>>400226
I agree we need one.
I don't think we need one, but I don't see it hurting anything, and I see other people really enjoying it. I doubt /tp/ trolls would invade other threads. I support the creation of /tp/.
>>400226
>HIRO PLS MAKE BOARD FOR OBSCURE TOPIC NOBODY CARES ABOUT BUT ME
>PLSSSSSS
This could fit under the architecture board if anything
I can see mods making this and then everybody who thinks it's a cool joke now dropping it in 2 weeks when it isn't funny anymore and then the board ending up being slower than /news/ or even /po/
I don't care either way but it seems doomed to fail on its own. I agree with >>400409 that it could and probably should be put under some other future board's purview if a relevant board like an architecture/engineering board gets made at all.
this would be perfect
>>400226
If it is not about theme parks, then make itabout rollercoasters.
/tp/? /tp/ for my bunghole?
