>>421164
They should be deleted or rebuilt from scratch.

doesn't look dead to me

>>421164
We should delete the most popular boards and have the moderation lock down on the smaller boards during the shitstorm until it passes over.

If we killed /v/, /b/ and /pol/ even we might stand a chance as a community instead of a cesspool.

>>421164
The smaller the boards tend to be the better ones actually.

Shitposters, edgy contrarians and attentionwhores in general go nuts where they know a lot of people are going to see their replies, which are the faster boards. They won't waste their time on a dead board because they'll get bored waiting for responses, unless they think the place is so dead that they can single-handedly fuck it up unimpeded.

>>421164
I remember /po/ getting raided by /pol/ one time
it was funny

>>421164
What was that peak?

>>421273
nah, not at all.

those boards are the site's lint filter...if they don't exist, the users from those respective boards will start shitposting in the boards most similar to their native board.

For instance, /pol/ would probably flood /k/ and /his/.

/b/ would wreck the porn boards.

/v/ would ruin...everything else.

>>421705
/po/ is occasionally home to off-topic threads from /b/ and other boards, mainly because the board moderators are limited and thus don't constantly view the board's content.

>>421164
/pol/ is known to hang out with /po/

>>421164
dead boards are dead for a reason: almost nobody posts in them because they have a very niche topic

I still think /i/, /po/, /ic/, /3/, /gd/ should be merged into a general art board.