DUDE LSD LMAO

DUDE DRUGS DONT ACTUALLY PROVIDE ANY INSIGHT THEY JUST MAKE THE MUNDANE SEEM DEEP LMAO

DUDE EGO DEATH IS A MEME LMAO

DUDE DRUG INDUCED EGO DEATH IS NOT REAL BECAUSE NOTHING CAN SEPERATE US FROM THE SUM OF OUR EXPERIENCES WITHOUT PERMANTENTLY DAMAGING THE BRAIN LMAO

File: marked[1].jpg (62 KB, 384x266) Image search: [Google]

62 KB, 384x266

>>390756
If we're advocating for THE OLD WAYS, I lament that threads no longer sport "Marked for deletion (old)."

The never-ending, never-dying threads have turned most boards.. there's an R-word here. Every "general" is just a sub-board within a board, and posting outside of that general, when it is going, you're lambasted and told to return to "the general." Sub-(R-word)s.

Threads should be able to die of old age, before the various limits are met.

You want Sage to be visible again? Then threads need to die sooner.

>>391332
No we need sage visible again so we can sage shitpost threads to hell and back.

>>391336 s
If you want to sage a thread, just post the word "sage'. You fucking idito.

>>391350
Visible sage makes it better though, it gives people the hint

>>390756
Rather than calling it "visible sage," just ask for the e-mail field back.

>>391332
I'm not sure what it's like in Infinity, but in Next you can choose to prune by date or page or number of replies; it's very flexible.

>>390756
It was always a bad UI.
It should be a checkbox.

Also, sage does almost nothing, especially since you can sort the index/catalog by last reply. Why do you even care?

>>391353
The hint of a downvote.

I don't want visible sage. I sage literally every post and I usually don't have something negative to say, I just don't want to bump threads.

I'm in favor of "marked for deletion (old)" returning.

>>391427
where do you think you are?

Bring back Mailto:nokosage