Are you in favour or against carbon taxes?
>>79311272
Yes. I think its the best way to price in the damage CO2 emissions cause.
Yes. And fast food should also be taxed highly for the economic damages it causes over time.
>>79314049
And that money should go into making produce cheaper imo
There's zero point crippling your own industry if you can't insist China does the same
>>79313579
But why CO2? Shouldn't we also have Methane taxes and Water Vapor taxes and taxes on fucking everything? Or is this just another bullshit crusade by the eco-hippies that will never be happy until we're all back living in caves and growing fucking mushrooms for sustenance?
>>79311272
Burn the coal,pay the toll.
>>79311272
The carbon tax doesn't work. It's supposed to push innovation in reducing CO2 emissions but it just ends up lowering profit margins.
>>79314507
^ This
China will further ass rape us in trade
>>79311272
Yes, just look at China and their pollution.
We should give the corporations more incentive to actually fix these problems before they get us all killed.
Also there's the thing called climate change.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/
>>79311272
I'm against taxing cow farts.
Cow farts have rights.
>>79317548
China is actually making huge investments into nuclear energy to reduce the amount of coal they need to burn in the winter.
