CONSPIRACY THEORISTS BTFO
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: CONSPIRACY THEORISTS BTFO
NASA SAID ENOUGH AND MADE PUBLIC 10 THOUSAND MOON LANDING PICTURES
https://m.thevintagenews.com/2015/10/05/so-nasa-got-sick-of-all-that-conspiracy-thing-and-released-over-10000-photos-from-the-apollo-moon-mission/
>conspiracy theorists btfo
>anti-freedom btfo
>>79163917
There was never a doubt. Stars and bars baby!
Really makes you think
>>79163917
>inb4 people ignorant of photography chime in
>>79163917
>releases pictures
>1337 years later
what
>>79163917
Old news are old
Someone even made a short movie with all the pictures they released, don't have the link tho but it's fucking beautful
Somewhat related, final SLS booster test from yesterday. Next one to be lit will be flight hardware in 2018.
https://youtu.be/LhxSk70r8dw
>>79164251
>release only the best pictures to the press to show that you did it
>peoples start for years to doubt your achievement
>now enough is enough heres all the picture you fags
Man will never leave LEO unless on a suicide mission...only turtles & tardigrades.
>2015
how did I missed it.. bookmarked.
>>79163917
>we are sick and tired of consparicy yards so will release hundreds of photos in our current time with photoshop u sea do doing this back then when technology wasn't that advance and would of been more believable
>>79163917
>people actually unironically believed that NASA would go through the trouble of faking the moon landing when it'd be easier and cheaper to actually just go to the fucking moon
>>79164673
NASA were all drunken stewbums just being fed telemetry data from our projekt under DOE black budget.
>>79164673
>when it'd be easier and cheaper to actually just go to the fucking moon
There might be dinosaurs out there left over from the filming of Jurassic Park. Since it would have been cheaper.
>>79164673
this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6MOnehCOUw
Oh nice. They had enough time to edit out all the aliens and structures they found.
>>79163917
Neato
>>79164653
Takes time and money to scan all that old film to into digital. Plus it costs money to host thousands of high res images, which is why they used Flickr instead of their own servers.
There's probably a lot of red tape involved too.
>hey guys we can fake pictures and sell them as real. These dumb redneck Americans totally will eat this up
>>79164825
I wasn't aware the Moon was extinct like Dinosaurs.
You dip.
>>79163917
that picture looks so face omg
>>79164673
That's not it, retard. Don't you think it's fucking weird that we send robots to Mars and talk about colonizing it, but we're too terrified to set foot on the fucking moon? There's something up there they don't want anyone to know about.
moon fakers, flat earth fags, hollow earth cucks
please go back to /x/ anytime
>>79165072
Inappropriate capitalisation gives you away m8. F minus.
>>79165113
So face??
>>79165337
fake oops
>>79164673
Why when you could just pay Stanley Kubric?
>>79165257
We already went there and the general consensus was that it was fucking awful.
Whatever i dont know why im even replying to you.
>>79163917
>Implying this wasn't what the conspiracy theorists wanted
>>79165257
People have been there once, why go to that shithole again?
>>79165293
Your logic is irrefutable. Outstanding. You've truly mastered critical thinking.
Some look weird. This one looks digital or a stock photo
Background parallax offsets weren't considered for PP remediation.
>>79165268
The best goy.
>>79165257
>can't tell the difference between Doctor Who and real life
>>79165639
> stock photo
Who would have taken the photo? You dip.
>>79165639
Random boulder? Only one?
>>79165750
Im saying it looks digitally produced, maybe stock photo isn't the right word. But some look legit
>>79165257
Okay, I'll bite a little bit...
What do you think is up there that they don't want us to know about? Extraterrestrials? Waldo? The orca from that South Park episode?
>>79163917
Why were they keeping 10,000 photographs secret?
I thought they were all about science and the pursuit of knowledge.
Also, they wait 40 years to release all this? Are they forgetting this program was taxpayer funded?
Those photographs belong to the taxpayers, most who paid their taxes back then are long dead!
This is disgusting. Only a turd could think this is some great thing.
If anything I'm now MORE conspiracy theorist than before! Fuck NASA!
>>79163917
No one landed on the moon. Can we stop being retarded already? It's 2016.
>>79165337
>TV
>JCPenny
Good ID
>>79165257
>There's something up there they don't want anyone to know about.
what's up there, mulder. give me at least a guess.
>>79163917
I dont beliebe in moon landing conspiracies.. But how the fug did they shoot 10,000 photos in 6 landings? That's insane
This just proves that Kubrick is a great director
>>79164871
kek
>>79165883
You don't know how photography works do you?
Yo take a billion photos of the same thing with slight changes and you keep the good ones.
>>79165639
Probably because pictures from that same set have been printed a gorillion times since they were published. You've seen them printed in textbooks and magazines and shit even if you don't remember it.
There aren't actually that many good photos of Earth from beyond low-orbit, so the ones there are have been used a lot.
>>79165732
>doesn't buy in to your dumbass crackpot conspiracy theory
>hehe nice job getting tricked by the jews unlike me who is such an intelligent critical thinker
Like clockwork
>>79165883
NASA was alcoholic pencil pushers whiteknuckling it until the oasis of a liquid lunch.
>>79165955
The truth is up there.
>>79163917
AFTER 50 FUCKING YEARS THEY"VE HAD ENOUGH TIME TO FABRICATE PROOFS
>>79163917
N O S T A R S
O
S
T
A
R
S
Stopped reading @
>NASA SAID
DOWN WITH LIARS!!!!
DOWN WITH SCAMMERS!!
DOWN WITH FRAUDS!!!
>>79165883
I can't even tell if this is satire anymore.
>>79165846
>>79165925
>the size of the earth and how the continents are arranged changes constantly
someone post the photo, nasa has release photos of the earth that all look like complete bullshit
Fake and gay.
>>79163917
looks 'shopped
>>79165991
If you look close you can see the wire suspending the astronaut in the op pic
>>79164500
>he doesn't realise there's a thin atmosphere on the moon, extremely thin
>he doesn't realise that flag would move alot more on earth (if not constantly)
>>79164673
how easy is it to get humans through the van allen belt?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QFwo57WKwg
>>79165762
There might be more near it that just aren't in the photo.
That said, a lone boulder could be there by a number of ways, given all the impact craters.
The regolith was a mixture of cornstarch and spun silver mine tailings crushed then pulverised in specific set dressing batches via lab mills.
>>79164500
There's no air friction on the moon to stop the flag from swinging after they plant it
>>79166088
You think about it, there is no way you could see the light of a star, being they are millions and millions of miles away. Earths atmospheres acts like a magnifying glass so we can see the light of the stars
>>79164653
>consparicy
>u sea
>advance
>would of
Did you even make it to middle school?
>>79166088
>I don't know how cameras work
>>79165883
>Why were they keeping 10,000 photographs secret?
They weren't a fucking secret. They just weren't easily available to the general public. Ever seen an Apollo photo? Oh yea they had cameras dipshit. They were encouraged to take as many pictures as possible.
>I thought they were all about science and the pursuit of knowledge.
From the public image department. Apollo, Gemini, and Mercury missions were all about conquering the strategic high ground and if need be putting a military presence on the Moon/LEO if the Soviets looked like they'd do the same.
>Also, they wait 40 years to release all this? Are they forgetting this program was taxpayer funded?
As I said before they weren't all just readily available to the public. You could probably go to the National Archives or some NASA related center and ask to see them (not the originals because you dirty neckbeards would probably fuck them up).
tl;dr you're a retard fuck off
>>79164673
>paying to some filmmaker is more expensive than get to the moon
wew
>>79166238
>antenna
Ok now I'm 90% sure you're all just LARPing as conspiritards
>>79163917
Why were all these photos kept secret? This only makes me more suspicious
>>79166027
Go to bed Taiwan, you're drunk.
>>79166116
>NASA
Literally one letter away from Satan
>>79166195
>>79166481
>antenna
How convenient
>>79166244
>how easy is it to get humans through the van allen belt?
About as easy as sending them to the moon in the first place. Throw them through the thinnest area they can as fast as possible and they don't receive a terrible dose.
>>79166242
this is the moon we are talking about, not a scary koala bear
>>79165883
Maybe the pictures had high-res images of technology that the US government did not want released yet.
>>79166238
What is an antenna?
>>79166195
Of course it's not the same in every image, the spacecraft is moving and rotating, the moon is orbiting the Earth, and the Earth is spinning. Plus there are different lenses, film, and exposures used.
>>79166508
There's pictures of ayylmaos they don't want you to see
>>79166327
Lools placed. Also a boulder of that size would leave a giant crater. Nothing around it alludes to an impact
>>79166612
Well they did communicate by radio so... Yeah pretty convenient
Also
>suspended by wire that extends about 5 inches from the suit
>>79165257
I think it mysterious that no one drinks water from toilet. Someone did it once for a dare and that's that? Suspicious.
>>79166461
it's a shit design site but there are hundreds of pics here from every Apollo mission including all the moon landings, most of which have never been published anywhere
http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html
>>79166444
Checked
>>79166813
Where's the crater m8?
Did God gently place this Boulder here?
>>79166540
Well fugg, looks like I'm a #MoonLandingDenialMissile now
>>79166702
Where is it in this photo?
>>79165846
Oh wait he doesn't need one because he's standing -.-
>>79163917
worst photoshop in the world
he doesn't even have a shadow
>>79166778
w-what the fuck?
>>79166244
Apollo used an inclined trajectory to go around the most intense portions of the belts. Plus they moved through them pretty quickly.
>>79166978
Glaciers
Commies went into space before you burgers. You lost the space race
Obviously fake, becas the Earth is flat
Another failed psyops by NASA
>>79166280
>literally just played that in Spotify like 5 minutes ago
>>79166823
The rest is invisible. Also he's only suspended off the ground 4-5 inces
>>79167104
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u6Tt3PqIfQ
>>79163917
Reminder that only white people are intellectual and skilled enough to do this.
>>79167092
i know this is low-quality bait but he obviously does have a shadow
>>79166778
Can this be replicated with thesw new photos?
>>79166778
So that's how they did it....
>>79167270
>Spotify
Fucking normie reeeeeeeeeee
>>79166244
http://www.braeunig.us/apollo/VABraddose.htm
>>79166813
Maybe it's only a piece of an object that impacted?
Maybe it's what was left after another object impacted?
Maybe there's more of it under the surface dust?
Maybe it's been eroded by micrometeoroids?
Of all the things to call a hoax the moon landing should not be one of them. Even if you claimed they filmed walking on the moon on Earth they still built a massive expensive rocket and put trained astronauts on it. For what? More expensive and difficult to fake than actually going through with it.
it's just the lighting I have problems with.
There rest looks like a proper hoax. Just that white light. I couldn't explain it.
>>79166832
solid post
>>79166466
>Implying he would be the only one involved
Making it fake would be impossible for past America, too many people involved.
VAN HALEN BELT
We was kosmonauts n shiet
We Moonexit now
>>79164818
>>79166244
>>79165113
Ladies and gentlemen, the 3rd worlders that believe we never made it to the moon.
I remember showing these to a friend a couple months ago, I made a comment about conspiracy theorists getting btfo, and he went full "You're a sheepy! After all the years they just decide to show all the pictures they had to photoshop!"
When it comes to moon landing conspirators, they are the most annoying to me.
>>79165257
Shitty dust and low gravity, that's what's up there. Nothing worth going there for. At least there's iron on mars
>>79167306
This really is a triumph for all whites, not just americans. NASA was 98% white at the time and the head of NASA was an ex-nazi scientist. Europeans should take pride in the moon landing instead of rationalizing it as a conspiracy. If Europe wasn't still rebuilding after WW2 it probably would have been Germany or Britain that did it first. U.S. wasn't cucked yet when it happened either.
>>79167448
Light can be funny on the moon. The closer horizon, craters, and lack of atmospheric light scatter make distance, slope, and scale difficult to gauge visually.
The Earth also reflects more sunlight at the moon than the moon does at the Earth.
>>79167638
At some point most conspiracy retards would deny any kind of evidence. I don't really understand what's so bad about being wrong sometimes.
Breaking News!
Latest Released NASA pic proves moon landing was just as real as the holocaust
Make The Moon Great Again
>>79165257
Are you genuinely retarded?
It's a fucking rock why would we even want to go there.
>>79167638
When it comes to all conspiracy theories, the Apollo hoaxers genuinely upset me. I can write most of it off to them being retards that really don't understand shit about the program or any of the technology.
It just sucks because if you just take the time to understand what it accomplished and how they did it, it gives you an amazing sense of pride in humanity. It's one of our greatest achievements and it's shit on by people who have a shitty YT vid or geocities site that don't understand photography, rocketry, engineering, orbital dynamics, etc.
The Apollo hoax conspiracy was started by the KGB btw fagets. To undermine support in the American gov't.
>>79166778
Poland, please stop, go somewhere else. I'm sure there's a chemtrail denier you need to argue with.
>>79166778
How come the ribs aren't regularly spaced?
>>79163917
How is it so unfeasible that some idiots can't go to the fucking moon?
>>79167994
>>79167630
>>79167274
>>79166778
pls clean toilet poland
>>79168077
should have bought a condom as small as your dick
faggot
>>79168017
Like leftist ideas and cultural marxism.
They didn't really loose the cold war, or more so we didn't make it out okay from it.
>>79168140
He was talking about the photo, not his deformed child. You're drunk, go home.
>>79168017
Also, some of them are really obnoxious.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wcrkxOgzhU
http://www.space.com/16794-apollo-17-landing-site-explored-by-orbiter-video.html
>>79168315
buzz sounds like a real prick's name
The type of faggot that would get drunk at a barmitvah grab your wife's ass and tell absurd stories of himself walking on the moon.
>>79168686
All of your posts are obnoxious as fuck m8. Stop posting any time
>>79168017
This is how I feel about 9/11 conspiracies.
Dumb memes like "jet fuel can't melt steel beams!" And "WTC 7 was a controlled demolition, look at the puff of air!"
Guys, it's obviously fake. What they don't want you to know is that it was filmed on location.
>>79168686
poland is butthurt he can't into space
>>79168800
>"WTC 7 was a controlled demolition, look at the puff of air!"
What? lel
>>79168880
How old is this dank meme? Usenet old?
>See Jethro, I done told you I'd make a rocketman after all one day.
>>79168909
When the WTC 7 was about to collapse, air burst out of the Windows. This was because the interior was collapsing prior to the exterior, but truthers really believe that was detonators going off for a controlled demolition.
>>79167788
Source: your ass
How the fuck does a channer know about light on the moon dumb nigger try harder shill
>>79168686
Edwin Eugene Aldrin would probably cuck you. An 86 year old man would fuck Stacy right in front of you after he knocked your teeth out for insulting him, fucking toilet cleaner.
>>79169159
And this was caused by what? Plane shrapnel?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sU7gJ2TnQqk
>>79169349
cool story faggot
>>79167636
>his only accomplishment is fake
kek
>>79168800
But jet fuel can't melt steel beams.
>>79169092
Cernan was based as fuck. There's a new vid on Netflix if you have it called "The Last Man on the Moon". Very good.
>>79169515
Most Poles are cool. Why do you have to be a faggot?
>>79169605
>he thinks he's white
A little off topic, but if you think about it the moon was only visited by white American men. Makes you kinda feel pride
>>79169836
It was 1960's America. What did you expect? Now if/when we got back we're going to send a Somalian nigger, a Puerto Rican woman, and one white guy to make sure they don't die.
>>79165257
>Low gravity
>Barely any water
>No usable atmosphere
>Deadly dust and rock fragments
Mars is actually able to be teraformed and support life, not the moon.
>>79169719
fuck you and have a rotten day
>>79163917
What an amazing bunch they are, keeping safe all those dangerous pictures from the public, only to release them to contradict literally 6 tinfoil hats.
>>79170063
The moon would be great to test tech used on Mars and is only 3 days away though. A lunar outpost would have some benefits of a low gravity well, potential resource extraction, telescopes on the far side, you could test a space elevator there, linear accelerators, H3 fusion, free vacuum for novel manufacturing processes, plus it'd be neat as fuck.
>>79170081
Cheers faggot.
>>79170540
>telescopes on the far side
what good does that do? it's not darker any more than the side we see.
ITT: The reason why it was so easy and a few 37A tards. Thank you television casualties.
>>79170715
#1 - no atmosphere, but that doesn't give you any advantages over orbiting telescopes unless you figure you could set up bigger telescopes in gravity where you could service them more easily.
>>79167272
>the rest is invisible
Oh... damn why didn't I think of that it's all so clear now.
I think I'm actually better at this conspiracy thing than you are. In fact I bet you're one of those gullible fucks who thinks that the moon is actually real. Little did you know it's actually a hologram. Prove me wrong.
>>79165257
>ridiculously expensive even for a superpower
>dangerous (some notorious attempts ended in death and near-death.)
>Moon rocks and dust from several landing sights already brought back to Earth and studied
>>79171106
>#1 - no atmosphere,
so you are saying that the side facing us has an atmosphere? or did you not understand my question?
>>79165257
Spider-rocks?
>>79171603
Chinese sweatshop making moon rocks
I never went to America. I've only seen pictures of it. America must be a hoax.
>>79166238
this antenna-like string, that ends about a foot above the suit? jesus, i'm convinced now
>>79170715
>>79171106
You replied to the wrong person, but when it's dark on the far side though you would have excellent observations without any light pollution.
JWST has a sun-shade for that purpose though. But I'm talking a more permanent option. JWST will eventually run out of fuel and systems will degrade.
>>79166244
Literally effortless, as events show.
But don't take our word for it, when the Czech Republic gets someone onto the moon, they'll be able to check our evidence.
>>79167268
then explain to me with the sun being there and so high , how can peoples where the Arrow point dont see the sun ? nothing is blocking their view
>>79172324
It's really a shame they went to all the effort to fake the moon landing just to overlook that little detail.
>>79172759
>giving people with down's syndrome attention
wew lad
>>79173317
if it's like that then why is the north so cold
checkmate faggot
me: 1
you: 0
>>79163917
I never doubted the moon landing happened but it's really weird that NASA waited until 2016 to release these photos.
What were they doing with them for 60 years? Editing?
>>79164463
>fakes a moon landing
>only releases the best pics to the press
>people start finding mistakes in the pictures
>spends 40 years mastering photoshop to release more pictures to make the fake landing more credible
>>79168800
How did WTC 7 fall then? Literally nothing was wrong with it and buildings right beside the Twin towers still stood after being collapsed on top of
>>79173763
i was responding to my post cause i forgot the pic in it , it was in response to Portugal anon
>>79163917
Wow.
Holy fuck.
These photos were TOP SECRET as fuck for 6+ decades, and the government actually successfully kept them a secret for that long without a leak.
This is arguably the longest held secret (without being leaked) of the US government.
Why?
>>79174260
sorry then my waffle friend
>>79168800
>using an obvious false flag as your example
Wew lad. My home oven reaches the same temps as those wtc fires.
>>79173763
>>79172759
>falling for the Jews this hard
The Jews have spent the better part of the 19th and 20th centuries persuading the west that the earth is spherical, don't you know? Nice job falling for their tricks, you blue pilled faggots. I bet you also believe the holocaust is real and that 9/11 was perpetrated by Islamic terror groups.
>>79174285
Because they just took them last month on a soundstage
>>79166540
How can people actually believe this shit?
>>79174614
you fail to disprove my point still my man :^)
checkmate
me: 2
you: 0
>>79174733
A lot of people are retarded anon. These people are also allowed to vote and make shitty websites.
>>79174285
They're not digital. Pretty easy to sneak in a thumb drive and copy 50 GB of data nowadays.
But these were actually film, not even photographs.
>>79174285
They weren't top secret, they were archived, anyone can look at them. They just uploaded them to the internet.
>>79171603
fuck you that film was awful. I had so much hope.
>>79174285
>TOP SECRET
>implying
Anyone with the proper credentials/background could go look at the film on request most likely. They're probably a little nitpicky about it though since they're considered a national fucking treasure you idiot.
>>79163917
Those are cool as fuck, why would they wait so long to release them?
...Unless they needed time to create fske photos
>>79174205
It burned down, which is why it took until 5 in the afternoon to collapse. I suppose that's evidence of a conspiracy when your sense of reality is heavily influenced by anime and science fiction.
>>79175434
Did you bother reading the thread?
>>79175621
Kek
>>79175621
I know it's hard to give the first step and critically consider that a conspiracy theorist might be right, but you should give it a try. 9/11 reeks of conspiracy and WTC7 didn't collapse because of the fires. It was even reported to have collapsed before it collapsed.
I don't like to try to convince anyone about all the wrong things of 9/11 using WTC 7, but it's something to take into account too.
>>79176309
People who talk about 9/11 conspiracies usually have no background in structural engineering. Sure, 9/11 may have been an inside job. But the planes did the damage.
>>79174116
Nice mental gymnastics, fag.
If they went there and planted flags and most likely left stuff behind, shouldn't you be able to see that with a telescope?
>>79177440
with a good enough telescope you can actually see the landing site and the flag is white also now
>>79175276
>Anyone with the proper credentials/background could go look at the film on request most likely.
Isn´t that what top secret is? Just people with the proper credentials get access to the info....
>>79177440
>If they went there and planted flags and most likely left stuff behind, shouldn't you be able to see that with a telescope?
No telescope in existence is powerful enough. Even Hubble which is in a higher orbit than most stuff in LEO can't resolve the Apollo sites with any clarity. It would all be in one pixel or some shit. The only 3rd party photographic evidence we have of the Apollo sites is Japan's JAXA LRO that's been orbiting the moon taking photos from like 60nm or something.
Even then you can't see much other than the rover tracks or the LEM descent stage.
>>79176811
Exactly. Why would the Feds (or whoever) bother with all of the controlled demolition shit when you could just commandeer a couple of 767s and significantly reduce the chance of being caught in a conspiracy. Hell, you could even load them up with TNT just to make sure.
>>79177440
good thinking Poland, why don't you guys invent such a telescope for just that purpose. the rest of us will wait a million years or so until it's finished.
>>79177644
>Isn´t that what top secret is? Just people with the proper credentials get access to the info....
No. Probably anyone in the academic community (even international) would have easy access to them. But like I said they're probably guarded and handled very specifically because they're a national treasure and they don't want someone fucking up the originals. Prints exists in the National Archives.
Just because you haven't personally handled the photos/rocks/materials doesn't mean they don't exist.
>>79177576
No.
>>79173317
I'd be more concerned about Argentina and Australia being on opposite sides of the disk, despite people being able to boat or fly south to get there faster
I wonder if those "Moon Landing is hoax" idiots realise that Soviets looked on every single inch of the way that Apollo traveled and if it was a hoax they would shitpost it on evry single country of West and East.
>nasa
Into the trash.
>>79163917
ALL NOTHING BUT NEVADA
That's what it is, it is nothing but Nevada.
>>79163917
I won't believe it, but going back might help but nobody will because it's impossible.
>>79177817
>Hell, you could even load them up with TNT just to make sure.
Explosives forensics would ruin that.
Why would bringing the buildings down matter? The death of hundreds of American lives in a major terrorist attack on NYC and the Pentagon would be enough to get the public on their side.
It was an extremely unfortunate case of the perfect weapon being used against the perfect target. The construction of WTC doomed them when 400 thousand pounds of metal hit them fuel of 25000 gallons of jet fuel at 500 mph.
Look up the concrete deck construction of WTC. One the metal web joist that have relatively small gauge steel were compromised the entire thing was doomed.
>>79177993
They kept quiet to ensure that the plebians don't realize the earth is flat. By not disputing it they could funnel investment into their "space program" as well.
>>79165257
THERE'S NOTHING TO FUCKING DO ON THE MOON YOU ASSHOLE
IT TAKES LIKE 3 FUCKING DAYS TO GET THERE. 3 DAYS INSIDE THAT FUCKING CAPSULE FLOATING AROUND LIKE A BITCH. YOU WANT TO FLOAT AROUND LIKE A BITCH IN A TIN CAN FOR A LONG WEEKEND?
AND WHEN YOU GET THERE THERE'S FUCK ALL TO DO. OH SOME MOON ROCKS COOL, LOOK THE EARTH COOL! WELL THATS FUCKING IT! ENJOY SITTING THERE FOR ANOTHER 3 DAYS WIATING TO FUCKING LEAVE.
THEN YOU HAVE TO FLY ANOTHER 3 DAYS BACK. IT'S FUCKING BORING.
>>79177576
Even with a theoretically perfect telescope, the laws of optics make this impossible. You could do the math on the back of a napkin, even the lunar module would subtend less than a second of arc over your field of vision.
What did Kubrick mean by this?
>>79176811
Picture is bogus. Contrasted up composite with WFC damage. Fuck off.
>>79178544
forgot pic
>>79169605
>His countries only accomplishments are crying like babies over two worthless islands and losing wars.
>>79178228
Totally paddling in sewage shill. F minus. We have it all.
>>79178424
> flying to the moon
> boring
Nigga you're high? People watch travel shows all the time, it's the fucking moon!
Put some celebrities on the rocket, a married couple who find out be often cheated on the other, a guy who claims its fake. Get Budweiser to sponsor the rocket
Fuck off it's boring? No chance, we've never been and it's impossible to go
>>79178592
>>79178734
Take more lithium. Or better yet join your countrymen and neck yourself retard.
>>79178424
Well there is Hydrogen which is really good rocket fuel and tiny amounts of water near the poles but other than that nothing interesting.
The only use I can thing of for it is a refuelling station for rockets after leaving earth.
>>79178228
You're probably right about the explosives, although if it was a hoax then all of the forensics would be controlled by the same people who were responsible for the attack (which is absurd).
I don't actually think 9/11 was an inside job, I just don't get why ""truthers"" insist that planes couldn't have brought the towers down and that it must therefore have been a controlled demolition.
>>79166778
wtf I hate the moon landing now
>>79179021
Laugh until the time to cry comes. Sloppy crews followed everywhere.
>>79176309
>It was even reported to have collapsed before it collapsed.
There is always a ton of wrong information as these live events unfold. Mistakes happen. Doesn't mean there's a large conspiracy behind it.
>>79167638
who took this picture pls?
>>79178906
Correct, leaving orbit is not healthy for apes, if it could be done it would have been done again many times already.
On the other hand, the Masonic moon landing TV shows had serious rating drops after episode 1. The apes just didn't care. Yet Kubricks moon aliens space oddity movie is still popular. almost like, the monkey likes being told lies. This basic principle can be monetized and commercialized.
>>79179128
They don't understand shit about structure. Take corner out of your house and set it on fire. Let me know what happens.
The concrete deck construction of the WTC is what fucked it.
t. structural engineer
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA
>>79163917
Moon landings did happen, they are not fake.
So both deniers and believes of moon landing are all wrong and right.
What happened is moon landings happened, but they found alien bases on the moon including ships, alien tech and a corpse. There is authentic material on this.
Therefore the original material of the actual moon landing was not released to the public.
A fake moon landing was then filmed in a high tech studio on earth, because they wanted to cover-up the alien portion of the moon landing.
Sometimes people say "show whats on the dark side of moon". That is on the side where bases where found mainly.
So yes moon landings happened, but fake material was initially released about it.
During the some years now, for a period of 10 years or whatever, NASA have released more and more pictures, but they release real images of space mixed up with fake images.
For example shadows going in different directions (see attached pic), on moon there is only one light source according to NASA, and that is the sun.
Why then does the flag and the cosmonaut have shadows going in complete opposite directions????
This picture is taking on earth in a professional studio for example.
And also there are no winds on the moon, so the flag does not wave in the wind like it this on the recordings. Its a fake picture.
Why did they not release them any sooner?
>>79179419
Aliums.
>http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4225/mir/photo/mir-photo.htm
>>79179554
During the landing and descent of this vessel, it is supposed to have rocket boosters enabling a smooth descent. These "brake rockets" should produce a crater beneath them during the descent, not seen in the picture.
This is another of the fake pictures, where the vessel have just been planted on top on mud.
There are no trace or sign of any rocket activity beneath the vessel.
Those who knows, they know.
>>79179552
You risibly sad fucking shill. Everywhere.
>>79163917
>American flag on the moon has been bleached by the radiation of space
>aliens in the distant future will think the French landed on the moon first
Michio Kaku already entirely debunked this theory anyway...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=drSqtw0Qywk
>>79164463
>release only the best pictures to the press to show that you did it
>>release only the best pictures to the press
Why not all of them? Let people decide the "best"
Why hide anything at all?
>>79167306
wtf I hate white, patriachical supremacists now...
>>79179566
for you and everyone else has asked this same question:
my guess is that NASA, like most everyone, thought that people would use the single greatest information source ever created, the internet, to get SMARTER, instead of DUMBER.
since that really hasn't proven to be the case, all they can really do is keep dumping more evidence and facts on the dummies heads and hope that some or it might finally sink in.
>>79167677
>Europeans should take pride in the moon landing instead of rationalizing it as a conspiracy.
We do and congratulate you. Only the most idiotic people I know believe in the moon landing hoax.
Why the nasa doesn't make a kikestarter to go to the moon again while offering the direct stream over jewtube and twitch for dem moneys just to lower costs? They could stream the place of the real landing and even bring back the flag for an auction or something.
>>79179114
The moon really isn't good for shit except hydrogen mining. Building a base to refuel rockets would be redundant. You're just wasting propellant to fly there and land again. Why not just launch from earth straight to the target and cut out the middle man?
>>79177831
>all this assumption
It's easy to claim these were 'available' now that they've been released.
No one knew these existed because they were so much of a secret.
>>79178906
We need to make a celebrity death match... ON THE FUCKING MOON
THE RATINGS WOULD BE OFF THE FUCKING CHARTS
>>79165958
Most were consecutive photos taken automatically.
>>79166832
Get thirsty while on the job?
>>79179966
you realise that they took thousand of pictures and that most of them where propably of shit quality cause they just showed space ect , thats how you do photography , you take tons of picture and keep only the best one to show to peoples
>>79179554
>>79179756
>literally just reciting the plot of Apollo 18
Apparently there are people who are incapable of distinguishing fiction from real life.
>>79179454
canadians are without the worst posters on this board. even when you're not trolling you're still fucking stupid
>>79179756
The reason for these recent releases of images is due to an interview with Stanley Kubrick, a famous film maker who directed the recording of fake moon landings.
In year 1999 he was interviewed and admitted on tape to have faked the moon landings, 3 days later he was shockingly found dead!
His only condition was to make a contract that this interview could not be relased until more than 15 years after his death, which is about now. Now NASA is running a counter-action with propaganda in order to make us believe.
http://www.snopes.com/false-stanley-kubrick-faked-moon-landings/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=rR4pf6pp1kQ (interview where kubrick admits faking moonlandings, from 1999).
>>79163917
What does this prove? Theyve literally had decades to create and produce legit looking fakes since the first accusations started.
>>79163917
Everyone who's not retarded already knew we landed on the moon.
The real question is - just what the fuck was in those backpacks?
>>79180827
You just said it was reciting of Apollo 18, well thats about correct, since NASA have kept the same strategy always.
The same as your shill strategy and the intelligence agency you are working for have changed its agenda very little, r u with me bro.
>>79163917
Fake as fuck
how can the moon landing be real is the earth is flat?
>>79163917
>wait until 2016 when digital imaging becomes sufficiently advanced to create 100% accurate fakes
Nice try spaceniggers.
>>79181123
>>79180885
This is why
>>79179554
>>79179756
notice how most of the deniers in this thread are from ex-ussr countries
i rest my case
>>79180436
>>79180947
>>79181082
>>79181116
>>79181123
Retarded conspiracucks. You won't be spared on the day of the rope.
>>79163917
I'm going to tell you about a concept that I call 'conspiracy misdirection'. It's basically a type of misinformation/disinformation. Conspiracy misdirection is what happens when a conspiracy theory is propagated that is considered to be the truth about whatever that conspiracy theory is about, but actually is NOT the truth and hides an even GREATER conspiracy that is TRUE (and thus NOT a 'theory'). One of the MAJOR techniques that intelligence agencies such as the CIA, MI5, the Mossad, etc. use to deceive us is conspiracy misdirection, which is to make certain conspiracy theories popular in mainstream society that are used to push us further away from the truth. I'll give you an example: They'll tell us that the Apollo 11 Moon landing never happened, although I think that what most likely happened is that the Apollo 11 Moon landing not only happened, but they found more than they bargained for on the Moon like artifacts and ruins which CONFIRM that we are NOT alone in the universe. Eventually, we might have even been warned to never come back - which might explain why we've never gone back to the Moon since 1972. Even if we weren't warned to never return to the Moon, we DID land on the Moon and found WORKS OF INTELLIGENCE on it. I am UTTERLY CONVINCED that people on the NASA payroll are promoting the 'Moon hoax' conspiracy theory to push people further from the possibility that beings (possibly even ancient HUMAN beings) landed on the Moon a long time ago and built stuff there. The 'Moon hoax' theory might have even been CREATED by NASA employees. COME ON people, THINK. What do you think is the more paradigm-shattering secret?: The possibility that we DIDN'T land on the Moon or the possibility that we DID land on the Moon and found artificial stuff there? OBVIOUSLY it's the second possibility. (end of part 1)
>>79177440
They did and you can.
>>79180885
This is from a Mockumentary called Dark Side of the Moon.
>>79181393
(start of part 2) You see, the REAL reason why the second possibility is being hidden from us is NOT because a loving government wants to prevent mass panic (that's just the cover story), but because they want to prevent us from asking 'too many' questions. If it were confirmed that we DID land on the Moon and found artificial stuff there but were lied to about such a historic discovery, then people (and LOTS of them) WOULD ask more questions about what else they've been lied to about. They'd say "Well, they lied to us about that, so what ELSE have they lied to us about? The origin and history of the human species? The pharmaceutical industry? Free energy? The banking industry?" It opens the door to EVERYTHING. EVERYTHING. And THAT'S why the 'Moon hoax' theory is FIERCELY promoted, while most people have almost NEVER heard of that second possibility (and, more worryingly, probably haven't even THOUGHT ABOUT IT). Another example of conspiracy misdirection is the sudden popularity of the Flat Earth theory. The sudden popularity of the Flat Earth theory is a CIA psyop designed to divide and distract people from the TRUE nature of Earth, which is that Earth is HOLLOW. Earth's crust is about 800 miles thick and there is a 'sun' at Earth's centre (which is actually a nuclear fission reactor) which is about 650 miles in diameter and the distance between a dweller in the Inner Earth world and their inner central 'sun' is only about 2,900 miles. (end of part 2)
>>79181464
(start of part 3) Okay, this is a shorter version of what conspiracy misdirection is for people that don't like reading lots of text: Conspiracy misdirection is when a false conspiracy theory is used to hide a true conspiracy theory that has even more far-reaching implications than the false conspiracy theory. (end)
>>79181015
Look man, I'm just doing my job. The CIA has assigned me to spend all day shilling on 4chan, so I do it. I get a decent pay and I am supporting a family. Can you say you wouldn't do the same?
>>79181230
Ironic since the Soviet Union's own space agency tracked the confirmed the American achievement
Why would the Russians do that if the moon landing were faked?
Yet there is simply no explanation for the technology that went into those life support backpacks, unless the Americans are hiding huge advances in technology from the general population and have been for many many years
>>79181502
Like I mentioned earlier in this thread, the Flat Earth conspiracy theory is being used to hide the Hollow Earth theory so that mainstream plebs never think about it. I know that the Flat Earth theory is a misdirection, because the Flat Earth theory become VERY popular starting from sometime last year OUT OF NOWHERE. There has NEVER been ANY convincing evidence of the Flat Earth theory (even when it suddenly become popular last year). Earth is hollow. As someone who has intensely researched the Hollow Earth theory for almost a decade, there is a VAST amount of evidence for the Hollow Earth theory - scientific evidence, mathematical evidence and even evidence from many ancient myths in many different parts of the world in many different periods of time throughout human history. Consider this: How come the Hollow Earth theory almost NEVER gets mentioned as an alternative to the Round Earth 'theory'? The mainstream media is pushing the Round Earth vs. Flat Earth narrative and pretty much NEVER mentioning the Hollow Earth theory. Does that not seem suspicious to you?
>>79181454
say what the fuck you want mr.shill,
stanley kubrick, the most film maker ever, admits on tape faking moon landings, end of discussion
>>79181556
Here's a diagram I made of the hollow configuration of Earth. As you can see in the diagram, Earth's inner surface has an upward-pointing curvature (which means that you would actually see land in the sky if you stood on the inner surface of Earth).
>>79181643
We were NOT born too late to explore Earth, for there are STILL new lands for us to discover and colonise. Take the hollow pill. Flat Earthers are gatekeepers of the Hollow Earth 'theory'.
>>79165392
>Fake oops
How about a real one? You did make a mistake, afterall.
>>79163917
>1000s of pictures
but that only links like 50 pictures anon
>>79168800
Dude that shit was shady the day it happend, also tons of first responder testimony that points to shennanigans of some kind.
>>79181552
They publicly confirmed it but the KGB started the hoax theory to subvert American society.
Cucks ran with it.
Moon landing happened Yes.
But the images and recordings published, initially and still today, are from a fake-moon-studio on earth. Some real images from space are mixed in together with fake ones.
They found alien bases on moon together with a ship, tech and a corpse.
>>79180420
>You're just wasting propellant to fly there and land again. Why not just launch from earth straight to the target and cut out the middle man?
fuel is heavy on earth
>>79180420
Because the moon has less gravity and atmosphere than earth, most rockets would use up their fuel even getting there, but they could land and take off with much more fuel than when they arrived.
>>79163917
neato so did they release the real photos or the ones with things edited out?
Released 1000s of pictures!
>shows 40 pictures that look like they've been instagramd.
HUR DUR POL BTFOOOO
>>79163917
>it took NASA 20 years to create all these fake photos
America number 1.
>>79181895
lol, "Active measures"
I love Russia so much even today they are still just like Boris and Natasha in real life
>>79166540
Fuck it, I'll bite
>Cameras don't change over decades
>The earth doesn't rotate
>What are seasons
>What are orbits
>What is common sense
Is there anywhere to download them in bulk? Scrolling and saving one by one is out of the question.
>>79182096
Shut up Ahmed.
>>79181819
>but that only links like 50 pictures anon
You fucking dipshit. The link is right there in the article. But here you go because you're obviously retarded and need to be spoonfed like every other idiot in this thread.
>https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/
>>79181551
>Ayy lmao
How many will go to jail from this thread?
>>79163917
>NASA SAID ENOUGH AND MADE PUBLIC 10 THOUSAND MOON LANDING PICTURES
NASA finally finished shooping ten thousand pictures
>>79167306
they have egyptians on the team also
>>79181643
a) why is there nuclear fission occurring in the centre of the earth? Is this a man made thing or is it a natural occurance?
b) if the earth were hollow you would not be able to stand on the interior of the earth as you would not experience any gravitational attraction to it. This is due to Gauss's flux theorem for gravity. You would only experience gravitational attraction to objects closer to the centre of the earth than you are. This can be proven by pic related equation, it's a common undergrad physics exercise.
>>79167446
>For what?
recover alien mind control weapon from crashed vehicle on moon
use it's rays to make earth men gay to get more pussy
I think we are seeing the effects of this horrid conspiracy before our very eyes
>you will never be comfy astronaut
>>79182325
>tfw this
Feels bad man.
>>79181556
>the Flat Earth conspiracy theory is being used to hide the Hollow Earth theory
was wondering where that psyop came from, I thought they wanted to see if christians could pray the earth flat so it would be visible as flat from space
>>79168800
>He believes 9/11
>>79181551
>The CIA has assigned me to spend all day shilling on 4chan
lies, if you worked under agency directive you would never say that, instead you work for an asset at best
>>79181551
>Can you say you wouldn't do the same?
I wouldn't lie to people for money, I was taught better than that
>>79182180
link in the article you morron :
https://www.flickr.com/photos/projectapolloarchive/
>>79182497
why live
>>79163917
Did nasa really sperg out at troll videos on youtube?
>>79163917
This isn't anything new - the Apollo Lunar Surface Journal Archive has had a searchable database of tens of thousands of photographs, along with thousands of document scans, schematic drawings, maps, etc available for the better part of a decade.
http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html
Want a fun way to pass the time? Select the search option and enter three or four random numbers in the Image ID search and see what you get. You'll typically come up with a dozen photos... 90% of which are just photos of rocks and dust, but occasionally you'll find a nice one.
>>79163917
Call me a tard or whatever, but I still say the moon shit was faked. Why not release them the year the did the mission, why release them now when they can so easily be doctored etc. I love my country, or at least 8 years ago and before, but this shit stinks to high hell.
>>79163917
Fake and gay
>>79182727
The fact that you think I would never say that under agency directive is exactly why I do. The rabbit hole goes a lot deeper than you think, kiddo.
>>79182883
Your country is fake and gay.
>>79164871
I loved this show.
It's pretty obvious that the landing (human part) was staged but Americans are still the best when it comes to sending rovers and exploring shit.
If only NASA was funded properly and had clear goals in mind.
>>79183018
Yeah instead nasa does muslim outreach.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlXG0REiVzE
>can't get past Van Allen Belt
>gets to the Moon with a shitty 60s technology
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uAPBRvd8OTY
>first ever space walk
yeah, look at those hands moving, it's clearly a shitty russian cartoon
GOOD. FUCKING. GOYS.
TRUTH CAN NEVER BECOME FALSE
AND FALSE CAN NEVER BECOME TRUTH.
A BABYLONIAN SATANISTIC DEATH CULT HAVE RULED THE EARTH FOR 10,000 YEARS.
BUT THEIR TIME IS COMING TO AN END VERY SOON.
JESUS CHRIST IS LORD.
>>79165923
>No one landed on the moon. Can we stop being retarded already? It's 2016.
HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA I LOVE YOU!
that sentenced made my day and I will use it one day in real life, verbatim.
>>79163917
It really is sad, but also quite humorous, how pathetically stupid all the conspiracy theorists are. They can't actually help it though, because their brain is physically defective (i.e. pathological). They simply don't process information the way a normal human being does. Sadly, about 80% of the people on this board fall into that category.
>>79165923
I think u need to read through this thread. In the unlikely case you are not a shill, landings happened, but the pictures were faked to cover-up an (at the time) abandoned alien base found on the moon.
>>79183611
and also they would realise how stupid they were if they putted a little research into it , but when they do they use it to say : DUUR LOOK THOSE LIES !!!
>>79165257
This is bait right? What would you gain from going to the moon again? We already have samples from the moon and know we can't sustain life on the moon. It would be really expensive and really has no point.
The Mars rover collects data and studies a planet that we haven't been on before. If nasa or some other agency wishes to colonize it, they need a lot of data to make sure their equipment will work. Rovers can stay longer than humans and accomplish what is needed on the first run
>>79183698
>alien base found on the moon
>NASA nukes the moon to "see if there is water in it"
spoopy
>>79163917
What we used to do before having to give so much fucks about niggers who have nothing refusing to stop breeding, believing in a jew god, shaking a spear or waving an AK and fighting in the name of america is wrong and the eternaljew.
Its fucking boring nowadays. Just wish a state could be born where its in the constitution that liberals and wogs are against the law. I want to explore, I want us to use our brains again.
>>79165846
shopped image;
always invert then zoom
>>79177817
This has pretty much always been my feeling on 9/11. I've always felt that if it was a conspiracy it would be way the fuck easier to just have a handful of marines crash planes into buildings.
All of this shit about planting explosives and whatnot is like fucking amateur as fuck. YEAH GUY'S LET'S INCREASE OUR CHANCES OF GETTING CAUGHT BY OVER 9000 FOR NO FUCKING REASON BY PLANTING A BUNCH OF EXPLOSIVES IN ONE OF THE HIGHEST PEOPLE DENSE AREAS IN THE WHOLE FUCKING COUNTRY.
>>79183611
Constant bombardment by grandiose fictional movies and TV shows like Mission Impossible and 24 causes some people to lose touch with reality.
Subconsciously they begin to think something like a moon landing hoax is plausible because they've seen similar scenarios play out thousands of times before on a TV screen. It's kind of sad, really.
>>79183905
>alien base found on the moon
>NASA nukes the moon to "see if there is water in it"
:)
>>79183098
>can't get past Van Allen Belt
The late, great Dr James Van Allen would like a word with you.
>The radiation belts of the Earth do, indeed, pose important constraints on the safety of human space flight.
>The very energetic (tens to hundreds of MeV) protons in the inner radiation belt are the most dangerous and most difficult to shield against. Specifically, prolonged flights (i.e., ones of many months' duration) of humans or other animals in orbits about the Earth must be conducted at altitudes less than about 250 miles in order to avoid significant radiation exposure. A person in the cabin of a space shuttle in a circular equatorial orbit in the most intense region of the inner radiation belt, at an altitude of about 1000 miles, would be subjected to a fatal dosage of radiation in about one week.
>However, the outbound and inbound trajectories of the Apollo spacecraft cut through the outer portions of the inner belt and because of their high speed spent only about 15 minutes in traversing the region and less than 2 hours in traversing the much less penetrating radiation in the outer radiation belt. The resulting radiation exposure for the round trip was less than 1% of a fatal dosage - a very minor risk among the far greater other risks of such flights. I made such estimates in the early 1960s and so informed NASA engineers who were planning the Apollo flights. These estimates are still reliable.
>The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is nonsense.
> - James A. Van Allen
>>79181278
Good goy
>>79169446
Flight 93 never made it there. It was then a wild OP but the demo went on with media frontrunning narrative saturation.
SAVE THIS IMAGE
>>79184122
Left to right Shmuelly. Left to right. You'll hang soon enough.
>>79179554
Wow... It's the shadow of an object that is outside the frame and that fucking flag is tilted. This is true retardo shit right here.
>>79184526
retard
>>79184960
bla bla bla u are the only retardo here...
There should be 1 single light source, but shadows goes in complete opposite directions, SOMETHING isnt right here :))))
>>79185177
Many thanks for you clear and concise argumentation for your opinion and for your added scientific knowledge and experience! You zionists are really showing your true self!
>>79185271
It's the shadow of an object that is outside the frame. It casts to the same damn direction. It's too thick to be the flag's shadow anyway.
>>79185271
zionist? im nothing mate. Dont follow anyone shitty argument.
The picture of a guy in a space suit next to a ruin and then taken in black and white means fucking nothing.
