are feelings/personal morals ever a logical argument?
No, it's literally in the fallacy list.
That being said, emotional argument was literally part of my year 10 English curriculum. Feminised education even 10 years ago.
>>78896796
Not only are morals frequently illogical, they have no place in real-world governance.
>>78896796
Feels < Reals.
no because they are purely subjective and lack objective tests.
>>78896911
>10 years ago
It's been a hell of a long ride.
https://youtu.be/EmPGgBtCJJM
>>78896796
Yes because otherwise you would have zero rights.
>>78896796
one could say that something is immoral and that would be a point against it
other than that fuck peoples' feelings
>>78896796
If someone in a friendship or relationship isnt happy despite logical insight it is still a legitimate argument.
That said in the world of actual problems and solutions no. Never.
>>78897212
you could use it as an obiter dictum, something to facilitate in the persuasion of the argument but using it as the argument itself would not be fit as a rationale for what you'd be arguing for.
We can't argue logically, we're individuals and not orange juice like in the animes.
>>78896796
virtue ethics aren't a valid ethical school of thought because they cannot be universalized without self contradiction
