>muh sticky on /his/ says religion and philosophy
>muh humanities
Yes, exactly. Humanities.
>Religion
/his/ is for the academic, non-biased, secular study of religion as it relates to the humanities. Appropriate threads on /his/ about religion would be "How exactly did the Protestant schism occur" or "what are the differences between these denominations" or "What does this faith practice" or something like those. But people are twisting it into "Christian generals" and "how did you become an atheist" threads and "what is your belief" threads and "Is there a God" threads. Plus, general worshiping.
>Philosophy
/his/ is for studying philosophy, not "philosophizing". So stop starting threads with shit like "Dude, what do you think the meaning behind everything is?" or "Why aren't you killing yourself right now? Dude, what's the point?" And again, "Is there a God" threads. Rather, you should ask, what philosophies answer those questions and how.
Contain the religious/anti-religious circlejerking and philosophizing to /rel/ - Worship and Philosophy.
here is your reply
>>414924
Fuck off or contribute.
>>414908
Only if you allow atheism discussion
>>414908
>/his/ is for studying philosophy, not "philosophizing". So stop starting threads with shit like "Dude, what do you think the meaning behind everything is?" or "Why aren't you killing yourself right now? Dude, what's the point?" And again, "Is there a God" threads. Rather, you should ask, what philosophies answer those questions and how.
Too bad that's a legitimate form (albeit pretty incoherent) of studying philosophy.
t. philosophy grad student
>>414926
I'd like to contribute by shitting on your face you fucking retard, kill yourself. This is a serious reply to your question in the OP. sage.
>>415060
Making shit-quality posts like yours isn't contributing. Making shit-quality posts like yours is against the rules. Announcing your sage is also against the rules. No anon, kill YOURself.
Just because the quality of the religious discussion on /his/ isn't up to your standards doesn't warrant another fucking board. Fuck off.
>>415212
Can you read? It's not humanities. It's off topic. That's the issue.
>>415216
It is on topic because it's just general theology discussion. Fuck OFF retard.
>>414908
That "Humanities" category on /his/ has been a real minefield. Many people wanted /his/ going back to the /q/ days, no one ever asked for /rel/ except as a containment board.
>"what are the differences between these denominations" or "What does this faith practice"
These also aren't really historical questions, although they may lead to a historical answers. For the most part all the talk about religion is in the present tense.
There's also a lot of overlap by making the /his/ board so broad. /lit/ panicked they were going to lose their philosophy discussion when /his/ was created but they still have it. /pol/ still has history, religion and atheism threads. /x/ still has religion and atheism threads.
>>414956
Of course atheism threads belong on /rel/.
>>414908
/rel/ - Hat Memes & Qualia
>>414908
good idea
