please make sage visible againsome newfriends don't even know what it isthanks

DUDE LSD LMAO

DUDE DRUGS DONT ACTUALLY PROVIDE ANY INSIGHT THEY JUST MAKE THE MUNDANE SEEM DEEP LMAO

DUDE EGO DEATH IS A MEME LMAO

DUDE DRUG INDUCED EGO DEATH IS NOT REAL BECAUSE NOTHING CAN SEPERATE US FROM THE SUM OF OUR EXPERIENCES WITHOUT PERMANTENTLY DAMAGING THE BRAIN LMAO

File: marked[1].jpg (62KB, 384x266px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

62KB, 384x266px

>>390756
If we're advocating for THE OLD WAYS, I lament that threads no longer sport "Marked for deletion (old)."

The never-ending, never-dying threads have turned most boards.. there's an R-word here. Every "general" is just a sub-board within a board, and posting outside of that general, when it is going, you're lambasted and told to return to "the general." Sub-(R-word)s.

Threads should be able to die of old age, before the various limits are met.

You want Sage to be visible again? Then threads need to die sooner.

>>391332
No we need sage visible again so we can sage shitpost threads to hell and back.

>>391336 s
If you want to sage a thread, just post the word "sage'. You fucking idito.

>>391350
Visible sage makes it better though, it gives people the hint

>>390756
Rather than calling it "visible sage," just ask for the e-mail field back.

>>391332
I'm not sure what it's like in Infinity, but in Next you can choose to prune by date or page or number of replies; it's very flexible.

>>390756
It was always a bad UI.
It should be a checkbox.

Also, sage does almost nothing, especially since you can sort the index/catalog by last reply. Why do you even care?

>>391353
The hint of a downvote.

I don't want visible sage. I sage literally every post and I usually don't have something negative to say, I just don't want to bump threads.

I'm in favor of "marked for deletion (old)" returning.

>>391427
where do you think you are?

Bring back Mailto:nokosage