Aren't we exactly the same as these retarded BLM niggers when we advocate the removal of all muslims?
I mean of course we're not wrong, but that poses an interesting situation. Isn't it hypocritical if we condemn the BLM niggers for being savages because they're killing white cops when we want the same for mudslimes?
No, those two desires are barely comparable.
>>81467995
Expecting logic and critical thinking on 4chan is like expecting civilization in the jungle.
You won't find it there.
Yes because intent and values don't matter at all, only an approximate visual similarity which allows you to paint yourself as above everyone.
Moral equivalence is for fifteen year olds. Principles matter.
>>81467995
>white cops vs muslims
One of these things is good, one isn't. That's the difference.
>>81467995
There is nothing wrong or "hypocritical" for fighting for your own interests. That's liberal double-thinking.
Also, the fact niggers and mudslimes are fighting for their own interests doesn't make us friends or anything, especially, because their interests are completely detrimental to the interests of white people.
More whites are killed by police than blacks.
Everyone has to follow the same law.
>>81469287
Explain how it's double think?
>>81469174
Yes but try to see it from their point of view.
In their eyes, the white cops are a killing "their people" by the dozens, so they must kill them in defense/retaliation.
Maybe their actions are justifiable from their own point of view.
However, that means they are fundamentally opposed to white people and are a threat to us, along with muslims.
Guess we're gonna have a hell of a time defending ourselves from all these degenerate savages.
>>81467995
Opposing radicals doesn't make you radical.
>>81469577
Isn't it obvious?
Minorities fighting for their own interests is fair and right, while white people fighting for their interests are bigots and literally satan.
>>81469896
But what about radically opposing them?
Killing all muzzies seems pretty radical to me.
>>81467995
you are trapped in the good vs bad dichotomy.
Muslims have another dichotomy: forbidden or commanded.
You should use the dichotomy of our interest vs not in our interest.
>>81467995
Muslims fuck children, hate gays, hate women and hate non-muslims in general.
Some edgelords on this board might agree with at least one or two of those but then consider that they also hate pork, hate dogs and hate alcohol.
On the other hand the police is not an ideology, it does not advocate a specific line of thinking and it does not outright threaten those that aren't the police add to this that the deathtoll of the police is much, much lower than the deathtoll of Muslims.
So yes, you are being an idiot.
>>81469781
They live an imaginary world.
They actually believe that cops are just out there hunting niggers to dome for fun.
>>81467995
No we're not, since we want the removal of foreign elements.
>>81467995
No because we're white
>>81467995
You can't logic your way through /pol/. That's a good thing, keeps us from being seen as serious threats.
>>81467995
No, niggers want to kill us because they want us gone(funny enough if we're gone they won't have anything because we make it all)
We want to remove kebab because they're actively trying to wipe us out and take over our lands.
>>81467995
That's kind of like saying you're hypocritical for being against murder if you support the use of deadly force in self-defense. Context is everything.
>>81467995
No it's hypocritical to condemn France concert murders when you guys want to do the same thing to those people.
>eagles of Death metal
>not degenerates
>>81470009
It isn't when you look up just how many of them want Sharia
Then it looks like you're doing the world a favor
Of course though it'll be America who does it because just like the last two times you Europeans will pussy out on the genocide and allow them to continue to exist and hen future generations will have to go through this shit all over again.
Font worry lad, we will do what has to be done
It's pretty obvious, when discussing blacks or Muslims, that people on this site have difficulty understanding that a small portion of a large group aren't necessarily representative of the whole group.
I mean really the only thing to ponder about is how much the majority of the group are willing to restrain the extremists/radicals. It seems like, generally, they'd rather just not be involved in them, insomuch as they put no effort into even attempting to control them. They likely agree with the sentiment, but not the methods.
>>81470921
Looking forward to it ameribro, although I doubt it will be in the next 4 years with shillary as president
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8fy_LPhpPA4
>>81470387
>implying illogical idiots aren't the most dangerous threats of them all
Then again we're white so it's okay.
>>81470043
>hate gays, hate women, hate liqued jew
>implying this is bad
>implying this makes you an edgelord
>>81472025
Don't bother. A lot of these /pol/ fags don't even realize the amount of cognitive dissonance they have
>muslims beheading whites
cruel, barbaric
>muslims in the west need to be forcibly removed and executed
totally fine.
See the problem.
>>81472440
Well the question rises, is this cognitive dissonance a bad thing?
>>81472604
Yeah. Unless you can justify it. You could say all muslims are inherently bad, but Muslim Americans are among the highest earning and most educated group in America. It might be different in Europe.
>>81472604
The biggest cognitive dissonance I see with /pol/ is that they will take a dumb violent white over a smart peaceful muslim/black/jew/mexican/non-white just because they are white. Which is pretty dumb.
