I don't get it
>people are finally getting banned for drakeposting
About time.
>>438154
/a/ has relatively strict moderation, probably more strict than /tv/ and /v/.
>>438160
Reddit.
>>438154
The mod personally hates the drake Meme/ Reaction image series
Believe or not, outside of the rules mods and jannies are just as much if not more culture fags than the rest of 4chan.
When they think some meme isn't funny or a sign of another websites traffic they'll try to destroy it. Think about all those faggots that shitpost when they think a meme is forced and then give them mod powers.
So basically you posted drake on /a/ and the mod decided that your intention was to solely post that drake meme rather than reply to that comment regardless if the post itself was within topic and thus banned you.
You see the same shit on /v/ with the Mario autist meme. Despite the threads being about mario, despite the meme being about videogames, the thread gets deleted and OPs banned.
Why? Because the mod doesn't find it funny and believes that the popular use of unfunny meme (which is perceived as forced) is a form of shitposting and thus lowering the quality of the website despite evidence to the contrary.
But even if all of /v/ liked it, the masses don't matter because that would mean changing the board culture from whatever standard the mods prefer (I.E the same mentality that lead to 7chan trying to be a time capsule). You see the opposite with banposting , an offtopic meme which often isn't banned on /v/.
>>438180
Thanks for proving to me that drakeposters literally never have anything worthwhile to contribute. Call me Reddit again. I love it. Little slut.
>>438154
>macro image replies
>>438186
A fossil from an era where moot felt that reaction images with texts were not appropriate on anything but /b/, back before everyone unironically called things memes. The only reason it's still there is for situational excuse to ban.
>>438186
At that point half of the thread was just reaction images.
>>438182
Drakeposting is bannable, because lots of people on /a/ tell them to fuck off and the fact they are always shitposting. It has nothing to do the mods/jannys and all to do with /a/ doesn't want them. Same as the frogs.
>>438256
>this reaction image 9.9/10 times is used for the sole purpose of shitposting and low quality posts
>ban it because the people using it are retards and not wanted on the board
>>438257
Just admit that /a/ has a hidden rule that only allows anime reaction images.
>>438256
Report the other reaction images. Nobody said they were okay. It's just that Drakeposting is the stuff that gets reported the most because the highest number of people find them worth reporting. You're taking a bigger risk by posting Drake. Also, the captcha just gave me an image that seems to be a bunch of piles of poop. What the fuck?
>>438263
>hidden
>All images and resulting discussion should pertain to anime or manga.
Congrats anon, you didn't even read the rules. You technically can only post anime images on /a/, however this rule is generally only enforced when you using memeposting images like drake or pepe.
Ban images. 4chan should be text-only.
Banned on /b/ twice for GR15 and once for raiding my friend's stream, banned on /mlp/ 4 times for NSFW, banned on /g/ once for GR15, banned on /v/ once for 2 Babies 1 Fox and once for GR15, banned on [s4s] once for GR3 (posted an image of a dude syringing shit down his dick), banned on /sp/ once for proxy, banned on /int/ once for GR15, once for offtopic and twice for proxy.
>>438154
I don't get it either
>>438333
Oh, you definitely get that.
It's sad that /qa/ has gotten to the point where people just post clearcut bans they pretend not to understand.
>>438154
>People shitpost with drake images
>/a/ has low tolerance to shitposting
>???
>b&
>>438178
>/v/
>Strict mods
I wish.
>>438154
I once banned for ban evasion when I posted a screenshot of a ban that was expired
Luckily I appealed it
>>438565
>got banned by ban evasion
>didn't evade the ban for ban evasion
You missed a great opportunity to meme some jannies.
Apparently Jade Raymond has nothing to do with videogames.
>>438911
I don't know why I'm even giving you the time of day but moot(literally who etc. etc.) once said /v/ has the simplest fucking rules: TALK ABOUT VIDEO GAMES.
Asking for nudes of a girl who just so happens to work for a video game company is about as on-topic as making a video game thread on /tv/ because that game just so happened to show up for like 2 seconds on a TV show
Reaction images are basically image macros... And those ate against the rules outside if /b/. Not that you'd notice
Most of my bans I get but going off on a tangent for a single post doesn't really make sense to me as bannable.
>>439748
This is always bannable. You cannot write that post off as a mere accident, you knew what you were typing and that it had nothing to do with video games and that it just feeds more off topic discussion.
People have it in their heads that it's okay to talk about futa on a video game board because the mods don't punish for it enough, because loads of violations constantly slip through the cracks. But you make a post like that, you're always taking a risk.
>>438154
the jannies are retarded autistic children who do stupid shit to make themselves feeel important
>>439727
>I don't know why I'm even giving you the time of day but moot(literally who etc. etc.) once said /v/ has the simplest fucking rules: TALK ABOUT VIDEO GAMES.
Yeah, moot was a really stupid, autistic faggot that way.
>>439964
Most ironic post I've seen in a while.
this was someone on my ip range but not me
Excuse me Mr. Mod, but what? Mind explaining this to me?
>>440018
I guess you effectively triggered /mlp/
>>440032
Well, mission accomplished I suppose, but I certainly didn't expect to be banned for it. I see threads like that all the time on /v/ that routinely hit image/post limit. I really didn't think anything of it.
>>440018
>Nyxfag getting banned
I see nothing wrong with that.
>>440063
/v/ has bad moderation, that's why. If it were any good those posts would be nailed immediately.
I get banned for posts I don't make all the time. Sometimes I only get weeks or months after the ban was actually filed, even though ive been posting like normal. Anyone else get this problem?
>>440355
Do you live on a campus?
>>440357
I used to, and I had the problem then. But it happens at random at home too, and i know im the only one using 4chan. Just this morning I was posting from my phone, and was notified of a permanent ban for posting cheese pizza last year, and yet here i am posting on my phone again like normal
>>440386
>Phone
That's why. You know how phone IPs work.
>>440404
i guess i don't
>>439788
What's wrong with off topic discussion?
This is an anonymous image board, not a scientific journal.
>>440690
>This is an anonymous image board, not a scientific journal.
They're one of those STEMlords who literally cannot fathom people having a subjective conversation.
The type of autist who drops his spaghetti when the old lady at work asks him how he's doing.
>>440690
/sp/ here.
Fuck the mods. I literally don't know how they cannot understand some basic fucking facts:
1. In a sports game there's this thing called half time, commercials, and time outs which means from 3 to 30 minutes of no sports. Thus posters in a thread will often talk about off topic stuff until action resumes and that's okay.
2. In live sporting events there are crowds of people some which are sexy or look stupid or do something funny. There are also tv commercials and posters in a thread talk about both the crowd and commercials and that's okay since it's part of the sporting event.
3. Sports have seasons and there is often many months between the end and beginning of a season. During these doldrums, /sp/ fills the gap with other threads which has been accepted for years.
Fucking pissed me off when I got a 3 day ban for making a webm of a guy falling down the aisle and wiping out the beer seller during a Cowboys game.
>>440690
>What's wrong with off topic discussion?
Everything.
The only rule 4chan needs is "no off-topic and garbage posts allowed".
>>440698
>1. In a sports game there's this thing called half time, commercials, and time outs which means from 3 to 30 minutes of no sports. Thus posters in a thread will often talk about off topic stuff until action resumes and that's okay.
That's when you're supposed to discuss the game that you've just watched. During the actual game you obviously watch the game = no posting.
>>442478
>no posting
literally retarded
also, dvr
>>442466
Looks like the janitor on /tv/ actually did their job for once, unfortunately they stopped short of recommending you for the permanent ban for evasion tripshit. Doctor who is for girls anyway.
>>442480
You might miss a goal if you post on 4chan during the game.
>>442466
Aren't you a special snowflake. You got banned for obvious rule violations, and act all butthurt about it? You should be permabanned for ban evasion and for being underaged.
>>438154
>Drakposting is banned
>Sheev and Bane are OK
wut
>>442690
What's wrong with Sheev? It's an amusing name. Silly that people on /tv/ spam it instead of Palpatine, but even though they do, every time I see it the discussion is still legitimate. Makes me think Star Wars actually causes people to behave civilly.
>>442466
>tripfag
>posts NSFW on SFW board
>proceeds to frogpost
>posts about his block for no reason
>ban evades
The only shame is that the ban wasn't much longer.
>Get warned from shitposting thread.
Fine by me, obvious that a warning was comi-
>"You are banned from posting"
What's the point in giving me a warning if you're still going to ban me?
>>438536
They are.
Is it me or the mods getting more picky in general, not just on v?
>>439970
Indeed. You can get banned for a back-to-reddit image, and then someone 3 topics over posts the same image and nothing happens.
mods do what the hell they want for the laughs, it's that simple.
>>443089
Isn't that a daily thread on /v/?
What kind of shit show are the mods running here?
>>443022
>Shitty thread bait on /co/
>decide to post cheesecakes
>everything going good
>get a warning
>turns out one of the mods backhanded the report on me and I was allowed to keep posting like nothing happened
>based mod
>get banned later on
It really depends on which mods see you
One mod gives you a warning but another banned you anyway. I doubt the mods listen to each other either
>>443152
>Yeah, daily threads that don't talk about video games
I thought the whole premise of the thread was "its 4am, what did you play today?"
I wish mods actually made attention to /vp/ so they knew what gets spammed
>>443153
>Shitty thread bait on /co/
>decide to post cheesecakes
It's time to stop posting. He was right to ban you.
>>443159
That's what the OP might start with, but everyone always just starts talking about the struggles of every day life. Maybe saying they're interested in an upcoming game, or that they had fun playing a game recently. But the the vast majority of posts in those threads are always about personal issues. People! Other boards exist on this exact same website! Go use them!
>>443161
Because if that shit tier of a pokemon gardevoir gets its own thread then anything can
>>438154
I don't get the "r***** boogeyman shitposting" ban. I really don't.
>>438333
you should have gotten a month for that
mods aren't big on sarcasm are they?
>>443162
you don't understand /co/ at all
>>443162
>posting cheesecake is a bannable offense on /co/ despite /co/ being known to do this since /aco/ hadn't existed at the time and anons still do this despite /aco/s inception
>>443167
I got warned when i tried
>>438911
>be a thirsty virginal faggot
>get banned for shitposting
>cry about it on /qa/
can't make this shit up
>>443323
see my take on this as to why he could see the dog. now I am basing this all off my Chinese background, but the dog was, in a way, the escorter. it is said that when people die, they are escorted to where they have to go, be it heaven or hell. as to the kid seeing it? it is rumored that children can see things we can't, due to them being purer or something. so you'll often get children going to churches or hospitals or temples, and say that they see uncles and aunties with warm glows behind them or beasts and sickly looking people in rags and tags. as to the dream, dead and dying loved ones tend to, for some reason, try to leave some message or enter our dreams, but alot also, in the 7 days following death, may revisit familiar places, go home, sit on their favourite couch or something, as if to say goodbye one last time.
I was banned for a day a few months back for a post that wouldn't even load in the ban page. I put my mouse over it and nothing popped up.
The reason was given as 'Off-topic'. Don't even know what board it was on. Didn't think to screencap it.
>>442693
>Sheev and Bane are OK
>CLASSIC threads are not
I don't get it, the only point of /tv/ at the present is nothing but memes, the board is shit god dammit
>>438160
>Not liking Drakeposting
I don't have a screencap, but I got banned for comparing seizure warnings to trigger warnings on /v/ and providing stats for how few people with photosensitive epilepsy there are and how many people with PTSD there are.
It's 1000 to 1 in favor of PTSD btw. Case you were wondering.
Just got banned from /co/ for "spoiling" an anime that came out in 2014. Love these casualfaggot mods.
I got banned for having fun in a /sp/ game thread.
>>443395
you were having too much fun. mods know best.
>>443171
>responding to bait
Stop it. It can be difficult, but at least try to not feed the trolls.
>>438154
I've never been banned.
the mod on /pol/ keeps warning me for reporting shitposts. he needs to read the god damn sticky.
can we all agree that being too strict about enforcing on-topic discussion all the time only leads to a duller, less interesting place?
Strict compartimentalized boards is the road to r****** and would only make the most autistic posters here happy at the detriment of everyone else (ie slighlty less autistic people with some normalcy still into them)
>>442466
Serves you right, tripnigger.
>>442466
>breaks rule
>gets banned
BUT I DINDU NUFFIN.
this one had me fuming to be honest with you familia
>>443580
1 day bans are so cute.
>>443713
seriously who gives a shit. it's a good excuse to take a break.
>>438182
so mods are just the same retarded shitflinging children as the rest of us, but with superpowers?
that's terrifying
>>443715
In what way is it terrifying, or are you just being hyperbolic
>>443717
what if it's not just mods
what if it's presidents, feds, authority figures who matter
what if there is no real world, only shitposting
>>443718
You have no idea how deep this rabbit hole goes
>All images and resulting discussion should pertain to anime or manga.
If only this website had a page for Rules that new friends like OP can read, understand, and follow.
>>444215
So weird to think Yuudachi gets Satan eyes but her personality doesn't change at all.
>>444225
>>442690
>>442693
I'm going to explain a concept to you that you may or may not be familiar with. Being an American based image board there is a concept in our society where no one backs a loser. Might makes right is writ large across the acts that go unseen while the general public heaps scorn on those who get caught up. If you get your post reported and deleted it just means you're part of the nigger underclass not subtle enough to integrate your meme into the current lexicon.
This of course isn't even taking into account people like myself who have overlapping browsing windows with people forcing their own memes. If you're not pumping out your own content while ACTIVELY reporting competing memes why are you even signing up for the game? You're posting like it's still 2007 when we've moved onto the next level.
i like bumping into someone else's bans when my IP changes
>>444294
or this 2y old one
>>438154
I don't get it, what is /pol/ about?
>this is perfectly acceptable
>>>/pol/64201157
>>>/pol/64204208
>this crosses the line
>>>/pol/64216526
Also got another thread complaining that brown eyed people are subhuman
But I remember starting another thread on /pol/ that has nothing to do with politics, but it's perfectly okay
I am convinced some hotpocket got pissed off that someone indirectly called his anything than a God so he deleted my threads.
I got banned from /v/ once for saying "you are literally my nigger."
Another time, I got banned for uploading a picture of Quiet's ass from MGSV and saying "ITT: We guess vidya characters by their asses."
>/c/
>pointing out that a pic was Tumblr cosplay
>1-day ban
Now that's just super.
>>445133
Why did you feel the need to do that? Doesn't sound like it has much relevance unless someone was asking for the source of the cosplay and you linked the tumblr blog. Which I somehow doubt is what you did if you got banned for it.
>>445143
We have a cosplay board. I invite you to find out what it is.
Hint: it is not /c/.
>>444361
Proof?
>>438256
>posting none /a/ related images.
/r9k/ please.
>>445144
Images should be cute ("moe") in nature.
Ecchi belongs on its respective board. Males belong on the cute/male board.
Heterosexual couples are allowed.
None of these rules forbid posting cosplay on /c/. Don't whine just because you aren't familiar with the rules and got banned for a shitpost.
>>445175
>I don't know why /cgl/ was created.
Well, good luck with that.
>>443580
>24.251.20.44
>>445175
i guess this was fair enough
i feel more like i was banned based on actually getting the get rather than not delivering
not that i was given enough time to do so, thought i never was going to
>>438154
Once.
Geez, looking through these and all the other stories I hear makes me wonder why /mlp/fags complain about moderation as much as they do. They get away with everything up to and including blatantly off-topic shit and thinly-veiled raid threads, as long as they attach pony images and don't make it blatantly obvious or post porn. Even then, multiple second-hand accounts confirmed the threads are usually just deleted and rarely the OP might be banned.
