Kotaku confirmed not credible news.
Thank you based, Hiro.
It was just a test to see if you would allow it.
Its a "blog" site, of course its not credible. Reuters, FOX, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, RT, and Al Jazeera are all credible, Al Jazeera is debatable
>>363370
>RT
>>363383
Hate to say it, but they're not a blog site. They might have a pro Russian stance, but they're not even close to Salon, Breitbart, Daily Kos, and Rolling Stone are
>>363387
Breitbart isn't a blog site tbqh.
Politicians, like Nigel Farage, who represent millions of people post articles there.
>>363402
Mods need to make another sticky then,laying down what sties are and are not allowed
>>363402
Breitbart is zionist clickbait trash. Andrew Breitbart and Matt Drudge invented the concept of clickbait in the 90s for fucks sake.
Could we get this rule for /v/, too?
>>363417
Click bait news is still news.
>>363478
Nope.
odd that all of these non news sites are allowed. I'd argue that Breitbart is trash too
>>363557
>motherboard.vice
whoa look, /news/ is /shill/ already
that was fast
>>363557
The 4th article from the top left you circled, blogs.scientificmerican.com, is actually a respected science magazine. It's like their 'short summary of what's new in science' section of the paper. I wouldn't lump it in with the other tabloid articles you circled just because of the word 'blog' in the URL, but to each his own.
>>363569
There is a news section and a blog section at scientificamerican.com. The sticky clearly says
>Blogs and editorial articles are not acceptable news sources
>>363573
If you actually look at the content of the story it isn't a blog and it isn't hollywood gossip like every other thread circled. I think you just can't get over the word 'blog' in the URL when it isn't actually a blog.
they really should just implement a filter to prevent those sites being posted
Looks like gooble gabble to me
>>363377
>Al Jazeera is debatable
How so? I feel that the criticism for them can be applied to CNN, except people for some crazy reason love them enough to allow CNN to do the shit they criticism Al Jazeera for doing
>>363383
Dumb weebfuck
>>363557
>that celebrity tabloid garbage
Jesus fucking Christ, do these mouth breathers really browse here?
>>364149
I think it was being done by someone who was purposely trying to sabotage the board, or a really horrible troll. Mods deleted those threads at least.
>>363377
RT is literally as credible as Dailymail is
>>363387
Just because something isn't a blog site doesn't mean it's a credible news site. RT is literally Russian government controlled and funded propaganda. At least sites like Breitbart and Daily Kos are, to my knowledge, independent. I'd rather have those allowed than RT. And from what I've seen, those sites don't have an insufferable fanbase of Putin cocksuckers who are so up their ass over hating how things are done in the West that they're willing to bend over backwards to a literal foreign authoritarian dictator just because he also ostensibly opposes the West. Literally the useful idiots of our time.
>>364205
Put "Israel" in the place of Russian and "Bibi" in place on Putin in your paragraph and you have described Breitbart.
>>363370
And yet there are 2 breibart threads up on the frontpage right now.
Those obvious shit for sites need to be autobanned to not even allow you to post that comment just like with twitch.
>>363557
Literally cancer: the board
>>364220
It would be better if there was a 4chan approved archive site through which all stories had to be posted
