>In a landmark ruling in June the Supreme Court of Canada has declared that non-penetrative sexual acts involving animals are legal
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/bestiality-supreme-court-canada-1.3624312
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/bestiality-legal-canada-supreme-court-a7073196.html
http://www.christianpost.com/news/canada-legalizes-most-sex-acts-with-animals-165053/
I have some questions for any Canucks on /pol/:
>How big was popular support for this decision?
>Has daily life in Canada changed much?
>>81349386
First I'm hearing about it, what the fuck is wrong with us
>>81349386
>legal loophole torn by a turbo-Jew counts as legislation
Already paperwork coming down the pipe to correct it. Long story short, child molester with sex dungeon pays turbo Jew shekels to shorten sentence as much as possible.
>>81349883
Canada noooo
Holy shit what have they done to you?
>Jun 09
It's the current month, come on.
>>81350237
>>81349883
The supreme court decision means of course that it has always been legal strictly speaking, but a definitive ruling surely makes it clear and sets precedence.
Are Canadians now open about their intimate relations with non-human animals, or is the culture just not there yet?
Also:
>Does it count just for you own pet, or are all pets now legal game?
>>81350372
Trudeau has good taste in retrievers.
>>81350637
>has always been legal
Only in modern corrupt culture that uses the letter of the law, then the spirit.
And like I said, it's going to be corrected.
>>81352027
Can you link to any information about the upcoming change?
>>81352027
Is it likely that Canadians will accept their sexual liberties being infringed upon in that way?
What will Canadians (Humans and animals) feel about a return to such old fashioned (for Canada), pre-modern legislation?
Is the attitude in Canada now, generally one of triumph and relief?
>>81352533
https://nerskine-smith.liberal.ca/news-nouvelles/media-availability-private-members-bill-announcement-toronto-humane-society/?utm_source=Media+Contacts&utm_campaign=4691c7c22b-Statement_on_DLW_bestiality_SCC_decision6_8_2016&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_9a65b90f6d-4691c7c22b-132632809
>>81350951
what's so special about that one?
>>81353254
Thank you. Are you SURE the bestiality law is one of the loopholes this law would close, though?
>>81353980
It was brought up precisely because of this ruling.
>>81355134
So the shark-finning and cat-skinning, that's just to make it easier to swallow?
The west is Sodom and Gamorah
