>Replying to a thread stating that you've reported or "saged" it, or another post, is also not allowed.
Why is this a thing? Aren't there ever threads that deserve people shouting SAGE and REPORT repeatedly? It seems like an outdated legacy rule from the /b/ spam years that could go away.
>>330376
without the rule they'd be used like downvotes or little pissant threats people would use to win arguments
>>330379
Call me naive if you want but I guess I've only ever seen people say things like "REPORTED" if it actually deserved it.
>>330379
>win arguments
There's no winning here; we've all already lost.
>>330383
The don't even use sage when they reply. It just bumps the thread, witch brings more replies.
If they were actually smart, they'd just report and hide.
>>330376
Maybe you should not create so many awful and board unrealted threads.
>>330376
>Aren't there ever threads that deserve people shouting SAGE and REPORT repeatedly?
...No? Spam is fucking stupid. It's a good rule because it teaches idiots to keep their mouths shut when they have nothing of value to say.
>>330480
>Spam is fucking stupid
This seems like a good reason for people to announce sage and report to be honest.
>>330383
Perhaps you were on boards where it wasn't much of a problem. On others, it was.
>>330924
Sure. Being fucking stupid is a good reason for people to announce sage and report. And then get banned.
>>330379
>Winning on 4chan.
>>331344
What board were you on when it was ever a problem?
