[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
ghosthustlers
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /pol/ - Politically Incorrect

Thread replies: 75
Thread images: 13
File: hahahah.png (555 KB, 1057x682) Image search: [Google]
hahahah.png
555 KB, 1057x682
HAHAHAHA Wow!
>>
>>80840202
more like ghostbusted, amirite?
>>
>>80840460
Booooo, get off the stage!
>>
>>80840202
doesn't count. Anyone can vote there. Probably downvoted by the same people who downvoted the trailers.
>>
>>80840629
aww, dagnabbitt!
>>
>>80840784
the IMDB is actually pretty accurate.
Movies below 8 are trash, so are shows below 9.
>>
>>80840881
I thought it was acceptable :3
>>
>>80841168
<insert loud obnoxious black humor noises>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMol4KdcyJ0
>>
>>80840202
(((PAUL FEIG)))
>>
>>80841819

>AW HEEEELL NAW
>>
>>80840784

Which is allowed
>>
>>80842147
>*violent exaggerated gestures*
>*moves head around*
>*idiotic facial expression*
Fucking niggers annoy me to no end.
>>
File: Southern Brazilian.jpg (136 KB, 620x794) Image search: [Google]
Southern Brazilian.jpg
136 KB, 620x794
>>80840202

IS IT A RACE THANG OR A WOMYN THANG???
>>
>>80840887

Actually a lot of decent movies that go against liberal ideology are rated really low. Some are legitimately bad even though /pol/ approved (angrybirds wasn't good, but I'm glad it was made). But some are actually decent. But because they go so heavily against lib ideology they're rated at 6-8 territory.

99% of the time you're correct though.
>>
File: image.jpg (68 KB, 715x594) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
68 KB, 715x594
>>80840202

SHEEEIIITTT
>>
File: as.png (16 KB, 359x393) Image search: [Google]
as.png
16 KB, 359x393
men are pigs. pic related

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1289401/ratings?ref_=tt_ov_rt
>>
>>80840887
>>80843603
>t. fat nerds
while you watching "some le epic 10/10 movies" your gf is getting fucked by big blak cock.
at least thats what i like to imagine.
>>
ugh gamergate much
>>
>>80840202
Suits them right for shitting all over ghostbusters. assholes.
>>
>>80844279
i'll never understand why they didn't just do a spin off

set it later, and be a new team, or be their fucking daughters and start their own if it has to be an all female one

lazy hollywood deserves to have a flop
>>
>>80840629
>Booooo
more spooky than the movie
10/10 bones, would rattle again
>>
File: WTFGB.jpg (78 KB, 751x312) Image search: [Google]
WTFGB.jpg
78 KB, 751x312
Prime example of how critics get paid under the table to promote a shit movie as good, and of course the website got paid huge for that fake ass 89% want to see bit..

I will never use rotten tomatoes for reviews again.
>>
>>80843908
>Femenazis trying hard to manipulate the score.

Ahahahahaha
>>
>>80843603
Angry birds was great, fuck you
>>
>>80844758

Isn't that what "gamer gate" taught us? And isn't that why the cunts tried so hard to spin it?
>>
>>80844758
The top critics have a much less favorable rating though.
>>
>>80845015
People today have the attention span of a fly and the memory of someone with alzheimer's. People jump on the wagon for the newest story, and in a week they are off to the next with little to no memory of the last one they all were on.

Same shit will work every time. People don't learn a thing..
>>
>>80845294
50% is still way too high. But Top critics have more of a reputation to protect. They've also watched WAY more movies than the average person and tend to be a lot more "critical" of any movie. The lower rungs of critics are much more easily swayed though.
>>
File: 6VjwWUo.jpg (25 KB, 700x420) Image search: [Google]
6VjwWUo.jpg
25 KB, 700x420
>>80843896
>>
>>80845759
Man that's creepy.
>>
>>80845759
we wuz ectoplamsa and shiet
>>
>>80840887
>movies below 8 are trash
>shows below 9 are trash
Holy shit, that's a shitty opinion if I've ever seen one.
>>
File: shig.jpg (54 KB, 620x388) Image search: [Google]
shig.jpg
54 KB, 620x388
WOMEN ARE FUNNY. PERIOD. END OF STORY. CASE CLOSED. DEAL WITH IT.
>>
>>80845759
Omg she looks exactly like slimer. It's uncanny.
>>
File: 49235395.jpg (91 KB, 400x400) Image search: [Google]
49235395.jpg
91 KB, 400x400
>>80843291
>>
>>80840887
>subjective ratings of film by plebs
>accuracy
Pick one
>>
I contacted the IMDb admins and told them to remove the early votes since the movie hasn't been released yet.
>>
>>80840887
>IMDB is actually pretty accurate.
No it isn't what the fuck? The Dark Knight Rises has a higher score than Heat. here are tons of cases like this.

IMDb has a recency bias.
>>
File: 1467655772843.jpg (26 KB, 368x475) Image search: [Google]
1467655772843.jpg
26 KB, 368x475
>>80843908
Lol men seem to be the only ones capable of objectively judging content. Stupid feminazi whores trying to boost the rating to justify their dumb ideology. You make me sick, take the blind fold off.
>>
>>80840887

>movies below 8 are trash

so either you're an idiot or the rating scale is fucking worthless
>>
>>80840887
>being this much of a fucking idiot
>>
>>80840202
you don't like my movie?
>>
>>80847535
Why the fuck can't it be both anon?
>>
>>80840887

IMDB ratings consistently have classic 80's and 90's movies hovering around 5-6 stars.
>>
File: under the skin.jpg (34 KB, 661x343) Image search: [Google]
under the skin.jpg
34 KB, 661x343
>>80840887

Bullshit. IMDB is trash.
>>
>>80843603
yes, backstrom was 9/10, but sjws fucked it up, because he made jokes about indians
>>
Almost TWO FUCKING HOURS long???
>>
>>80843291

Its a don't you dare remake Ghostbuster thang.
>>
>>80847535

He's right though. 2016 is projected to be the worst year grossing in film in America since the 1920s.

Nobody is going to movies anymore in America unless it has a 8+ imbd and 95% RT score.
>>
>>80840887

I'm giving you another (you) because that seems to be the trendy things nowadays.

btw ur an utter fucking nigger faggot kill urslef

Why does anyone even watch (((movies)))? it's like you want to brainwash yourself. Fucking normies on this board.
>>
>>80846217
kek
>>
>>80840887
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096256/?ref_=fn_al_tt_1

This is one of the greatest movies ever made and it's only rated 7.3.
>>
>>80847781
thats cause people rate them without nostalgia glasses on like you have
>>
>all the positive reviews openly expressing joy at the fact it is 'good' despite the 'gamergate' negative press

Gamergate literally achieved absolutely nothing.
>>
File: 6.2.png (353 KB, 697x789) Image search: [Google]
6.2.png
353 KB, 697x789
>>80848449
wat
>>
>>80848614

I legitimately enjoy those movies to this day. I can be the first to admit nostalgia glasses when it is a legitimate case. Main reason why I don't play old video games.
>>
>>80844072
Faggot
>>
File: 7.3.png (191 KB, 675x556) Image search: [Google]
7.3.png
191 KB, 675x556
>>80848952
>>
>>80844072
That's a double cuck if your get off by thinking another guy is getting off by getting cucked
>>
>>80840202
am i the only one that thinks an all female cast with an original script could have easily been a bad ass flick?

plus who really gives a fuck if they make a bad movie? ghostbusters was easily one of my favorites when i was a kid and i've got all the toys locked away somewhere to prove it but i still dont get it. if this movie is shit does that make the first ghostbusters shit too?

fucking i think 90% of this controversy is just manufactured by the hollywood jews.
>>
>>80850068
I don't mind an all female cast, but they have to look good.
>>
>>80843603
>looking for a documentary to watch while doing other shit, want to watch some bears kill some shit or something
>all of the documentaries on imdb's lists are literal leftist propaganda

>Where to Invade Next (2015 Documentary), To learn what the USA can learn from other nations, Michael Moore playfully "invades" them to see what they have to offer.

>The Hunting Ground (2015 Documentary), An exposé of rape crimes on U.S. college campuses, their institutional cover-ups, and the devastating toll they take on students and their families.
>>
>>80844758
I never use rotten tomatoes anymore, just trash. I mainly use IMDb, but you got a lot of autismos there too. I mainly look at the 10&1 one star reviews on new movies to get a feel.

Reviews on older and less popular movies tend to be better since you got less SHITPOSTERS
>>
what are some redpilled movies /pol/?
>>
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1B9Cs9F6Kme
>>
>>80847392
It's ridiculous, isn't the force awakens higher rated than both Jedi and a new hope? (forgot where empire is)
>>
>>80852125
Found out I am autistic, tfa is lower than all three. Still doesn't deserve anywhere near an 8.2.
>>
>>80844758
your just too stupid to understand their ratings systems
>>
>>80840460
>>80840629
Funnier than the movie at least
>>
>>80845568
Probably has a lot to do with the fact that Top critics probably are a lot less likely to accept bribes from Sony.
>>
>>80840784
>Anyone can vote there
Oh no!
>>
>>80850145
I am getting really fucking tired of the anti-beauty trend.

It started with Girls, then Orange is the New Black took it to a disturbing pornographic new level, now we get a Ghostbusters and it has no less than 2 dykes possibly 3 and the hottest woman there is a 42 year old. Next is Suicide Squad, where they had to cover a naturally beautiful woman in Margot Robbie with 60 pounds of scars and tats.

What's the Charlies Angels reboot gonna be, a bunch of paraplegics?
>>
>>80840202
Some days ago this shit got like 3.5
In a couple of months it will prob end up 5-6 after libtards start to upvote it
>>
>>80853627
First is more gays and lesbians. Then trannies, then it'll be mudslimes.
>>
>>80844758
>>80845568
There is a review embargo until the movie comes out, sony is only allowing people that pledge to give the movie a good review early screenings.
Thread replies: 75
Thread images: 13

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.