Rand Paul VP
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: Rand Paul VP
Rand Paul VP
Source pls?
>>80918602
Shutup.
He's going to chose David Duke and you know it.
>>80921285
*choose
>>80921285
David Duke is clinically retarded. I'm surprised he can read
>>80918602
Lambright is to be Trumps VP
>>80921425
Lol, nigger detected.
>>80921425
sick burn
They hate each other, dont they?
>>80924765
Also, im pretty sure he'd support gary johnson if he gets 15%
>>80919709
HAPPENING
CONFIRMED
>>80924765
no
>>80919709
Yeah and Rand shit all over Trump during the imte of the debates trying to earn brownie points from the Jews. And he got BTFO. We could have had 16 years of Trump/Paul but Rand had to be a cunt.
>>80919709
>>80918602
>(pic related)
>>80925184
Gary johnson is a democrat in disguise
no one with any understanding of libertarian principals would vote for someone who says the NAP "goes over their head" and supports wage controls, anti-discrimination laws, and plenty of other totally coutner to liberatrian beleifs.
The libertarian party has been hijacked by leftists and gary johnson is the product of that.
>>80930312
You're a fucking idiot if you think people are voting Gary Johnson ""to get him into the White House""
Smarten the fk up, you braindead shit
>>80930468
Nice strawman idiot
Advocating for corrupt lefty fucked up "Libertarianism" helps no one and only makes her harder to actually spread good ideas.
The NAP is essential to it, easy to understand, and gary doesn't talk about it because it contradicts all the crazy leftist shit he likes.
>>80930702
It's not a strawman, it's ad hominem. Please see the /pol/ sticky, summerfag.
People are voting Gary to get 3rd party representation. Weld is a boss if you have ever watched him past your macros and meme hearsay.
>>80930928
Strawman is you misrepresenting what I was saying and arguing against something I never said.
People are voting gary because cnn and other democrats are giving him attention to undermine the repulican party and trump.
he has 0 chance of succeeding
he will and only can have a NEGATIVE effect on spreading ration ideas about liberty
he is only spreading because the left is desperate
he is an unabashed leftist and anyone supporting him is actively undermining liberty not supporting it. The modern libertarian party has been hijacked by leftists and giving them more power won't help.
AGAIN
LIBERATION CANDIDATE
SAID THE NAP IS OVER HIS HEAD
YOU CAN'T MAKE THIS SHIT UP
leftist ploy to undermine trump, that's the only reason he is getting any attention.
>>80918602
>Sooooooo...
Redpill me, are we fucked up?
>>80918602
>2011
>>80931650
He. Is. Taking. More. Votes. From. Hillary. Than. Trump. You. Retard.
>>80932667
I think your keyboard is messed up on your phone
People who would vote hillary, not vote at all, or vote liberatiran are more liekly to just not vote at all or go for trump. Unless you have actual data backing your claim up your a nutty johnson shill
>>80932809
Nutty DNC shill*
>>80932809
It's common knowledge if you had any faculties at all for intuition, but here's the first thing I found (I'm not doing research for you pro bono):
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-is-gary-johnson-taking-more-support-from-clinton-or-trump/
>Johnson looks especially likely to peel votes from Clinton and Trump because he will probably achieve ballot access in all 50 states, which is unusual for a non-major-party candidate.
>>80933243
Footnote:
>The model also adjusts polls that don’t include Johnson, projecting what his vote “should” be in the state and taking votes away from Clinton, Trump and undecided and giving them to him. Where this occurs, the model takes an equal number of votes away from Clinton and Trump.
Shouldn’t the model be taking more votes away from Clinton, based on what I’ve written here? Maybe, but doing this would introduce a number of complications. For one thing, as I’ve mentioned, the extent to which third-party candidates are drawing votes from Clinton and Trump has shifted over time, and it will probably shift again. For another, it might vary from state to state; it’s plausible that third-party candidates hurt Clinton more in blue states but hurt Trump more in red states, for example. Finally, the polls-plus model (but not the polls-only model) assumes that the third-party vote will fade down the stretch run, and it gives some of the vote back to Clinton and Trump. If we program the model to take more votes away from Clinton when polls don’t include Johnson, should we also have it give more third-party votes back to Clinton when polls do include him, on the assumption that the third-party vote will decline?
>>80919709
>id: fag
>>80930928
>People are voting Gary to get 3rd party representation. Weld is a boss if you have ever watched him past your macros and meme hearsay.
T. Karl Rove
>>80921425
>Ph.D in History
>clinically retarded
LMFAO
