Really forces cognitive function.
uuuuuh...
really demands thought
>>81489467
Lol
>>81489467
This really makes me think....
>>81489467
>no shit you think the media just started covering all of this out of no where
>youre actually falling for their bait because you are accepting the narrative they want you to think. Its fucking obvious us administration and media want you to think this, so they make it real
>>81489700
>that flat line
>those digits
>>81489467
>Mass shooting by President
kek, Obama's really good with a gun huh?
>>81489700
it really did flatline. Is there any going back?
>>81489467
Chart coincides well with factory displacement to China.
Bring back factory jobs, mass shootings drop.
>>81489700
this is fucking autism.
but i am now actually concerned.
keep me posted
>>81489700
Anybody got a tldr on everything FBI anon said?
>>81489700
This "graph" is 100% subjective.
>>81491568
All data came straight from major events on wikipedia (worldwide and america)
I simply filtered out bullshit like "usa decided LA will be 2024 olympics" etc. and very minor happenings like a single car explosion in Iran
>>81489467
Just a coincidence.
>>81491886
Subjective in terms of what is considered a "happening".
>>81491487
He said that it's basically a part of the FBI vs everyone else in the US government. That Hillary's emails are only top of the iceberg, and the Clinton foundation is involved in everything shit that happened in the world in the past 10 years, and also, child trafficing. Furthermore, he said that the FBI found things about the US' operations both home and abroad that if were released to the public, would incite a revolution at best, and a world war at worst.
>>81489700
>FBI anon said flynn VP
What has FBI anon CORRECTLY called?
>>81492097
>subjective
Like I said, I was careful with the happenings. I only discriminated based on what obviously was too small or unrelated. I didn't just pull ones I remembered, I used EVERY happening notable for wikipedia
>>81489700
This chart is absolutely stupid and shows how gullible /pol/ is.
Putting something into a chart does not make it suddenly authoritative. Quantifying "days since last happening" is also flawed since it's most of these are arguably not a "happening" and some of them are ongoing yet count as a single instance of "happening". It seems like it should be "days since the last event that /pol/ actively discussed" which itself is flawed as a metric of "happenings".
>>81489700
can I pick these cherries?
>>81492287
Doesn't matter how careful you were, dimwit. Its still extremely open to personal bias.
>>81492142
Wasn't Bush Sr. from the CIA? Pretty sure FBI is just one of many underling spook shops now under the umbrella spook corp DHS. An FBI guy wouldn't see out of his compartmentalized hierarchical box. Many of these shootups look like classic black ops. Especially Sandy Hook.
>>81491487
it be bad
>>81492543
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_in_the_United_States
Feel free to find happenings I "biased" against then Britbong. I'll gladly add them.
>>81489467
The spikes dont even math with the severity of the events.
http://www.snopes.com/mass-shootings-obama/
Check your sources fags
>>81492290
you talk like a faggot. Maybe an Asian faggot. Am I 100% right or just 50% right?
