[b]We should have bold and [i]italic[/i] tags on 4chan tbqh because why the fuck not?[/b]
Seriously, what's the harm?
All the software updates, besides the .webm update have been about preventing the 4chan user doing something.
Give the users more powers.
>>393254
Maybe just italics, I think bold would be more heavily abused for shitposting.
>>393254
>>>/8gag/
>>393275
We don't need tags on the image board side
>>393254
>>>/reddit/
>>393283
Another newfriend doesn't know we used to have bold and italic tags on the text boards but they were never implemented on the image board side.
What's with all the newfriends?
>>393286
What's with the stupid newfriend right here thinking the image board side even needs tags
>>393294
Because they would be fun.
Why do newfriends hate fun?
>>393298
Go shitpost elsewhere newfriend
>>393254
>>393322
>>393321
>>393394
>>393321
or have ones like these
'' itallics ''
''' bold '''
== redtext ==
_underline_
-cross out-
>>395518
BBCode is objectively better
>>395518
I much prefer [b]bold[/b] because we already have [spoiler]spoilers[/spoiler] enabled on some boards, which implies that the code is already there.
>>395550
>wanting BBC
How much of a faggot are you?
