Should 4chan go back to the days when getting banned also meant you couldn't browse 4chan?
Also post your ban's if you got them
>>415415
There should be tiers of bans. 18 years or under should be banned from browsing, definitely.
Yesterday I got banned on /tv/ for posting a thread about how Penn Jillete called /tv/ a shit board.
>>415415
>Should 4chan go back to the days when getting banned also meant you couldn't browse 4chan?
I wouldn't object, but would it really solve anything? It's ridiculously easy to get past a ban.
I'm 90% sure it is a photoshop, but eh, /r/ the video if anyone has it.
Yes, we should. If only because if I'm banned on one board, but I only post there once in a while, I will suddenly get a ban and be like "when did this even happen?"
And if I can browse the topics, I'll just reply on my phone. Browsing on the phone is tedious, but replying is worth the effort.
>>415426
It was spammed a lot before, maybe you didnt know
>>415430
a lot of people here don't know what they're doing
>>415455
>but eh
Stop trying to act cool, brat.
>>415426
When did he do this?
>>415693
Some people don't have to try.
no they shouldn't OP
Thanks to based cloudflare we will never know the sensation of getting readbanned again.
>>415415
Tbh i`d rather go back to these ridiculous but funny bans than be banned every week for stupid shit.
>>415415
no because ive been banned enough times for posting NSFW stuff on /tv/ or /vg/ which i sometimes post but dont get banned for and also for making waifu threads on /tv/ i mean why doesnt hashirama tell the fucking retarded mods to just knock it off and make vg and tv nsfw, you shouldnt be on those fucking boards at work anyway, 4chan itself isnt even supposed to be sfw jesus christ
>>418448
and by nsfw stuff i mean r34 and webms of nude scenes or nude pics from films
>>416626
Last I heard Cloudflare doesn't cache 4chan's HTML. So it could still be done. But people could just look at the archives anyway.
not a ban but a warning. this was in response to /aco/ getting created
funny thing is they would go on to create /trash/ like a month later
I got banned for posting Reddit and Memey (criticizing Rick and Morty) on /co/. /co/ mods seem to be very strict, I get banned very fast if I post Reddit and Memey but I made 4 threads in /tv/, 4 in /v/, 3 in /r9k/ and 1 in /b/. It's fucking hilarious, I got 300+ replies on /tv/ today, 200+ yesterday, 200 the day before, on /b/ I got 200+ replies, on /v/ I got 200+ as well. On /co/ it usually gets 100 before I get banned.
Note to mods: I AM NOT BAN EVADING I HAVE ONLY BEEN BANNED ONCE ON /co/ FOR 3 DAYS AND FOR 1 DAY ON /v/
Why do the /co/ mods ban me? Is it a crime to criticize that shitty reddit show?
Shoutout to swaglord and the rest of the /tv/ crew, they know how to have fun, moot would be proud.
>>418461
/trash/ was made to test thread moving
>>418459
Cloudflare uses it's own protocol to send only what has changed, having custom pages would still increase resource usage.
Plus you're forgetting the part where the built-in archives were added to rake in more page impressions.
>>418473
and it fucking failed because the mods didn't bother moving the threats. Too much work for them.
However /trash/ has worked as a good containment board for furries, Steven universe, RP threads and pony porn. So it has worked in a way
>>418484
>Too much work for them.
I wonder how much effort it actually requires to move threads?
>>418487
It shouldn't take more than two clicks or so.
>>418484
They don't move enough threads but I've actually seen a few threads on /v/ get moved recently. Usually it's some semi-furfag game that gets derailed with cropped porn but still with enough genuine discussion not to warrant a complete nuke.
>>418491
It shouldn't sure, but they probably have to copy paste numbers into some shitty HTML form.
>>418506
Honestly, if not one of them writes a script to automate that, it's their own fault.
>>418471
Are you that one guy who complains about that one line in the show? The guys over at /co/ have probably caught on already.
i got banned for impostering swaglord and i AM swaglord :^)
We are from the red pill and to the red pill we shall return. I am informing all brave red pill warriors of the world that the moderator of /s4s/, a board formed, developed, and published against /pol/, the Soldiers of /pol/, and the red pill, along with all the janitors and posters aware of its contents, are condemned to death. I call on all valiant redpillers wherever they may be in the world to kill them without delay, so that no one will dare insult the sacred beliefs of the red pill henceforth. And whoever is killed in this cause will be a martyr. Meanwhile if someone has access to the moderator of the board but is incapable of carrying out the execution, he should inform the people so that swaglord is punished for his actions.
>>415415
No, because most "bans" are for petty shit while shitposters get off with a warning.
>>418461
Stay mad, furfag
>>418627
haha...Meme
>>418630
why would i be mad that they added an officially sanctioned furry porn board?
No, that would encourage people to evade bans. It's fine the way it is, though I believe mods should use warnings more and ban less, and janitors shouldn't be able to block you from posting.
Here's a ban I received a long time ago.
I still have no idea what I did wrong. I made a non-offensive Jewish joke while talking about my PS4. Maybe both the janitor and mod was a newfag and thought I was actually going for quads and not just continuing the ps triple joke.
>>418627
Usually these types of jokes are made in threads relevant to them.
>>418627
cringe
>>418471
>hahaha i called it reddit, that'll show all these fags posting in this on-topic thread dedicated to the show i am currently shitposting about
>WTF WHY DO YOU BAN ME I WAS ONLY TRYING TO HAVE A CONSTRUCTIVE DISCUSSION
eat shit faggot
>>415415
That would decrease ad revenue you silly billy
Have you ever been Permab& if so why
>>418731
Don't be silly, if someone was permanently banned, they wouldn't be abe to post :)
>>415415
Keep being able to browse but give out harsher and more frequent bans.
>>418461
Personalized ban messages still exist?
I'm constantly fucking IP range banned because some fucking nigger shitposts in the same IP range. Everytime the ban is lifted the ban is reapplied after a couple of hours. It's like he doesn't even stop shitposting. Gookmoot is not getting 20$ from me.
No it'll encourage more ban evasions
>>418707
fucking kek
some mods are pricks but this is funny as fuck
>>418707
It seems jokes are against the rules.
>>418882
Find him and kill him
>>418882
Range bans are lifted?? I thought they were permanent.
>>419390
Apparently they run out like normal bans since I usually can post for a bit after 3 days again.
>>415415
>desustorage
going back to that would be useless
>>419394
It's definitely a full range ban and not just all the IPs in your range being banned individually? I've always been told that rangebans are permanent.
>>419400
You sure you didn't just happen to, for a couple of hours, get IP addresses from your ISP that coincidentally don't fall into the banrange, before falling back in afterwards thanks to changing IP addresses?
>>419403
No. I whenever I can post I get IP range banned a couple of hours later and after 3 days I can usually post again.
>>419405
Interesting, I've been looking around the archives and found a number of references to rangebans being permanent.
>4chan currently has around 50-60 moderators
>out of every 20 mods usually only 1 actually gives a fuck about the site and it's userbase where's the others just circlejerk each other on the IRC and click "ban/deny all" on the ban/ban lift request page without even looking at any of the submissions
For the 3 or so that are out there, you have my thanks.
>>419405
And you're definitely receiving those re-bans without having changed IP addresses (like for example losing and regaining mobile signal)?
>>419425
I have a dymaic IP that changes every 24 hours but that happens at 2am my time while I usually get banned at 1pm-5pm.
>>419426
I guess they are probably permanent or not at the discretion of mods then because there's conflicting information out there.
>>418707
I guess because the joke you made is not vidya related?
>>420062
[spoiler]>>420186[/spoiler]
>>418448
>get banned for nsfw
>4chan itself isnt even supposed to be sfw
>>420360
4chan not being SFW does not mean that you don't have to follow the rules on boards that claim to be SFW.
