Y'know, people complain often about /v/ being a place being plagued by e-celeb threads. On a similar note, /co/ is treated as some sort of artist-centric board although it's supposed to be about comics and cartoons. Why are discussions centered around artists on websites like Tumblr or DeviantArt allowed, particularly those who don't make any actual webcomics? Bloody Hell, even the ones who do make real webcomics usually end up having threads that resemble /v/'s e-celeb threads.
>>396306
/co/ isn't as fast as /v/ so the raw number of complainers is lower.
Test
Test 2
>>397693
these animoo would look better with beards
>>396306
This is a battle you cannot win. The majority of posters on /co/ legitimately think the place is their safe tumble-like deviantART-lite. It's never recovered from the meme "/co/ is love." There are people there today, been spamming non-stop for over 5+ years. Never banned, posts never pruned. Nobody on /co/ has the gumption to complain, so it never wells up as a user-driven force for change. Y'know we have two boards for drawing? One for drawing just whatever you want, and one for creative freeback on your drawings? If you point this out, you are told to calm down and/or go back to [bogeyman board/website]. /co/ was my main bored, years ago. But there is no fire there; They are legitimate and figurative children. To the point where I left.
I can't handle them anymore. They've always lobbied to have the rules changed go benefit their isolationist "inclusive" love-cabal. They even made their own *chan because Moot wasn't friendly enough. I don't know if it is still around, but that was the circlejerk failure every /co/mrade wants the real /co/ to be.
Leave that place. They fashioned themselves into a "containment board" with no outside influence.
>>397839
/co/ is a shithole but I have nowhere else to talk about muh cartoons.
