Can we rename /soc/ to "White Knight Central"?
Seriously that whole board makes me ashamed to be male
it's full of thirsty faggots trying to contactfag these ugly/average girls.
>>291461
>Can we rename /soc/ to "White Knight Central"?
Make this thread again right before April Fools Day.
>>291461
What the fuck. Literally nobody is going to get hooked up through /soc/, and I can think of nothing bad that would happen if we nuked the board. It seems to just attract snapchat using normies and other undesirables.
Why are you even reading the text there?
The only thing I wish they would change is to turn on an /r9k/ bot for the images only, to weed out the fuckheads posting reaction images. Better yet, don't mute or block them, just give them a non-original-image CSS class so everyone else can hide them.
>>291461
It would make more sense to have a general rule added to the rules that if you reveal your gender to be female, your IP should be permabanned.
How long is it going to take normalfags to comprehend this: women have no place online. Tits or GTFO exists for a reason. Every single male orientated space women infest becomes corrupted. It happened to the pubs of the western world, it happened to every previously "unpopular" male hobby, and it turned the internet into a social media shithole.
/soc/ shouldn't exist at all.
Every single board that didn't stem from anime-random should never have fucking been made. There are countless sites for normalscum and their shitty hobbies. They don't belong here. This board shouldn't exist either because the "no complaining about moderation" rule ought be abolished. 4chan is no longer a tiny site run by a group of faggot goons from Something Awful.
>>291588
>It would make more sense to have a general rule added to the rules that if you reveal your gender to be female, your IP should be permabanned.
Make it gender neutral, the male attention whores are even worse.
>>291589
There is no such thing as a "male attention whore" when women aren't present, you fucking idiot.
The internet is a male space. Deal with it.
>>291593
>There is no such thing as a "male attention whore
You've obviously never met a twink.
>>291593
>There is no such thing as a "male attention whore" when women aren't present, you fucking idiot.
Oh how little he knows...
>>291597
sorry for involuntary tripfaggotry
But it's quite ironic
>>291594
>You've obviously never met a twink.
Can you hook us up with one?
Also OP is jelly no one likes his/her/whatever body and face pics he/she/whatever posted.
