Collective Filtering

Thread replies: 5
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
Collective Filtering 2015-12-24 21:51:49 Post No. 392132
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: NHGieLnU[1].png (84 KB, 208x208) Image search: [Google]

Collective Filtering Anonymous 2015-12-24 21:51:49 Post No. 392132 [Report]

Everyone knows the janitors can't do their jobs.

I suggest a collective janitor browser extension. Rule-breaking/bait/spam threads will be collectively filtered, and hidden. Sage in the options field will be automated in any filtered threads.

>but won't this devolve into the tyranny of the majority?
The system will accommodate to the taste's of individual users. For instance, if one user flags a post as spam, and a second user flags it as not spam, then these users should have less pull on what is filtered between each other.

Eventually, this system would balance itself and create a 4chan unique to everyone's preferences.

Thoughts?

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-24 22:00:05 Post No.392139
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-24 22:00:05 Post No.392139 [Report]

That's literally Reddit

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-24 22:12:21 Post No.392150
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-24 22:12:21 Post No.392150 [Report]

>>392139
No it isn't. You can negate the effects of the people who vote against what you like.

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-24 22:46:46 Post No.392170
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-24 22:46:46 Post No.392170 [Report]

>>392139
Except that you're welcome not to use it.

>>

Anonymous 2015-12-24 23:07:32 Post No.392185
[Report]

Anonymous 2015-12-24 23:07:32 Post No.392185 [Report]

>>392139

>Redditors comes to 4chan
>"Let's make it more like Reddit."
Same shit with Californians moving to Texas. Reddit is California, 4chan is Texas.