Women aren't literally men's physical property, but are they socially our property when we're engaged in a romantic relationship?
This is a seriously retarded photo. Do you realize how much harder and rarer it was to take photos in the early 1900? Do you honestly believe women wouldn't have taken slutty photos if they had cameras in their pocket?
Photos were rare so you always posed carefully and didn't hold a smile in case it messed up the shot.
Further, men controlled all the cameras and since women were faithful and most men weren't photographers of course they wouldn't take seductive photos.
Literally how brain dead are you?
>>80080008
It all just boils down to degeneracy anon this picture is just trying to say that there has been an increase in degeneracy in the west for a while now.
I'm not saying there has NEVER been degeneracy before the start of the 2000's but the amount of degeneracy these days are certainly thrown around a lot more.
>>80078760
>>80080008
They would have been afraid to take slutty photos because it would not be tolerated back then.
They would have been LITERALLY lynched. KILLED.
>>80080008
I think you´re retarded one. People doesn´t change, but society does and the behaviours tolerated nowadays wouldn´t be permited or praised when my parents or grandparents where young. Doesn´t matter if they had cameras or not.
>>80078760
Women belonge to men.
A daughter belong to the father and after they marry they belong to the husband.
If you disagree, you're a sissy beta male
>>80078760
Feminists and niggers ans sluts destroy social cohesion.
>>80084055
>>80078760
kek
>>80081443
Grandmother, how sexist. How about you let them decide there on gender you CIS scum.
Just because she gave birth, nursed a child, has a vagina, clearly is a female, anyone with any sense of logic with the possible exception of a mentally ill liberal degenerate would know they are a woman, doesn't make them a woman.
