>create libertarian paradise with no state army
>each person hires their own mercenary
>richest guy in the land can hire the most mercenaries
>richest guy uses his army to conquer all the other guys and impose his own economic system on everyone else.
How the fuck is this system supposed to work? Wouldn't the above happen every time?
this sounds suspiciously like an argument, but it's clearly not
>>79423318
Kill the richest guy
>>79423318
That's anarchy, not liberalism (or libertarianism, as uneducated Americans call it).
>with no state army
What is with you fucking leaves and confusing libertarianism with anarchy
In fact an army is THE only difference between the two for some people and you cock it up
See above
you're a moron
>>79423318
>no because muh ostracization
I swear Stephan can be a genius at one thing and toddler mentality at another
>>79423660
>>79423669
but Stefan literally argues against state armies and the monopolization of force. he say's it's the same as taxation, which is theft.
>>79423318
Hey mercenary go slaughter and kill those civilians that every single one has a gun and a mercenary protecting him, i want to be a ruler of this land
>yes mastah
>impose his own economic system on everyone else
IIRC, steal the land, rape the women and enslave everyone is more popular, but economists haven't won enough wars to really have a frame of reference.
>>79423318
>Wouldn't the above happen every time?
It is.It is how states were created.
>>79423814
Because he's an anarchist you cock
Make like a leaf and kill yourself
>>79423318
>create libertarian state with no state child services
>parents spank their children
>>79423318
But that violates the non aggression principle so it wouldn't happen
>>79423318
>never read ancap literature
>literally every ancap wrote a refutation to his retarded point
>a fucking leaf
And just by the by, the difference between libertarianism and anarcho capitalism is exactly nothing, apart from the fact that some people like to propagate the institutionalized violation of private property rights while still calling themselves libertarians. They are philosophically inconsistent cucks.
>>79423318
Didn't something similar happen in japan?
>>79424073
but anon, spanking violates the non aggression principle!
>>79424099
>literally every ancap wrote a refutation to his retarded point
Do you mind giving us a summary, then? I'm curious as to how they would prevent the scenario from occurring.
>>79423318
It happened in the middle ages
