When will we get an architecture board? There are already architecture threads popping up at least weekly on boards such as /int/, /fa/ and even /pol/. There's clearly an interest for it.
I'm not opposed, but you're literally and figuratively the only person that wants this. You're on a crusade for what would instantly be the deadest board on this site. It makes me think there are ulterior motives, like you want to use the board to post pictures of those furry-style anthropomorphic jetplanes and robots and shit.
Is that your fetish you deviant? Getting off to an Eiffel Tower with big metal titties?
Blow it out your ass.
>>429496
What? I'm saying this because there are architecture threads on almost every board which often get 100+ replies. /his/ was a huge success and I think /arc/
could reach almost /his/ level in activity. That, or a board called /dsg/ could open which is for design of not just buildings but furniture etc.
>>429498
I was just giving you some heat, my friend. I would not visit your proposed board very often but wish you the best of luck in persuading Hiroyuki to create it.
>>429496
Ah shit. He knows about me and Tsunderplane.
I think it is a good idea as long as it's a little more generalized, like making it architecture and engineering or architecture and something else.
Architecture and big booty sluts
>>429480
Not outright deadest. It's probably be equivalent to /po/. As OP said, there's barely enough interest to get a thread a week even when you consider all the boards, and most won't ever even see one. Basically the same case that /po/ had.
>>429491
>at least weekly
with that kind of support, you probably need 2 or 3 boards
