>made a furry board
>didn't make a loli board
Why is this allowed?
>>372604
Well, ask yourself this.
>Loli is illegal.
>Furry isn't illegal.
Why is this allowed?
>>372604
The only time there was a furry board was when it was a trap, a setup for fucking with furfags.
The loli board actually existed for genuine use.
>>372799
/trash/ is the furry board. Stop denying this.
/l/ will probably come soon enough. These things take time.
>>372802
Oh, the furfags made their home on /trash/? Well, nothing of value was lost, I mean, that's shit in the latrine, that's the natural order of things. Trash goes in /trash/
It would be nice with a new /l/ though. Not because I have too much interest in lolis (I more like teens), but I have many lolicon friends, they're nice people and deserve to have a place discussion.
Better staff it good though, nobody wants a repeat of last time. Like, you'd ideally want there to be one janitor for every time zone, purely for liability's sake, it takes just a few rotten eggs to spoil it for everyone else.
>>372802
The furry board where you can make threads that have nothing to do with furries.
>>372621
>loli is illegal
Except it isn't
>furry isn't illegal
Technically speaking, furry can be illegal. When you have a "human" having sex with a "furry," that's apparently illegal. I remember this because Canadian Mounties were trying to deport this one furry and that's what they were trying to get him on.
>>373180
The RCMP arrested him for loli cartoons. Fuck that chink child pedo.
>>373180
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1466A
And a case where a guy got 6 months in prison for possesion of a tiny bit of lolicon amid a tremendous collection of non-pornographic manga.
http://cbldf.org/about-us/case-files/cbldf-case-files/handley/
If you think that one single court case that you can't even remember about a Canadian counts, then you surely agree that one single case about loli counts too. Loli is illegal. I'll revise my point to agree furry is also illegal. Whatever.
>>373539
>And a case where a guy got 6 months in prison for possesion of a tiny bit of lolicon amid a tremendous collection of non-pornographic manga.
>http://cbldf.org/about-us/case-files/cbldf-case-files/handley/
That was also a very famous case that a lot of people have been talking about because that shit is straight unconstitutional-- the court was very much in the wrong in that case. That's why so many paranoid lolicons cite it. Just because a law is enforced improperly doesn't mean that victims of bad justice were criminals.
>If you think that one single court case that you can't even remember about a Canadian counts,
https://youtu.be/6y_5b1JsIs4
>then you surely agree that one single case about loli counts too.
Wrong. Federal law overrides State law. See Ashcroft v Free Speech Coalition.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-795.ZO.html
>>373559
And yet it happened.
Goes to show you something. The law is open to interpretation, you get plea deals, and you go to jail for things that aren't the law.
Cops will arrest you for having lolicon, you'll be in jail for weeks awaiting your trial because you can't afford bail, you'll take a plea deal because your public defender will tell you 6 months is a bargain, and you'll go to jail.
4chan would rather avoid that tragedy so they don't allow loli on their servers.
>>372604
Probably because loli and shota straddle on the line of legality in a lot of countries. Kind of glad trash exists though, less furfaggotry permeating into other boards
>>373180
It's illegal in every country where feelings literally run the entire system. /pol/ isn't too far off from reality everywhere except for the United States where these problems don't exist. This is because there is a certain amount of tolerance for things that aren't always good.
>>373569
>4chan would rather avoid that tragedy so they don't allow loli on their servers.
4chan has always been laissez faire when it comes to legality. When under fire, moot always just played opossum and claimed he didn't do shit-- which was true. If there's a CP problem, let the police bitch about it.
Pedophiles will never get their board... it feels so good.
>>373652
That isn't even kind of true. Why do you think the "illegal content" radio button exists?
It's so you get vanned.
>>372621
Well, ask yourself this.
>Loli is allowed on /b/
Why is this allowed?
>>373569
>4chan would rather avoid that tragedy so they don't allow loli on their servers.
>they don't allow loli on their servers.
But they do you cocksucker,loli is allowed on /b/
>>373180
Typical clueless tripfag talking shit, it was because he had no money on him and the RCMP weren't satisfied he could take care of himself.
>>372604
>Why is this allowed?
Because Hiro is not actually our saviour.
>>372604
>Allowed
>Implying there's shit you can do about it one way or the other
>>372802
/ttrash/ is more of a roleplaying board than a furry board. The RP threads are about the only active thing there, and maybe the kpop dudes too
>>375681
The RP/HG and yiff/clop people split the board and both stay away from each other
>>373667
That's mean.
