What did she mean by this?
She actually said this? Oh my god.
>>79953717
Probably the same thing she meant yesterday when you posted this?
>>79953779
yeah, she really said that
https://twitter.com/hillaryclinton/status/688917116314120192
>>79953717
I don't get it
>>79954140
Thanks for correcting the record.
pretty obvious. if you commit a crime you go to jail, regardless of who you are.
the problem for you guys is that clinton has yet to be found guilty of a crime. Negligence, sure, but not a crime.
a Republican FBI director, with all his resources, couldn't find anything other than negligence.
>>79954242
Then why did they prosecute other people for similar things?
That she is bigger than too big to be in jail.
>>79953717
She meant she knows she belongs in prison, but she can't get there without your help.
Please help make lemons into lemonade.
Call the DOJ, put them on auto dialer, pay a neighbor hood kid a few bucks to call.
> pic related.
From everything that happened this week, there is no reason not to convict her for perjury. She lied under oath at a congressional hearing.
That's a felony. They won't convict her on email. Fine, help me play 3D chess. Call them and ask why she's not under charges for blatant perjury. No investigation needs to be made, just a prosecution. It's a slam dunk to disqualify her for president.
It's your right as a tax payer. Get involved, Carpe Diem. Do something other than complain.
Shit just copy pasta the fuck out of my post, if you don't want to do anything else. If WE don't do this, who will?
#rigged system
MAGA
>>79954227
3d checkers my friend
>>79954242
Losing classified information is just as much a crime if you do it on accident.
>>79954242
The problem with you fags is you let people get away with crimes
>>79954166
She's just rubbing it now
>>79954403
all government employees can face two different forms of punishment; criminal and administrative. to face a criminal punishment, they have to prove intent - malicious or criminal (for instance selling secrets to another country). FBI said it would probably have lead to an administrative punishment, but since she's not employed anymore that's irrelevant.
>>79954404
feel free to re-join the conversation when you're not so emotional.
>>79954242
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
the US Oversight Committee has requested a hearing with the FBI Director in regards to the difference between what he said (careless) and what is prosecutable (negligence)
“The FBI’s recommendation is surprising and confusing. The fact pattern presented by Director Comey makes clear Secretary Clinton violated the law. Individuals who intentionally skirt the law must be held accountable. Congress and the American people have a right to understand the depth and breadth of the FBI’s investigation. I thank Director Comey for accepting the invitation to publicly answer these important questions.” https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/oversight-state-department/
>>79954980
No, recklessness and negligence can also satisfy the mens rea element of crimes. There's clearly a case for at least negligence (she did not know the risk but SHOULD have known) - and that's being generous.
Hillary broke the law.
>>79954992
>a Republican majority congress is not pleased that the Democratic nominee for President didn't get the punishment they feel is appropriate
yep, I'm sure that will lead somewhere!
>>79954980
being negligent of classification and security protocols is a crime regardless of intent
>>79955533
>Being careless with classified documents isn't illegal
>Being negligent with them is
>>79955533
Comey is a Republican
>>79955832
nope.
But if you refuse to accept that fact, go here: https://tips.fbi.gov/
they're waiting for bright young minds like yours to help them out in cases like this.
>>79953717
Really makes you think...
>>79955533
Like it or not, what the director stated exactly falls exactly within that .edu link.
He does need to clarify further why what he stated doesn't mean she gets prosecuted.
>>79955970
exactly. If there was ever a chance for Clinton to face an indictment, it would be now. But he didn't find anything to charge her criminally with.
is this board usually filled with this many teenagers?
>>79956078
No one is being paid to shill for Hillary by the way. It's a Republican-funded lie and a pathetic attempt to smear her campaign.
>>79955533
the FBI themselves said punishment would normally be appropriate but isn't because (((reasons)))
>>79956277
>0.25 sheckles have been deposited into your account.
>>79956257
>he didn't find anything to charge her criminally with.
Yes, he did.
>>79953717
She's taunting us by telling us how things should be. (admitting that what she said is not the way things presently are)
>>79954359
Why did I laugh so hard at this?
>>79956078
It's a felony you dumb faggot.
>>79956257
>FBI """"""didn't find anything""""""
>She must be innocent
Oh child...
>>79954242
>Republican FBI director, with all his resources, couldn't find anything other than negligence.
... When it comes to handling classified data, negligence is all that is needed to be jailed for a long time. It's one of the few areas where intent isn't necessary to convict someone.
>>79953717
#ImWithHillDawg now
>>79956379
Are you really this stupid?
subject to security or administrative sanctions. Repeat it one more time: subject to security or administrative sanctions.
Let's go over that sentence: it means if Clinton was still Secretary of State, there would possibly be an administrative punishment. Not facing an indictment.
>>79956687
>implying the investigation didn't find shit so heinous that the FBI is letting her off for fear of their lives
>latest Hillary post 5k likes
>latest Trump post 25k likes
Are the tides turning?
>>79957038
That's basically what Comey said. That Hillary is guilty as fuck and normal people would be jailed for this shit, but he's scared of his family being sacrificed to Moloch.
>>79956786
I'm now a member of the #HillaryArtillery
>>79956786
What they should do, however, in order for justice to be truly served, is to remove all her privileges with regards to handling sensitive information. She cannot be trusted to handle them responsibly, she will no longer be able to have access to classified material. This would no longer enable her to run for president without a conviction.
Problem solved. That would be an administrative punishment, would it not?
Hillary managed to take control of the entire US government. That takes brains, courage, and strong leadership. She seems exactly the kind of person who should be in the oval office. I'm with her.
>>79953717
It's funny because she just proved she's too big for jail.
>>79958022
Problem is that the president doesn't receive any clearance rating anyway so there's no way to, on-paper, limit that.
>>79958282
Shame, it would be hilarious for them to be able to do that. Then basically say "Yeah, you can run for president, but you won't be able to do or know anything so you might as well fuck off back home now, bitch"
Can someone define alt-right for me? I looked it up on jewipedia and it said some shit about white supremacism or something.
>>79958022
Yes, brilliant idea. The FBI should remove a private citizen's access to sensitive information.
>>79958556
anything that's considered "right-wing" but not neo-cons.
but people don't like things being non-binary so they consider anything other than main-stream neo-cons and neo-libs to be racist/extremists/[insert whatever word you like].
Fire up the constipation camps, race wars now
>>79958556
>falling for jewish labels
>>79954242
Ignorance is not the same as innocence.
My biggest concern.
My absolute biggest concern.
Somehow, Hillary wins. Trump fails because crooked Hillary is backed by too many people working the system.
I should imagine, after a few terms of that bitch, she will have destroyed everything that America stands for. She has already said that she admires Merkel, she is also a war mongering piece of shit. I've been working for days now trying to help people over at the /cfg/ thread trying to dig up dirt on the Clinton Foundation in the hopes of stopping her. If somebody doesn't, take a good hard look at Europe. That will be your future, and then what? Our only hope of salvation will be in the hands of Russians. God damn..
>>79958890
Or it'll just be like Obama except now with women screaming in the streets "I don't gotta pay my mortgage" and then they all get extremely disappointed in the ensuing years.
>>79959197
From what Hillary was tweeting, it looks like she is going to flip the system and make all rape and sexual assault "guilty until proven innocent". That is going to really suck in this SJW feminism infested world
>>79958721
... Access to classified information isn't a right. It's a privilege that can be readily revoked. Especially if one has been NEGLIGENT with that privilege.
>>79956257
Are all Norwegians this naive? You just believe anything you hear on the flashing box in your living room?
The FBI director received death threats were he to recommend prosecution.
>>79959418
Or she's just spewing shit just to get in power. Remember she's an evil cunt, so why would she care about what her masses want?
I don't want her in office, but I'm not going to have an anxiety attack if she wins. The american political system is far to self serving and those at the top are the most self serving.
>>79959584
Security clearances are still on record between government positions except for the president. The presidential position is exempt.
People like pic related make me feel embarrassed about being a registered democrat.
>>79958721
.... Are you saying this sarcastically in that someone who has shown extreme carelessness with classified information that may now be in the hands of our enemies should not face security restrictions?
>>79958240
This. tbqhsenpaifam
>>79959809
And FBI is supposed to do what? The FBI handles crimes, not administrative punishment, which is what Comey stated yesterday.
>>79959620
sure thing buddy.
>>79956786
Are you really this stupid?
What Comey said isn't the law. His opinion isn't the law. OK?
Hillary broke the law.
I wouldn't expect Hillary shills like you to be any more honest than she is, of course.
>>79954242
like when refugees rape it's okay because they dont know its against the law!! :^)
>>79960233
>Hillary broke the law.
no, she clearly didn't, or she would have been criminally charged at the recommendation from the FBI. not the FBI nor any other person or entity has been able to prove that Clinton did this with malicious intent, which is required by law to be criminally charged in her position. As Comey said; subject to security or administrative sanctions.
>>79960685
thanks for your contribution to the discussion.
>>79961201
10 Kronen were deposited to your account.
Keep up the god's work, (((Anon)))
>>79961201
>No guys she didn't break the law cuz someone said she didn't
>Even though the law objectively was broken
>>79961201
>she clearly didn't, or she would have been criminally charged at the recommendation from the FBI
Are you really this stupid?
Obama's Justice Dept. isn't going to indict Hillary, no matter what she did. The fix is in. Obama, Lynch and Hillary are all crooked, and they have a criminal's typical arrogance for the law.
do you guys think if the FBI was a legitimate organization they would have not investigated sandy hook and 9/11 by now? give me a break, they are bought and paid for all the way.
>>79961444
>the Republican FBI director is in on it!
wake up sheeple, am I right?
>>79961440
the law was not objcetively broken. Try again.
>>79962067
>The law was not objectively broken (it was)
>tfw Hillary is working with Trump to bring down the big banks and is sacrificing herself to jail so Trump can win
holy fuck guys this is it!
>>79961201
>being this naive
the FBI flat out admitted she broke the law, she did the exact same things others have been charged for.
>>79953717
She is a big guy for you.
>>79962067
> The law was not objectively broken
You dumb cunt.
>>79954550
This
>>79962428
wtf i love hillary now
>>79954242
the code word 'republican' doesn't mean anything since the entire GOP is against Trump.
try harder, shill
>>79954242
All this started from America trying to find justice for the death of its own in benghazi. Now it's about how she handled her emails because that's the best the right can do
>>79956257
They literally did. But somehow for Hillary, the standard for gross negligence is intent. Think about that. In what universe does that make sense?
>>79953717
She means: "I'm a lying cunt who actually thinks that people will believe what I am saying."
>>79963139
no the FBI did not admit that. They mentioned negligence, and in similiar cases that would lead to security or administrative sanctions. No laws were broken. To break the law in a government position, you need to have criminal/malicious intent, which Clinton did not have.
>>79964332
republican is not a code word.
'shill' however is a buzzword used on /pol/ by someone at their wit's end.
>>79963139
Just like the affluenza teen did. He murdered 4 people and the judge just let him go because being rich is hard enough and a valid legal defense
>>79964835
>No laws were broken
>>79954242
Im pretty sure there is such a thing as criminal negligence
And handling the most secret information a country has in your private server is probably the second biggest criminal negligence after killing someone on thw workplace by not following the safety rules
>>79954350
Calling the DOJ?
COULD IT BE SO SIMPLE?
>>79954166
someone needs to hack her account and pin that tweet and retweet it with "lol"
>>79965126
>I'm pretty sure
>>79962067
>the Republican FBI director is in on it!
>wake up sheeple, am I right?
Would you please stop talking about things you don't understand?
Comey is Obama's FBI director. He wants to continue as Hillary's FBI director. His ambitions go beyond his party registration. He's going to play ball.
>>79965126
>>79965783
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
>>79966440
gross negligence is a legal concept, it's not the same as 'just' negligence.
you sure you want to continue making a fool of yourself?
>>79966602
Yeah and her actions match the description, so what's your point?
>>79966982
>match the description
gross negligence is a legal concept, FBI did not find Clinton's action to be grossly negligent. The end.
Are you struggling to understand your native language?
>>79966602
>Negligence doesn't *really* mean negligence duh!
>>79967320
>FBI didn't find her negligent so obviously she wasn't
k
>>79953717
>except me
>>79967336
here I'll teach you:
gross negligence is a legal concept.
negligence is a word.
>>79967461
that's how the legal system work, yes. The FBI do their investigation and recommend either a or b.
If you want discuss tinfoil theories, I'm not going to entertain you.
>>79954310
Different circumstances. People often plead guilty to cut on lawyer fees and to avoid a big controversy.
>>79968111
>Different circumstances
You can say that again.
>>79967955
Correct and Hillary did both.
https://youtu.be/wbkS26PX4rc
>>79969035
holy fuck son she's incompetent
>>79969035
lmao
