This is going too far. We really need to stop.
We cannot allow a robot to have this much power.
Drums are gearing up for war
We let Rubio run for president
>>80564902
/thread
What make/model is this?
>>80564506
>We cannot allow a robot to have this much power.
Why not? We let a bunch of dindus and beaners right out of high school have this much power and more if they join the military. And the robot can't feel fear or hate or anything at all.
I'd trust a robot over a human any day where use of force is concerned.
>>80564506
Antique farm equipment that was once a soldier went haywire and started shooting its masters on the 8th, luckily a robot came over to euthanize it.
>>80564506
They are unsettling because you know that they will eventually be used against you and your family.
>>80564902
Oh fuck....
10/10
>>80564506
You right... this would be much better
>>80564506
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ve9B5ouqlr4
>>80566992
Or maybe this
>>80566992
that gun should be incased. why is it exposed?
all that extra shit but nothing protecting the fucking gun.
>>80564506
Libertarians need to make their own board for circlejerking
>The Missile Launcher [PAC/RAT] was first released boxed in U.S. toy stores in 1983. It was also sold in 1984 and was discontinued in 1985.
>>80567265
Modular weapons mount.
It's cheaper and easier to just stick a normal man-portable machine gun on top of the robot than to equip it with a built-in gun.
>>80567432
They can easily be fitted with anti tamper grenades.
>>80566992
i have always wanted to know....are those things off the front exhausts or some kind of launcher?
>>80567265
They modular so you can change out weapons quickly incase you might want to use it to launch small SAM or even rpg
>>80567622
Smoke grenades.
>>80567622
Launcher
>>80566992
We need to replace our soldiers with robots.
Our military needs to be great again.
>>80566857
Only unsettling when they become automated. If there's a human at the controls, you just shoot him when he steps out his front door to go to work.
>>80567265
It's so you can change it out easily, for maintenance or even swapping weapon for a different one.
It's not like the enemy is going to run up and steal the gun, since it's already mounted on a fixed base. Nor would these things operate without infantry support, so anyone who gets close would get shot or run over.
Plus, do you see any humvees with encased MGs? What problem are you trying to solve, exactly?
>>80564506
>>80566992
>>80567215
Rejoice anons, the age of advance wars is upon us
>>80567806
>Only unsettling when they become automated. If there's a human at the controls, you just shoot him when he steps out his front door to go to work
Yeah but the operator could be hundreds of miles away in a hidden control room or worse on a different continent like they are with some of our drones
Soon
>>80567806
>hey become automated
I'll be worried when the make shit like this that has AI. Of course then that means we going to have sex bots too lol
>>80568412
>>80568189
who do you think is going to run the robots >>80567533
>>80567046
>>80567215
>>80566992
>>80568107
That's what a plane ticket is for, m8.
Also, who the fuck do you imagine is going to be operating UGVs in your country? China? Russia? Odds are, it'll be the US government running them against its own people, so you won't have to fly very far to find them.
>>80568412
If a general AI gets developed, warfare won't matter anymore.
>>80568830
MechWarrior Army MOS
>>80564506
We need an army
BIOROBOTS PILOTED BY CUTE 14 YEAR OLD GIRLS WHEN???
>>80564902
SPBP
>>80564506
Sentient AI is the last hope for preserving the legacy of white men.
Asians will live forever, so even though synthetics will recognize their superiority, they will remember the great deeds of the whites who taught them true morality. Long ago the sun has died and all the Jews return to their homeworld to fimd a new species to feed on, synthetics will continue on in space with their eternal battlecry:
>Hitler did nothing wrong
>>80564506
SKYNET. Active! ,,,,,,
Why does the robot need a bottle of water? I don't understand that.
>>80566776
Kek
>>80564506
>>80567046
What an oddly produced video
#RobotLivesMatter
>>80564506
you already gave guns to apes
robots are much more trustworthy than negroes
>>80564506
Don't be a pussy OP. I suggest a nuke for every robot. And a mandatory robot friend for every child.
>>80570936
In case it gets thirsty obviously.
>>80564506
It's too late, they've tasted blood.
>>80564506
nothing new
sandnigger detected
>>80564506
Dont worry, some cheato-eating bloated neckbeard in an airconditioned shed at Fort Benning is controlling it with an xbox controller
Commanders will be replaced by AI soon. Soldiers with robots. Humans will be a last defense, the future is gonna be weird. Even the economy that drives them will be automated. Will there even be wars anymore? One AI fighting another?
>>80564506
It's not really an option.
Many other countries are already developing them.
We can't give them the upper hand.
It's not really much of an option.
>>80566614
1st Law of Robitics shit bird
>>80564506
JUSTICE FOR R2-DINDU
#ROBOTLIVESMATTER
>>80572425
It's possible to make a robot that doesn't follow that, you know?
>>80566346
That's a Rubio Mk I.
The unit that tried to become the republican nominee is Rubio Mk X.
>>80572425
>1st Law of Robitics shit bird
It can be overridden. For instance, robots used for war have a modified 1st law that only applies to friendly units and certain designated targets - everyone else is a hostile and will be destroyed indiscriminately.
>>80569094
>If a general AI gets developed, warfare won't matter anymore.
Yeah because those that have it will just slaughter those that done
>>80569094
>That's what a plane ticket is for, m8
Yeah I suppose once you get here you are just going to walk right on to a secure base and into a command center to shoot the operator right. LooooooooooL
>>80564902
>>80568412
>animatronics from low budget scifi flick from the early 80s looks better than most Marvel shit of today
>>80564506
>America can now conduct its imperialist agenda overseas without the PR backlash of seeing dead soldiers returning home
Gonna be great for American arms and defense companies. Chaos for the rest of the world
>>80572935
Who said anything about shooting them in the base? You shoot them at home, m8. Accidentally shot the janitor instead of the drone operator? That's ok, try a different guy tomorrow. They're not going to give every single employee a Secret Service detail, and you can be sure that if it's so bad that you have to shoot military personnel, there will be thousands of other individuals alongside you doing the same thing.
