Any chance we can have IDs removed from /pol/?
Flags are fine though.
>>390984
Remove both
/pol/ does not need to be /int/
>>390987
I agree, but I don't want people to scream "poo in loo", IDs are easier to go after.
We can also delete /pol/ in the process.
>>391008
Seems like that would solve the whole problem.
Serious question: Why are there any boards without IDs?
I honestly don't understand the point of not having IDs. What does not having them accomplish? Is there something other than samefagging that not having IDs accomplishes?
>>391303
If there's any board that should have sockpuppetting, it's /pol/. Sockpuppets are a valid argument technique.
Also I'm you.
>>390984
Sorry, there is no chance of this. Now that you have your answer, I assume you'll respect it and not ask again.
>>391305
I disagree. Sockpuppets are terrible. Samefagging is awful and it makes it look like a topic nobody gives a fuck about is a bigger issue than it really is. Furthermore, it leads to rampant falseflagging.
>>391314
People are still going to hide posts that say certain things. You can't stop technology from marching on. If people want to filter your ID or your tripcode they're welcome to. It's their loss for being so highly triggerable.
Still, I understand where I'm coming from when I say that I want free speech on 4chan.
>>391318
People who can't handle being triggered should go back to Tumblr.
I still have the utmost respect for you.
>>391305
>Sockpuppets are a valid argument technique.
This is what /pol/ truly believes
>>391303
>>391305
>>391311
>>391314
>>391318
>>391320
All of these posts were me.
I hope this illustrates the point that IDs should stay on /pol/.
>>391324
Setting aside that it was blatantly obvious that the posts were you, doesn't it illustrate the point that IDs should be on all boards so that people like you can stop behaving like faggots?
>>391331
>people like you
I don't normally do that...
>>391343
