How does /pol/ justify this?
Can you honestly say that Islam is a violent religion? Just look at the facts.
>>80858502
The Koran is much smaller, only 80% of the size of the New Testament
>>80858502
Rapefugee say, Mohammad dirty camel rapist.
>>80858661
Well why does that matter
By not including the Old Testament, which is a kike book.
How do mudslimes justify this?
>>80858952
Do you even have a source for that?
>>80858502
How do I justify what?
This doesn't even mean anything lmao
If the bible or quran says "don't torture people" it's somehow an indictment according to you.
What are you sliding rabbi?
>>80858880
You are why everyone fucking hates us
But the Qur'an is the literal word of Allah.
The Bible is a work that's been translated over and over and over, it's original meaning obscured and it was never considered the direct word of god.
>>80858502
Yes I can honestly say that. There has been 40,000 terrorist attacks by Muslims over the last 10 years world wide. Fuck you Mo.
>>80858502
Do____ vs. Do Not _____
>Checkmate
>>80858880
More 'hard words' as a percentage of total.
Also: Reward as a 'good word'. Top lol.
Context is also important. The Qu'ran is a warlord's red book while the bible is merely a communist manifesto.
>>80858502
By pointing out that Islam teaches the Quran in Arabic is the perfect word of God, and translating it to English to compare it to a book originally written in Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek or whatever proves fuck all.
>>80859286
>The Qur'an* is a warlord's red book
Kek, you've obviously never read it.
Isn't the bible much longer than the Quran?
>>80859516
I think both testaments combined are like 10x the size of the Qur'an, if I recall correctly
>>80859515
It's literally a book that explains how people should live under his empire. He didn't even disguise the title of the belief and directly named it submission.
wtf i hate christianity now
>>80858502
Bible and OT have been around longer than Islam.
>>80858502
>A book that describes and condemns torture and violence twice as much as a second book that condones it is twice as bad.
>>80858502
"facts"
Besides whatever stands in the bible - christianity was reformed some centuries ago and all of the "kill x for y"-parts were declare invalid.
On a Percentage basis the Koran is far worse since it is literally one tenth the size of the bible.
>>80858502
>taking single words out of context
There's a difference between the sentence "the person who stores hate in their heart is walking in darkness" and "for the unbelievers a grievous chastisement awaits in the Fire therein shall they reside"
>>80858880
>Well why does that matter
I'll bite.
Account for 'hard words' per words in general and the Quran has far more than the OT. The NT has almost none in comparison.
Christianity is also a divisive and extreme ideology
Christ told us he didnt come to bring peace, but division. If our state honored God we would also be executing gays, adulterers as outlined in Leviticus
>But muh shellfish
All scripture is God breathed
Jesus specifically changed certain things in the new testament for pretty clear purposes, and left others
>>80858502
>>80862511
>Christianity is also a
Useful idiot leave.
>>80858502
Okay, now imagine if Christians didn't integrate into society and actually followed through on all the attack metaphors.
That's fundamental Islam.
>>80863797
Explain your case theologically
>>80858880
You can't be fucking serious, maple nigger.
>>80858502
>How does /pol/ justify this?
How many Christian attacks have you seen lately?
>>80858502
Strawman picture of the worst shelf.
>>80859216
Hahaha complete nonsense, it's been transliterated from the original manscript, so no it's meaning hasn't been obscured..
>muh qur'an is infallible.
Nope sorry. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91AM7665cbo Uthman burned a lot of different versions of the qu'ran because entire sections of it was lost, and put out his version of it. Entire chapters and verses were lost because muslims had forgotten them.
The bible is far better preserved. But you're not told that.
>>80864053
>Explain your case theologically
I know 4chan is just for shitposting, but I'll do a favour and explain it properly.
Imagine a theoretical new cult. They're called "Saving children". Saving children have a motto of breaking into homes and raping young girls and murdering young boys. That's what they do. How can you be against saving children?
'Religion of peace' is the exact same childish wordplay, and it's pretty sick to think that people would actually fall for it.
>>80864621
Where did I defend Islam? I'm only saying as it pertains to "aggressive language" in the Bible, there is indeed clear instruction to be "extreme"
>>80858880
>>80865234
>Where did I defend Islam?
What do you believe? If you're American it's likely either God, Equality, or Allah. Shit all over one ideology and you're promoting another by default.
