>>345742
I would still post about celebs and ecelebs in the regular boards.

I dont want to post about them in a containment board, thats gay.

>>345744
they'd be banned from regular boards, like generals moved to /vg/

>>345742

No, just make celeb posting within the rules for each board.

/v/ has had AVGN and Spoony threads for nearly a decade. It has had twitter threads since Phil Fish's first meltdown in 2011. /tv/ should have celeb threads since it's the board about freaking actors and celebrities.

A celeb board won't solve anything. People want to discuss them at their board. /v/irgins don't make Game Grump threads on /k/. /tv/fags don't make Kardashian threads on /o/.

>>345749
That seems like a lot of unnecessary work for the enforcement staff. Maybe you could just learn to cope instead since it's on-topic

>>345742

Not good enough. We also need a containment board for the containment board. /cf/ - Celebrity Feet

>go to /tv/
>make thread about an actress
>post pictures of said actress
>50/50 chance the thread gets deleted

I don't understand.

1. /tv/ is the board for television and film. Television and film stars actors and actresses ergo discussing them is par the course.
2. The moderation is across the board. Sometimes a thread is untouched, sometimes it's deleted immediately which is very confusing.

I'd just like to say that last time I visited /hr/ I had to hide more than half of all the threads on there, almost all of them celebrity threads. I've always gone to /hr/ primarily for high quality pictures of various aspects of culture from before the internet, not clippings from the latest Hollywood gossip magazines.

>>345897
>high quality pictures of various aspects of culture from before the internet
lol, /hr/ has NEVER been about HQ pics from the 50s and before.

>>345767
Because most 'actress' threads are a smokescreen for circle jerk about your disgusting fetishes. That's why they get deleted all the time.

>>345742
Birds?