If America is really this big why haven't they conquered the world yet. Is it beacuse they are fat or the fuckin kikes?
I mean would they benefit more if they would have the whole world???
>>79426958
Kek
>>79426958
>>79427020
We simply don't want to. We could easily destroy the standing armies of literally every country on Earth in less than 365 days but the will to do so isn't there.
>>79426958
but we have
>>79426958
> why haven't hey conquered the world yet
We're trying and that's not a good thing for us or anyone in case you haven't noticed.
>>79426958
Because we don't give a damn about you insignificant norms!
If trump wins will he conquer the world?
>>79426958
they can barely manage their own small country. what are they, several trillion dollars in debt? taking in 800%+ more land mass is not going to help them
>If America is really this big why haven't they conquered the world yet
We don't feel the need to conquer the world to compensate for our micro penises like european countries did.
>>79426958
Read "The Grand Chessboard" by Zbigniew Brzezinski.
Basically we are taking over the world one section at a time. Europe is cucked, the Middle East is destabilized, Russia and China are both surrounded.
That's why the U.S. Has had a boner for Syria and Iran for so long. After they fall Russia and China are in much weaker positions geopolitically.
Africa and South America don't even matter.
>nobody mentioning how inaccurate this map is
Goddammit, Americans
>>79427717
they will get shit tons of oil
>>79426958
>he said, in english, on an american weeb forum
>>79426958
It's because we havent decided to eat you yet
We're keeping you alive till we get hangry
>>79427835
Fuckin hell I didn't even notice how much bait was in that image.
>>79427835
ikr. But if there is trilions of bad mexicans in california why doesnt texas just leave usa and stop paying for those aliens??? Look how big it is it could definitely work alone as a country it self
>>79427835
This is perfectly accurate. Have you never taken a geography class? The globe/world map makes it hard to, but the surface area of the US is about the same as Mars.
>>79426958
1. That map is highly inaccurate
2. We already have.
You see, a German may think "we roll their capital with tanks and win the war" but an Anglo/American wins before the war begins, by bringing an entire world economic system down upon your head, so that it doesn't become "you, your armies and allies vs them" it becomes "the entire international community, every multinational corporation, every monetary entity vs. your """rogue country""" "
Our country has created the system called "The Beast", now who can make war upon us?
>>79426958
Unfortunately the country has been taken over by anti-nationsalism
>>79428090
Last time southern states tried to leave the union it didnt work out for anyone. Also there are shittons of messicans in texas.
The US doesnt need to take over the world. We already have invaded the minds of your children with pop music, reality TV, and smartphones.
>>79427835
Most of the maps you see on a regular basis are deceptive because it's impossible to map a globe perfectly onto a two dimensional rectangle. Once you adjust for this distortion then you'll see that OP's image is accurate. Well, Australia is a bit too big but otherwise it's pretty accurate.
Literally no reason to expand our borders. We have everything we need here and it would create nothing but problems. No one else has anything we need that we can't get. Plus the majority of the rest of the world is absolute shit tier and we'd have to build up their infrastructure and stuff and we'd constantly be dealing with insurgencies all over the place.
>>79428257
1. Map is accurate beacuse Earth couldn't be flat if there weren't for the giant center so called "USA" in the middle
2. Thats my point if no one can make war upon USA why don't they just take over the world?
>>79428320
It's really strange, how we're simultaneously the biggest proponents of globalism and destruction of identity and sovereignty, yet all carried out through a nationalist lens.
A 19 year old American with a bottle of Mountain Dew and an internet connection may say "slot the ragheads" as they're considered a threat to the U.S., yet the easterners being destroyed were secular governments, replaced with radical Islamists, as a million refugees pour into the west, due to a war supported by '''patriotic''' Americans who dislike Muslims.
>>79428450
Its quite simple beacuse earth is flat and a giant square. Its just the retarded kikes making all the maps wrongly so people think earth isnt flat and invest in space travel, but infact money goes to the kikes. Nasa is literally getting billions of dollars every year but that money goes to kikes as they own Nasa
>>79427789
You're right... But faggots are trying to subvert us from within our own borders... They know we're too powerful to fight head on, so they're taking the backdoor approach and trying to destroy us internally
>>79427061
>We could easily destroy the standing armies of literally every country on Earth in less than 365 days
Sure you could.
>>79428614
We already have. You're thinking in terms of conventional warfare. Military force is actually counter-productive to maintaining control and results in chaos. The greatest control you can exert over a people is economic and material. No one is "developed" who isn't infested with out corporations and beholden to our monetary entities, like flies on a corpse.
>>79429088
They dont need militery if the have 3/4 of all the nukes in the world
>>79429088
>>79429189
>>79427061
So could Russia, but our sphere of influence dwarfs theirs. Again, military is the last dimension empire to consider. Our power stems from a globalized economy.
>>79429088
>the volunteer only army isn't at peak standards during peace-time
brilliant one, ahmed
>>79429189
Yeah because nuking the entire planet will surely not have an impact on America. Are you being stupid on purpose?
>>79429088
Same idea as wealth inequality. 99% of soliders are there to look good, 1% actually does the killing
>>79429315
>so could Russia
Nice fucking meme. Their economy is still recovering from communism, corruption is rampant, and they have what, two aircraft carriers? Russia has literally zero power projection outside their immediate borders.
>>79429315
This.
>>79426958
You're forgetting something
>(((they)))
>>79429324
Even your active soldiers are absolute horseshit. You have quantity but lack quality.
>>79429088
>He thinks wars are still won with manpower
we got fat fucks sitting in air conditioned warehouses in kansas blowing up people thousands of miles away. And if we weren't worried about civilian casualties no one would stand a chance.
>>79429088
If there was ever another draft nearly every fatty in the country would be broken back into fighting shape through six months of basic training and not having 24/7 access to Taco Bell.
The Jew keeps people fat and lazy so civilians don't turn against them. The military makes them into men.
>>79429407
They can destroy the entire world many times over. Even if 90+% of their warheads were intercepted by missile defense systems (impossible) they'd still be able to wipe the continental U.S. off the face of the earth.
My point is that guns and bombs are the last thing you should be considering in modern empire. If you have to break them out, you're already losing. We have on our side an entire global economy in which everyone must participate but is also beholden ultimately to us or entities tied to us. We are The Beast, I say again.
>>79426958
we have the biggest cocks so we don't really need to
>>79429538
Reminder that 2 of the countries on that image were literally bulldozed in a couple of days by Germany until America destroyed Germany with our superior air force.
>>79429693
I'm totally discounting nukes. My original post was entirely hypothetical.
>>79429538
kek too bad america has drones and doesnt need retards anymore
>>79429548
Drone striking children and women in the middle-east is hardly a military feat. If you tried to invade a European country you would be destroyed.
>>79429538
We don't even have the quantity. Compared to Sweden maybe but we find ourselves on much more equal footing with China or Russia. That being said, our entire military backbone is built around money and technology, again, stemming from our control of the global economy.
>>79429843
>you would be destroyed
>>79429407
kik Russia recovered years ago...
>>79429407
but they border basically everything
>>79429843
gonna sic your jihadis?
>>79429781
>I'm totally discounting nukes. My original post was entirely hypothetical.
>No, I'm right. I mean, if that part about me being wrong weren't true, I'd be totally right.
You're hopeless.
>>79429957
Wow you took over Germany after they fought a world war surrounded at all fronts against practically all of Europe. America so stronk.
If it was America vs Germany you wouldn't stand a chance.
>>79429843
America could fuck whole Europe in 1 day (nuke Berlin and activate all drones in those militery bases while whole Europe falls in chaos)
>>79426958
Top kek, Serbia. I think I've met people stupid enough to take this at face value though, sadly.
>>79429971
Yeah and then the economy went down the shitter again the last few years
>>79429843
We don't need to, remember? I think Denmark actually dropped more bombs for us in Libya than France did.
>>79429538
Yeah, remember when the Germans had quality soldiers in WW2, and easily beat the Soviets, because overwhelming numbers don't mean anything?
Yeah, neither do I.
>>79426958
Your image gave me a good laff! Here have 1 internet.
>>79430112
You absolute monkey, I'm not arguing against you or saying what you said isn't true.
>>79430155
>that wasn't a REAL war
>>79429718
Yeah but they're all black.
>>79430155
no if it was America vs only Germany no Japan Germany would get destroyed why do you think Hitler wanted Japan to distract usa
>>79429088
sure buddy. Sweden totally is good even though 90% cant serve in the military. Blond people are not eligable to serve yet they had to let them in anyway LOL
>>79430228
>Serbia fuck off comparing me to Slavs
>>79430328
>wrong statement
>proven wrong
>"no, in my hypothetical scenario in which reality doesn't apply, I'm right"
You don't really know anything, so you should probably stop talking.
>>79430155
>practically all of Europe.
>drones
>rail guns
>lasers
We're getting so far ahead of the rest of the world militarily it's ridiculous.
>>79426958
>>79427020
>>79427502
>>79427885
>>79428090
>>79428614
>>79428813
>>79429189
>>79429818
>>79429971
>>79430197
>>79430409
>>79430503
based Slovak CIA agent
>>79430604
>in my hypothetical scenario in which reality doesn't apply, I'm right
That's the point, monkey. In hypothetical situations reality doesn't apply. I'm not talking about reality. I'm talking about a non-realistic hypothetical scenario. Do you understand, monkey?
>>79430688
what's the pint if you don't want to use it???
>>79430468
You know it's funny because all of Nato is using Swedish-invented warfare. There's a reason Sweden has never been invaded. Scandinavian countries in general are THE warriors/soldiers of this planet.
>>79430239
>We don't need to, remember?
That's not we were discussing. We were discussing if you could, and you can't.
>>79430197
Why do you suck America's cock? And no, they couldn't "fuck whole Europe" in 1 day. Go back to school, kid (if you have any in Slovenia, fuck if I know).
>>79430861
Why are you all nationalistic here but when it comes to leting in refugees you are first to beg for more?
>>79430768
So you're admitting that you're wrong, finally? If you have to strip the scenario of all connection to reality to make it feasible, you're wrong. This is really stupid. You need to just either stop posting or admit that you're wrong, but you're not because you're also hard-headed and going to continue this ridiculous line until the bitter end. That's fine. I'll be here.
>>79427717
>small
>governing over half a continent's population
Oh wait Youre a leaf
>>79430805
WW3 is coming. It's inevitable.
>all of Nato is using Swedish-invented warfare
uh huh
>>79431069
>Why are you all nationalistic here but when it comes to leting in refugees you are first to beg for more?
The general populous has been indoctrinated/brainwashed by the jewish educational system and media manipulation (thanks to America and the allies for liberating the jews during WW2). The jews target Sweden the most because we have the highest concentration of white people on the planet. You know, the people that the jews want to exterminate?
>>79430861
>Scandinavian countries in general are THE warriors/soldiers of this planet.
>Denmark surrenders in less than six hours to German invasion
>Norway surrenders in ~ 2 months
>only 10,000 casualties inflicted on Wehrmacht
ayy lmao
>>79431081
If we're talking about real life, I'm wrong, monkey. I'm not talking about real life, monkey. I drew up a hypothetical discussion to generate intellectual discussion about the topics at hand, monkey. Take your autism medication, monkey. I was never arguing with you and I never said you were wrong about any of your posts because I didn't read them as they didn't pertain to the civilized discussion that I was having, monkey.
>>79430633
Russia did a lot of the grunt work in WW2
The US just kinda cleaned up the dregs.
Wouldnt have been possible without our manufacturing base though (which we dont have anymore)
>>79430861
No, we can. We have the military to actually tackle (A) European country. Now, how we'd ramp up the propaganda machine to get the war started, when the entire continent is already beholden to us economically and politically is where it falls apart, as we don't need to invade you guys, remember. It would be like invading Puerto Rico.
>>79431196
Leafs should be banned from posting on /pol/ just like dindus, kikes, latinos, indians, australians, animals and women
>>79431325
But sweedes have really well develpoed militery nowdays pic related
>>79431325
No, you made a really bad argument and are now trying very hard to dump your shame by covering your tracks with "no, I was hypothetically stupid". You need to stop, before this gets worse for you than it already is.
>>79429433
god looking at our empire makes me rock fucking hard. The military base is our equivalent of a colony
>>79431069
Based
>>79431760
You never raised any reason why my argument was wrong. You simply said that the situation I proposed couldn't happen in real life when I already established that I wasn't talking about real life. Your entire line of posts is pointless, monkey. There's not even a reason for you to be so mad and upset about being wrong other than military grade autism, monkey.
>>79431388
It's actually quite fascinating how deluded you americans are. I reckon it's becuase you're being brainwashed with american exceptionalism from a very early age, right? You can't even defend your own country. There's a reason you needed France to help you during the revolutionary war. You lost against jungle monkeys in Vietnam, and you struggled in the middle-east against sand-niggers. Your military is a joke, always has been, always will be. You will never be able to invade a European country (Not talking mediterranean, baltic or slavic countries, obviously).
>>79432088
>you will never be able to invade a European country
>>79432242
Already been through this. >>79430155
>>79426958
>If America is really this big why haven't they conquered the world yet.
Haven't you noticed, we already have...
You're typing in English, your films from jew land, your oil purchasable only in dollars, your culture is influenced by US, everything "cool".
There was a culture war, and we won. That's why you think America has no culture, it looks too much like your own...like everyone's.
>>79429189
I wonder what happens if you fire a nuke at a supervolcano
>>79429407
Uh no you idiot
Russia is very much a superpower
USA has the latest technology, China has the largest army, Russia is that one country that has a bit of both and also borders anyone that matters
>>79432618
Germany is a European country, and we invaded Germany. Therefore we invaded a European country. You should specify all these special terms and conditions before you say retarded shit :^)
>>79432692
>former USSR republics, China, and Finland are the only countries that matter
Interesting perspective you have, Volodimyr.
>>79431248
m8 please
WW3 is going to be the anglo nations (except Canada, those cucks will stay neutral) + Russia vs. the EU + Middle East
China will remain neutral until one side gets close to winning, then they'll side with them.
>>79432683
Sun gets blacked out by ash and every living thing dies.
>>79427061
>We simply don't want to. We could easily destroy every country on Earth in less than 15 minutes but the will to do so isn't there.
fixed.
>>79432671
>You're typing in English
>>79432088
lel slavs would unite in to red army and then we would be unstobapble
>>79426958
Because most of the US is just forest or barren landscape. Land size and population size are to different things.
>>79432827
Oh okay. Well in that case Sweden has invaded America (:
>>79432692
They are not a super power. Super power is not just military strength.
To be a super power you need to have 3 things.
1. Economic strength
2. Ideological strength
3. Military strength.
Russia has #3. China has #3 and #1. US is the only ones with all three.
Also, China has no navy, so they're absolutely fucked in any war against the US. Russia vs China is up for debate though.
>>79432944
yeah, the language became ours when we won the war of independence, oh that reminds me Happy 4th of July old bean!
>>79433052
>two*
Fucking phone.
>>79432977
You already tried that. The USSR wasn't that mighty.
>>79433056
What a retarded post
>>79426958
Your map is a little off. North America is only about the size of main.
>>79432827
Japan, China, Poland, Alaska, and all seas surrounding them, yes that covers basically anyone important
In a span of a day, I've been called black, Latino, and now Russian
/pol/ get some originality
>>79432088
Most people here would go the "but Vietnam wasn't a REAL war" route, sure but if you think you could stand against our military (not that we'd be fighting alone, we never do) you're not being realistic. I think the Swiss or Finns could give us a good run and I can't say how occupation would go but the intimidate warfare would be overwhelmingly in our favor.
We may not be able to defeat the UK and definitely not Russia, from a military standpoint, but you guys or any central European country would fall quickly. Again, I can't say how occupation or rebuilding would go.
>>79433190
Just using your kind of reasoning. Your really just calling yourself a retard.
>>79433082
Russia vs China would be very very interesting to observe
>>79433227
Russia doesn't border Japan. Bordering the same ocean as another country doesn't equate to bordering them. ffs anon
>>79433299
Nigger how is my reasoning flawed? All I did was post a picture of Americans invading Europe and you got mad
>>79433282
Keep telling yourself that. Get back to me once you've stopped dreaming.
If you can't even win against jungle monkeys in Vietnam, what makes you think you can successfully invade one of the whitest countries on this planet? You really are delusional.
>>79427789
>Africa and South America don't even matter.
That's what "climate change" is for
>>79433452
>Nigger how is my reasoning flawed?
How was mine? I just said Sweden has invaded America, becuase "technically" we have. Just using your own argument against you. Not my fault you don't like it. Should have thought about that before you decided to be a moron.
>>79433541
Where is the American declaration of war on Vietnam?
>>79433452
semantics, ocean is a natural border, the point is they have active bases near everyone, and so do we, why do you think we have bases in Japan and others?
>>79433282
We would destroy even Britain. Do you know how large our standing army is? It would be over in a couple days.
>>79433680
>>79433678
>just said Sweden has invaded America, becuase "technically" we have.
Because you literally haven't and there's no evidence to the contrary. Are you literally 12 years old?
>>79433731
Not an argument
>>79433678
>technically you haven't.
>>79432011
You said we could "destroy the standing armies of every country in less than a year", which we can't (not that we need to if we could) but then when I point out one of various reasons why, you jump to "no what I said was only hypothetical, anything that proves me wrong doesn't count, 'cus it's hypothetical".
I'm genuinely amazed how many fellow Americans get fooled by the military-industrial complex. Though really most of the world is fooled by it too. They don't even particularly hide out strength, they just put a thin veil over it that most (even soldiers i've talked to) accept.
Americas military is so absurd people truly don't comprehend its absurdity. We have 10 aircraft carriers that boast more firepower then the ENTIRE worlds navys combined. Most of the world is ocean people, America's navy is beyond insane comparatively to the rest of the world.
Numbers for military stopped meaning anything back when guns we're invented.
Russias military strength is a meme. Most of their land vehicles have never been in combat and they all are drastically inferior to the Abrams tank.
>inb4 nukes
Talking about nukes is stupid because the entire idea is to avoid mutually assured destruction.
>>79427789
>South America doesn't matter
>one of the largest sources of natural resources
yeah nah you're a cunt
>>79433541
White countries have an actual infrastructure to destroy, unlike veitnam.
Once we blow up your power stations, trains, water plants, and roads you will be begging for a land invasion.
>>79426958
>>79433762
>Not an argument
Not an argument
>Because you literally haven't and there's no evidence to the contrary. Are you literally 12 years old?
Except we have.
>>79433784
We have, according to his dumbass reasoning.
>>79427061
I love you, America. I love your patriotism and can-do-attitude.
But sometimes..you just gotta stop.
>>79433876
>You said we could "destroy the standing armies of every country in less than a year"
We literally could. You're absolutely deluded if you think otherwise. We have absolute uncontested control of the air and all other power proceeds from there in military terms. You've given no reason why I'm wrong other than those that are automatically discounted by the hypothetical nature of the scenario I've provided. Again, if we're talking about reality, the actual, current, real situation, you're right, but we're not, monkey.
>>79434062
Any proof?
>>79434110
Pessimism was illegal in the Third Reich.
STOP #WHITE LIES
>>79433891
>Once we blow up your power stations, trains, water plants, and roads you will be begging for a land invasion.
Yeah and white countries (unlike Vietnam) have things to prevent that from happening you complete idiot.
>>79429088
>I don't know what ineligible entails
>>79434172
>Any proof?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Sweden
:)
>>79434307
It's not my fault that you're illiterate.
>>79434177
..why is australia called africa?
>>79434321
>1638–1655
>Swedish education
United States didn't exist until 1776
>>79433541
We did, after the fact. They wear Levi's blue jeans and have a Mcdonalds in Ho Chi Minh City. They're entangled like everyone else.
We could most easily take your people, for lack of any nationalist or religious ideology among your youth and a strong need of economic security, add atop all of this the fact that your military is geared towards defending against Russia in a conventional war, when the only way anyone other than Russia or China could stand against us is through unconventional warfare.
Your people lack most importantly the mindset to protect their country, so you'll always be under our spell. Unless those "refugees welcome" women and gay pride students are willing to go squat in the tundra for a decade with their love of Sweden the only thing to their names (unlikely) there's no way you can effectively defend yourselves. We would bury you under bombs, then U.S. dollars.
>>79433698
No, Britain is hard to invade and most importantly, they actually have some grit in their craw. We could probably wipe their military pretty quickly, assuming Australia stays put, but occupation would be messy.
>>79434017
And the Europeans owned the whole continent for decades. How crazy it is, this world that we live in; it makes perfect sense.
>>79426958
Audible kekking has ensued. I like how NA fits inside the US.
>>79434172
>other than those that are automatically discounted by the hypothetical nature of the scenario I've provided.
Whelp, there you go. You said "could destroy every standing army on earth in a year" not "the circumstances of my impossible scenario change at will whenever my reasoning falls apart"
>>79434502
I said America, not United States. You should specify all these special terms and conditions before you say retarded shit :^)
>>79435008
If nukes are included, basically any nuclear armed state could achieve the same. When nukes are discounted, only the United States could achieve this goal, but since nukes are present in reality, the scenario is hypothetical.
Christ you're dense
>>79435030
America and United States are synonymous but since English is your third language (after Arabic) I'll let it slide.
>>79433174
was for some time untill retards started to run it also had commnunist ideas which are retarded
>>79435163
Even in the "hypothetical scenario" (you want to change after you've been proven wrong) you're still wrong because we have about 2million people on hand at any given time. We could take A country (not Russia or China, though) but by no means every country on the planet, and certainly not within a year. The only way would be for you to backtrack (again) and re-include nukes to the """hypothetical scenario""" and even after that it's still impossible for Russia having a larger nuclear arsenal and will to use it if invaded.
There's this overrated movie called "Aguirre, The Wrath of God", watch the end scene.
>>79435675
> we have about 2million people on hand at any given time
There you go again with retarded shit, monkey. We fielded more than that in the 1940s. We can easily get millions more men at any time. If you notice, my post didn't say occupy every country on Earth, just obliterate their militaries, which would quite definitely be possible.
You're probably too young to remember Desert Storm.
>>79435877
An inexperienced conscript army leads to more harm for the overall military than it helps. Even with every able-bodied man (and now intersex otherkin) called to arms and even with nuclear weapons off the table we'd exhaust our manpower and our economy long before effectively wiping the standing armies off of Europe or Asia.
As well, our power stems from our control over the world economy and all civilized countries being beholden to us. They're not going to stay in line if we steadily creep from country to country indiscriminately attacking them
In no way whatsoever is your scenario, no matter how much you try to adjust it or control it, even remotely feasible.
>>79436644
Casualties would be incredibly minimal. Our navies control every and all oceans and our planes control each and every sky. All we have to do is find the enemy and then they'll disappear after an air strike.
>>79437023
The Russian missile defense system would make an air-based victory impossible and the UK still has a strong navy. That's not the point, though. We're still fighting in Afghanistan and we couldn't hold Vietnam, so superior airpower and a superior navy don't guarantee victory, even if the enemy has none at all. This isn't rock paper scissors.
>>79429433
That pic triggers me
>Russia didn't do nuffin
>Every country that borders Russia is just rayciss, Russia never did anything to them
>>79437461
Yeah, most of those guys are cucks and halfheartedly support their own occupation, in fear of a country with an actual military. That being said, these countries are all firmly under our sphere of influence, even if they fear Russia's. No one is free, here.
>>79430155
>Wow you took over Germany after they fought a world war surrounded at all fronts against practically all of Europe
To be fair non-Prussian Germans are pretty shit at war.
>First French Republic is invaded by nearly all of Europe just after a near economic collapse and revolution and wins
>Repeats this four times in less than 20 years
>Louis XIV fights half of Europe to place his son on the throne of Spain and wins, confirming his holdings in Germany in the process
>Prussia with British aid solos France, Russia, and Austria long enough for the Tsarina to die and be replaced by a Prussian fanboy
>Israel defeats a coalition of Arab countries in less than a week
>Germany fights a war against France, Britain, Russia, and Serbia and loses despite being allied to the Ottoman Empire and Austro-Hungarian Empire
>Germany tries again 20 years after the previous war ended this time with Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary, Italy, and Japan as allies and proceeds to lose yet again
>>79435163
>America and United States are synonymous but since English is your third language (after Arabic) I'll let it slide.
Here is the merriam webster definition.
>either continent (North America or S. America) of the western hemisphere
You should really learn your own language you illiterate retard, lmao.
>>79437661
Oh I agree I am simply saying that Russia's bellicose actions are the reason they are surrounded by NATO bases, not because NATO is being a big mean bully. Every country we have a base in chose to let us build the base there.
Why did you guys put north america in new england? Doesnt that contradict your point?
>>79429843
>If you tried to invade a European country you would be destroyed.
Is this real life?
>>79426958
(((you)))
>>79426958
>>79427020
Why? We already have the best country on Earth.
>>79429538
delete this
>>79426958
It would be expensive and a chore.
It's like climbing mount Everest, we like that we could do it any time but fuck if we're going today, we've got shit to do (or think we do)
>>79427717
Debt stops meaning anything when you own whoever you owed money to
That is, btw how we're going to solve the national debt.
>>79431895
I guess a hut is the equivalent of a country then.
>>79434611
You do know Britain doesn't work like a normal country does in wars. It relies on more ETERNAL methods, more economical and political methods. More reconnaissance methods. More 5D chess methods.
I have no doubt America could wipe out most armies in the world, but I have no doubt America would lose to most countries. Ironically (or not) the reason you lose is because you're so ignorant you can't see past your own treasure (literally and metaphorically).
>>79426958
you know what they say
big country
big people
big dicks
hit me up
