So I remember some time ago, some /vp/ fags started to use this board to warn about the rampant shitpost that was going on there, and for what I heard at the time it actually worked.
But recently it's getting really bad again for what I saw, with constant bait threads with bait pics like >>25215662 that go against the board rules besides. Also the fact that those threads about genwars are now posted daily and constantly, including some that are posted on /v/ too, on the same way and with the same posts sometimes.
It's specially bad if you take into account that they weren't allowed even back at the time when this kind of thing was constant, and the board just got newer stuff to talk about, so it's not like they are drying up right now.
>>442767
Welp, I see it was deleted, so thanks MOD I guess. Just wanna point out through that they are getting daily lately, like the goodra threads used to, except sometime he starts halfway through a thread. I'm not sure if he picks random threads or if he starts himself with another subject so people won't notice until they read inside of it.
>>442769
Why does your board have a Gardevoir general?
Is that even allowed?
>>442796
Damn, there's a Gardevoir general? I'm gonna start going there.
The answer is probably because Gardevoir is amazing. Whoever came up with that idea has fine taste and the mods have fine taste too for allowing it.
>>442806
They also have Phox Phriday threads for the Fennekin line.
>>442849
Once a week is fine, but a general?
There is not enough discussion for something like that.
Keep in mind I used the word discussion loosely, we all know its just an image dump.
>>442849
Another excellent choice.
Really, the question I have to ask is, why are there so many sexy Pokemon? Nintendo really knows what's up.
>>442855
>Nintendo
You mean Gamefreak.
They know their fanbase, Satoshi Tajiri is autistic.
>>442806
Kill yourself.
>/Pokemon are real/ gets deleted because 10 people think that it violates R6
>Five times as many think the same of /ggvp/, and half as many even enjoy it, but it stays up
Why?
>>443246
I ask myself this same thing everyday.
>>>/vp/25222222
Come on, mods, this guy has been spamming the same "discussion" with the same samefagged replies for hour after hour, thread after thread, day after day for the pure purpose of derailing anime-related threads and drowning out all actual discussion
Hell, these particular posts are nearly word for word identical, he's not even bothering to TRY hiding that he's just spamming the same shit over and over to shitpost anymore:
>>>/vp/25222955
>>>/vp/25222735
>>>/vp/25222677
>>>/vp/25222403
>>>/vp/25222342
>>>/vp/25222230
>>>/vp/25221000
>>>/vp/25220812
Copypasting most of this post from last thread: I find it rather disgusting how much favoritism the mods give to the Team Rocket RP thread. Every other RP thread (usually) gets deleted reasonably fast as they should, but ninety-nine percent of the time the Team Rocket RP threads make it to bump limit even though it's the same tripfags freeforming every thread.
If you tell the inhabitants of the thread to make a Skype chat or some other thing you get "muh board culture, we're been here since /tr/, get out newfag"
If you mention the favoritism it gets on /vp/ you get warned and your post is deleted while the thread is still up (not that there isn't a Global Rule against complaining on 4chan but still, the mods are clearly awake if that happens).
I'm almost positive a janitor or mod is one of the tripfags in those threads, that's how much protection it gets.
When I went to /qa/ for the first time last thread I was pleased to see the moderation here agreed with me and that the threads were often swept from the board, but after the thread 404'd they started popping up again; they've even changed their OP to something more subtle, I didn't notice it until this hour because of it.
>>>/vp/25222658
This is the current thread, it actually doesn't have most of the usual tripfags in it (unless they're disguised) but I feel the need to bring it up anyway because if you let them set up camp fully again they'll fight much more strongly to stay.
I also agree about /ggvp/ not belonging, though I choose to fight my battles one at a time which why I don't actively rally against it.
>>443445
We should get rid of the /ggvp/ and other furfag threads before even caring about RP. RP is infinitely better than that shit. Pick your battles in the right order.
>>443449
Killing furfags on a topic like Pokémon is a near-insurmountable battle. We've already nearly wiped out RP threads; the second largest group, Pokémon are /real/, has already been disbanded. If we can take out the remaining figure the board will be cleansed entirely of it outside the sporadic one-off thread that would never truly go away. That is why I fight this specific battle first.
>>443453
RPs shouldn't be generals, but I think that it should be fine to have a weekly Rocket RP, or a weekly PAR RP, or both. The furfags are infinitely worse, and don't even entertain 10-20~ people like the RPs, but are just made to piss people like me off, and it works.
>>443458
>but are just made to piss people like me off
And RP threads are just made to piss people like me off. I don't see why you can't fight your battles and I fight mine, we don't conflict each other and in a perfect world both our problems would be solved.
>>443459
>And RP threads are just made to piss people like me off
RPs are made to entertain autists, but they aren't nearly as bad, and by focusing on them, the mods apparently think that we're all fine with something that more people hate than have ever hated the stupid RPs.
>>443464
There are more people in this thread who have stated they want /ggvp/ wiped out than people who want RP threads wiped out, and I even made sure to state that I agree with wiping out /ggvp/. The numbers are with you.
>>443465
Then, we should stop complaining about the RPs, until the /ggvp/ are gone. It is a million times worse, and it needs to be gone before focusing on anything else.
>>443466
Well the RP thread is already deleted so I'll go with you and try to focus on /ggvp/, at least unless I see a Team Rocket thread make it to bump limit or something.
>>443469
Why can't we just move to get them to make it weekly? Then they'd be happy, and we'd be happy. Or I would. Now, how did you convince the mods to start deleting them in the first place?
>>443471
You mean the RP threads? The first post I made about it, and the only post I made before things started getting done, was the same post I made in this thread with slightly different wording. I suppose I just made an argument that the mods found solid.
>>443472
Well, let's hope they see these arguments.
>>443478
I'll try to divulge my own thoughts on /ggvp/ in detail to help your case.
/ggvp/ has no discussion at all. If they aren't dumping images they're shitposting. Some of the images are blatantly furry or fetishes like >>>/vp/25219518, there's direct discussion about wanting to fuck it (which despite what they try to tell you is also furry), and there were presumably—I say presumably because I only started going to /vp/ during the XY hype period and wasn't around for it—similar Pokémon Generals in the old days that got banned for the same reasons as /ggvp/ would in those times, having no discussion and just being nonstop image dumps and shitposts. It brings nothing to the board and only further encourages the low post quality that plagues the board as a whole. If it isn't removed entirely it should at least be reduced to a weekly basis like the Delphox and Lopunny threads have been.
Hopefully my thoughts assist you, anon.
>>443484
>/ggvp/ has no discussion
>there's direct discussion
Fuck me, I should've proofread. You know what I mean, though, it's not remotely quality discussion.
>>443484
They were hit just as hard with shitposting when it was a weekly thing.
Just get rid of it all together, if you give those people an inch they'll take a mile.
>>443583
Well maybe they'd keep in line if you showed them you weren't afraid of actually moderating them. It's worth a shot, give them a chance at redemption.
Also I apologize for avatarfagging, I didn't even realize I was doing it consistently.
>>443588
>Well maybe they'd keep in line if you showed them you weren't afraid of actually moderating them.
They are just like the RPfags. I have seen threads where they say they'll continue to be shitty fucks after the people calling them out go away.
Moderation for them means a couple of posts / threads get deleted then they just post them right back up in a couple hours time.
The only way to deal with something like this is to outright ban it.
>>443598
Still, if you go full-on ban it's just going to push them further to not die. Even Hitler knew to ease into the Final Solution with the ghettos.
I'm also concerned about the potential unintended side effect of any Gardevoir thread getting banned on sight even if it isn't general faggotry and just a random image dump. I dislike /ggvp/ but I don't dislike the 'mon itself.
>>443624
Sadly, the mon is a huge magnet for shitposting. Banning Gardevoir will send a message that /vp/ will take none of your furfag bullshit.
If gardevoir-posting can be kept to in-game, anime, or TCG discussion only, then it could be saved. Otherwise, it's too much of a furry magnet to be kept around
>>444508
But where does that stop, is the issue? Do we ban Lucario posting because furfags love Lucario? Do we do the same with Sceptile, Delphox, Lopunny, Mienshao, and any other common target for furries/scalies? Do we ban any Ashnime discussion because of what a shithole Ashnime general is?
I think we need to be careful with this type of thought, slippery slope is a real thing and we need a balance between "everything is allowed and Bui has taken over the board again" and "no fun allowed whatsoever, you get banned for having a different opinion than whomever is in charge or liking what they don't like." /vp/ has hit both extremes in the past.
>>445237
>Do we ban any Ashnime discussion because of what a shithole Ashnime general is?
No, you get some fucking proper moderation to delete the shitposting people that hate the anime drown the thread in rather than blame the thread itself.
>>445288
Well isn't that the same as Gardevoir threads? Just remove the shitposting and waifufaggotry (as in the blatant "I want to fuck it" kind). And if there isn't enough left afterward to justify a 24/7 thread, then don't let it be a 24/7 thread and instead just have it be like phox phriday.
>>445305
In theory, yeah.
In practice,
>if there isn't enough left afterward to justify a 24/7 thread
is pretty much a given.
While it's on my mind, can something be done about the Yo-Kai Watch shitposter, the one who goes into any Pokémon thread that says anything negative about any design and posts "Get a load of this" with a Yo-Kai Watch image?
http://fgts.jp/vp/search/image/bavo8B5ETXC3Zl1yXS9L9g/
http://fgts.jp/vp/search/image/4s_57r633qJLSjrI19ZQoQ/
http://fgts.jp/vp/search/image/rErGTQ9PWJM7D9KBbZ52OQ/
>>445308
Oh, definitely, but we have to play it out with cause and effect instead of going straight to the conclusion.
You know what would solve /padt/'s problems?
A rolling page 2 sticky.
:^)
Oh good someone made another complaint thread, thought I was going to have to
again
>>445311
He's actually pretty handy for labeling genwar threads though.
>>445657
Not really, you don't have to hate a gen to dislike a Pokémon from that gen.
>>>/vp/25238249
I didn't think I would have needed to point this thread out, but somehow it's stayed up more than 24 hours.
>>445799
Which rule is this breaking?
>>446181
/vp/ is a blue board.
>>446182
I wouldn't call it porn, but the same stuff gets posted on /c/ too - also a blue board.
I guess mods just have a different definition of "not safe for work".
post yfw Clover is dying
A new /Pokemon are real/ is up. Let's just let it stay up, but if they make a new one the second that one hits the bump limit or dies, report it.
They can have a weekly, but not a general.
Anyone else agree?
>>446384
No, fuck them.
You can't show any mercy to these types of people. Look at what letting Gardevoir general slide did.
>>446396
Gardevoir general is a thread for a single Pokemon used by 5~ people.
/PAR/ is a thread just for simple entertainment of 25~ people, where worldbuilding stuff is discussed.
It is completely different, you jackass. It shouldn't be a general, nobody should hold one identity for more than one thread, but it should be allowed.
If you still aren't satisfied, then ignore it.
>>446406
I'm a little conflicted by this. On the one hand, I agree that those threads have the potential to get out of control. On the other, I don't really see a problem with them having a single thread up at a time, as long as it's a single thread at a time and marked consistently so people can hide it if desired.
>>446406
>then ignore it
Oh I love this, just ignore it, it won't get out of control. Nothing like that has ever happened on /vp/.
>>446422
>Implying these 2 things are even slightly similar
>>446422
That sort of thing is unlikely to ever occur again, precisely for the reason you state.
>>446424
>>446426
Time and time again its been proven they can't control themselves, ignore the threads all you want but sooner or later its going to be the same all over again.
Why is it that /vp/ bends over backwards for shit like this nowadays? A couple years ago these guys would have been laughed off the board. People knew to show these faggots that they weren't welcomed.
>>446440
We "Bend over backwards" because it's better than "WHERE'S THE LEAKS" and "ALWAYS F.E.M.I.N.I.N.E."
Also, worldbuilding isn't bad. It won't get out of control if the threads are reported and deleted when they are made more often than weekly.
>>446440
What does that even mean? I report and ignore.
I can't control retards who respond
>>446440
I don't think it's so much bending over backwards as there's not a whole lot to talk about, so things get let go. I'll be the first to agree that they need to be moderated, but I don't think simply cutting them out entirely is the answer either.
>>446384
>Anyone else agree?
Not at all. Give RPfags an inch and they'll take a mile.
>>446566
Should have probably linked the thread. >>>/vp/25250677
>>446566
But RP isn't against the rules.
You're literally saying "I don't like this. Ban it"
>>446797
I'm more specifically saying "it's low quality and autistic, ban it."
I have to, as I usually do when making this argument, cite Aura Time.
>>446800
>low quality and autistic,
It's called worldbuilding. It's allowed on /tg/, and we're a franchise board, which means that anything related to the topic, even if it would normally go on another board, goes there.
>>446811
>/tg/
/real/ tried going to /tg/, actually, and got told that they were against the rules. Freeform RP is not allowed on /tg/ (the only reason quests get a pass is the QM-player interaction and there being structured rules in the sense that the QM is the ultimate facilitator of what does or doesn't happen). It was agreed by both /tg/ and /vp/ (excluding the people who frequent those threads of course) that /trash/ was the most appropriate place to go since they don't have to worry about any post quality rules or furry rules, but the anons that go to /real/, I shit you not, think they're "too good" to be sat next to horsedicks even if it would save them any and all trouble regarding deletion.
Also who the fuck posted >>>/vp/25251936 I don't want shitposters flooding these threads by it getting linked.
>>446816
Shitposters will browse /qa/ themselves and link the threads like that for maximum shitposting potential.
"I don't like it. Ban it" is a legit argument if enough people don't like "x" vs the people that do.
Lets a look at /vp/'s history. There was a thread called jewing general, it was a thread about ripping off passerbies / people on the GTS for rare pokemon, keep in mind this was before powersave and injecting so 6iv and shiny pokemon were indeed rare.
The board didn't like it even though the thread didn't technically break any rules. They were scrapped obviously.
Point is fuck these RPfags. Why are people here defending them, oh right because they are the same shitheads that use that borderline furry thread.
>>446825
I legitimately had fun with "DiancieEgg4Shiny" when people were ignorant enough to fall for it.
>>446825
The problem is, out of the 500~ people that use /vp/, 30~ of them use the RP, and 15~ want it gone. It breaks no rules, except potentially GR6. You are the ones stating that it breaks GR6, so you have to support your claim. You need over 50% of /vp/'s regular users to agree with you to support your claim.
It's not "Those who use it against those who don't," it's not "Those who like it against those who hate it," it's "Those who hate it against those who don't."
The majority of /vp/ doesn't hate it, since the majority doesn't care for it one way or the other.
Do you understand?
>>446833
There's no way to poll the entirety of /vp/ in this fashion; even if Strawpolls weren't easily fucked with, it breaks Global Rule 8 to ask them there. I say it is indeed those who like it against those who hate it.
If, in real life, you had to have a public vote on some niche issue, let's say making it illegal to own some stupid fad shit, and only 20% of the population went out to vote and it was overall voted in favor of banning said fad, you can't just go "well 80% of the population didn't go out to vote so obviously they don't care, that means they have to stay!"
Someone not voting or speaking about an issue is exactly that, someone not voting or speaking about an issue. To count silence as anything other than silence is just you taking illogical measures to keep your RP thread alive.
>>446838
If everyone did vote, then it would be 20% against 80%. I'm not saying that those who don't care wouldn't vote, I'm saying that, out of 2 options, if they did vote, they would vote they didn't hate it, meaning that they do not think that it breaks GR6.
We can't have a real poll, but we can assume from the post counts of this thread, their thread, and the biggest threads.
>>446840
>If everyone did vote, then it would be 20% against 80%.
[citation needed]
We had this exact conversation last thread, albeit regarding Team Rocket RP. There are reasons for a person to dislike something and feel it doesn't belong but not publically speak about it on their own free time. You CANNOT just assume everyone not speaking up is on your side, it's a heavy, blatant bias.
>>446841
>[citation needed]
I was using your numbers.
If someone doesn't publicly speak about it, we can assume that they have no strong feelings.
Make a thread on /vp/ and tell people to come here to add to your voice if they hate it.
>>446844
>If someone doesn't publicly speak about it, we can assume that they have no strong feelings.
We CAN'T assume that. You're only assuming that because it defends your general. To give the example I gave last thread:
>think Team Rocket RP doesn't belong
>report it whenever it's made
>ignored by the mods
>mention in-thread how it doesn't belong
>>get out newfag we have seniority we can do whatever we want
>complain about moderation quality on /vp/ at one point
>get a warning for Global Rule 8 while thread stays up
>get dejected and stop publically speaking against it until I check /qa/ and see a thread regarding /vp/
But I bet you'd say I'd vote to keep that RP thread if you polled me during that dejected state.
>Make a thread on /vp/
Again, Global Rule 8, last time I did I got warned. We've had these discussions on /vp/ before, and it was pretty much ruled that nobody but the fucks who go to the threads want them around. It was discussed at length on several different boards.
http://fgts.jp/vp/thread/24909542/
http://archive.4plebs.org/tg/thread/44459284/
(Thanks archive.moe for dying and forcing me to go through several different archives.)
Also notice that the /vp/ archived thread I linked was in fact deleted.
>>446846
>general
I've already offered the compromise of the RPs having weekly threads.
>>446851
Well then let me rephrase to "You're only assuming that because it defends your threads."
>>446852
I'm assuming because this is the only thread that I ever see people hating on the RPs in. I don't even see them linked in cringe threads. If as many people hated it as you say, surely I would notice them more, no?
Make a thread, link here, tell people to come here if they hate it and say why they hate it.
If you're correct, you'll get 20 replies agreeing before it gets deleted.
>>446856
>I don't even see them linked in cringe threads
People link other /vp/ threads in cringe threads? At most I just see them screencapping OP, and usually someone screencapping that screencap and posting it immediately after.
>If as many people hated it as you say,
I didn't say everyone that doesn't speak up hates it. I said you can't assume anything from what their votes may be unless they actually vote.
If I were on a dynamic IP I'd make the thread.
>>446858
>I didn't say everyone that doesn't speak up hates it. I said you can't assume anything from what their votes may be unless they actually vote.
Okay, let's just give your numbers more, then. 70 hate it, let's say, and 30 people like it.
Are these numbers more to your liking?
You still would have less than half, which is what you need to rightfully claim that it breaks GR6.
Unless you believe that more than half hates it? Or that my argument of those that hate it versus those that don't is incorrect?
>>446861
>which is what you need to rightfully claim that it breaks GR6.
And where exactly is that written?
>>446851
What is it with this "anything belongs on /vp/ as long as its weekly" mentality?
Let's allow slugfucker to have his own thread as long as he keeps it on a weekly basis.
>>446856
>if you complain about them then you are a sissy baiting faggot that hates to see people have fun
>if you ignore them then you accept them with open arms and they can yiff in peace.
>>446825
The Dawn threads of long ago and Bianca fart threads didn't break any rules either and they were removed because people spoke their minds.
Don't ignore problems and hope they'll go away, people. Children do that.
>>446862
Nowhere. But would that not be the most fair way to do it? I suppose that, more accurately, it would be "You need a mod or janitor to agree with you" would be how you determine what breaks GR6.
>>446863
>Let's allow slugfucker to have his own thread as long as he keeps it on a weekly basis.
The difference is, those threads are narrow and present no interesting discussion. A weekly "Mistakes that you believe GF made" would be fine for him to make and mention Goodra in.
>>if you complain about them then you are a sissy baiting faggot that hates to see people have fun
>>if you ignore them then you accept them with open arms and they can yiff in peace.
1. I never even implied that. I have no doubt that most of you are not shitposting, you truly believe your points. Now you need to defend them.
2. These threads are not furry threads. The furry posts should be deleted, but ones like "Have any of you ever met Brock? I'm about to challenge him, but want to seem cool," ones that lead to people expressing potentially interesting ideas about characters and species, are good.
>The Dawn threads of long ago and Bianca fart threads didn't break any rules either and they were removed because people spoke their minds.
Then get more people to speak their minds about it.
>>446866
>those threads are narrow and present no interesting discussion
But somehow Gardevoir/Delphox threads do?
>>446875
Did I ever say I support those? Did I imply it? Weekly threads don't work for everything.
Just because Delphox threads are weekly, doesn't mean that I support them.
>>446866
>Then get more people to speak their minds about it.
Its always the same thing. Gardevoir threads, RP threads, now /real/ threads.
A shit ton of people get upset and they start talking about it here, when the subject finally has enough people some faggot mod deletes the thread or puts it into auto sage so it doesnt get attention (this happened in the very last thread).
I swear its almost as if the 4chan staff were the ones behind these threads.
>>446887
>the very last thread
Was there a recent thread on /vp/ itself to complain about /ggvp/? Because if you mean the last /qa/ thread I'm pretty sure it hit bump limit.
>>446889
Luckily its still in this sites archives >>439428
>>446887
>A shit ton
>Complaining about Rocket and /real/
I've seen no threads complaining about the RPs. Did I miss one?
>I swear its almost as if the 4chan staff were the ones behind these threads.
I think that some mods/janitors do actually browse /qa/.
>>446893
There was one complaing about RP's, and another one saying the anime general should be cleaned up / gardefags need to go.
Not sure if there was one specifically about the /real/ threads.
Does this board have a dedicated archive site?
In case anyone was wondering, /vp/ does have some moderation. I got this for posting in a Team Rocket thread (not /TRRP/).
>>446895
fgts.jp
>>446896
>Please review the rules
???
/vp/ has no rule against roleplay.
The only board that does is /mlp/.
Maybe the janitor covers both boards and just got confused?
>>446899
Roleplay threads are covered under Global Rule 6, janny probably just wanted to specify so anon understood why he was being warned.
>>446896
>You were warned for: Posting things I dislike.
Lol. RP is not banned, so what is this idiot doing?
>>446899
/vp/ janitor is the same as /mlp/ janitor
if this is true then alot of things are starting to make sense
>>446902
If that were the case, he should have cited global rule 6.
And roleplay is allowed on /tg/, so it can't be global. I'm not buying it.
>>446909
Hold it! Freeform RP is not allowed on /tg/, as was previously stated in this thread as well as in the archived /tg/ link posted!
>>446825
But were jewing generals just unpopular and died naturally, or were they nuked by janitors into oblivion?
Honest question. I don't remember those at all.
>>446910
I've seen a freeform RP on /tg/ get to bump limit. /tg/ has more users and janitors than /vp/, so was it just a vacation day?
>>446910
Ah okay, I went back and read that.
If that is an established rule, all I ask it that it be cited in reports so people aren't confused. More clarity helps everyone.
>>446910
If it's not stated in the official rules, how can anyone be expected to follow it?
>>446911
They were nuked during their first run.
I remember them trying to come back a second time somewhere in 2014, don't know what happened to them that time.
>>446916
That's what the blanket rules like Global Rules 3 and 6 are for. It's also why staff added the ability to warn instead of ban, so that things can be made more clear without severe consequence.
If you wish for them to officially put up a "no roleplay" sub-rule instead of it being under the blanket fan, I don't see the harm.
>>446890
>All of 4Chan is cancerous. Deal with it.
This is probably the biggest issue with /vp/, actually, because i bet a ton of little issues stem from this thought process. "Oh, everyone else shitposts so I should shitpost too! They're doing an autistic thing so I can do another autistic thing!" Then when you or someone else complains, "but everyone else is doing it, might as well ban the entire board if you're going to ban this!"
We need a change in attitude.
a little help mods, the picdumping fag is loose again and its shitposting the thread spamming his annoying serena pics
>>>/vp/25257164
>>>/vp/25257184
>>>/vp/25257195
>>>/vp/25257268
>>>/vp/25257317
>>>/vp/25257344
>>>/vp/25257352
>>>/vp/25257376
>>>/vp/25257394
Place your bets on how much longer this thread will stay up
>>>/vp/25263445
I say another 2 hours.
>>447726
It's already gone, what was it?
>>447750
Furry porn/Gary dump thread. Also Moses.
>>447755
Furry Gary? What?
>>447762
Furry porn thread, but Gary bombed it.
Look it up on fgts.
>>>/vp/25263505
>>>/vp/25265122
>>>/vp/25265427
>>>/vp/25265778
>>>/vp/25265786
>>>/vp/25265801
>>>/vp/25265843
I know it's to be expected with subject matter like this, but if Phox threads are going to be okay can the furry imagery be cleaned up (as in, shit like breats and overly human proportions, and OCs are a furry matter so I threw in the one OC post for good measure)?
>>>/vp/25270686
This shit shouldn't be allowed. Take it to /v/.
Question from an outsider:
What's up with all the complaints about /vp/ here on /qa/? How can there even be so much trouble on a niche board? I don't get it, the Pokemon fanbase must be filled with lunatics.
>>448362
There aren't as many as it looks like, but the ones there are have gone largely unchecked for some time now. That's why things are blowing up in here like they are.
>>448362
Most complaints are exaggerated, /vp/ only needs a mod/janitor sometimes to clean up literal shit pictures and to clean up the spam. It's mostly peaceful without much need of moderation.
>>448362
/vp/ is very poorly moderated so at times the board gets flooded with shit that stays up for hours
Then you get the persistent guys who troll threads but not with blatant shitposting, so unless janitors keep an eye on the board fail to notice it. Fetishists and shit are the worst (for example a guy called Scott who can't shut up about a characters breasts). Also newfags falling for their bait and replying doesn't help (or the shitposters using another device to reply to their own posts)
Finally its the lack of information/content the board has had for the last year or so, which means people decide to make threads about memes or retarded offtopic bullshit
>>448362
/vp/ isn't for Pokemon, it's just a shitposting haven where some Pokemon fans go to and try and derail it.
>>448362
It's like making board just for Sonic fans, of course it's going to be filled with furries and shitposters. The issue is /vp/ goes largely unmoderated and we have plenty things stay up when they shouldn't stay up.
And I mean like actual near-defendable things like fetish threads, not just my hateboner for RP threads and Gardevoir threads. The vore thread from recent stayed up more than a week, more than 168 hours.
>>448913
*near-indefensible
>>448411
>Most complaints are exaggerated
I think you're right.
Consider this. There's a board for My Little pony. Realistically that board must be filled with even more autists and weirdos than the Pokemon board. Yet I never see any threads here on /qa/ with bronies complaining about their board. Why aren't they complaining?
Maybe you guys are just too sensitive.
>>449050
I don't know, maybe they actually have their shit moderated
Why is /vp/ still a board?
Also holy shit, it's been six years since it was made.
>>446384
Alright anon, you got your wish and the thread stayed up.
>>>/vp/25279149
This is the new one, do you still agree it should be deleted?
>>449694
Let's let that one stay up. It lasted a very long time.
If they create multiple threads in a day then its a general, right now its just another thread.
>>449776
I fucking called it. Give them an inch and they'll take a mile.
>just one per week guys!
>just one per day guys!
This is why I was opposed to letting the first one stay up, this is exactly what was going to happen.
>>449782
I bet you've never even watched LoGH. Stop wasting time here and go watch it.
>>449784
Actually you're right that I didn't finish it, I watched up to around Season 4 but real life made me too busy to finish. I'll start over from the beginning, thank you for reminding me that I need to do so.
>>449782
I'll have you know I partcipate in both the /real/ threads and gardevoir threads that get constantly attacked on this board and the only people who want them gone are the people who shitpost and try to derail them.
If it bothers you that much just add it to your filter and ignore the thread, they are not breaking any rules.
>>449789
>I partcipate in both the /real/ threads and gardevoir threads
Well that explains why the two generals are similarly cancer, they share the same userbase.
>>449791
>everything i dislike is cancer
RP isn't even all that bad, in fact the threads are really fun. Guess you hate to see people have fun.
Stay salty.
>>449793
>>449795
Is there one that says "Are you losing the debate? Post shitty meme."? because that's what you are doing.
No one can give any valid reasons why /real/ threads / gardevoir threads / team rocket threads should go.
>>449798
>No one can give any valid reasons why /real/ threads / gardevoir threads / team rocket threads should go.
Maybe it appears that way to someone who stops any and every post from this thread and the previous one that disagrees with you.
>>449795
Okay, I have to admit that image is amazing.
>>449799
If it were only me defending the rights to these threads don't you think the mods would have done something about them by now?
Fact of the matter is there are alot of people who like and actively participate in these threads hence why they are so popular.
Cry all you want but its obvious that a couple of shitposters aren't going to change the mods opinion of these threads.
>>449806
>don't you think the mods would have done something about them by now?
No, because as we learned from Team Rocket RP, /vp/'s mods are known for heavy bias.
Mods HAVE deleted TRRP and /real/ threads in the past, especially the latter because mods used to not be biased against them. We had seemingly managed to wipe /real/ off the board, but the people defending TRRP likely encouraged them to come back.
I'm just looking to protect /vp/ from becoming the cesspool it was in /tr/ days. I keep bringing up Aura Time in these threads and how apathy from the mods will only bring back shit like that, but in all honestly Aura Time isn't nearly the worst /vp/ has ever been. Look at this. Look at this image, would you allow this to return? Because if we stay on the path we're on it's going to return to the days of got yer feets and Garybombing and unregulated pornography dumping. Slippery slope is not a fallacy here, as was proven right here and now by
>just one /real/ thread per week!
turning into
>just one /real/ thread per day!
as soon as you seemed to get your demands.
>>449814
That image has nothing to do with the state of the threads right now.
If one bad apple starts spamming porn in TCG general does that mean that the whole thread should be blacklisted??
You're just trying to push some neurotic agenda where threads you personally don't like should see the boot.
>>446825
>you will never DiancieEgg4Shiny again with /vp/
;_;
>>449819
No, but if someone started making a porn dump thread it should be deleted.
I am not complaining about the shitposters in the Team Rocket RP, /real/, and Gardevoir threads. I am complaining about the Team Rocket RP, /real/, and Gardevoir threads. Freeform roleplay is some of the lowest quality posts you could make, it's Deviantart-tier. Pretending to be a member of Team Rocket with no system of rules where you can always win via fiat is just a circlejerk. /real/ threads
>lol I have a Pokémon it's doing real life animal things lol Mr. Mime is stalking me lol my electric type is shocking me guys I don't know what this Pokémon is even though I do someone tell me what it is so we can pretend to be clueless like we were really in Pokémon
brings absolutely nothing to this board. It's all one-or-two-posts of non-sequitors repeated endlessly or people listing common knowledge facts about Pokémon as if they were actually applying it to something. It is, again, a circlejerk with no real discussion.
Gardevoir threads are image dumps with waifufaggotry thrown into the mix. There is nothing it brings that is worth being more than weekly, yet people like you defend its 24/7 threads with
>it's Pokémon so it's allowed!
even though that opens the floodgates for any of the garbage I brought up in the previous post. Gardevoir general has no discussion to it like the others; if it ever did it's long-since been exhausted by being a 24/7 general. It's again a circlejerk.
Circlejerks are only ever defended by circlejerkers, the type of people who blanket anyone that calls their low post quality out as being "just a couple shitposters, nobody really dislikes us!" It's the same mental state CWC has, calling any and all a troll for not loving his masterpiece. The fact that there's an overlap betwee several of these circlejerks only strengthens the feeling I have that they need to be removed. They hurt the board and will only hurt it more when worse things start being allowed.
>>449865
I agree with the assessment of the Gardevoir threads; they really do need to be cut back to once a week at the most, to give time for new OC to be developed if nothing else.
The /real/ threads are in a bit of a bind, because they're likely to be declared useless no matter what happens; too short a post and there's no quality, too long in a single post or a chain and it's a circlejerk.
The Rocket threads used to not be total circlejerks, but now they are due primarily to lack of interest from more than a few people. They do try to provide more detail in the things they do, but it's a balance between high-quality posts and moving stories along that's often poorly struck and allowing little room for other interested parties to come in.
>>449694
Look here.
>>>/vp/25280723
This is the last chance.
Hiro please announce Pokemon Z.
>/wfg/ being bothered by a known injector that tried to combine both /ekx/ and /wfg/, something that neither threads want.
Jesus Christ, just ban the chucklefuck already...
I've noticed a lot of "Hardest decision of my life" threads on /v/ (refering to choosing a starter in gen 1 games). It's kinda getting out of hand, I even told them to go back to /vp/ and my post got deleted for some reason.
>threads like this >>>/vp/25255107 going rampant recently, with one that was even moved to /e/ the other day, reporting doesn't do shit
>b-but furfags
>>450615
One step at a time
>>449960
>>>/vp/25286514
I'M ANGRY NOW
YOU WERE RIGHT, GIVE THEM AN INCH, THEY TAKE A MILE
>>450650
What's the problem?
>>450650
I warned you guys, I told you exactly what was going to happen.
>>450655
They're making regular threads again. All that progress we made on fixing /vp/ has been undone, we have to start from scratch.
I bet it's partially my fault for lapsing my conquest to assist in the removal of /ggvp/. Now both are rampant instead of just one. This is why I fight my battles one at a time.
>>450708
>Fixing /vp/
A pipe dream within a pipe dream.
>shitposting general to 'fix' /vp/
Autists like you who sold the board to mods in the first place for 'protection' from Bui in the first place should just fuck right off. If you want your autistic safespace to talk about Pokemon, go to an actual forum.
>>450708
Honest question.
What do you consider "fixing /vp/?"
Getting rid of the role play threads?
Getting rid of the generals?
Getting rid of the anything and everything you as an individual don't like?
Because that seems to be the general consensus I see consistent in these threads.
When I see a post I don't like, it's as simple as pressing that little button that allows me to hide it.
What's that? Another one? I'll hide that one too.
WHY IS THIS SO FUCKING HARD FOR PEOPLE?
/vp/ since it's inception has been plagued by this kind of general faggotry. The way these boards work, the more popular threads will get more attention. So when threads get image bombed, usually by people posting the likes of Gary Oak and Spider-Man, they make (their words) the "shit threads" reach the image limit faster, and constitute the creation of more "shit threads."
Shit makes more shit. The only way to fix it is to stop making more.
tl;dr: The best way to "fix /vp/" is to leave it alone, stop the worthless demonizing of threads, and USE THE HIDE FEATURE LIKE RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE!
But I guess that is too much to ask for, isn't it.
>>450743
>if you want your autistic safespace to talk about Pokemon, go to an actual forum.
>if you want your autistic safespace to talk about politics, go to an actual forum.
>if you want your autistic safespace to talk about video games, go to an actual forum.
>if you want your autistic safespace to talk about anime, go to an actual forum.
>if you want your autistic safespace to talk about cartoons, go to an actual forum.
>>450743
You're the person who was defending Bui in >>>/vp/25279459 weren't you
>>450747
>just ignore it!
Every time. Guess we should've ignored Bui like the above anon wants too.
>>450708
Half the people there seem to think that it's a shitposter, since no-one there made it. Report it and report any others until next week. I'm still pissed.
>ITT: Everybody citing Bui's faggotry and how /vp/ handled it as whole as the main reason why /vp/ is shit.
The main reason why Bui became so infamous is because NO ONE on the damn board had the balls to learn computer programming and use that knowledge to dox him.
There, I fucking said it.
>>450786
Bui's a shit, always has been, always will be.
Doesn't mean you had to sell out the board to mods in the process. Fuck off.
>>450786
>Guess we should've ignored Bui like the above anon wants too.
Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying.
>>450747
the report/hide function is one of the most underutilized goodies on /vp/. Usually if one sees a thread that does break the rule or just something they don't like, they can report the OP, which automatically hides the entire thread and allows for further browsing without seeing it anymore. To interact with the thread any further would be about the equivalent of willingly browsing /d/ only to complain about dickgirls: Nothing good comes out of it and often gets the complainer banned instead of the thread.
In my opinion it becomes a problem when said things start leaking into other threads, like if RP somehow gets into a thread talking about a newly announced Pokemon. Alternatively it becomes an issue if threads start flooding /vp/ like those goodra threads from years ago or today, the 'false' gardevoir threads that pop up when shitposting invades one..
>>450811
>the report/hide function is one of the most underutilized goodies on /vp/
I use it all the time, most of the time nothing is done though.
>>450811
You will get warned / banned for reporting threads, its happened.
You are literally telling us to STFU about these cancerous borderline furry threads. No.
As you can see lots of us have had enough of this faggotry and want something done about them (i.e. ban the threads).
>>450825
You need to deal with the fact that furries are becoming accepted on this site. The times are changing. Change with them or get left to die.
>>450828
And this anon has hit a large issue in general. Furries have been winning the war gradually.
Hiro never should've made /trash/. Containment boards never, ever, ever work, /mlp/ being the exception because mods did the proper work to stomp into the dust anyone posting about it off that board. All it did was tell the furries "hey, you have this new place to go to!" and when you give someone an inch, they take a mile, as has been said repeatedly in the thread.
I'm not even sure how we can counter it, to be frank. Mods just don't seem to care.
>>450831
>/mlp/ being the exception because mods did the proper work to stomp into the dust anyone posting about it off that board
And why wouldn't that work for furries as well? /trash/ is barely enforced since it's not a "true" furry board. From what I gathered it's more of a red /mlp/ than a /fur/, with some other /b/-tier shit moved from other boards.
>>450825
>You will get warned / banned for reporting threads, its happened.
True, but I'd rather take a warning/1 day ban for not having a report count rather than 3 day ban for complaining.
>You are literally telling us to STFU about these cancerous borderline furry threads
Never said that. What I meant was that as anons, we don't have any powers to directly delete threads. The only tools provided for us is the report button and using the feedback/mod email/irc (and apparently going to qa). So instead of complaining in problematic threads to cause an even worse storm, use the tools provided.
>>450853
I do have to agree with this. My /qa/ visits have done far more than complaining in-thread has ever done.
>>450615
This shit infuriates me the fuck out. Lolicon/ecchi pokegirl shit allowed all the time, but only the "furries" are the problem. Furries ARE taken care of, sometimes even too far: if any mod look at my IP's ban history, my last ban was for a completely SFW Lopunny pic with very subtle breasts, and it was a pic that was posted several other times before so I was sure it was safe. That AT WORST should be just a warning, not a flat-out 3-days ban.
And I do report every of these threads. But nothing happens.
>>450708
>fixing /vp/
You mean making /vp/ what you and a handful of other people want it to be.
Stop with the ego, /vp/ is not yours and it never was yours.
Deal with it.
>>450876
You seem upset. History has shown that people don't want /vp/ to be a furry cesspool like it was in /tr/ days, and if you really want that you can go to /trash/ or 8/vp/, the latter was ran by Bui himself last I checked so you can yiff all you want there.
>>450747
Old /vp/ had thicker skin.
All I need is a mainline game announcement and I'll stop shitposting. I promise.
>>450880
>furries
You don't remember Gary Bombing?
>>450880
Who's the one crying to the mods here?
>>442767
Yeah I'm not sure. Reddit /mlp/ mods or something.
Gardevoir threads.
Phox Friday.
"Would you ______ a Pokemon?"
Even as much as I like Pokegirl threads, they're only one step away from furshit.
I'm not sure why this is allowed.
moot left and suddenly /tv/ becomes the worst board on the site and Pokemon is flooded with furshit, even /b/ threads or BLACKED threads are left up on /pol/ with 200+ replies
what the fuck, why the fuck is this allowed
mootwo, what the fuck?
>>450884
The mods are banning all gary bombers, deleting their posts, and leaving the offending threads up.
I'm telling you either one of the mods really hates /vp/ or approves of all the furshit.
>>450925
>one of the mods really hates /vp/ or approves of all the furshit
WHY THE FUCK IS THIS ALLOWE
WHO HIRES THESE FUCKING PEOPLE
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST
>>450927
>WHO HIRES THESE FUCKING PEOPLE
It's all Hiro's new mods, I hear issues with them all of the place on a ton of boards.
>>450928
WHY IS THIS ALLOWED? WHY WOULD YOU INTENTIONALLY HIRE MODS THAT GIMP A BOARD'S PRODUCTIVITY/COMMUNITY?
>>450930
THEY CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH THIS!
>>450920
>/vp/ got fucked as soon as moot left
Yeah, no, /vp/ was doomed the day leddit found /vp/ during XY leaks. I remember there was a screencap of some anon posting Tentaquil and then it was immediately reposted in reddit, and I don't expect any better when next main games get announced. Perhaps before that, or you could argue it has always been shit, but at least it used to be the kind of shit I'd have a good laugh at. Not to mention moot never really cared about the board anyway, seemingly; friendly reminder that Goodrafag was born, grown and exploded under his watch, and not even when it reached critical mass did he ever show up to make any sort of statement, not even a "may you drown in that shit". Nothing.
How do we get the metaposters to leave?
>crybaby thread deleted
Thank you mods
>>450933
fuck moot, glad that cuck's gone
far as XY times went, I personally thought that was some of the best times /vp/ has had, plentiful discussion about the actual game, Friend Safari threads, givaways, trading
pretty great considering how mediocre XY was
side note: why is reddit allowed
>>450935
fucking kill yourself
Why allow this incorrect usage of the term, "general"?
>>450936
>side note: why is reddit allowed
What does this mean?
>>450935
Can't get more off topic than bitching
>>450938
"Ban things I don't like! Waaah!"
>>450927
>>450928
>>450930
>>450932
You're retarded.
Very retarded.
Mods are fucking horrible in many different ways. They do things differently every single day.
Sometimes they go crazy and delete things that are in no way "furry" and ban the poster for days. Sometimes they don't show up for hours and things stay up that shouldn't.
However, they will never actually tolerate furshit. The only reason threads like that stay up because they simply aren't here.
How about that panty shot thread that's been up for hours?
Or the pokegirls thread that's started with porn?
They're still up and being actively moderated.
Don't ever act like mods tolerate furfags or that you're the fucking victims here.
>>450942
I meant on /vp/, meta talk here is fine obviously
>>450936
Moot approved RP stuff but he banned furshit.
>>450936
There were some golden times during X/Y indeed, but so many problems too. Those Hilda/Rosa/Bianca/Roxie/Cynthia constant threads, also "Pick your waifu before somebody else does", I remember having several of those filtered at the same time; the constant Smogon threads contesting/agreeing with the heavy load of bans/suspect tests, filled with furious shitposting that also invaded other threads; all the EBIN MEMES REPOSTED NTH TIMES ALREADY XD; all the other furryshit and whatnot; at some point I had about 40 (forty) threads filtered. About half the entire board.
>>450944
They only come when something gets enough reports, since furries wont report other obvious furry posts and threads they wont get deleted.
/vp/ is not moderated, case and point >>>/vp/25280623. It has been 30 hours since this has been posted.
>>450952
that's a furry post? huh
>>442767
Son, you’re too young. Do you really think there are that many people responding to your post on this forum? It was all me. Let me change another user ID again and post the same expression here, then you’ll know.
>>450881
Much thicker
>>450963
Here's an updated version.
[spoiler]Kinda, it's from 2014. It needs some repolishing.[/spoiler]
>>451007
We updated it a little while back. I can't find the file though but we did update it for recent times.
>>450853
case in point, this to stop shit like what's going on in >>>/vp/25289291
>>451023
>A thread of everyone calling your ideas stupid
>28 posters
Looks like /vp/ has made it'd decision.
Go back to tumblr and stay there.
>>451038
Didn't the OP admit he was rusing everyone, or was it a ruser that was admitting to be OP?
I couldn't follow that thread.
>>451038
>Looks like /vp/ has made it'd decision.
wow! the thread full of dragon type cocks disagrees with the views of the people here
>>451057
>one poster invalidates a whole thread
I know you're rusing, but some people actually believe this
>>451053
Person claiming to be OP said that the thread was a ruse but that doesn't mean OP here isn't.
Ruser could have been pretending to be the OP here after OP's last thread got deleted.
Either way OP is still a faggot who should become an hero.
>>451023
That thread might possibly be the worst thing I've seen on 4chan in 2016 so far.
>>451067
That's how /vp/ used to be back when it was /b/+pokemon
>>451068
It only strengthens my resolve to see /vp/ righted and brought back to at least some minor amount of quality.
>>451072
Do you think I'll quiver to one defeat? A defeat that's arguable if it's even a defeat because two-thirds of that thread were furry/Gary/Nazi posting and another fourth was trying to discern whether OP was a rusemaster or not?
We've seen progress be made from these threads. I'm the anti-RP poster, and TRRP was heavily protected by the mods to the extent that you would get warnings for reporting it, but one /qa/ thread took away that stability (even if it's been coming back due to either mod apathy or a mod getting bribed). Change and improvement are never impossible, and we can't buckle on our ideals; we have to keep at it until either the board is saved or until its quality becomes so low that Hiro deletes it. I consider the latter a bad end so I'm going to keep striving to fix it gradually (as opposed to the OP of that thread being blunt and demanding everything at once, assuming he wasn't rusing).
Don't lose hope, anon.
>>450831
Yes containment boards work.
/mlp/ worked, /vp/ worked and to a certain degree, even /pol/ worked.
If any of those would stop existing, hell would break loose.
>>451120
Well [s4s] certainly didn't work, I swear shitposting only rose since its creation. I'm not the kind of guy who calls everything I don't like /pol/ but it tends to spread across the boards. /vp/ you have a point I guess, I do see /v/ Pokémon threads but you're right that it's a lot less than it could be.
I guess it's more hit-and-miss, but considering we already had a blanket ban on furries outside /b/ I didn't and still don't see the benefit of giving them a home on 4chan, it will only welcome them.
>>451122
IIRC s4s was meant as a joke and stayed because moot felt entertained.
I think that the problem with /vp/ is 1. a lack of moderation in the first place, 2. a not well or not at all defined rule of what makes a pokemon pic furry and 3. no restriction on certain threads like Gardevoir threads.
They should get a weekly restriction like similar threads on other boards.
You know, there's a point where something like janitors might be a welcomed thing when you have ongoing things like this that happens constantly in threads by one guy most of the time.
>>>/vp/25290823
>>>/vp/25290833
>>>/vp/25290831
>>451125
Number 2 is a good point.
In my opinion, the line for "furry" is crossed when a Pokémon has humanlike features that its species normally doesn't (like breasts) or is more humanshaped than normal.
To elaborate on that second point, look at Gardevoir. The breasts generally give away whether a Gardevoir pic is furry, but let's think about other features. Gardevoir has a blank face with no nose, an unnaturally thin and not-curvy-at-all body, long sticklike legs that come to points, thick arms, etc. If someone posts a picture of Gardevoir with a curvy waist and well-defined legs, I'd say that crosses the line into "furry." It might not even be something worth reporting because it's subtle, but if you had to point me at the image and ask me "examine this closely, would you call this furry?" I'd probably say yes.
>inb4 that one Gardevoir defender who always goes "but Gardevoir doesn't have fur so it can't be furry! I'm not a furry for masturbating to it!"
>>451075
And I'll be here trolling you constantly.
Because you're weak.
>>451125
No the biggest problem is that you people care too much. /vp/ is a half dead board, what do you think you're going to accomplish besides making it even more dead?
>>451161
>Shitposting is better than no posting!
Fuck right off
>>451161
I'll take a slow board with decent-quality threads over a fast board with nothing but shitposts, and I'm sure anyone that isn't a redditor who thinks every 4chan board is [s4s] agrees.
>>451075
TRRP got protected because Moot himself said they were okay when they asked him.
If you weren't such a newfag you'd know that.
>>451166
Why should I care about what some random tripfag has to say? Next you'll start quoting buttscab.
This >>451167 is actually a correct opinion to hold, who cares what Moot said in the past.
Although I personally don't have a problem with TRRP as long as it stays contained.
>>451170
Stop trolling please, it doesn't help the discussion at all.
>>>/vp/25288545
>>>/vp25288515
>>>/vp/25290087
>All of this intraboard fighting over, of all fucking things, trading.
Jesus fucking Christ...
Can't we just go back to the old system we had and ban the chucklefuck who insists on pushing his quixotic agenda?
>>451173
>>>/vp/25288515
I'm not quite sure what happened there...
>>451170
>How about we just eliminate /vp/ completely and give you all back to /v/ or shove you into /vg/
I would rather see the board deleted than the state it is now
>>451173
>>451174
95% of regulars in the wifi general thread all an hero'd and some guy named injectorbro came in and started handing out perfect pokemon. There are not enough oldfags left in that thread to drive him out so they started splitting the thread.
I honestly don't know if he has some kind of vendetta against /wfg/, doing it for the lulz, or believes it doesnt matter where you get your pokemon because it in end its all the same data.
He's causing a shit storm either way and funniest part is he is breaking zero rules unlike the other offending threads mentioned here.
>>451176
We wouldn't have all these imposters if everyone wasn't trying to be somebody
>>451171
It is a valid explanation why TRRP was immune for years though.
Really I don't have problem with them either, they don't post porn, furshit, or anything like that.
>>451172
We're having a discussion here? No the loudest person here is a zealot acting like this is the final crusade and that he's going to be the savior of /vp/.
>>451177
I believe it breaks the catch 'em all rule, as he is not actually capturing.
>>451177
>I would rather see the board deleted than the state it is now
To be honest, I agree, I'm pretty sick of the way things are.
I would miss /heg/ (though /vr/'s hack thread can accomodate the first two Gens at least) but discussion on the games themselves is usually better on /v/ than /vp/. Fuck /vg/ though I'm not touching that place with a forty-foot pole.
>>451177
have you guys tried mass reporting him?
>>451177
I don't see the problem with injectorbro. He clearly states that the pokemon he hands out are hacked and nobody is forced to take them from him.
>>451178
But again, this is what tripcodes are for
>>451179
Saying /vp/ should return to /v/ is not worthy of discussion though, /v/ would be hell on earth if this would happen.
Post quality is also more important than post quantity. This is proven by /v/ alone.
I think the /real/ thread was just deleted.
Did the mods finally listen?
Do the Gardevoir threads next.
>>451182
If you're sick of the way things are then you've been sick of /vp/ since it was created.
>>451185
>He clearly states that the pokemon he hands out are hacked
he impersonates people and uses their SIDs
>>451182
>but discussion on the games themselves is usually better on /v/ than /vp/
Guess how that would turn out once /vp/ is deleted.
Please use your brain.
>>451186
Shh, when something like this happens we should usually just take it as a quiet victory instead of gloating, no need to make the mods question their decision. I mean you can mention Gardevoir threads but to chain the two events like that is probably a bad idea.
>>451185
Don't get me wrong, I don't have a problem with injectorbro.
My only regret is that he wasn't doing his things when cancerous fucks like Ravi were hanging around /wfg/
>>451190
Convince me not to make one myself then... give me a good reason besides it makes you upset.
>>451188
He doesn't impersonate anyone, just because injectorbro gave me a perfect japanese shiny ditto with dawnys TID and SID doesn't mean he claims to be dawny
>>451190
It was most likely OP again anyway
>>451192
it'll get deleted again :^)
>>451189
These people aren't using their brain, they're using their feels.
Here's a fun fact, most of the mods and janitors are in the US and have to sleep at night and the ones who aren't have better things to do than ban stuff people don't like, they're too busy trying to ban illegal and openly against the rules stuff on more important boards.
>>451177
Both posts were by me, I fucked up linking the middle thread.
Oh, and...
>95% of regulars in the wifi general thread all an hero'd.
I'm an oldfag, but I stayed in other threads instead of going off to Skype.
>>451184
I have in the past, got a 1-day ban for "abusing" the report function.
The mods should know by now that he's only doing this just to get attention.
>>451185
>>451188
The other problems is that he's trying to combine two threads (/wfg/ and /ekx/, but I haven't an /ekx/ thread in months) that were fine being separate and the lack of respect towards how people play their games.
>>451193
>just because injectorbro gave me a perfect japanese shiny ditto with dawny's TID and SID.
And there's another problem I have with him...
>>451195
And I'll make it again:P
>>451199
You won't, you're too much of a pussy
>>451198
>I have in the past, got a 1-day ban for "abusing" the report function.
>The mods should know by now that he's only doing this just to get attention.
don't let that stop you
>>451202
I agree, images like that should just get an autoban.
Rosa, Roxie, and Hilda should be MUCH higher.
>>451199
Also while I'm on the topic I find pokemon are real threads to be kind of dull it's a pretty common thing on most boards here.
I've seen a half a dozen other boards do something similar off and on.
>>451177
>>451182
>would rather see the board deleted than the state it is now
I wish you pathetic dumbfucks would drop this holier than thou mentally.
Combined with the fact that you think you're all white knights on a noble mission and can do no wrong is really hard to watch.
>>451202
The problem is that we're dealing with posts, not an image.
>>451202
>Giving mods orders
What an ego you have.
>>451202
Holy shit
