you don't really believe this stuff is true, do you?
>>79857524
Shut up, Tyrone
I think the percentages are probably correct by those numbers seem way too high.
>>79857524
http://www.colorofcrime.com/2016/03/the-color-of-crime-2016-revised-edition/
>>79857524
Here's the Chicago stats that are recently up to date. It's mostly black on black crime there though:
http://heyjackass.com/home/
>>79857695
*but
>>79857524
28 people have had their dick shot off in Chicago wtf
>>79857524
Of course not, I'll take the word of buzzfeed and Black Lives Matter over the FBI or DOJ any day.
>>79857524
You don't believe the FBI??
Oh, wait...
>>79857524
The "when this is adjusted for population" number is wrong. They just inflated the real numbers to match the population gap, rather than looking at the real numbers. So the rest of the infograph after that is wrong.
Yes because I have read the full version
Dishonest OP
>>79857748
Making me think
The overall fallacy here is only looking at criminals rather than the entire population.
What you should be looking at is, of the almost 40 million blacks in the US, what percent have committed a violent crime?
In general, murder and violent crime are fringe issues. They are rare events. You can't use crime stats to generalize an entire population.
>>79858773
>>79858888
None of these are FBI statistics. THe graphic claims they are, but you can't find these anywhere online.
>>79859134
all of those are dead links. you fell for the meme.
>>79859305
You should look at it in terms of the victims. If you are white and live in a black, you will be the victim of a crime 100% of the time. You don't need to blame an entire race of people, but you shouldn't force people to be the victim of crime. White people put a lot of effort into avoiding blacks, we need to let them do it.
>>79859305
But the numbers show that it isn't whitey killing black people. It's the other way around.
>>79859356
>muh FBI statistics
Why the fuck should I trust the FBI?
>>79859594
Thats only because people look at the stats and assume all black offenses are against all white victims. That's not the case.
They look at a table like thishttps://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43
And assume that 100% of the black crimes went into the white victims spot.
When it truth it has to be broken down like this
https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/offenses-known-to-law-enforcement/expanded-homicide/expanded_homicide_data_table_6_murder_race_and_sex_of_vicitm_by_race_and_sex_of_offender_2013.xls
of the roughly 3000 murder victims, the offender was white 2500 times and black only 400 times.
The infographs are wrong. You are several times more likely to be killed by someone of your own race.
>>79859986
3000 white murder victims*
If you look at the black row, it's mostly blacks killing blacks too.
>post truth
>thread dies
Come on guys. I was really hoping for some butthurt racist tears.
>>79861098
Not surprising that most crime in homogenous areas would be in group, higher likelyhood of the perp and victem being the same race.
The problem is that black people still kill more white people than whites kill blacks, even despite the much lower number of black people. OP's numbers are off, but it doesn't change much about the argument.
>>79859986
>calling hispanics white
>only looking at one crime statistic
85% of interracial crime between whites and blacks is committed by blacks
>>79861555
>The problem is that black people still kill more white people than whites kill blacks
No it's not. that only a accounts for a few hundred murders a year.
>>79861685
There is an ethnicity sections
Interracial crime is only a small fraction of all crime.
And.. as I already said... criminals are an extremely small part of any population .
>>79857524
not racist
not propaganda
yes believe it
>>79859986
>>79860091
>>79860186
>>79861098
>>79861687
>>79861881
Are you intentionally eschewing the point of the infographic, that black crime is grossly disproportionate to its population size? You keep insisting the point should be that a minority of blacks commit crimes, but that's changing the subject, isn't it? You're not addressing the disproportionality, which is shockingly high (and obvious). What's the purpose of doing that? Intentional sophistry, or just misunderstanding of the information presented?
>>79861971
I'm surprised apes can figure out how to use a gun
>>79861881
>Interracial crime is only a small fraction of all crime.
Because we don't live near each other. White people avoid black people. If you force us to be together, there will be more interracial crime.
>criminals are an extremely small part of any population .
1/3 of all black men are in some form of the criminal justice system. Many more were never caught. Blacks are criminals, dude, get over it
>>79857524
Black on white crime would b a lot higher but even the most retarded blacks know they would get convicted for fucking with white people.
>>79862162
When you're trying to make generalizations about all blacks, then yes it matters. Also, as I already said the OP's numbers were wrong because they pretended the real numbers were much higher than they are.
You're just trying to build a culture of outrage over an extremely small issue.
>>79862260
>1/3 of all black men are in some form of the criminal justice system
Almost all of those are non-violent. A large majority are marijuana related.
I literally just linked the real fbi stats on what kinds of kinds the arrests are for.
>>79862919
>When you're trying to make generalizations
what exactly constitutes the generalization other than the counter-generalization you're struggling to make with all the subject changes and tangents you're pumping out?
>You're just trying to build a culture of outrage over an extremely small issue.
And you're just focused on signalling, like most sophists on the Left are. Its transparent. I know you're arrogant, but everyone sees it outside your echochambers on plebbit.
Is black crime highly disproportionate to their population size? Yes it is. What does that mean?
