Why are there so many SJWs on /v/ nowadays?
>>383694
Because 4chan is going into a multicultural mode, goy- I mean friend.
>lefty shitposts
>"its just a troll"
>righty shitposts
>"AAAAHHHHH FUCKING /pol/ LEAVE NOW!!!!!1!"
What is an sjw, in the /v/ context? Someone who isn't against having gays and trannies in games?
>>383742
pretty much this
>>383694
>why can't I post my gamergate insurgency threads
>>383758
reminder that moot banned GG to protect his friends' financial interests and neo/v/ actually defends him.
>>383781
nice, i totally trust and believe a hastily thrown together infographic from reddit
>>383781
Reminder that nobody fucking cares.
>>383781
>muh cuckspiracy
Get over it
Imagine if you were so retarded you actually bought into gamergate.
Imagine if you were so retarded you used the "Imagine if" meme.
Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
>>383899
It's only cool if you do it ironically, huh?
Remember when /v/ wasn't plagued by some sort of boogeyman?
>>383909
No, it's not cool at all. STOP POSTING MEMES.
Here's how someone who isn't an idiot could have worded that post:
"People who actually bought into gamergate are retarded."
See how easy it is? You hardly have to change anything.
>>383918
>"People who actually bought into gamergate are retarded."
Hey, you said it
>>383925
Hey, go fuck yourself.
>>383917
The internet has changed for the worse. "Boogeyman culture" is the current thing. It will probably never go away.
>>383881
>>383786
>>383869
>confirmed close friends with 2 people who have worked for Gawker (Scott Kidder/Mallory Blair)
>Canvas/DrawQuest funded by one of the cofounders of HuffPost
>Shared offices with Buzzfeed
>still defends him
How does it feel to be this cucked?
>>383694
I think you underestimate just how easy it is to pretend to be an "SJW," and how it's even easier to bait /v/ by doing so.
Not like I'd expect any less from the pissbaby headquarters of the internet.
>>384007
>implying anyone gives a shit about moot
Is it that strange to want /v/ to center around discussions about video games rather than feminism and journalism?
>>384007
reddit pls go
>>384013
>game gets censored
>can't talk about it on /v/ because that's somehow almost GG
>endless shitposting threads get no moderation by comparsion
>still defending the choice
Cucked. This. Hard.
>>384030
Oh, so we're finally back discussing the actual subject?
/v/ showed they couldn't handle these subjects without completely spazzing out and going in raidmode in chanology fashion and inconveniencing the whole site. Of course mods crank down on it
>>384010
Fuckin called it.
Remember, THE LEFT NEVER SHITPOSTS.
>>384010
Fucking this.
You dumbfucks are getting trolled and really easily.
>>384030
>internet armchair gamergaters blow the SJW issue out of proportion, they alarm everyone that SJWs are going to censor all their games and destroy their lives
>jap devs see this and get paranoid and decide not to release on the west for a while
>play-asia, as a marketing move, places the blame on a nonexistent SJW censorship and profits more than fucking ever
Why are you so dumb?
>>384059
FUCK YOU
GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>>384059
Fucking exactly. These people are being played like fiddles.
>>384059
Not even a goober but
>Mental Gymnastics: The Internet Post
>>384067
That's pretty much what happened, though. I saw it all happen and seeing how gullible GamerGate has become made me lose all hopes for it.
I think the only reason that gamergate ever took off is because it's adherents are too embarrassed and insecure to admit they got deceived.
>>384059
>muh play asia PR stunt
There's a reason why I spoke generally rather than singling out that event, autist. I knew from the start that the banning of GG would result in a clusterfuck because of how vague and meaningless the fucking term is, and watching the past year unfold I've been proven right at pretty much every point.
>some game gets fucked with by localizers/whoever in order to make it better fit "western sensibilities"
>/v/ tries to talk about it
>all discussion gets squashed because m-muh GG
>/v/ spergs the fuck out and spams threads/metaposts on /qa/
>repeat ad nauseium for each new controversy the mods don't like
It's positively autismal.
>>384086
>>some game gets fucked with by localizers/whoever in order to make it better fit "western sensibilities"
or
>studio pulls game because it's generally tawdry and is harming their perception in the west
>blames it on SJW
>you all circlejerk about them on /v/
You people are getting played.
>>383781
It's hilarious that moot is a cuck faggot my friend, but we all already knew he was a faggot. It's pretty obvious to me why he banned gamergate - for the same reason he banned the fappening, chanology, and even raids way back in 2006. To save his own ass from lawsuits, not anyone else's.
There's a gamergate thread up on /v/ right now. I think mods are allowing a little bloodletting.
>newfags that came to /v/ because of GG
I wish you niggers stayed on your old forums.
MUH DOA BEACH VOLLEYBALL!
Frequency Illusion.
It bothers you so you notice it every time it happens.
There are more non-SJWs and you don't really notice them because it feels like the default.
You can read about Frequency Illusion here: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Frequency_illusion
>tfw SJW-obsessed /v/ermin like OP have been shitting up Osomatsu threads since the tranny ep aired
>>383694
Because 3/4ths of them are the same trolls who have ALWAYS browsed /v/.
They just found a new way to piss you off.
>>383742
Someone who thinks like a neogaffer.
That's really the only definition you need.
Someone who thinks feminism is the new thing for video games, that games are problematic, that indie games are the savior of video games, and that anyone who doesn't believe their ultra-left propaganda should be banned from the site.
In short: They're the new face of neo-/v/.
/vg/ spelled the end of /v/ for me. It basically tore out the heart of the content that I went to /v/ for.
It's funny considering I thought generals were cancer at the time because of the circlejerking and tripfaggotry.
But with /vg/ left actual games content so I had no choice. Now I'm stuck with shitposting on /csgog/ with animefaggots and dank memesters.
What was left was console shittery and muh culture wars (of all flavours, not just gamergate).
I definitely don't side with kikes, niggers, trannies and faggots but these redditors with their 'Actually it's about ethics in games journalism' are fucking cringeworthy.
Inb4 that pic with the SJW falseflagging about anti-SJWs.
Browsing /pol/, /tv/ and /vg/ gives you the same content you'd have gotten 5+ years ago on /v/ plus much better memes (baneposting, sheevposting, Trumpposting etc).
>>384059
>thinks anyone even knows about GG overseas.
Not a goober, but that's just stupid. Fucking retardation to the next level to even assume that this isn't entirely about the freebleeding landwhales who have cried for years over DOA, GTA, and other games they've never played.
>>384764
This
I feel the same way about /vr/.
Maybe even moreso about /vr/ because it meant the few games I enjoyed anymore were condemned to a half-dead board filled with the same few dozen people who all know each other on IRC and circlejerk in their best buds threads.
No more spontaneous Marathon Deathmatches on /v/.
>>384772
Generals are bad.
>>383899
Op's image isn't a meme.
Is there any place on the internet that talks about SJWs as much as /v/?
>>384074
Blaming it as a PR stunt is pretty much the business version of
>ITS JUST A PRANK BRO
If your company is willing to hire people that butcher the game for their own belief, or tell the US audience to fuck themselves because of a vocal minority just to get some PR then get ready to take more damages then repairs.
Also, keep in mind XCX is selling poorly right now because of all this AND Japan is cracking down on porn because of low birth rates, so this concept of not selling to the US for attention is a god damn RISK.
>>384091
So what you are saying is that a vocal minority that doesn't even buy their games is complaining about things they find "tawdry" and as a result the developer is pandering to said minority that doesn't buy their games.
And SJWs, the vocal minority, is NOT the one to blame?
>>384795
Sweet opinion bro. I rather have a hundred generals again than a hundred of whatever-the-fuck they were replaced with.
>>384822
You've been living under a rock, son? /v/ is moderate compared to some of the other gaming shitholes that have emerged.
>>384822
/r/tumblrinaction
/r/kotakuinaction
>>384833
/r/tumblrinaction is pretty hilarious because it's supposed to be a place for moderates to talk about how SJWs are insane, but then if you post Stormfronter opinions and talk about how insane they are, you get this amazing comment graveyard at the bottom full of people saying "Well, to be FAIR... niggers ARE violent psychopath murderers and here are some stats provided by law enforcement officials to justify how often they shoot unarmed black people to prove it."
>>384841
Yeah you can talk all the shit you want about crazies but blacks are still a no-go.
>>384086
This.
Nobody even fucking knows what Gamergate means anymore. I see people accuse each other of being gamergaters for posting anything even slightly critical of feminism or the media.
It's become on the same level as Reddit where the people bitching about it and making it into this huge boogeyman are a hundred times more annoying than the thing itself ever was.
Look no further than this very thread. OP didn't even mention Gamergate or anything about it, yet here comes this shitposter >>383758
trying to make the thread about Gamergate so he can bitch that Gamergate is ruining everything. It's insane.
>>384851
>OP didn't even mention Gamergate or anything about it, yet here comes this shitposter
Not really; "SJW" is a shibboleth.
>>384764
/vg/ I think needs to go back to /v/
>>384851
This.
"Goobergator" is just as invasive of a boogeyman as "SJW", but good luck getting the shit-for-brains retards to acknowledge their hypocrisy.
>>384863
Why would you voluntarily disarm yourself in a war whose primary ammunition consists of tribally based accusations and shitflinging?
>>384878
Why would you voluntarily disarm yourself in a war whose primary ammunition consists of nukes?
Because you get the other guy to agree to do the same is why.
>>384763
>issues in video games, a bourgeois hobby aimed at lumpen manchildren that no leftist would give a shit about
>ultra-left propaganda
Go back to watching Fox News.
>>384841
This post reaks of John Oliver tier liberal butthurt that you got told to fuck off for posting STORMFRONT on a TUMBLR website.
Say what you want about the blacks, but posting off topic shit and then crying to 4chan about how "AAAAAHHHH FUCKING RACISM" shows that you are a SJW-tier idiot who needs to fuck off back to Tumblr.
>>384890
>no leftist would give a shit about
You're fucking joking right?
>>384851
But why do people feel the need to complain about feminism on /v/ in the first place? It's not video games.
>>384890
>no leftist would give a shit about
>what is Anita Sarkeesian
>Gone Home
>Life is Strange
>Sunset
>Phil Fish
>Gamergate
>Brianna Wu
>modern Bioware and Ubisoft
>8-4
>Undertale
And to top it all off, you even end it with "Faux Noos"
Why do liberals act like the worst of their party doesn't exist? Rightwing faggots at least ADMIT to being composed of /pol/acks and rednecks with no education but when you call out SJWs they shout NONONONONO THOSE DON'T ACTUALLY EXIST YOU ARE JUST BEING PLAYED/PARANOID.
>>384770
Holy shit. How fucking full of yourself do you have to be to think people aren't aware of Gamergate in other countries.
>>384922
Because
a. Feminists have derailed threads on /v/ pleanty of times
b. There is thousands of bait threads left up by mods who think that shitposting in them will make them go away and not push it to the top of the catalog for everyone to see.
>>384923
Nobody outside of GG cares about half the shit you listed.
>>384923
Tossing Undertale in that list REALLY shows that you have no idea what you're talking about.
>>384923
Not just that, but you forgot
>The fucking UN
It's a common problem now. Yet we can't talk about any of it because it might hurt some ultra-left moderator's feefees.
>>384912
You totally misunderstood the point.
The point was that it was a place for moderates in the center and people to the right of the left agree that people on the far left are crazy and that people to the left of the right agree that people on the far right are crazy, and people in the center get caught up in the cross fire a lot and find that their allies are often the people they fight against on another day.
This had nothing to do with me crying about wanting to be racist.
>>384931
Except that Undertale's fanbase and popularity is mostly composed of Tumblr, right?
>>384929
>IT DOESN'T EXIST
>yes it does
>IT DOESN'T MATTER
>>384888
>Because you get the other guy to agree to do the same is why.
4chan is about brinksmanship, mostly because all it takes is one anonymous faggot to blow up any accord.
>>384927
I'm gonna go out on a limb and assume that threads complaining about feminists vastly outnumber threads derailed by feminists.
>>384926
How fucking braindamaged do you have to be to assume people give a shit about Gamergate outside shitty liberal arts colleges in the US?
>OH NO SOMEONE HAD A TWITTER ARGUMENT IT WAS HORRIBLE
Literally no one cares. That's why the assumption that japan is literally shitting themselves over having GGers as customers is a braindamaged proposition by a complete leftist retard who assumes that the world stops where his twitter account ends.
But meanwhile
>Nope those feminists who have been railing for YEARS against Japanese games shure aren't the direct cause of Japanese game companies deciding not to dick with the US!
How full of yourself are YOU?
>>384923
Move all that shit to a new video game board dedicated to the industry. Already a thread on it
>>384926
>Holy shit. How fucking full of yourself do you have to be to think people aren't aware of Gamergate in other countries.
Seems reasonable to me. Most people in America aren't even aware of what Gamergate is about.
The only ones 'full of themselves' are the ones thinking their little shitflinging contest is followed by millions around the globe and is the direct cause of changes in societal politics.
>>384935
>that people on the far left are crazy and that people to the left of the right agree that people on the far right are crazy
Thats why places like r/stormfrontorSJW exist, to hate both sides. r/Tumblrinaction is meant to hate the most dominant part of Tumblr, the far left.
Kotaku in Action has been polled before, showing that most of them are in fact liberals. The fact you are blatantly shoehorning in race into this shows who you really are.
>>384941
You'd be wrong. You can go click any random thread on /v/ and most of the time it's a false flagger/actual feminist destroying the conversation with hypothetical question shitposting.
>why is this game so problematic?
Which is like kryptonite to reasoned discussion.
>>384941
Then you would be fucking wrong.
I've seen multiple derails/threads this week of nothing but hardcore leftwing smut, its a lot more dominant and a lot more of a problem then people who complain.
>>384923
Haha wow. None of those you mentioned are even remotely leftists.
>modern Bioware and Ubisoft
Are you seriously calling multimillionaire capitalist industries "leftist"? Take your head out of your ass. The paranoia here is astounding.
And if they've ever called themselves "leftist", yeah I can also call make a Twitter account and call myself Jesus, that doesn't make me Jesus.
>Why do liberals act like the worst of their party doesn't exist?
I didn't say SJWs don't exist, I'm saying they're not fucking "ultra-left".
>>384912
>You're fucking joking right?
Of course not. If you really think leftists are worried about this shit you have to stop listening to /pol/ and Gamergaters.
Here, take some leftist news outlets and tell me how they're full of articles about videogames.
https://www.jacobinmag.com/
https://www.wsws.org/
>>384937
>Except that Undertale's fanbase and popularity is mostly composed of Tumblr, right?
What the fuck are you on about? It's one of the top selling Steam games. Unless you're mental enough to try and claim that Steam is tumblr.
>>384947
>using political compass to measure anything
This is it, this thread has reached maximum levels of stupidity.
>>384952
>I've seen multiple derails/threads this week of nothing but hardcore leftwing smut
It's just you becoming so right-wing that now everything you see is left-wing to your eyes, take that into your thick skull.
>>384947
I wasn't actually talking about gamergate.
I was talking about /r/tumblrinaction which is a place where you talk about SJWs and Stormfronters.
Stormfronters laugh at SJWs there because SJW posts are more common. Moderates and Stormfronters both agree that SJWs are crazy.
Then when the moderates make fun of Stormfronters, the Stormfronters get upset.
I hope that clears things up.
>>384962
>>384967
>H-HE'S NOT AN ACTUAL LEFTIST THEY WOULDN'T DO THAT KIND OF THING!
>NOT UNLIKE THOSE FUCKING GOOBERS THOUGH
Great. Just fucking great.
This is basically why /v/ has slid into shit: Everything is a goober's fault, nothing is the fault of the feminists and false-flaggers. Calling them out on it results in "STOP TINFOILING OVER STRAWMEN", but holy shit do not mention something that a goober once agreed with, because the shitposters will attack with tipping and MLP images.
It's disgraceful. This is what /v/ has turned into, it seems.
>>384976
You sound upset. Maybe you should go back to 8gag where the feminists won't bully you.
>>384927
How many feminists do you think are actually on 4chan, really?
>>384980
>u mad? :^)
Didn't expect anything else from you, to be honest. We all know the real reason, though: Goobergate is a convenient excuse to de-rail threads and shitpost discussion into oblivion, so your kind just uses it at every opportunity.
Fucking genius, really. It's like a big red button that says "Quick, kill this thread and any significance it could have had" that you just leave out for anyone to mash.
The problem with /v/ is that it's accepted the boogeyman culture the rest of the internet peddles around. It used to be Reddit, then SJWs, now GamerGate. Just fucking discuss the games you enjoy and ignore the ones you don't.
>>384987
Are you retarded? I said discussion about feminism (pro OR con) doesn't belong on /v/. How does your feeble mind equate "my kind" with derailing/shitposting threads with GG?
>>384976
You aren't even making sense anymore.
In your head it's all a big group people you're attacking when in reality it's much more complex than that. Either way it's not the "ultra-left" and you should get that idea out of your head.
>>384952
I would like some examples of this hardcore leftwing smut because I'm just imagining it being something like trannies are people too or there should be more strong women video game leads.
>>384958
>Haha wow. None of those you mentioned are even remotely leftists.
because the person that tried to accuse games of being "misogynistic" by judging appearance and flat out lying, the people who called gamers shitlords for not buying their games, the game where most of the fans reside on Tumblr, the game that was praised for having gay people in it, and the game where a character shoots themselves and blames it on the gun is not "leftist"
and the studio that tried pushing a transgender into a game taking place in the 1600's is now leftist either, right?
>I didn't say SJWs don't exist, I'm saying they're not fucking "ultra-left"
Then what are they?
>>384961
>What the fuck are you on about? It's one of the top selling Steam games
Steam is the store that sells the game to people, in which most of the games discussion happens on Tumblr.
>>384962
Motherfucking called it!
>RADICAL LEFTISTS DON'T EXIST
>>384963
Remember the last time you saw a liberal chanting about killing niggers and burning the cross?
>>384986
4chan is a website, open to anyone on the internet.
>>385040
>because the person that tried to accuse games of being "misogynistic" by judging appearance and flat out lying, the people who called gamers shitlords for not buying their games,
Reminder that Sarkeesian, Wu, and Fish only have money and e-celeb status because GG gave them it. They were absolute nobodies before you retards became obsessed with them.
>>385034
Lets see:
>WOMEN ON /v/, WHAT GAMES DO YOU PLAY
>multiple comics about feminism
>speedrun thread derailed into debate about trannies
>other thread derailed into safe space debate
>other thread derailed into other tranny debate
>Fallout thread derailed into gun debate
All this week.
Not to mention all that non subtle sugarcoating you got there.
>>385019
>its not the ultra-left
Okay, let me explain this
A reasonable left/right arguement is something that shows the conservative/liberal mindset, yet isn't to hardcore, homophobic, or racist.
i.e
>I think blacks are being attacked by the police
or
>I think blacks are not being attacked by the police
A ultra version of these would be
>I think police are evil, crackers should die, and riots are justified
or
>we should kill all the niggers
Yes, there is such thing as too much for both sides
>>385053
Wu I can see, she showed up out of literally fucking nowhere and proceeded to leech of of Forskeesian.
If you don't think Fish was known pre-GG then you are a fucking newfag to pretty much the entire internet. His twitter meltdown that took place a year before GG was all over the fucking internet. Hell, the fact that "suck my dick, choke on it" is still spammed shows that you are wrong.
And belive it or not, TONS of people bought into Forskeezy, giving her money and supporting her scam. And if that wasn't enough, people like Angry Joe made videos talking about how "she jus wanted 2 tak about dem strong whimmins" when it felt that the people against her were at an all time low.
>>385056
>WOMEN ON /v/, WHAT GAMES DO YOU PLAY
>multiple comics about feminism
>speedrun thread derailed into debate about trannies
>other thread derailed into safe space debate
>other thread derailed into other tranny debate
>Fallout thread derailed into gun debate
Well I guess >>384967 was right. You really can't tell the difference between shitposts, moderate left, and hardcore left.
>>385065
>ITS JUST
>S H I T P O S T I N G
If I made a drinking game out of this my kidneys would be shut down right now.
If thats just shitposting, then so is all the /pol/ faggotry that derails threads. Please stop criticizing /pol/ you dumb gamergate babies :^)
>>385077
>If I made a drinking game out of this my kidneys would be shut down right now.
I wish you would, you illiterate moron.
>>385083
So are we just going to forget the topic at hand and just insult each others english now?
>>385087
You're supposed to capitalize the E in English.
>>385040
>Then what are they?
You mean politically? They fall in the category of authoritarian progressives/neoliberals. They're center; center-left at most. Most of them are also rich as fuck, there's no way they're "ultra-left", they're populists at worst. Progressives are also seen as right-wing in some countries, because they're basically the same old capitalists who are now trying to be "modern" and "open-minded".
Ultra-left means the radical left, which in turn means any of the following: anarchists, syndicalists, communists, mutualists, Trotskyists, etc. They mostly focus on either changing or fully dismantling the economic system. Again, they're not worried about censoring tits in videogames.
They're completely separate groups and they hate each other.
>>385056
No, that's not how politics work.
Just like conservatives and nazis are completely different groups with opposing ideas, progressive leftists and radical leftists are also completely different groups. It's not a matter of being "more" or "less", it's whether they attack the root of the problem (radis = root) or try to fix problems through reforms.
>>385087
I'm not insulting your English. I'm insulting your reading comprehension.
Why is anybody on this site talking about politics outside of /pol/ to begin with? Ban both left wing and right wing dipshits and crybabies to /pol/.
>>383694
>Why are there so many SJWs on /v/ nowadays?
Why are there so many SJWs on /qa/, or just 4chan in general nowadays?
Just look at this thread.
Why are there so many dumb shitters who found 4chan through /pol/ and think 4chan is le epic racist sexist hiding place nowadays?
>>385735
Why are there so many dumb shitters who found 4chan through Reddit or Tumblr and think any kind of anti-SJW or politically incorrect opinion comes from /pol/?
This shit has always been there.
>this thread
Is this what /v/ and /qa/ has become?
>>385738
Because they do. There used to be a guy who showed up on /tv/ every Friday night railing against niggers and jews regardless of the topic.
I started to engage him about something specific and he lost it. I started to feel sorry for him and asked him a few personal questions. He admitted he was crying drunk and invited me to /pol/ to talk about it when he was calmer.
This is what happens when people take "internet hate machine" seriously.
>>385740
I always want to hope the SJW apologists are all trolls and shills, but some of them are probably serious.
>>385744
Fuck off back to tumblr retard, no one wants your shit here. Or keep spamming /qa/ all day long if you want.
>>385745
What are you going to do if I don't? Raid me?
>>385741
Point is, these people have always been there. They were on /b/ for the first few years, then they were on /n/. Some of them always crossposted on other boards. Racist people exist, sexist people exist, they post on the internet, trying to associate them with a given board is retarded.
Being anti-SJW doesn't mean you're racist or sexist. It means you don't think SJWs and leftists obsessed with identity politics should use creative mediums for their agenda, or try to force political correctness everywhere. If anyone told you 5-10 years ago that "comic books are sexist" or "video games are sexist", everyone would've told you "they're just games, fuck off with this shit, stop shoving your politics where they don't belong", and they would be right. Being anti-SJW is just that same attitude extended to now.
>>385499
Because like it or not, censorship, SJW's, and feminism have now invaded in the video game industry, thus they are now part of the video game discussion
>>385751
>these people have always been there
No, they haven't.
>They were on /b/ for the first few years
That was something entirely different. Being a Nazi was the most shocking thing anyone could think of, so they had FUN with it.
>trying to associate them with a given board is retarded
It starts with /pol/ and you know it. Stop being so disingenuous.
>SJWs and leftists obsessed with identity politics
Nah, they're just normal people who don't believe in threatening women with rape because they play video games.
Get over yourself. Besides being full of shit, you're losing at every public example of people who talk like you.
>>385766
>No, they haven't.
Yes they have. Old /b/ was basically a cesspit of psychos, racists, pedos, and worse than anything on 4chan now until /b/ day. No one took it seriously because no one took the internet seriously, and no one cared. Of course a lot of it was joking but that doesn't change this fact.
>Being a Nazi was the most shocking thing anyone could think of, so they had FUN with it.
And a lot of them probably still do, you say that like /pol/acks don't have fun with their Trump maymays, or that "WE WUZ KANGS" shit. That's basically the equivalent of Bix Nood or "Around blacks, never relax" and Ron Paul /b/.
>It starts with /pol/ and you know it. Stop being so disingenuous.
You could say most of the jokes and culture in old 4chan started with /b/. It's still a boogeyman.
>Nah, they're just normal people who don't believe in threatening women with rape because they play video games.
You know this is just plain retarded. No one thinks rape threats are something legitimate, just because you're anti-SJW, anti-censorship, or anti-PC in the context of media, doesn't mean you support the fucking Holocaust. Do you really think the only people who don't want women to get threatened with rape are the same kind of people who talk about "mansplaining" and how media make you sexist and racist and anyone who doesn't is a Nazi?
>you're losing at every public example of people who talk like you.
What are you even talking about? What public examples? Everyone by now knows that political correctness and censorship are becoming a problem, especially in the entertainment industry.
>>385735
>>385799
>Of course a lot of it was joking but that doesn't change this fact.
All of it was joking. I'm beginning to suspect you're a "let's mold young minds" injection from some lame conservative think tank.
>And a lot of them probably still do
No. They seriously believe -- against all evidence -- that Trump is going to win. It's the same delusion that was in effect the last time.
> No one thinks rape threats are something legitimate
Extecpt the the targeted women who have been Swatted.
>just because you're anti-SJW, anti-censorship, or anti-PC in the context of media, doesn't mean you support the fucking Holocaust
wut?
>What public examples?
https://www.bing.com/search?q=sheriff+fired&pc=MOZI&form=MOZSBR
That's just one aspect. There are many more.
>>384947
>r/kia purposesly says they are left wing to deflect criticism
Lol wut, you only need to spend 5 minutes on KiA or 8gag to realize 99% of Gamergate is lolbertarian/Ancap right wingers.
Do you think the American Enterprise Institute (Christina Hoff Sommers) or Milo/Briebart would be grooming a left wing politicial movement?
>>385829
>All of it was joking. I'm beginning to suspect you're a "let's mold young minds" injection from some lame conservative think tank.
It really wasn't. It's why /n/ was deleted, because it was full of these people, did you miss the posts I screencapped from 2008? It probably wasn't as all-encompassing, but some of them were always here. When you have an anonymous space where people can say whatever politically incorrect shit they want, you're gonna get people saying politically incorrect shit. This is why people like you want to remove anonymity from the internet.
>Extecpt the the targeted women who have been Swatted.
I haven't heard anything about women being swatted, can you link me anything? Swatting is a general problem on the internet though, it mostly happens to male streamers.
>wut?
You said SJWs and leftists obsessed with identity politics are just people who don't want women to get threatened with rape. I'm telling you these people are the ones constantly pushing for political correctness and censorship in media which is what most people take issue with. Saying people who are called SJWs are just "concerned citizens who don't want women to get threatened" is asinine.
>That's just one aspect. There are many more.
I don't even know how this is relevant. So because a sheriff was arrested for using excessive force, which is a good thing, it means I'm wrong about... what? And once again you're implying anyone who takes issue with SJWs for any reason is a Nazi who thinks policemen should be allowed to assault mute black men for no reason.
Seriously what are you even doing here What are you trying to accomplish?
>>384976
>nothing is the fault of the feminists and false-flaggers
You constantly blame SJWs when you faggots know that Baphomet and extreme GG elements literally bomb threated your own events and sent syringes to Milo or hid Syringes around PAX and such, Baphomet and pro GG psycho's on twitter literally took credit for this, and yet EVERY time it happens you fags say "Duuur nah they're not Gamergate, it's a SJW False flag?"
That psycho driving to Anita's house with a gun or whatever that got arrested? Was he a SJW despite his wall and youtube videos all being pro-gamergate? According to Gamergate he was afterwards, it was totally a "SJW false flag".
I would make a bet if Sargon of Akkad when mental and shot up a fucking abortion clinic or something raving about cultural marxism, you would claim it was an SJW false flag as well.
>>385063
>Forskeezy, giving her money and supporting her scam
Explain how anything Anita did was a scam?
All Anita literally does is mediocre entry level media communication analysis in a pretentious voice.
The only reason Anita was ever attacked was because she has "Feminist" in her channel name.
>>385850
>our SJW movement is so extreme that people like Sommers have to get funding from right-wing institutes, and left-wingers have to follow right-wing outlets because left-wing outlets don't have the balls to say anything bad about us
>i-it must be because they're all secretly Right-Libertarian-Ancaps-Nazis-Fascists-Literally Hitlers!
>>385738
>This shit has always been there.
As someone who has been posting since 2005 and lurking since basically creation, no, no it hasn't.
There's a difference between the trolling and satirical racism of old 4chan that was SATIRE and the insane stormfront politicial racism that was planted here by Stormfront astroturfers when they started targeted 4chan in mass astroturfing campaigns in 2012.
>>385853
>>385855
Fuck off GamerGhazi. You people really have nothing better to do with your time than shilling on one of the most inactive boards on 4chan?
>>385858
>shilling
>>385858
Oh, so you can't actually explain how anything Anita did was actually a scam, it's unfounded slander because someone dare calls a medium aimed at 15 year old boys where 99% of women in it are used as nothing more as sex objects, "Sexist" and female gamers cop fucktonnes of abuse for simply being female.
I don't like Anita, I don't like Zoe Quinn, I think they are pretentious cunts, but being pretentious cunts doesn't justify the insane harassment they receive or claims they did anything wrong when they haven't apart from hurt the feels of retarded right wing gamers when somebody points out the obvious.
>Daily reminder almost everything GG claims has been completely debunked.
>Daily reminder that Eron is a schizophrenic nutjob who had a restraining order against him and his claims have been debunk
>Daily reminder that everything GG is based on is poor conjecture around people in an industry talk to each other because no GG's actually have jobs and realize how literally every industry works
>Daily reminder that GG'ers are so retarded they don't even believe in cultivation media theory, a theory that was proven in the 1960s and is the base theory behind all advertising and propaganda.
>Daily reminder that GG'ers are so retarded they don't even understand basic academic words and have to resort to strawmanning and quotemining (Sargon, CHS, Sargon) to do the mental gymnastics to even try make a point.
>>385866
Just stop.
I'm appealing to you because I agree with you, so I consider you to be smarter than GamerGaters.
Just stop and don't allow the debate to actually be a debate.
>>385851
>It really wasn't
It was. You're an idiot.
>I haven't heard anything about women being swatted
"15 Year Old Who “SWATTED” Gamer Convicted Of Domestic Terrorism; 25 Years To Life In Federal Prison"
Okay.
>Saying people who are called SJWs are just "concerned citizens who don't want women to get threatened" is asinine
See above.
>Seriously what are you even doing here What are you trying to accomplish?
Listen: "Do not post the following outside of /b/: Trolls, flames, racism, off-topic replies, uncalled for catchphrases"
>racism
Look closely again:
>racism
>off-topic replies
Do you get it yet? Or is your sense of entitlement so ingrained you don't think rules apply to you?
>>385866
There's a difference between writing a blog or an academic paper and the retarded social media jihad people like Anita, SRS and their brigade of Twitter/Tumblr loonies have been on for years now. Having to make an online series was just the peak of the PC retardation that was going on at the time. The way people are networked and the industry is centralized make it completely different from academic criticism of films for example. Comics and videogames have it really bad. Also it's obvious that these people are only here for profit and for constant activism. If they just wanted "criticism", they would've finished their series or written a few papers in a few months and be done with it, but here we are and they're still all over the place, and not even halfway done with their shit. There's no value or anything elevating to their criticism, it's all about enforcing political correctness on the internet and creative mediums and bringing them down.
Dismissing all the dishonest shit they've done over the years as simply "criticism" is asinine and ignores everything that has been happening and documented for years now.
We've seen the climate they've created now, games being censored or not releasedleft and right, a community in shambles it's all about politics now, all so maybe someone will make a non-sexual female. It's been a disaster that should have never happened, completely unnecessary since developers could always make whatever they want and it's led to more bad than good.
>99% of women in it are used as nothing more as sex objects, "Sexist"
Hilariously wrong and dismissive.
>female gamers cop fucktonnes of abuse for simply being female.
This is an internet and human problem, males receive the same kind of bullshit, even worse according to some studies.
>I don't like Anita, I don't like Zoe Quinn
Sure you don't.
>right wing gamers
>anyone who doesn't agree with my agenda is a "right-winger"
>>385866
>>385872
(cont.)
>a theory that was proven in the 1960s and is the base theory behind all advertising and propaganda.
There's a difference between how straight-up propaganda meant to change the viewer's mind affects you, and the way people react to arbitrary images in media.
Living in Nazi Germany, you're constantly surrounded by propaganda, being educated in a certain way so you hold certain views, being shamed and ostracized for not sharing those views.
This has nothing to do with how seeing violent or sexual images in media affects your brain. No link between violence/sex in media and sexism/violent behavior has been found.
It's not related to how political propaganda affects you, or how advertising makes you more likely to buy a product. Seeing a Swastika in a game won't suddenly turn me into a Nazi, thus there's no reason to censor it.
You SJWs seriously need to the fuck off 4chan. I can't believe you faggots still here after a year, and even fucking /qa/.
>>385868
>It was. You're an idiot.
Well you're gonna ignore all proof otherwise, so whatever you say.
>"15 Year Old Who “SWATTED” Gamer Convicted Of Domestic Terrorism; 25 Years To Life In Federal Prison"
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/15-year-old-gamer-convicted-swatting-hoax-satirical-article-creates-stir-social-media-1463463
>An article circulating online, claiming that a teenager was given a 25-year prison sentence for "swatting", has turned out to be a hoax.
>has turned out to be a hoax.
So a fake story that doesn't even have anything to do with female gamers?
>the rest of this fucking post
At this point I know I'm being trolled. You people really have nothing better to do than this?
>>385874
>So a fake story that doesn't even have anything to do with female gamers?
Seriously?
https://www.bing.com/search?q=swatting+4chan&pc=MOZI&form=MOZSBR
>>385879
Epic, simply epic.
>>385881
>literally linking a search engine
>the results aren't even relevant
Keep on trolling, I'm out.
>>385884
>Keep on trolling, I'm out
Glad to hear it. I win.
Fuck off and stay off, loser.
>>385894
>I win.
>if he stops responding, I win
>if he keeps responding, I win
That's a nice setup you have there, pal.
>>385894
>trying to get in the last word after getting BTFO
God you're pathetic.
The shekelshoah threads were better desu
>>385937
>Nice b8 m8
How is it b8? It's true that /v/ is infested with them since last year.
>>383742
Are you too retarded to see the difference between japanese-style sexual pandering and SJW LGBT pandering? No one is against gays and lesbians, just the faggy way libtards go about it.
Most people are tired of Gamer Gate. It was funny the first couple of days but shit gets old fast. It also got tiring when /v/ tried to fight fire with fire and went into a protacted war for the purpose of "ethics in games journalism" and teamed up with Reddit and god knows what else.
tl;dr they're not sjws, they're people tired of gamergate.
>>385954
>I'm tired of Gamer Gate.
Fixed.
>>385954
>tl;dr they're not sjws, they're people tired of gamergate.
A lot of them are. They're basically using the "GamerGate" boogeyman to refer to anyone talking about SJWs or censorship. So it really doesn't matter if you were part of that movement or if you even have Twitter account, you'll still be called that.
>>385958
As a 4chan user you share collective responsibility for spawning that piece of shit and now everybody must suffer for it.
>>385946
>/v/ is infested with them
Translation: The mods stopped giving a shit about the cancer.
Fun Fact: I used to have this daily ritual where I would check /v/ for V: tMB threads because I knew it was one of the few games they wouldn't shit on.
I don't even have that anymore.
>>385958
>A lot them are.
By that, I meant a lot of them are SJWs, that is.
>>385965
Instead they'd rather delete Santa hat threads. Seriously what the fuck is wrong with them?
>>385970
People who get called SJWs or told to go back to Reddit are going to call people GGers and tell them to go back to 8gag (and the other way around). Nobody actually cares whether these accusations are true. They're just convenient ways to fling shit.
>>385963
lol fuck off
>>385977
We're struggling together!
>>385974
The difference is the GG/8gag belongs here and SJWs do not. One are still anons, the others are basically modern day nazis and don't watch anime.
>>385980
>One are still anons, the others are basically modern day nazis and don't watch anime.
Plenty of "SJWs" watch anime. Tumblr loves it.
>GG/8gag belongs here
OPINION DISCARDED
>>385985
>OPINION DISCARDED
"GG/8gag" is basically almost everyone on 4chan before 2014, since all it is is anti-SJW and anti-censorship as far as it's used. Some of them might be cancerous but they're still anons like that guy said.
SJWs used to be limited to a couple SRS raids after 2011 and they were always told to fuck off, they're the ones who have no place here.
>>385985
They were 4channers until a little more than a year ago. As far as I'm concerned, the 4chan/8gag "war" is completely forced, and a non issue now that moot is gone. Hiro doesn't seem to give a shit, neither do the mods anymore. The only reason 8gag became popular in the first place was because moot was an insecure faggot who wanted to make his normalfag friends happy. The only people who cared among anons were /q/tards who love internet wars, and SJWs. I'm convinced most ordinary anons don't give a shit.
>>385990
>"GG/8gag" is basically almost everyone on 4chan before 2014
I've heard a lot of whoppers in my life but this one is out there.
>since all it is is anti-SJW and anti-censorship as far as it's used
So is /a/. And guess what - /a/ reacts to GG even more badly than it does to standard /v/, which it already loathes.
>SJWs used to be limited to a couple SRS raids after 2011 and they were always told to fuck off, they're the ones who have no place here.
I have been browsing 4chan and playing Japanese rape simulators for a period of time probably longer than you've been posting, and I still get called an SJW by faggots high off their ass every now and then.
>>385992
And they weren't 4channers three years ago, so all of them can go fuck themselves.
>>385997
I go to /a/ and I sympathize with GG. I don't post about it on /a/, because why the fuck would I?
>>386001
Would you say that "basically everyone on /a/ before 2014 is GG/8gag?"
>>386003
I'd say GG/8gag fags practice proper chan ettiquette, and don't post unrelated bullshit on other boards. If you get called SJW, stop getting into arguments on /a/ that make you look like an SJW.
>>386006
>I'd say GG/8gag fags practice proper chan ettiquette, and don't post unrelated bullshit on other boards.
I'd say that I've seen more GG/8gag shilling on /a/ and /jp/ (particularly during the height of the little shit festival) than, say, Tumblr.
>If you get called SJW, stop getting into arguments on /a/ that make you look like an SJW.
I barely post on /a/. For a few years there were a lot of truly incredible Gamergate retards infesting /jp/ and incapable of shutting the fuck up about things they didn't understand. Thankfully most of them have died by now.
>>385953
Plenty of people on /v/ are against gays. They are the ones that even /pol/ don't want. Honestly, I think it depends on how popular the game is. People complained about the homoness in Life is Strange and Undertale, but nobody cared about the gay characters in Tales from the Borderlands.
>>385997
/a/ has a lot of tumblrites who will call anyone who hurts their feelings "/v/". /v/ has a lot of tumblrites who will call anyone who hurts their feelings "GG".
You're acting like every board isn't full of newfags
>>386009
>For a few years there were a lot of truly incredible Gamergate retards infesting /jp/ and incapable of shutting the fuck up about things they didn't understand
Even though it didn't exist?
>Thankfully most of them have died by now.
So you're glad these people you spent all this time talking with probably killed themselves because of these issues, and yet SJWs aren't the problem? That's lovely.
>>386009
I would guess that most of those are false flags. What I remember quite recently is people in "hirohito is kawaii" threads crying wolf about 8shills and gg-er's. These threads were already off topic as is, and even more derailed by people trying to force a shitstorm. It think it is safe to say that anyone who gives a shit about the 4chan-8gag "war" is an idiot and shitposter.
>/jp/
I don't go to /jp/, but my understanding is they have maximum not giving a fuck of west politics, and generally admire Japanese values. I don't see why someone from /jp/ would side with SJWs or whatever.
>>386011
/v/ is gay as fuck
>>386011
>People complained about the homoness in Life is Strange and Undertale
From what I've seen people don't complain about them being featured in the game, they complain when other people make a big deal out if it, and the community becomes cancerous because of it. Same thing happened to Steven Universe.
>>386023
It's kind of like how people assume if you troll against the new star wars movie, you're a racist who hates black and a sexist who hates women, when the same people making fun of those shitty characters are /co/fags who love orange buttcheeks. Same reason why 4chan in general hates "strong women characters" but loves the anime style thing of making everything a badass little girl. There's a difference of attitude between the 2, and it shows in how shitty the story is.
>>386020
>Even though it didn't exist?
I guess back then it was Ron Paul and /pol/ garbage that seamlessly melded into GG.
>So you're glad these people you spent all this time talking with probably killed themselves because of these issues
Anyone who killed themselves over Gamergate is - I'm sorry - too fucking stupid to live.
>>386022
>I don't see why someone from /jp/ would side with SJWs or whatever.
It's not about defending SJWs, it's about telling off stupid children who think that everybody who's not an SJW should be supporting their holy Twitter crusade to improve ethics in gaming journalism.
>>383694
Because moot banned GG.
Don't call it a grave, it's the future you chose.
>>386027
>Anyone who killed themselves over Gamergate is - I'm sorry - too fucking stupid to live.
You say on a website where people marry cartoon characters and pee in bottles. Yes, a lot of 4channers are that insecure and damaged. If you're gonna be a bully about it maybe go somewhere else.
>It's not about defending SJWs, it's about telling off stupid children who think that everybody who's not an SJW should be supporting their holy Twitter crusade to improve ethics in gaming journalism.
But that twitter crusade is only a year old and you're complaining about things that happened several years ago, so why not be honest about what you're annoyed about? For all you know, people might agree with you, partially. Most people think "anti SJW" is the lesser evil but will still agree they can get annoying or cringey at times.
And what does Ron Paul have to do with this?
>>386028
The real irony of it is that if GG had never existed you could still be complaining about how women ruined your video games to this very day.
But instead, like the /mlp/eople, you turned it into a whole thing and thing gets spammed -> thing gets banned. Indefinitely.
>>386035
It never got spammed, they stuck to one thread until September even while the mod kept fucking with the auto sage filter. Moot banned it because his friends who read gawker complained about it.
>>386033
>You say on a website where people marry cartoon characters and pee in bottles.
Do people who marry cartoon characters get everywhere and tell people how that makes them enlightened specimens of human being? No, they keep to themselves.
>If you're gonna be a bully about it maybe go somewhere else.
If you can't handle mean people maybe you should move to a site like Tumblr where you can carefully control what people get to talk to you.
Plus, if they're dead, they're far beyond caring, and their next of kin aren't browsing 4chan to be offended by it.
>And what does Ron Paul have to do with this?
It was the precursor to retarded political shit leaking out of /pol/, before /v/ got on board with it.
>>386038
So did the /jp/'s "NEET thread" (which was a steaming pile of shit by any means) and that got banned even without being a lightning rod for activist retards.
>>386038
In fact I was just curious and it wasn't talked about once on /a/ in that month long period. So much for muh being spam. It was talked about in general on other boards but not in a way you can called spam. Really pathetic revisionism by SJWs.
https://desustorage.org/a/search/text/gamergate/start/2014-08-17/end/2014-09-20/
https://desustorage.org/_/search/text/gamergate/start/2014-08-17/end/2014-09-20/
>>386041
It sounds like you are just extremely opinionated and upset that others are opinionated as well. A lot of 4channers like Ron Paul because he is honest and has similar ideas to us. Same reason as Trump or etc. Why would this have been an issue unless you are arguing with people about Ron Paul on /jp/? As for waifu threads, people do talk about it everywhere and that is okay because that is what 4chan is for. Discussing things. To say no one talks about waifus is silly and anyway you missed the point that we are not normal, that is okay too.
>>386047
https://desustorage.org/a/search/text/evangelion/start/2014-08-17/end/2014-09-20/
https://desustorage.org/a/search/text/anime/start/2014-08-17/end/2014-09-20/
https://desustorage.org/a/search/text/manga/start/2014-08-17/end/2014-09-20/
>>386051
Oh fuck, lol
>>385992
>I'm convinced most ordinary anons don't give a shit
I can confirm this. People for whom GG is the biggest issue in their life are just creepy.
Nobody wants to see any of your political shit anywhere except /pol/. You anti-SJWs are fast becoming regular SJWs that have your own social parameters you obsess over, and it's getting pretty fucking tired from both sides.
>>386148
I never see anti SJWs on other boards unless an SJW started shit.
>>385980
>The difference is the GG/8gag belongs here and SJWs do not.
Except nobody here gets to dictate that. All of you pseudo-political faggots need to get the fuck out though
>>386156
Sure you don't.
That's why /tv/ is constantly inundated with right wing SJWs.
>>386157
>Except nobody here gets to dictate that.
If you were here before the last few years, you'd realize that moralfags/SJWs have always been hated.
>>386164
Yeah. I know about that.
But they're now compounded with right wing moralfaggots who are no less SJW in their pursuits to lay claim to 4chan just like their leftist alternates.
>>386165
It's a complex issue. You have these two sides that want to take control of the site, and they'll do things like false-flagging as the other side to get regular users on their side. Like SJWs will pretend to be retarded anti-SJWs by calling a completely normal person a "SJW" to make the term meaningless and cause infighting, then shitposters will do the same thing because it's an easy way to create arguments.
Ultimately I favor the right-wing side because:
1) If I wanted the other side, I'd go to almost any other site.
2) They really don't have that much influence on media, they rarely get things censored, etc. so even if they can get annoying, their shit is mostly just noise
I agree though that some of the more hardcore /pol/ shit needs to be toned down or contained
>>386175
>2) They really don't have that much influence on media, they rarely get things censored, etc. so even if they can get annoying, their shit is mostly just noise
No, they just try to influence the most of 4chan by trying to say shit like "4chan is /pol/ and /pol/ is 4chan and if you don't like that fuck off back to Tumblr you fucking SJW XD."
Like either you entirely accept everything they say or you're not a "true 4channer."
Bullshit. False dichotomy bullshit.
>>386165
>But they're now compounded with right wing moralfaggots who are no less SJW in their pursuits to lay claim to 4chan just like their leftist alternates.
Total bullshit.
>>386179
Lie to me, faggot.
Or tell me how I'm wrong, considering it's certainly not SJWs going WHY IS THERE A FUCKING BLACK MAN IN A MOVIE HEY DID YOU KNOW THERE'S JEWS IN THIS PICTURE DROPPED LOL on /tv/? Nice stretch, but you didn't even bother to have an argument from the start. Faggot.
>>386180
Blame Disney and Jewjew. SW has always had black people and women in it. No one forced them to highlight how diverse and progressive it is in the marketing, or to make Boyega look like a weirdo. He's a handsome guy, so why does he look like a chimp in the movie? That's a decision by the director.
http://www.theguardian.com/film/2015/dec/17/star-wars-director-jj-abrams-women-the-force-awakens-daisy-ridley-lupita-nyongo-carrie-fisher
>>386185
No, I'm not blaming other people for retards shitposting about something they can't possibly conceive or deal with because they remain triggered constantly about "diversity." This has nothing to do with Star Wars, I was posting an example, a constant and consistent example of this thing you call "total bullshit" in an effort to lie like there's some reward for you doing so.
>>386185
Does it need to be pointed out in every thread and about every movie though?
>>386186
>This has nothing to do with Star Wars
Then why did you mention it? Were you referring to another movie with black people in it? This political shit is tied too closely to a lot of video games and movies, how can you be described that discussion of them turns politcal?
>>386191
>I don't know what an example is.
>>386192
>my example was wrong so let's stop talking about it
>>386195
>You're wrong because I say so.
Glad we could get through your argument as quickly as possible.
>>386197
You haven't proven that there's a problem, just that /tv/ is discussing movies you don't like or saying bad things about them when they should only be allowed to praise it. Literally are you a shill?
>>386198
Didn't say any of those things at all. Typical /pol/ argument using misrepresentation. You mad because people don't like it when your only opinion is your diatribe of triggered words consisting of OH MY GOD, NIGGEEER!
NIGGEEEER!
NIGGEEEEER!
>>386200
Then be more clear next time. What are you complaining about?
>>386201
Yep, blame it on your poor reading comprehension.
>>386202
I am a retarded /pol/ack, be more clear what your complain is and what solution you want? Are you the same guy from /jp/ and complaining about 8ch/GG?
>>386203
No, although both groups need to fuck off from this place.
Unsurprisingly relevant.
>>386205
This post is still cancer and most people disagreed with you
http://desustorage.org/co/thread/45723951/#45735088
>/pol/acks are avatarfags he says while using some weird frog picture
>>386204
So in other words you have no criticisms, you are just being mean, and want to ban people for no reason?
Maybe you should leave, 4chan isn't for bullies.
>>386207
Agreement doesn't correlate to being correct, retard.
>>386209
Just because you are correct doesn't mean you're right, and don't call me a retard, retard.
>>386207
>most people disagreed
Do you even see the links you paste? Most replies were agreeing and/or complimenting him.
>you
Are you implying I was the one who wrote that post? Because that would be extremely autistic.
>>386213
Yes it is an extremely autistic post.
>>386175
Stop fucking pretending /pol/ is anywhere close to being sane and reasonable. Free Republic is the most unhinged right-wing forum with any influence and nobody from /pol/ would last 30 seconds there.
You've been doing this shit all day and no one is buying it. Fuck off.
>>386222
/pol/ is a lot better than freepers. what the shit?
Forums in general are either for retards, or overmoderated fiefdoms for pretentious fart-sniffers (another kind of retard)
>>386223
4chan is literally a forum
>>386223
Freepers are generally smarter than /pol/tards and their hugbox is more secure.
You could learn from them.
>>386231
>
>>386237
>>386222
>Stop fucking pretending /pol/ is anywhere close to being sane and reasonable.
/pol/ is a large board with a lot of posters, some of them being batshit retarded, others being very much sane and reasonable. /pol/ has been right about a lot of shit especially in years past, on issues that are usually ignored by the mainstream, they've also been wrong a lot of times. You take the good with the bad.
I wasn't even talking about /pol/ specifically anyway, I meant that I'd rather have people with strong, even excessive anti-SJW opinions on 4chan than for the site to become another arm of the SJW army. You think /pol/ is bad, but then you go to other sites that are all the same ultra-PC circles, and you're glad it exists as an alternative. If no one here is educated to counter SJW arguments and tactics, this site will become another breeding ground for them.
>You've been doing this shit all day and no one is buying it. Fuck off.
wat
>>386248
He thinks everyone is SJWs and you must be one person for disagreeing with him/
>>386248
>/pol/ has been right about a lot of shit
Like Romney winning?
>Issues that are usually ignored by the mainstream
Because they're no more relevant than astrology.
>they've also been wrong a lot of times.
Like a Romney landslide?
>I wasn't even talking about /pol/ specifically anyway
And yet you go out of your way to defend your home board's reputation like a territorial prince.
Listen: /pol/ outside of /pol/ is a bannable offense. Get that through your thick John Wayne forehead.
>>386270
>Listen: /pol/ outside of /pol/ is a bannable offense.
Nope.
>>>/rules/
>>386276
>>/rules/
>>386276
Go on /sci/ and call the OP in a thread a nigger loving jew, then get back to me.
I'll wait.
>>386277
>>>/global/rules/
There we go
Reeeee
>>386270
>And yet you go out of your way to defend your home board
Not my home board. It's not even in my top 5 boards especially since it's gone dowhill since the Zimmerman trial.
>/pol/ outside of /pol/ is a bannable offense
Even if that were true, that's vague as fuck since anything can be considered "/pol/" by some people. My only point is that if you kick out the /pol/acks from a board, the other side usually takes over, which isn't really that much better.
>>386284
I still consider /pol/ my place but I go to /a/ and /m/ more often. It's been boring since the boston bombing for me, no sleepovers anymore = no fun.
>>386284
>Not my home board
You're lying. I can smell it.
>Even if that were true
It is true.
>that's vague as fuck
This is an actual problem that relates to moot's waffling. I could carve a more decisive man out of a banana, but here we are.
The fact remains that technically you can get banned for using 'nigger' outsite of /b/. The reason for that is racism lends nothing to discussions on hobby boards.
>the other side usually takes over,
Translation: We can finally get back to the topic at hand.
>>386291
Stop being a nigger
>>386291
>You're lying. I can smell it.
Smell my ass, nerd. That won't make you more right.
>The fact remains that technically you can get banned for using 'nigger' outsite of /b/. The reason for that is racism lends nothing to discussions on hobby boards.
Ok what about /pol/ shit that doesn't relate to racism? So you can talk about politics unless what you say is considered racist? This rule has always been dumb and never enforced because it's fucking stupid.
>Translation: We can finally get back to the topic at hand.
No, more like instead of annoying fucks talking about jews, niggers and calling everything "degeneracy" and "SJW shit", you get a bunch of humorless, easily offended white knights and tumblrites calling everything sexist and problematic and trying one up each other on how progressive they are, and since there's no one to counter their bullshit, the board turns to shit.
>>386308
Basically this.
I get pretty >triggered by liberal and SJW shit but I always try to keep it in check. How would I live if I was angry 24/7? I don't like SJWs for ruining things I enjoy and therefore why would I bring it up where it's unwanted. Yet to say that discussions never turn political on other boards and you can't discuss things just because you have /pol/-ish opinions is a lie. I have seen threads about feminism in comic books on /co/ and people who disagree with the feminism gets banned. To me that means that the "no /pol/ allowed" mods don't want to keep things civil, they don't want to ban politics, they just want to be able to talk about their own politics but ban /pol/acks. To me that creates a shitty board if you're allowed to talk about liberal whiny shit elsewhere but to disagree with it gets you banned.
>>386308
>It's not 100% stormfront, it's gonna turn into 100% SJW
You are the biggest nigger around.
Seriously fuck off to whatever forum you came from.
>>386321
>Seriously fuck off to whatever forum you came from.
That's been true on a lot of forums I've visited over the years actually, unless you have moderators who prevent it from happening and don't go along with it. Something Awful, TVTropes... A lot of them eventually turned into a 100% SJW hugbox because all the non-SJW posters get banned or are afraid to speak up against the politically correct orthodoxy. That's why a lot of people migrated to 4chan actually. It happened to tumblr, it's happening to Reddit, and even 4chan to a lesser extent. All the politically incorrect subreddits like coontown, fatpeoplehate were taken down, and a lof their boards are also being taken over.
https://spinstrangenesscharm.wordpress.com/laws-of-politics/
>Any organization not explicitly and constitutionally right-wing will sooner or later become left-wing
Not saying you should tolerate every bit of off-topic Stormfront shit on your board, but if you forcefully get rid of all the people who lean that way, they won't be there when the other side takes over.
americucks everyone desu
>>386327
>if you forcefully get rid of all the people who lean that way, they won't be there when the other side takes over.
Nigger it was done here before and SJWs didn't take over.
It only created more shitposting.
>>386327
>That's why a lot of people migrated to 4chan actually.
If only we had been ahead of the SJW curve we could have offload those posters to other boards instead of becoming their spawning ground
>>386395
Then 4chan as it was would have never existed since a lot of oldfags came from Something Awful for that reason.
>>385946
242 replies
>>385972
Not vidya
>>385980
>The difference is the GG/8gag belongs here and SJWs do not.
Belong, not belong. 4 chan are anonymous boards so basically no one and everyone belongs here. 4chan is not a SJW free circlejerk, it has never intended to be one.
Also, a lot of GG issue come from breaking rule 1, and end with the noble purpose of "ethics in games journalism" as >>385954 said, and focus more on /r9k/ killer faggotry to help an anon to get revenge of his ex gf.
>>384951
>I-it's j-just bait guys, I swear!
>>385866
Why in the fuck did you come to this site? You know, I don't mind you being here, but don't force your tumblr shit on the rest of us. Keep tumblr in tumblr. I literally have nothing against that site, it has a role to fill. But you don't need to force your ideology on people on other sites.
>>386011
Having a carpet muncher as the protagonist of Gone Home was even close to the worst thing about that "game".
>>386270
The butthurt emanating from this post makes my dick hard.
>>386572
>4 chan
Uh-huh, you're definitely from here.
>4chan is not a SJW free
It should strive to be.
>an anon to get revenge of his ex gf.
No it doesn't. This shit hasn't been an issue since September last year. Fuck off retard.
>>386321
It's NOT 100% stormfront. You liberals are retarded.
>>386395
You could fuck off somewhere else reddit cuck.
>>386572
>4chan is not a SJW free circlejerk, it has never intended to be one.
Yes, that is true, I will acknowledge that.
>breaking rule 1
That is not true and you're an idiot.
There is no rule saying you can't be an SJW, or have a reddit/tumblr, that is true, however to say we should accept these people over fellow anons seems like a betrayal and you're an idiot.
>>385866
>claims they did anything wrong when they haven't
>>>
>>386694
>Uh-huh, you're definitely from here.
It was a Typo
>It should strive to be.
If you want a circlejerk there is Tumblr
>No it doesn't. This shit hasn't been an issue since September last year. Fuck off retard.
So why are we posting here?.. oh yeah. pic related.
Yes it is old news.
>>386754
I forgot harassment is not a crime.
Yes you can be SJW, have a Reddit/Tumblr and post on 4chan freely. Also I didn't write
>we should accept these people over fellow anons
There are SJW Anons that is why OP was complaining, that have the same rights and duties you and me have. Betrayal is discuss this outside 4chan, on reddit, tumblr or anywhere else, but in 4chan is fine.
>>387401
>If you want a circlejerk there is Tumblr
I don't think you understand what a circlejerk is. 4chan is pretty much the opposite of that, that doesn't mean literally everything should be accepted. That would actually turn it into a circlejerk because no one would do anything but accept everything and jerk each other off no matter how retarded they are. That's why ponyfags are told to fuck off, it's also why certain subjects are frowned down upon on certain boards. SJWs have no interest in participating in the community, they just want to impose their morals and ideology here and create their own circlejerk to use the board for their agenda. Some of them are probably paid to monitor boards and derail threads.
>So why are we posting here?
Because this thread has nothing to do with some guy getting revenge on his GF.
>>383694
/v/ attracts all the nu-male redditors, tumblr teenagers, etc. Large overlap between tumblr, /v/ and /a/ aswell.
Its mostly tumblr, alot of portals to 4chan have been dropped around there in the past year so now they're all browsing /v/.
Its pretty bad. If only I had a nickel for everytime I see someone call another guy a "fucking nerd!" on v.
