Can perpetuating "(You)" culture (the idea that replies have any value) be a bannable offense?
>>387814
Surely I'm not the only one that screencaps all my posts that get a lot of replies, right?
My record is 165 btw.
>>387814
I love how people who use this reveal how desperate they are for attention and recognition.
(you)s are essentially the equivalent of reddit upvotes
>>387841
Not true, you can get lot of negative ones
>>387844
People tend to read the posts with the most (You)s more often
Can perpetuating "(Autism)" culture (the idea that people on 4chan are being serious) be a bannable offense?
All the attention your father never gave you.
Are (You)s part of the stock 4chan experience now? Been using 4chan X so long I don't know what's what anymore.
>>387814
This idea existed long before 4chan made "(You)" a thing. It's basically one of the original tenets of trolling. "If you got them to waste time responding to you, you have already won." The only way to defeat a troll is to not respond to them AT ALL. Which is nearly impossible, so you see why they're so successful.
I don't see why you're acting as if (You) is a special thing. If it weren't on 4chan people would behave the same way, just with different words. This was the case before (You)s existed.
>>387895
replies are visible under the post even with the native options, posts with high reply counts are generally worth taking a look at in a 500 post thread.
>>387901
Yeah, and even if that were gone you'd still be able to see which posts get a ton of replies.
(You)s are worth something, the Pepe in the corner of my screen gets happier the more (Yous) I get.
When I see Pepe sad it encourages me to try and get more (You)s.
>>387911
This can't be real
>>387816
I screenshot all of mine and repost it often.
got a bretty good (You) screenshot today
That habit existed long before the inline extension was even around. They'd just go "here's your reply" to shitty trolls instead of (you). But I don't use extensions and just use vanilla 4chan. So, I don't really get involved in that kinda shit. Ignore it and it'll pass like every other fad.
>>387814
No because replies DO have value.
Even before the (you) thing people capped posts that got a lot of replies.
