable be considered hate-speech.
Oh no! Alert Interpol !!!!!!!
>(It's a real thing -- sorry if you're "redpilled" and have forgotten how to behave normally in a social society.)
Welcome to normal society, the imageboard. Top fucking kek.
>You really can't be serious. I've been coming here since 2006
Uh oh look out guise, we got an oldfag here.
>before 4chan was primarily a conservative news discussion forum, by the way.
There are plenty of liberals on >>>/news/ you know.
>Believe it or not, most /pol/ users who disagree with me are probably comparatively newfags.
Yeah but they can handle seeing things they disagree with and you apparently can't, so really you're far more of a newfag than those faggots who just got here last summer.
>>469136
>muh 4chans
>This entire thread
