Haters destroyed. What now virgins?
>>80694371
This movie "success" will fade in the wind in about one week, 2 tops, specially if this BLM shit keeps going, why did it even mattered in the first place
Remember when they remade The Thing with a female protagonist and people immediately forgot about it?
Remember when they remade Evil Dead with a female protagonist and people immediately forgot about it?
Remember when they remade Total Recall with an Irish manlet protagonist and people immediately forgot about it?
Remember when they remade Robocop and people immediately forgot about it?
Wtf I hate trump now
If they really wrote that then the NYT's journalistic standards truly are shipping
>tfw my dad decided that we didn't need to have two newspapers and wanted to cancel the WSJ because the NYT does "in-depth stories"
>>80694371
if that's true they wouldn't have to explicitly state it.
>>80694934
But the Evil Dead remake was pretty legit.
Definitely not an Evil Dead movie but a pretty solid effort, esp. by modern horror standards.
>>80694371
what do you mean destroyed?
it has a 3.5/10 on IMDB from pre-release viewers
the movie is pure dogshit even before release
but of course, you would believe the Jew York Times
>>80694934
>Remember when they remade Evil Dead
they remade evil dead?
>>80694371
>Having to use the words 'sexism' and 'misogyny' in a review for a film where the main themes of the movie are neither sexism, nor misogyny.
You're not reviewing the film, you're virtue signalling.
>>80695394
Exactly
>>80694934
>shit talking based collin
nigga never saw miami vice
>>80695394
They are making army of darkness 2 also
>>80695493
>people immediately forgot about it
>>80694934
>Remember when they remade The Thing with a female protagonist and people immediately forgot about it?
>Remember when they remade Evil Dead with a female protagonist and people immediately forgot about it?
>Remember when they remade Total Recall with an Irish manlet protagonist and people immediately forgot about it?
>Remember when they remade Robocop and people immediately forgot about it?
The Thing was a poor mockery of a classic movie.
Evil Dead was alright.
Total Recall was eh.
Robocop was absolute garbage. Wigger robocop? Really?
But women aren't funny
>>80694371
Well fuck I'm a #cruzmissle now.
Seriously though those fucking nigger lips, jesus christ america.
>>80694371
I feel for that brunette...
>>80695624
This.
They are only funny when imitating male humor, and they rarely imitate it well.
>>80694371
>women are funny
more so when we're laughing at women, not with them. The average woman, and man for the most part, has a bland as fuck sense of humor. Women are funny in the sense that you laugh at them when they mess things up
>>80694371
>3.7 on IMDB
LMAO
>>80694934
>Remade evil dead but with female
Dude, wat?
>>80694371
If women are so funny how come they never come up with their own comedy ideas? Its like every time a male comedy succeeds there is a female version of it 2 years later. The Hangover came out, then Brides Maids came out. Workaholics came out, then Broad City came out. Step Brothers came out then Sisters came out.
>>80695595
When i saw total recall (2012) in the TPB top movie list was the first time i said JUST WHY? in real life.
What a fucking unneeded pos remake
FROG OFF WITH YOUR PROPAGANDA PIECE OF SHIT
>>80694371
>06/20/16 New 4chan Banner Contest with a chance to win a 4chan Pass! See the contest page for details.
>05/08/16 Janitor acceptance emails will be sent out over the coming weeks. Make sure to check your spam box!
>04/28/16 New trial board added: /qst/ - Quests
>[Hide] [Show All]
>Please support 4chan by disabling your ad blocker on *.4chan.org/*, purchasing a self-serve ad, or buying a 4chan Pass.
I guess america is entering an era where the media aggressively lies about every single thing and websites censor and edit and shadowban. Good. You all deserve, your children deserve.
>>80695624
No they're not, unless they're working with a funny guy. This movie is PC Femnazism 3.0, though. Ugly hambest and sheboon might get laffs for being so ugly, I guess.
>women
>funny
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I7izJggqCoA
>>80694371
>Women are funny.
When they try to be funny, no.
>>80694371
> women are funny
Christopher Hitchens already dealt with this. Not an argument.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8S692f1tnuQ
>>80695975
>black men
>infront of their babies
haha good joke
>>80695975
>Black dads being around their offspring.
I like to play pretend, too.
>>80696059
>>80696086
I watched that video and I think it was a fairly poor argument on his part. He also couldn't stop mumbling and slurring.
To be honest I only ever liked the original because it was a bill Murray movie. I found the actual plot line kind of lackluster which is why the sequel fucking sucked since it had nothing to go on. This is just another sequel so who cares. I don't rush out to watch sequels and I don't really care about the feminist themes or all the severe butt hurt it causes which is actually kind of lulzy, it's a sequel to a sequel that got horrible reviews. The drama around this is probably more entertaining then the movie.
>>80695975
More like "White people are afraid of being jailed after shooting a black man mugger"
K, keep me posted
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0d2bRaFcCb4
Really makes you think...
>>80696196
Bill Murray is a natural, it seems.
Almost always cracks me up.
>>80694934
I still like that Evil dead movie
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-Pvk70Gx6c
>>80694934
Remember when they remade Spoorloos and everyone forgot about it?
>>80695595
>The Thing was a poor mockery of a classic movie.
Indeed. It was absolute shit. I hope its not considered canon. The mystery of that base was way spookier than what that shit movie actually portrayed.
>>80694371
Richard Roeper (you know, heir to Roger Ebert and America's most famous critic?) put up his review and he tore it to shreds. Called it one of the worst movies of the year. I mean Gigli bad. Razzie top contender.
Some choice quotes:
>a horrifying mess
>raggedy-looking, thuddingly unfunny, [and] utterly unnecessary
>bad acting...very little chemistry
>McKinnon absolutely butchers her performance
>The special effects...are so mediocre...a nod to the relatively crude effects of 1984
>Uninspired directing, editing, cinematography and music.
>one of the most forgettable villains of any movie I’ve ever seen
>A terrible script
It's beautiful :D
http://chicago.suntimes.com/entertainment/ghostbusters-reboot-a-horrifying-mess/
>>80696427
>GhostJUSTers
>>80695790
You know how Ash was alpha as fuck, just wanted to hang out with his friends, screw his girlfriend, then propose her marriage?
They replaced him with a crack addict that instantly got possessed, and where an independent black woman who needs no man replaces her role.
>>80694371
>Fat white girl with glasses
>Tall black girl with pubic hair on her head and the body of John Cena
>Chick with the body of dude with short hair, also wearing glasses
>Insecure white girl feminist
This has Jew written all over it
>>80694934
evil dead wasnt a remake, more like another story told at the same place with similar events occurring. i refused to watch it because i assumed it would be cheap money grab, but then someone told me bruce cambell and sam raimi were directly involved in its making, so i watched it. then watched it again right away because for a horror movie, it was pretty boss. they are working on a sequel for it right now.
>>80694371
>be in a movie theatre
>previews come on
>new ghost busters is playing
>people are literally laughing and making dumb jokes about it
>as the preview is finishing people are literally booing it
It's being propped up and puffed up by SJW's...no one wants to watch that stupid piece of shit.
>>80695219
Its just ((((Manohla Dargis)))) who is indulging her girl powah fantasy. Having been reviewed by someone else, itd have been crapped on
>>80694371
Which one of you put this up?
>>80697681
underrated
>>80697826
>women are funny
No woman is going to say that. unless they are feminazis
>>80695219
WSJ is better, NYT always manages to put out something like this on occasion.
>>80697887
If you like Raimi, check out his Drag me to Hell. It's got the spirit of Evil Dead II, totally hilarious and scary at the same time. You'll love it. It's classic Raimi.
WTF I HATE /POL/ NOW
>>80698437
I loved drag me to hell. The ending was pretty lulzy too.
>>80698242
>more Jewish than Schindlers List
wow
>>80698242
>J-dar
lol wtf am i reading??!!
>>80697826
>>Tall black girl with pubic hair on her head and the body of John Cena
>>80695798
Broad city is definitely funny though, and the female characters create their own dynamic . If it is an adaption, it's a good one. I remember a part where one of them (forgot names) was asking the other why she had a burner phone, and she said it was for dick pics. because she still doesn't know exactly how the cloud works she felt uncomfortable with pictures of dicks floating around because her family used the same network
I lol'd, they're like caricatures.
>>80697687
Ash wasn't alpha until halfway through evil dead 2. The fuck are you talking about?
>>80694371
We never said women arn't women, it's just weird and stipid to tkae characters that were male and make them female because 'mah girl power'
>>80699207
The comic where they were replaced with girls was pretty good.
But it was just Ghostbusters that happen to be women, as opposed to the entire focal point being that they're fucking women.
>>80699152
Tell me how Ash wasn't alpha in both the first and 2nd movies.
>>80698437
that movie has a special place in my heart. went to theaters expecting a horror movie, and i got a raimi horror spoof comedy. about the time she dropped the anvil on that monsters head i realized what i was watching.
>>80698437
but it has a woman on the cover
>>80699152
Ash was totally alpha in every frame of Evil Dead II. I can't comment on the Evil Dead, though.
>>80694934
All those movies made a shitton of money though, kek
>>80695740
Fucking white people, just end our race now.
>>80698099
Brilliant.
>>80694371
Not with a 50 million opening weekend
>>80699653
Mudslime pls go
>>80694371
Critics saying it's good is going to make people not watch. Most people who wanted to watch it was because everyone was hating on it and they wanted to see if it really sucked.
>>80700194
What are you talking about. 50 million would be a total success.
>>80694371
methinks the lady doth protest too much
>>80700783
>Critics saying it's good is going to make people not watch
That was pretty painful to read. Go back to school, m8.
>>80699494
I kek'd hard at the anvil scene. Same with the flying-eyeball scene. And the talking possessed goat lol. Goddamn that was a funny movie.
>>80700849
Go fuck your boyfriend faggot.
>>80695595
>Wigger robocop?
wat? I never saw the remake - is RoboCop a wigger? like an Eminem type wigger?
Almost half a century after Alien, with the final Resident Evil movie yet to be released, there are still people out there who think women in leading roles are a novelty.
wtf I hate hollywood now
>>80694371
Is that a real quote? How has journalism and reviews really come to this?
>>80694371
>people need to be told that it's funny rather than watching it and laughing naturally
You already lost.
>>80694371
I want to fuck those humanoids.
>>80695437
Very true, it's as if these cretins can't help themselves
>>80694371
I might have given this movie a chance if it came out a decade ago but in this age of pandering to the lowest denominator I'm not even gonna pirate it
>>80696998
The North remembers
>>80700822
It's "The lady doth protest too much, methinks.", you illiterate savage.
And doesn't apply here, since this is clearly sarcastic and not a genuine attempt to convince anyone of the quality of the film.
>>80694371
One of them isn't even a human though
>>80701063
Well, aren't you the clever one? How's middle school? Must be tough dealing with all those big books and spelling quizzes.
ITT: babymen that can't handle how funny 3 strong independent women and Harambe are.
>>80700791
Not with a 125 million + budget, and all of the advertising
>>80694934
>Remember?
no, lol
>>80702035
Don't cut yourself on all that edge. Stay in high school kiddo. I'd teach at your school next year, but Canada blows.
>>80702274
Holy shit you're right. I had no idea that opening weekends could make hundreds of millions. I googled the opening weekend records and the top fifty are all in the hundreds of millions. 50 million is nothing.
Still, I'm sure they'll make some profit by the end of summer. They won't lose money on the movie.
>>80700194
>>80702274
>>80702673
For the past 5 years almost all movies make it or break it in China.
If its popular in China, it will make its money back. If not, it wont.
Almost every movie makes SOME money in the USA, good movies make some money in Europe, and China is the saving grace that keeps rushed, bad, "american" style movies above the water.
>>80702498
>memeing with edges
I see you got your big brother to do your typing for you now lol. You're actually coherent. Good for you.
>>80694934
"The Thing" wasn't a fucking remake. It was a fucking prequel.
>>80694371
I wasnt aware this movie had a talking monkey in it.
Def going to see it now
>>80694934
All of these were okay, though. The Thing prequel that everyone here seems to hate had a lot of soul, it felt right, felt that people enjoyed themselves. I enjoyed watching it.
>>80702748
>For the past 5 years almost all movies make it or break it in China.
>If its popular in China, it will make its money back. If not, it wont.
Here's the best part. Ghostbusters isn't screening in China.
The Chinese have a strict law forbidding the portrayal of ghosts in their media. So Ghostbusters won't play there.
>>80694371
The sole fact that they have to fight for this movie to be recognized as a legitimate release is one of the most entertaining aspects of 2016.
>>80694371
>opinions of a bought out newspaper review are facts
>>80702988
Oh, I hadn't realized that. Isn't that law about skeletons only, because of the skeleton-ancestor cultural thing they have going? As in, skeletons in movies seems like desecration to them?
But if its really not screening in China, and considering the type of movie it is, it had to make all its money back in the USA and Canada, it has no market elsewhere.
>>80695740
> Cough Syrup up the arse
B-b-bless you
>>80702988
Bullshit. There are a shitton of Chinese ghost movies.
>>80703227
I'm reading up on their laws right now, the communists say its illegal to screen movies that "promote cults or superstition".
Basically the only way to have a ghost movie is to have the character be on drugs, or mentally ill, so that the rational viewer can deduce that those ghosts aren't real, they are hallucinations of otherwise creations of his imagination.
I don't see how they could edit Ghostbusters to appear as if the ghosts aren't real, so it will probably get banned.
>>80694371
Bullet to forehead
Yours if we are specific
>>80702763
I'm in my 30s with a Master's degree. If I choose not to type proper on a fucking anime website because I worked all day and it's 1 in the morning it's my choice because I live in America where we have freedom. Now go to sleep kiddo, your parents might need you tomorrow to do whatever the fuck leaffags do.
>>80703416
>the only way to have a ghost movie is to have the character be on drugs, or mentally ill, so that the rational viewer can deduce that those ghosts aren't real
I thought the Chinese were supposed to be hyper-intelligent? 105 IQ average? They sound like morons, the sort of people who think that Henry Cavill can really fly.
Thanks for doing that research. Interesting to hear.
>>80703618
Someone rustled lol
>>80694371
>girls
>women
This is 2016, genders aren't defined yet, until then lets use the closest to females we have.
>>80695798
I thought Brides Maids was pretty funny.
>>80703642
Well, if you've read Plato's Republic, he suggests a similar law in regards to poetry.
Poets shouldn't write or sing, and plays shouldn't be acted out, where Gods do mischievous things, and war against each other, since thats not how Gods are like, and this superstition is giving the masses bad ideas. It normalizes things like rape, killing your father or brother, or war, since thats something the Gods do, so why wouldn't we?
Chinese censorship laws seem heavily based on Plato in that regard, and heavily based on Goebbels in regards to national security and promoting national pride.
Which isn't to say I agree with them, but to call them low IQ nonsense is stretching it. They are reasonable and sensible, and can be argued for or against, and I'd argue against them. However I wouldn't offhandedly dismiss them.
>>80694371
>haters destroyed
sure okay
>>80698890
>Broad city is definitely funny
Yeah, maybe to an Aussie.
>>80694371
>>80695595
>>80694934
>>80697081
you guys hear about how they were planning to use old style special effects for that movie and the execs botched it in favor of CGI at the last minute? in my opinion the old style could have saved that movie
>>80694371
>make a movie cheaply with shitty actors/writers
>have female lead cast with token black so you can blame it on the patriarchy
>people throw tomatoes as planed.
>"What are you? Sexist?"
>normies will go see the movie in mass out of fear of being called sexist/raciest
>producers control consumers
>maximum profit for minimal effort
>>80702942
The Thing Prequel had a lot of potential but got squashed by Universal. Originally Amalgamated Dynamics were brought on to do practical creature effects and stunts which were finished all the way up to filming. But the studio felt that audiences would prefer digital effects and had them almost entirely covered over in post-production by CG creatures.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fBzpT7VmSaU
>>80704454
>you guys hear about how they were planning to use old style special effects for that movie
Which movie??? Curious.
>>80704454
>>80704686
Short video that you should see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bL6hp8BKB24
What you are saying:
>CGI is bad
What you should be saying:
>bad CGI is bad
>>80703862
In Plato's republic, the lower classes (warrior and merchant?) were bred to have lower IQs, and were not as educated. I don't think that that's the case in China today, is it? I assumed that they were innately more intelligent than other nationalities due to whatever evolutionary pressures they were subject to over the eons. But I really have no idea either way.
>>80705071
You are drinking the /pol/ koolaid and overestimating the genetic component in IQ, and underestimating the cultural and education one.
Genetics play a role, but not as big a role as you are imagining.
A person with amazing potential for intelligence who was raised by wolves will not be very good at taking tests, because he isn't educated and lacks the cultural reference points.
>>80698099
Perfect
>>80694371
>Ghostbusters rotten tomato rating - 75%
>Batman v Superman rotten tomato rating - 27%
Another proof that burgers are cucked by Jews.
>>80704861
That was the coolest video I've seen in a while. Thx for posting. It really shows how much we take for granted. So many of those films look 100% real, so much so that we don't even stop think if it's CGI.
>>80705357
So then Ghostbusters is so much better than Batman v Superman. Hard to believe.
The trailer wasn't funny
I'm not a sexist just because they chose shitty parts of the movie to show
I doubt it's even that funny though if the trailer is so bad
Jesus fuck these people are desperate to prove something
>>80694371
If somebody drew that black woman exactly how she looks they'd be caleld racist for drawing a stereotypical caricature.
>>80706121
>Just noticed the lips
>>80706121
I don't think anybody drew her yet, all i got is this
>>80694371
Yea, women are funny... just not these ones
There's more.
>>80694934
They remade the thing?
>>80694371
>be liberal
>have no choice but to double down and defend a shitty movie
>too chicken shit to phrase your opinion as an argument because it will get annihilated any other way
>hurr durr girls rule get over it!
>pat self on back for being "brave" when in reality you know exactly how much of a fucking loser you sound like
That's you OP
>>80694371
>1 post by this id
God damnit /pol/, really? 140 fucking replies.
Movie isn't even out yet, anyone with a brain knows reviews are bullshit
>>80706501
It was a "prequel" in 2011.
>>80694371
filter out the scores given by feminist bloggers and you have this
and its only day 2, the real reviews are coming in.
>>80705163
>Genetics play a role, but not as big a role as you are imagining.
I know that education plays a large role, but it can only bring a person to the limits of their potential. And because education is so available these days and to such high levels, the innate limits of each people is laid pretty bare. African Americans score between 11 to 15 points lower than the average for white Americans, despite attending the same schools in the same neighbourhoods.
Development rates for black communities, whether they are in black majority nations or in black enclaves in non-black nations, are lower than for any other ethnic group. This is true even when they receive large amounts of aid. This is a consistent pattern seen globally.
Likewise, the east Asians enjoy the highest development rates, even when starting from virtually nothing (e.g. pre- and postwar Japan, Singapore, Hong Kong, South Korea, or in Western countries as immigrants who arrive relatively poor and underprivileged but who, within a few generations, ascend to the middle and upper classes of society).
Education is the key to unleashing our mental potential. But I'm afraid that in Africa and within the African diaspora, their limits are largely met. They've been given more "nurture" than their "nature" can leverage, and they're just not getting anywhere as a result. Just one man's opinion.
>>80706554
>have no choice but to double down and defend a shitty movie
This is probably what the early reviews are more than anything
>defend movie because it was women in it
>call people sexist, really nail that flag tot he mast
>see movie
>oh god it's fucking terrible
>but if I say anything I'll never hear the end of it
>>80706121
Unless the artist was black.
>>80706501
Sort of. It was prequel. But it was all shit so don't even bother seeing it.
Is this accurate drawing of black Ghostbuster or is she drawn too pretty?
>>80694934
The Thing was a good movie though.
When you have to tell the audience that it's supposed to be funny, you know you went wrong. If people find it funny they will do so without anyone telling them.
>>80706756
uncle tom
You heard her, /pol/
GET OVER IT
>>80706620
I clicked the "top critics" link a few minutes ago and it wouldn't display the score. It said "Not available at this time" or something. But it would show the higher "all critics" score if I clicked that link. Curious.
>>80706900
That's true.
>>80706723
You are just repeating something you read without addressing my post.
I told you why you are mistaken about the chinese in terms of their perceived (by the government) susceptibility to ghost stories and other superstition.
It has to do with culture and education, and not with genetics as you initially assumed.
For any given stupid claim, I can wager you that I will find a high IQ person who believes it.
>>80706620
This same bar was like 75% 24 hours ago.
>>80706825
Grace Jones was, well, graceful and beautiful and sleek and angular.
Leslie Jones is the exact opposite in every way.
>>80694371
>Haters destroyed.
3.5 on IMDB
Reality hits you hard bro.
>>80694371
Nothing. No one is forcing us to pay to see this garbage.
>>80694371
Women can be funny (pic related). Most modern female comedians are not funny, however. Rather than clever humor, most jokes and gags consist of the same basic formula
>muh I'm fat
>muh vagina
>muh his penis tiny
>muh SJW propaganda hidden behind lazy joke
Lazy comedy is not funny, regardless of gender (hence why Mr. jew WEED LMAO is also unfunny)
>>80707176
I see 5.1/10 all the time. Why? Geolocation or shit like that?
How is this getting good reviews. Look at imdb.
>>80707116
What about this? They compare her to a colonial French slave from Africa with gigantic booty. Does she have such round booty or just simply a male body?
![1dd8f69ca0[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/8SSxsZz.jpg "1dd8f69ca0[1].jpg")
>>80698242
No wonder it was such a good movie.
>>80694934
I didn't know any of these existed.
>>80698242
Holy fuck high score
>>80695394
They went with more of the less-comedy-esque original and turned it into every horror film after 2010
>>80698437
Legitimately good movie.
>>80707573
Its still pretty jewish, big projects with loads of technical people listed in the credits just overpower the jewish main cast.
>>80707042
>You are just repeating something you read without addressing my post.
I am addressing your post. You stated that education plays a large role in determining whether or not a given population will be able to score highly on an IQ test. I agree with that. I also agree that the high IQ scores associated with east Asians is due in part to their education and culture. They have a Confucian culture that has emphasized the importance of education. That's all fine, right? No disagreement?
All I am saying is that if you give Africans the same educational opportunities and inculcate them with the same culture (or indeed in a wide range of different cultures around the world), they still end up on the bottom of the socioeconomic ladder. Why is that? Given the wide range of educational and cultural differences between African populations, we should expect to see varying levels of achievement in terms of their IQ. But we don't. Now those are just facts.
I'm open to any theory that can explain this persistent disparity. But so far "not enough educational opportunities" isn't compelling because, when they've been given the same educational opportunities, the results are still skewered. If you can't blame their low scores on culture, well, what else is there?
>>80703819
>dat pic
I initially thought "this brunette at the front feels disgusted around all those weirdoes" then I realized
>>80707569
The elusive Hottentot!
I can't comment on Leslie's booty because I haven't seen it and I don't want to. I'd prefer to remain ignorant on this one.
Who thinks insulting your customers is a good marketing scheme?
>IF YOU DON'T WATCH IT, YOU'RE FUCKING RACIST OR SEXIST
>YOU FUCKING BASEMENT DWELLER
Jesus Christ.
top kek
>>80707960
>That's all fine, right? No disagreement?
I disagree, because the "high IQ scores associated with east Asians" are referring to descendants of east Asian immigrants in the USA, not to native Chinese.
Further, participating in IQ studies is something mostly done in universities, or people recruited randomly on the street by statistics companies. Those will necessarily be urban dwellers, unless the study was explicitly done in multiple rural areas, which is rare and expensive.
On the other hand, a movie will be seen bu university students, but also by rice farmers who fry crayfish on the flat roof of their house to sell at the open market in the village down the river.
Regardless, again you are moving away from the issue being discussed, namely the censorship of superstitions from films in China, and towards (justified or not) anti-African rhetoric.
I don't like west Africans. They are on average more violent, and less creative, less intelligent. This is genetic, and when looking at big numbers of people it is easy to spot. However it also has nothing to do with the thread, or my post.
I'll just mention that the common comparison I see, although I can't know if its the one you observed, is between the descendants of east Asian immigrants to the USA against native west Africans living in what is effectively civil war in west Africa.
it is unfair, and I feel its not necessary to do. There would still be a difference in a fair comparison, just a less shocking one. You can't compare a university educated Chinese descendant young man to someone who eats the guts of prisoners he executed to become bulletproof.
>>80708113
>>IF YOU DON'T WATCH IT, YOU'RE FUCKING RACIST OR SEXIST
Sony also recently said that they main target demographic is young men. Really. So I have no fucking clue how "Sony logic" works.
>>80708341
I think you have some very good points in here but I can't respond to it now. I'll do so later if this thread is still up. I genuinely want to see things from your perspective and to correct any errors in my own. It's not often that I come across posts this thoughtful so I want to make the most of it.
Do I even need to say it?
>>80703618
>implying anyone cares or believes you have a masters degree
I hate it because its starring women and i know that they only did it for what we see now. A unneeded reboot that cant be criticized because its stars women.
Women ruin everything
>>80695286
/thread
>>80708257
That movie was fucking awful tho.
>>80703618
>kiddo
>kiddo
>kiddo
>>80695595
>Robocop
people ignored it just because he was Swedish
fucking racists
>>80704454
>>80704767
I have a few more like these but I might head to sleep soon.
>>80703832
Same but his point still remains..
>>80694371
>Even Bill Murray likes it, goys!
>>80704295
I just now remembered Ghostbusters reallt had a black man. That Winston dude, right? That screencap is spot on, he was simply another fella. New "Ghostbuster" nigress ape is a walking stereotype. 30 years of liberal swing sure does wonders for race relations...
>>80694371
The votes are pretty interesting.
You just know they will take the demographic votes here and label it more misogyny. Because young males can't vote accurately...
>>80708341
Not only that but IQ is just a a starting point. It's what's done with it that counts, and being one of the group is important with a communal species.
Even if widely held ideals are suicidal.
Sorry if I missed this being covered before, just read a few of these.
>>80694371
Are negative reviews still being pulled?
>>80704861
CGI on itself isn't bad, it has it's place on the industry.
But it you hit the head of the nail; bad CGI is bad.
>>80695740
Women are like germans. They are not born with a sense of humor at all. It's probably why so many lying cunts say they like a man who can make them laugh.
>>80709156
lol. you can see him die inside at 11 seconds.
>>80705163
>cultural reference points
>implying IQ tests are created for this or that culture and aren't made as a one-fits-all
keep implying faggot.
>>80694934
Last movie i cared about with a female protagonist was Alien.
>>80694371
HOW WILL WE EVER RECOVER
>>80694371
Atleast they're honest about whats really important to them. Indirectly.
They Know its shit but they have a horde of sjws defending this garbage, reminding eberyone who doesn't like it of their privilege.
Well played Sony, well played.
I see this becoming a thing in the next years with all kinds of franchises.
>Marty and Doc go back in time
>they get trapped in an alternate universe
>they're now female
>Marty also ends up black
>they have to kill their regular selfs to survive
>happily keep on living as Martha and Docca
>The End
>dont like it?
>shut up shitlord
Thank God I'm not into comics. The progressive influence would make me sucidal.
>>80709250
>young females
kill them, kill them with fire
>>80696998
Wtf is this?
In my langauge Spoorloos means "without a trace" or more directly "without leaving tracks"
>>80694371
75% on rotten tomatoes.
Not really a great score. I was expecting it would get 80%+ just from all the pressure for critics to say they like it. It currently has 75%, so 1 in 4 critics was willing to say it sucks even with all the SJW/threats threats.
I think it will do quite badly in the box office where people will be influenced more from word of mouth. Even if it got 85% or so, I'm not sure it would do that well. Who's the audience for this movie?
>>80709323
IQ tests are created for a culture that has children solve tests in school.
If you quite simply don't know what a test is and haven't done tests before, you won't score high in an IQ test, despite your intelligence.
Tests are much more relevant in some places in the world, as a thing that everyone deals with, in school, in university, on job interviews, online for recreation and so on.
In other places, people are born, grow up and die without having solved a test once. Those people won't score high on an IQ test.
This is of course a very extreme example, and there is a spectrum of familiarity and comfort with the test format, as well as other things like mathematical thinking, abstractions, geometry, language structure and such.
I don't know how you can even consider that a test which includes physics questions is entirely reliant on inherent intellect and genetics, when it took humans many tens of thousands of years to come up with a coherent model of physics.
Education and culture to play a role.
>>80694934
I remember Ash Vs Evil Dead. Kelly and Paco are too Affirmative Action for my taste, but so long as Ash is allowed to be un-PC, I'm fine.
>>80709492
>Spoorloos
In Sweden we use the word Spårlös for the same use
>>80694371
Getting really tired of this "women can do anything men do!" meme.
>>80708341
>I disagree, because the "high IQ scores associated with east Asians" are referring to descendants of east Asian immigrants in the USA, not to native Chinese.
>what is china with an IQ of 104
China, Korea, Japan, all have high general IQ scores of above 100.
>Those will necessarily be urban dwellers, unless the study was explicitly done in multiple rural areas, which is rare and expensive.
Proof?
Why would costs be so much of a problem for an educational institute who would be smart enough to know that taking a non-random sample of a population will give skewered results? Either you proof this or this is bullshit.
>>80696087
Kek
>dear diary, today Sweden was uncucked
>>80709208
The best part is how the SJWs were screaming about how racist the original was because Winston Zeddemore wasn't a scientist like the other three, even though Ernie Hudson said it wasn't racist and pointed out how Zeddemore was one of the mosy reasonable characters at times in the movie.
But I guess this stereotypical sheeboon is a better reflection of anti-racism.
>>80709497
>Who's the audience for this movie?
According to Sony, young males.
>>80694371
>Ghostbusters
>A dated (but good) comedy that only worked BECAUSE of the characters and the premise and everything being exactly as it was
>It's 2016 come on
>Make them all women
>The exact same plot and setting as the original but with women
Is this supposed to be a massive fucking joke to the coke-snorting execs or do they actually believe movies sell because of who's on the cover?
>>80709529
Ash will also be an arrogant, macho, sexist, blowhard doofus. That's his charm.
>>80709557
Seems it is related.
The movie's english title is "The Vanishing"
Ah and I see the movie is Dutch, which explains it all.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096163/
Are there many similarities between Swedish and Dutch?
>>80697631
he's "wrong" in his opinions. The effects were good and McKinnon is the best one in it.
He's sort of right about the rest but I'm calling objectivity into question here - I think he has a boner for the original (which is streets better, yes)
>>80709788
That's the only reason why the series is any good, really. That and the comedic use of blood and guts and demonic possession.
>>80709851
>Are there many similarities between Swedish and Dutch?
Well there are some German words that have been kinda Swedi-fied because of our historic relation, so that could be why
>>80709524
IQ tests can be created without a need for culture or cultural reference points.
>In other places, people are born, grow up and die without having solved a test once. Those people won't score high on an IQ test.
You don't know that at all.
>I don't know how you can even consider that a test which includes physics questions is entirely reliant on inherent intellect and genetics, when it took humans many tens of thousands of years to come up with a coherent model of physics.
There are no 'physics' questions in an intelligence test. There are abstract reasoning and logical questions, both of which are important for humans. Now one could say that some tribal person has never had a need for abstract reasoning, but then you'd see that back in his IQ result. You can go on and cry about how the test is racist and doesn't account for culture, or you could just accept that his culture is so fucking degenerate that it never even asked some degree of abstract reasoning from him and that he himself as the product of his culture is equally degenerate.
>>80709529
Paco is OK as a goofy sidekick. Kelly is annoying as fuck and that actress couldn't act if her life would depend on it.
Also, that whole Xena plot is retarded. I mean, seriously, is this something you would like to see in Evil Dead?
>>80707286
Keeping Up Appearances is such a good show. That and Are You Being Served? We can't have good comedy anymore thanks to everyone becoming overly sensitive, I remember Mel Brooks even complaining about this.
>>80709851
Germanic language tree.
Base words for many things are the same/similar. Just like structure.
>>80705071
The reason Plato suggests censoring all degenerate media was actually so that the high class of rulers (the philosopher kings) didn't get corrupted. They were meant to be isolated and raised to be the best rulers possible. It wasn't about shielding the low classes.
>>80709156
>Hello darkness, my old friend
>>80709978
>You don't know that at all.
How can a person who doesn't know what a test is, and hasn't done tests before, score high on a test?
You are being obtuse and just dismiss without arguing.
>1 post by OP
>200+ replies
Didn't even read the thread, but well done OP.
>>80705163
Then why is it that when we throw everyone in the same pot the ones with the shit genetics continue to seek out and create garbage culture and score poorly on tests?
>>80710018
It had potential, but the entire end of the season seemed to fizzle out anticlimactically.
>>80710155
fug
But it wasn't that bad of a thread. On /pol/, it's juts par for the course that half of popular threads are either bait or contrarian.
>>80709973
>>80710039
Thanks bros, will have to do some more research
>>80695975
Is that why they run away from their babies and the cops?
>>80696189
Its not really an argument but more him just being an edgelord.
>>80709856
I think Richard may be right. From the trailers I've seen, she's been a bit cringey and awkward. Not funny at all. We'll have to wait and see.
>>80710544
I would have thought that, but I assumed he was too intelligent for that. My mistake.
>>80707727
This. It was not bad but generic as fuck. Remove the necronomicon and its just a possession movie
>>80698332
>genuinely curious about WSJ
>see pic related
i just.....
i can't.
the fucking racism here.
you people are ill
literally shaking right now.....
wow.....just. just wow. literally unbelievable.
ill never understand this......place.
it feels like
after the past 2 weeks i have been here it just seems to get worst and worst.....
blatant racism
child porn spam
animal abuse
anti semitism
holocaust denial
woman hating
homophobia
fat shaming
off topic adult cartoons
the list goes on and on.......
the n word literally hurled around like it was a casual insult......
are there even moderators to control this insane place??!!!
disgusting.....are you even "humans"? or just jaded pieces of SHIT??!!
i see why you people are callled the sewer of the internet...
>>80694371
Let's see how much it makes at the box office, shall we?
>>80709274
Women are giggling messes around strong, attractive men. Some women laugh a lot but I'm referring to the ones who giggle at anything certain men say.
>>80710991
This
>>80706585
>Movie isn't even out yet, anyone with a brain knows reviews are bullshit
there are basically two types of review for this movie:
1. It's meh.
2. Cheerleading reviews.
That tells me it's shit.
Cheerleading is wishful thinking at best, intentional dishonesty at worst.
>Who you gonna call?
>>80711022
You are wise, for an Irishman.
>>80695975
Actually, white dudes are afraid of getting jacked and murdered by black men.
>>80710935
On the other hand, it means they're being critical of the candidate, which I would very much doubt to see from NYT.
>>80711043
HeMan.
>>80694371
women are never funny. they don't know how to be. it's so not fashionable, and that's not them.
>>80710991
Not sure why anyone is surprised that a movie playing politics is attracting reviewers who also play politics, won't mean shit if they can't put butts in theatre seats.
>ghost busters getting good reviews
Gosh I wonder who's behind this review?
>>80710122
I dismiss because you do not proof your statement.
>>80707573
Unbeatable
>>80701275
Look inside your heart. You will find the answer there.
>>80711117
Thanks man, we do try. Some of you muslims are all right.
>>80711043
I guess all those people must be dieing of rage right now given 1 in 4 critics said they didn't like the movie. Every single one of them is as despisable as James Rolph I guess. I mean.. Why would anyone hate a movie starring 4 women? Do they just hate women or something?
>>80710688
I saw the premiere two days ago and I think she's excellent. I mean, she's weird but she's an actual character. Mccarthy and Wiig fight it out to be an amalgumation of Venkman and Egon (unsuccessfully) and Jones' character has a character trait of being knowledgeable of NYC history but it never gets used and she becomes a stereotype.
McKinnon is the only actual character
>>80694371
Name one thing the New York Times ever said that was accurate... just one... I dare you
>>80694371
This isn't a complex scientific theory that undermines hundreds of years of preconceptions.
This is what people find funny.
If you need to try for decades and spend billions in an attempt to convince people that women are funny, then they're not actually funny.
You'll note that we don't have to constantly remind women that men are funny.
>>80711385
They must, since the most important aspect of any movie is the penis/vagina ratio
>>80711223
i guess so, so is WSJ lefty like NYT? Because I've been looking an alternative for NYT and Brietbart doesn't really cut it.
>>80711385
>Some of you muslims are all right.
Thanks, kuffir. We'll be gentle with you when we take over your country.
