When we invaded Iraq in the early 2000s, since then, has there ever been any shred or link between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden and Al Queda?
>>81054110
that's not why we invaded
No and that's not the reason we invaded.
Who cares.
>>81054354
>>81054421
This. The Iraq war wasn't a failure.
>>81054421
Jewing aside, what was the real reason then? People say WMDs but a whole bunch of other countries have those so why not invade them?
>>81054840
>The Iraq war wasn't a failure.
>>81054354
>>81054840
>actual neocuck apologists
HAHAHAHAHA
>inb4 you call me a "goddamn librul democrat"
>>81054840
But it was a huge disaster for the reagion and now it's spilling out into Europe. Sure the mission was accomplished but we burned down the whole neighborhood to swat a fly.
>>81054998
They control a lot of oil. They didn't play geopolitical ball with anyone, and the Saudis (whose oil we also need) were shitting their pants about them. In short: to secure stability in the oil market
>>81054998
Because when we kicked saddam's ass in '91 we allowed him to stay in power under very specific conditions that included, among other things, the right to inspect his military's arsenal whenever we pleased. He stopped allowing the inspector's access in 1998 and became more and more sketchy about the proposed inspections until tensions boiled over in 2003.
>>81055027
>Clean Break goes as planned, Israel is more secure than ever
>Halliburton makes loadsamoney
>muslims are now killing each other at exponential rates
Mission accomplished
>>81055176
I'm just explaining why it was a success, I never supported it, regardless of the aims.
>>81055279
Europe is collateral damage. As long as Israel and corporate interests remain secure, nothing else matters.
