>be Canadian
>>80806760
Please tell me this is taken out of context.
>>80806832
No man, it is fucked. That is why people who have been in relationships for five years have separate apartments. One of the factors in high housing prices in Canada.
>>80807032
>relationship for five years
>still not married
That is absolute degeneracy.
this cant be true. Please tell me this isnt true
Quebec master race as usual.
Independence when
>>80806760
>>80807166
why is getting married such a big deal?
Canada could get worse under Trudeau. He's poised to limit gun laws even further, even though he's protected with dozens of armed guards. Protecting your family with a gun from a person attacking your family with a gun will soon be illegal under ALL circumstances. Enjoy your children, your spouse and yourself being killed.
>>80807741
It's not going to be a big problem in the east, there is not a lot of gun killing here. Don't really know about the west provinces.
>>80806760
last line in the small print:
Quebec doesn't give a fuck about this stupid shit
Based as always
>>80806832
I just looked it up, cohabitation with a spouse for 12 months constitutes a common law marriage in canada.
>>80808001
not in Quebec however
>>80807827
Harper just added self defence laws a few years ago, called 'Castle Law", in which you can protect yourself, your home, your property and your family. Two events caused this, a convenience store owner that restrained a robber and a guy that had his home fire bombed and he shot a warning shot in the air. Both of these cases resulted in charges of the people protecting their places.
>>80806760
That infographic is incorrect. Common-law for immigration purposes is separate than common-law for tax purposes, and separate than common-law for spousal purposes.
True, common-law is after 1 year for immigration purposes, but that is only if you want to sponsor somebody.
Common law for spousal support in Ontario is 3 years, and even then there are no property rights.
>>80808412
>>80808121
Indeed, Quebec has civil law as opposed to Common law in the rest of Canada.
>>80808001
Really does vary province to province.
Ontario is three years with no kid and one year with a kid.
>>80808592
If a man is beating the shit out of a woman, why the fuck would i care if she retaliated against him and killed him?
>>80807827
There is literally no gun crime out West but Turdeau is probably going to make a big fuss because he is a cuck and hates people.
cant you just get married with a prenup that states she gets nothing if she divorces you for reasons other than proven abuse or infidelity?
>>80808932
>"Why did you kill him"
>"B-because he was so m-mean and raped me every day for 20 years."
Are you literally that retarded? Allowing women to kill someone and then invent some excuses.
>>80807944
>Based as always
is quebec normally the most based or what?
>>80809237
Judges throw out prenups all the time. All the woman has to say is that it was unfair or made under duress and you're fucked.
>>80809237
get off your phone faggot
>>80808592
This one isn't that bad, but it sets up the question of whether a spouse would be able to kill a husband and then simply say "he was battering me".
So long as the burden was on the spouse to prove it was battering, and she made attempts to leave the situation or inform authorities, I can get behind it.
>>80809316
How common is that scenario? not every women is Mary Winkler.
>>80807703
jesus
>>80807827
It's completely a non-issue.
If you combine shotguns and rifles though we actually have a higher homicide rate per population than the USA has with just rifles. A bit funny when you look at how small the number is.
>>80810747
Yeah maybe I actually want to protect my finances yanqui.
>>80810825
I am sure it as nothing to do with Canada's 3% Black population vs the United States 13% Black population.
>>80806760
>affair can make you common law spouse
>divorced for cheating
>wife takes half
>mistress takes half of your half
Kek
>>80811469
Oh it's ridiculous. The black population is over 50% of all USA homicides. How that can get covered up so well is bizarre.
>>80807526
I'm sure he will have no issue "maintaining the children's lifestyle," so long as the kids are in his care.
In my opinion, you don't get to quit your job, and continue to get paid in perpetuity.
>>80806760
>literally just say youre co-habiting with a friend
thank god VR has arrived
>>80811880
If this friend is a "female" friend, then your fucked.
>>80807166
It's 2016, leaf. A wife and family is the worst investment you can make. Women have shit for brains and usually bring nothing of value to the household then demand a 50/50 split (more if you were dumb enough to give her children).
>>80807526
sounds like the only sane option is putting a bullet in the 3 kids and wife's heads.
>>80812072
The only woman I've ever trusted is the one who went homeless with me through a brutal winter. She had other options, but, since they weren't extended to me, she stayed with me, living in a car, surviving off ramen noodles and truck stop showers for 6 months.
I trust her, but she's the exception, not the rule. Married her 5 years ago.
>>80812072
33 years from now I wonder what the world will look like.
If we still have one by then.
>>80812239
Ever shoot a shotgun full of bird shot at a pie plate? While the majority of the pellets hit the tin, you'll have a few strays that go flying by it. Congrats on a stray.
>>80812438
I don't understand the analogy, but thanks. I was completely set on being a bachelor for life until meeting her, and, even now, she is the only one I would ever consider marrying. She was also a virgin until I proposed, which is nice.
>>80812412
I'm just being honest. Don't believe me? No troubles, prove me wrong. Go get married and have a few kids. When you're living in a shit apartment after she took the house and your kids hate you but still have the courts order you to pay for their college, I want you to think back at this.
>>80812719
I was trying to say that my post was a generalization. They're will always be a few that don't fall into the group. Sounds like you got a good one.
>>80812722
Correct. Women naturally crave stuff, the same way men crave sex. The only difference is that the state enables one addiction, while all but outright criminalizing the other.
Lel canada is meme tier
Also wont last long, feminism is dying so fucking fast because the left agenda is focusing on race issues again which of course leads to uprsising of the right where PC culture dies again and were back to the fifties before everything resets back to women.
>>80808592
I believe you should be able to kill a cheating spouse. So I support this.
>>80806760
It's not just a canadian thing.
Jesus titty fucking christ. Your government is literally forcing you to get cucked and pay for some bitch you aren't even married to.
Once Trump wins we need to annex you to save you from your cucked white guilt government.
>>80812239
Ever read about the Decembrist wives in Russia? Their husbands were exiled to Siberia by the ruling class for dissent. The wives left comfort and luxury for cold and hardship. They stood by their husbands through every challenge and the Decembrists went on to bring life, knowledge and culture to Siberia.
She sounds like a keeper anon
>>80812722
No I agree with you.
I just imagine myself old, sitting on a generic park bench thinking back to how it all USED to be. I'm pretty sure the world is just gonna get nuked by then.
>>80806832
Yes it's out of context.
It's different time periods for each province for one. In Alberta you need at least 2 years to be considered common-law for example. Also you need to generally file your taxes together or apply for common-law/civil union for it to go into effect.
In the court codependency needs to be established since they are all synonymous in Canada. Codependency = civil union = common-law here. So say you and your girlfriend are on eachothers insurance slips, that would imply codependency and possibly that you are in a common-law relationship. For just general roommates that never really share finances, insurance, loans, etc. it will be very hard to prove codependency and the laws regarding common-law relationships will very rarely, if ever, apply.
The OP image is a massive overexaggeration and generally none of it applies to the real world and it's just people freaking out over nothing.
How does alimony exist in a time when women are allowed to work and support themselves? It's not like women are dependent upon men. How the fuck does this still exist?
>>80813656
>The OP image is a massive overexaggeration
Feminist who wants to protect feminist laws detected.
>generally none of it applies to the real world
Sure, buddy, then why do these laws exist if their impact is nearly none.
>>80813656
>How does alimony exist
Because pic.
>>80810367
Very common, including false rape allegations
>>80813873
The laws do have impact, but they impact people that are in common-law relationships. You don't just magically enter a common-law relationship against your will. You most likely did paperwork to get there.
Common-law partners often share insurance since you get it discounted, you get the same tax benefits as married couples, and you get the same mortgage/loan benefits as married couples as well.
I assure you, if you are in a common-law relationship you would definitely know it, unless of course you suffer amnesia, alzheimer's, dementia, etc.
>>80810367
>How common is that scenario
Too common. Women will use every law as soon as they can to harm men.
>>80811660
Nope.
>>80813087
When you people are stuck dealing with this shit, Sharia law suddenly starts to make sense.
Now that's something I never thought I'd be saying.
>>80806760
You faggots are trusting a bullshit infographic more than your own ability to google.
>>80814061
>You most likely did paperwork to get there.
In that case why not just get married?
>>80809364
No Quebec is a bunch of socialist french turds who whine and cry for welfare while bitching and moaning about how much they hate Canada.
If we didn't already have the natives they'd be the niggers of Canada. "Sa cre bleu we need more money for le programs. Stupid English have no culture!"
>>80813730
And if women are equal to men, shouldn't men get alimony, custody and child support at least some of the time? What makes women so special that they deserve those benefits if they're equal to men and don't need to be propped up?
I think feminists hate themselves and other women far more than anyone on here does. They put on a girl power image, but self-respecting people don't need or want handouts and privileges.
>>80806760
Why is Quebec so based?
>>80814213
Yeah but the vicious mudslimes that accommodate it are a completely different story. Genital mutilation for both boys and women are done for anti degeneracy reasons/too stupid to think but the mudslimes themselves are still degenerates. Regenerate your foreskin by donating to foregen!
>>80813524
the US has Common Law marriage too.
>>80814431
Marriage takes more paperwork and legally they do require you to have a ceremony (at least in Alberta they force you to do one) which means you have to find a commissioner and two witnesses and do all the paperwork even if you don't want a formal ceremony. It's a waste of time and money since common-law/civil unions are equivalent to marriage here.
You can also go the registry office and declare yourself in a civil union any time you want, even if you haven't been living together for 2 years or whatever it is where you live. You just let them know and sign the papers and you're good to go. Cheaper than marriage (I believe it's free actually) and no ceremony requirement.
This basically only applied to meth heads and natives
>>80814061
>You don't just magically enter a common-law relationship against your will.
"you will be considered a spouse for spousal support purposes if you and your partner have cohabited for three years"
Stop trying to push false information. Canada is a feminist shithole and should be named as such.
http://www.commonlawrelationships.ca/ontario/
>>80813585
Imagine the kids of today and tomorrow. They will grow up thinking this world we live in is normal. At this rate it's all they'll ever know.
>>80814218
Everything in that graphic is correct.
>>80814941
Men are waking up. And women will lose their leverage when vr sex/fembots are everywhere.
>>80814811
That doesn't hold up in court anyway
https://www.educaloi.qc.ca/en/capsules/common-law-couples-making-life-together-without-being-married
>They don't benefit from the protection of the family residence if ownership of the home or the apartment lease is in the name of one person only.
>They don't have a right to a division of their property if they separate.
>They don't have a right to a "compensatory allowance" for work done by one person that benefited the other person while they were together.
>One partner can't ask for support payments from the other partner (financial support for one person in the couple who might need it).
>The partners don't inherit from each other if one dies without a will or if one was not named as an heir in the will.
Also
>Common-law couples can use a contract to agree on various aspects of their life as a couple while they are living together.
>A man dies without a will. His common-law partner doesn't inherit anything.
>>80807526
A hitman would be considerably less expensive.
>>80814941
Shit, I am 18 and this shit is terrifying. Being aware and seeing this happen right before my eyes is truly a surreal experience.
>>80813087
>I believe you should be able to kill a cheating spouse. So I support this.
Yeah, nah. Cheating is definitely shitty but not death penalty shitty. I do, however, believe the cheating spouse should get diminished or even zero compensation/rights during the divorce.
You cheated? You get zero shared marital assets. You also don't get custody of the children. Etc.
>>80815307
>https://www.educaloi.qc.ca/en/capsules
Quebec, you retard!!! As mentioned in OP's pic only Quebec doesn't have this.
>>80811660
Did you miss the part about presenting yourself as a couple in public?
