Someone edited the second BREXIT petition json file between 10:00pm and 10:30pm.
Second referrendum petition:
>https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215
Javascript code for data storage of the second referrendum petition:
>https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
Internet archive page of the .json code:
>http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
>Open "find" then type GB to locate number
>Add on on hour to waybackmachine times to get UK times.
>I've already fixed the times below
16:35 on 25/06/2016:
>http://web.archive.org/web/20160625153506/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
21:21 on 25/06/2016:
>http://web.archive.org/web/20160625202143/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
23:01 on 25/06/2016:
>http://web.archive.org/web/20160625220110/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
>first and second: the UK signature updates like normal from 354,634 to 365,483 in 5 hours
>second and third: in less than 2 hours and the number exploded from 365,483 to 2,401,768 from the UK
>"but OP, this could be a conspiracy theory and 2.1 million really did sign in 2 hours."
I've already thought of that:
This is the signature page:
>http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215
20:00 on 25/06/2016:
>http://web.archive.org/web/20160625190047/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215
2,205,213 signatures
22:45 on 25/06/2016:
>http://web.archive.org/web/20160625214559/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215
2,520,285 signatures
23:14 on 25/06/2016:
>http://web.archive.org/web/20160625221449/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215
2,572,155 signatures
Above three prove that the signature count did not increase by number signing in the two hour explosion.
Someone edited the file at a point within the two hours. The edit was between 10:10pm and 10:30pm.
Who's got their hand in the cookie-jar /pol/?
Allowing the people another vote is true democracy.
>>78769010
Bump, Anything I can do? I'm shit at front-end and cannot use my domains, but if you need any data science, do tell
>>78769186
Nah, it's not true democracy until you allow a third vote.
>>78769010
Bump
>>78769347
It's true democracy when the outcome changes after at most 10 votes
>>78769499
I think they should have a referendum every morning.
>>78769010
Bump
>>78769010
wait. wtf is going on?
I thought the brexit vote was to leave.
Are you saying now liberals are saying "oh wait, we need another vote to change this?"
what bullshit is this? Are we going to vote till they get what they want and then "sorry, the people voted"?
>>78769010
Cameron himself said, if the UK voted to remain, there would NOT be a second referendum, so why do the rules change if they vote leave?
>>78769865
lmao is that the angry nyc violin midget or whatever
Let's hope it exceeds the UK population.
>>78769917
Yes it's doug
>>78769865
Exactly the EU will force them to vote again and again until they vote how the EU wants. Then it is settled for good, no need for another pointless vote.
>>78769896
Because feelings, Anon. Alot of people were very upset about not being under a corrupt superstate anymore.
Here's my accounting for all time points and the most current data.
Personally I don't think the file was edited since Line 9 is consistently around 30000. This is important since it takes the displayed vote and compares it to the number of votes in both the constituent part and the by country part of the file.
If we were to see some editing, it should jump significantly somewhere, which it doesn't.
However, that does not discount the possibility of foreign IP's (bots).
Info about the JSON file:
There are two parts:
>Votes by country
This does not seem to be updated as fast, possibly since they're trying to screen out possible fraudulent votes.
>Votes by constituency
This part tends to be updated more frequently, probably because the constituency is determined by a zip code which is asked for in the petition signing page.
>>78770135
And in the interest of full disclosure:
http://pastebin.com/g9dCZ85v
>>78770098
Fuck feelings emotions are weak
Cyborg masterrace when?
>>78769010
Are you kidding me guys? Its a shitty online petition a bunch of Too High to Vote Millennials wiped off their lazy cheetoe stained fingers off their cum rags then typed out and voted for.
Nobody is going to take this seriously.I mean God bless you for doing this as only /pol/ would and keep it up but I am just saying.
>>78769010
BUMP. Which channels are you using to spread this info?
>>78770135
are you the guy from the other thread? >>78769456
also why would the minimal change in line 9 be a surprise? its total votes minus constiuency and non-uk, why would that prove editing false?
>>78770418
This. The poll is normal behavior by people in denial that this happened, and will happen. Expect the full seven stages of acceptance to play out over the next couple weeks. This is anger & denial.
>"These results aren't legitimate, we need another vote!"
>>78769010
This smells like Florida
There were several threads on this already where people were posting a bot file here that someone made on infinity chan and people were using it in the threads and stacking votes. They put Vatican City, and other places with low populations to have like 30,000 votes when they only have populations of 4-500 people. Hundreds of thousands of votes were added with the bots throughout the course of one thread hitting post limit, and it went on for multiple threads and had been going on before I started watching the threads.
It's rigged as hell m8, thank the chans for doing it.
>>78769865
>>78770046
I spent forever looking for this. You're welcome.
Requesting the image of the book page stating "Never take no as an answer" with the european countries which voted out of the EU but were ignored
We are at two articles on semi-obscure websites for now:
https://off-guardian.org/2016/06/25/the-2nd-referendum-petition-is-wide-open-to-fraud/
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/eu-referendum-claims-petition-for-second-referendum-is-rigged-as-it-storms-past-two-million-a3280971.html
>>78769010
>Who's got their hand in the cookie-jar /pol/?
I wonder
>>78769010
ANAL - YTICS
There won't be a second vote, retards.
It's a referendum. Not a neverendum.
>>78769010
cucks are assblasted
praise kek
>>78770900
>Requesting the image of the book page stating "Never take no as an answer" with the european countries which voted out of the EU but were ignored
Come oooon...
>>78770477
If you care about brexit, you probably shouldn't until you have an ironclad case. Perhaps it would be better to approach this from a "foreign voters" angle rather than an editing conspiracy.
>>78770534
Yes I was in that thread, but no I was not that poster.
I think a minimal change in line 9 proves it's not edited* because it it were edited, we should see a jump at some point since they would probably adjust the displayed vote count which would cause a step up after some timepoint.
On the other hand, if you compare Line 8 (Sum of all votes by country) and Line 3 (Total count displayed), you can see that there is a sudden drop after 21:21.
I don't think this is evidence of malicious editing since last thread someone said that whatever service is editing the by country counts is updating the UK number slower than for other countries since they saw places like Vatican increase in realtime while the UK count lagged. Not to mention the fact that this number keeps declining shows that the service is in fact catching up to current data.
>>78770971
What did you use to make that?
>>78770718
Well hopefully they keep it up until it exceeds the population of the UK.
>>78770806
>>78769010
This is good, have you sent it to anyone/ news site?
>>78771347
But we have the proof for the editing, don't we?
And now the JSONs have been corrected, that would be the main point to bring on
This is excellent news. We've caught the shills red handed and they absolutely know it.
>>78771685
>>78771445
Thank you and RARE. How's the weather there, little virgin? How did people take the brexit?
>>78769010
Didn't they already have a petition where millions voted leave?
Make a video on it.
ehehehe
Louise Mensch, by the way, is a vocal Leave campaigner.
>>78771750
What do you define "editing" as?
I thought it meant either outright changing a number on the JSON file (which would be obvious and difficult to keep consistent due to the many categories) or adding an arbitrary constant to the counting program which should show a huge spike at some point.
If you mean just pointing a bunch of bots at the page, then that's its own thing altogether.
>>78771685
>>78771445
I can't seem to find the source of the book. Any clue?
>>78771347
to note, the line 8 - line 1 count seems to be fairly consistent. The only number that jumps significant is the gb votes in country, but I assume only the constituency votes are counted, right?
It's all pretty much right there on their github
https://github.com/alphagov/e-petitions/issues/483
>In the JSON data feed, the 'signatures_by_country' element is not updated on this petition - https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215
>The total of this column does not equal the total number of votes in the e-petition. Not sure if this is issue #437 ( #437 ) coming back again.
replied
>Hi @xjpeter,
>We've temporarily disabled the signatures by country for the UK because of the high load we're experiencing on that petition. That said, the number was woefully out of date so I've run a one off calculation for that petition to update it and the figures are closer to the truth now. It'll continue to drift as time goes on, but we hope to re-enable the live count when load dies down.
>Cheers,
>Murray
And then Murray commits some changes. Since OP didn't include time zone information it's hard to line this information up
>>78771993
I may be stupid enough to not understand the unconsistency on the JSON case. Care to explain? You mean like making some excuse up about "latency"?
>>78772060
Fairly sure it's this.
https://www.amazon.com/Why-Vote-Leave-Daniel-Hannan-ebook/dp/B01B6B6SBG
>>78771685
isnt that image enough reason to want to leave?
>>78772164
The counter for British votes on the UK section always lagged behind the sum of votes in the constituency section (and by extension the number of votes displayed).
In the last thread we thought that it was because they were scrutinizing the UK votes since they were the most "important", but this >>78772115 seems to explain why.
The constituency count vote seems to be updated in real time since the numbers are split into district by postal codes which are self-reported so they are instantly available and not filtered for now.
>>78769010
WHO CARES
H
O
C
A
R
E
S
Brexit won, it's over.
Bump with merchants
>>78772171
Thank you a bunch.
2$ for info that should have been free at day 1. What a prick this Hannan is...
>>78772361
I understand. I'm off to work, but will give a look here from time to time
>>78772361
Wait, I just thought of something: If the constituency count is updated in real time (self-reported) while the by country count is not, then it would be nearly impossible to tell how many foreign/bot votes there are since there is no good reference point to compare each count to.
>>78769010
Bump
>>78769010
What?
Petition fraud you say?
Impossibru
>>78773422
share script lad
>>78773126
>it would be nearly impossible to tell how many foreign/bot votes there are
no, it should be manifestly obvious in many cases.
>>78770971
What magnificent software birthed this?
>>78773617
http://pastebin.com/rgiiPbww
>>78773621
Then what about bots based in Britain or using British proxies?
If the British by country count doesn't go up while the by constituency one does, then you can't tell if it's legitimate or not.
>>78773855
in britain its a paper vote from what i understand
>>78769010
EU wants us out ASAP honestly dont think they would let us change our decision now, they want to make an example out of us.
>>78773899
This is an online petition with no protection, not an official vote.
>>78773621
>someone else who writes the a like that
hello brother
>>78773958
is assume this is sarcasm then
>>78773043
>>78769010
Ammo for your shit.
>>78774316
Also has archives for all to use however they want.
>>78773658
I'm kind of shit at this, how do I run it?
>>78769010
Hahaha its too late goy.
We are having our 2nd referendum and Britain will stay.
You cucks thought you could leave?
So naive.
>>78774316
Here are my replies to your infograph. You're getting the data from the wrong set of data in the JSON file.
>>78770256
>>78770407
>>78771113
>>78773002
You have to get the GB's result from Signatures By Constituency and not from
Signatures By Country as those are not updated in realtime.
Did someone switch all of the non-UK signatures and into UK signatures?
>>78774677
No, the non-UK number consistently increases throughout.
This doesn't seem to be a case of data editing at the top, more like botting from below.
>>78774305
Sarcasm, or not knowing what "voting" he's referring to.
This petition shit isn't an official vote.
nobody in Britain is even talking about this in any serious capacity...
it was one of those 'fun' headlines for a few hours yesterday. foreign signatories, and non-brits dragging it out on /pol/
fuck off already, there's way more interesting things going on. un-cuck your own countries
>>78769698
They'll need to streamline the process though.
They should get their police to go door to door collecting the referendum votes to make it easier for the public.
>>78771685
>Nice Treaty
What kind of stupid name is that? What's next, "Mean Treaty"? "Devilish Treaty"?
>>78776891
It's a city in France.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nice
Who wants a new referendum is stupid and these digits confirm it.
>>78777783
I do... For personal reasons.
>>78774397
you're fucking helpless, how 'bout reading the actual code...
I'm very basic in coding and analytics, does this mean that a large number of signatures were from outside the EU? I'm debating a lefty on this atm.
How do you get this to people that actually can do anything about it?
>>78769010
>16:35 on 25/06/2016:
>>http://web.archive.org/web/20160625153506/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
I made a script to parse the json file. Result:
>total signatures according to website: 1765889
>all signatures per country added: 418527
Hmmm
If this shit is true then this needs to be front page everywhere. The UK's future is at stake because of lefties who don't even fucking live there.
The discrepancies have been solved by the Portuguese statistician as a false alarm.
>signatures_by_country not updating on petition:
https://github.com/alphagov/e-petitions/issues/483
And here are my numbers to prove that the sum of signatures_by_country weren't even close to the number of total signatures until now.
>16:35 on 25/06/2016:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160625153506/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
Total number of signatures: 1765889
Sum of all signatures by country: 418534
Number of signatures from United Kingdom: 354634
>20:00 on 25/06/2016:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160625202143/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
Total number of signatures: 2367548
Sum of all signatures by country: 453139
Number of signatures from United Kingdom: 365483
The 21:21 archived page uses the exact same JSON as 20:00 above.
>22:45 on 25/06/2016:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160625220110/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
Total number of signatures: 2547875
Sum of all signatures by country: 2499997
Number of signatures from United Kingdom: 2401768
The 23:01 and 23:14 archived pages uses the exact same JSON as 22:45 above.
Python script (requires Pandas): http://pastebin.com/Yhr7B92y
Just replace the url with any .JSON from any UK parliament petition
>>78779791
Right now the stats are as follows:
Total number of signatures: 3017197
Sum of all signatures by country: 2587514
Number of signatures from United Kingdom: 2401768
So 92% of signatures have come from the UK based on the sum of all signatures by country.
>>78769186
kek
>>78769499
Make it six... million.
>>78774248
Actually I made this, hello bro
>Nooo, the first time doesn't count, doesn't count!!
>Another referendum please, we don't like the results of this one.
Is this how referendums supposed to work?
So basically they just turned all foreign bot votes into UK votes?
>>78780796
No, they just updated the number of votes per country.
Why people don't read the thread...
People should read the thread don't you agree NhMFfciV?
>>78769010
We know it's a fraud guy. Faggots have been here on /pol/ openly boasting about using bots to add votes.
>>78781102
I do.
>>78781232
Yes, but the OP was implying there was manipulation by the UK parliament, and not by the signatories.
please get it to 6 trillion!
>>78769010
>>78769010
That's what these retard get for running scripts to "make a joke" out of the petition. Now all these "obviously fake votes" are simply made legit votes, and every fucking newschannel here reports how millions are demanding a new referendum etc.
Those idiots who thought helping the petition would somehow "expose" it got played. Now they just made all these Vatican City votes into UK votes. Well played. The petition is growing way too slow. They just need to get to 18 million, and it will be sensational and proof that the majority demand a second referendum, including Leavers who changed their mind. This will be their narrative.
And it will take way too long for it to reach 60 million, at which point it will become obvious something's wrong. Way too long. And you can expect them to simply shut it down at 20-30 million.
You fucking idiots who ran (or are still running, God help us all) scripts are absolutely doing this to help the remain camp and all other EU shills out there. There's no "mocking of democracy" or whatever - nobody in the media or government cares, everyone keeps citing just the numbers as proof for massive British opposition to leaving the EU.
>>78771856
This
It can spread both easier and be more digestible as a video.
>>78774502
Since way over half of the petitioners come from OUTSIDE THE UK, No, there will be no referendum.
You would need 17 million signatures from UK citizens to get that referendum, anyway.
>>78781896
Heh, Bonaire
Lets get it to 8 billion signatures
>>78769010
New more accurate shit to repost and spread. Made to induce butthurt in a very sneaky quiet way.
What the fuck are they trying to imply?
That the votes for exiting the EU that both main parties of government and globalist elite were against was fixed?
>>78769010
Are you an idiot?
In fact don't answer that. I'm guessing you're not really much of a tech person.
I don't know if you realise that maybe due to the amount of traffic hitting the petition.parliament.uk site that issues were happing due to an unintentional ddos by the public? As I'm pretty sure that the servers for the site were woefully poor for the hit they were taking initially.
>>78781975
That would be true in the '90s. But if the hacker named 4chan manages to spam the information hard enough on kikebook and co shortly after our SSM has gone full remain shill it could be interpreted as a hard hit against the EU and SSM.
I will not run the script but am open to what comes out of it.
>>78782042
Do it and have it max. 3 min. Better make it 1:30
>>78782299
You're an idiot, read the thread - the number of GB votes were always proportional to the sum of all votes by each country >>78780496
Also from this graph >>78782299 you'll see Vatican City votes never went down
And based on the links from OP:
>16:35 on 25/06/2016:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160625153506/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
Total number of signatures: 1765889
Sum of all signatures by country: 418534
Number of signatures from Vatican City: 10
>20:00 on 25/06/2016:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160625202143/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
Total number of signatures: 2367548
Sum of all signatures by country: 453139
Number of signatures from Vatican City: 2981
>22:45 on 25/06/2016:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160625220110/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
Total number of signatures: 2547875
Sum of all signatures by country: 2499997
Number of signatures from Vatican City: 5418
>>78769010
I posted something on reddit worldnews about the number of GB signatures around 19 hours ago and it got....a lot of upvotes....
>>78776891
>Dutch education
even if you bring the legitimacy of the petition into question, it's going to be seen as sabotage and only give the leftists ammunition. no good can come from this.
>>78769010
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36629324
https://www.rt.com/uk/348437-brexit-petition-parliament-millons/
reely maek u thnk...
Makes you think about how stupid easy it is today to be a journalist..
Portuguese News (RTP 1) Is saying that the parliament is going to discuss the petition in the House of Commons next Tuesday
http://www.rtp.pt/play/p2229/e241132/bom-dia-portugal-fim-de-semana/505269
As said in the video after 18:32.
I am thinking they have a case of bad reading...
>>78769010
Informed our media, spread it on Twitter. It just gets blocked/ignored. The media keeps reporting it to show how the referendum was a mistake and now everybody wants a second chance, most of all people who voted "leave". Should really have been expected.
EMAIL THIS SHIT TO YOUR PARLIAMENTARY REPRESENTATIVES
THIS IS ENTIRELY YOUR RESPONSIBLIITY, BRITFAGS
CONTACT YOUR PARLIAMENT AND LET THEM KNOW!!!
CONTACT THE MEDIA AS WELL
>>78783304
YES! TELL THEM MOST OF THE SIGNATURES ON THE PETITION COME FROM OUTSIDE THE UK!
>>78773913
Yes, this. Especially when:
>lol just kidding guys, sorry about the global market thing
>BRITAIN - GET OUT!!
>South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands","code":"GS","signature_count":3338
>There is no permanent population on the islands.
Seems legit.
where can I find the emails of your parliment members? I'll email them my fucking self you worthless britcucks
>>78769010
INFORM UK MPs ABOUT THE FRAUD
SEND PROOF, AND BE IT LINKS TO THESE THREADS TO SHOW THAT PEOPLE WERE RUNNING BOTS
THE MEDIA IS IGNORING ALL MESSAGES INFORMING THEM ABOUT THE FRAUD, THEY KEEP REPORTING IT AS REAL, EVEN RT
IT'S EVERYHWERE ON GERMAN TV
DO NOT LET THIS SLIDE
>>78782299
I will kek if they show this on the BBC.
>>78782980
please clap..
It'd be hilarious if this petition was given any attention in parliament.
Because that'd be the first time for any online petition ever.
>>78783561
Are you really expecting a journalist to access the data and research populations and stuff, ESPECIALLY when most of them happen to be EU shills? They simply ignore this, comment sections get disabled, nobody reports the fraud apart from one or two private websites.
They will just look at the total number and point at the paragraph where it says "only UK citizens are allowed to participate" and then play dumb. You know, benefit of the doubt, why would anyone cheat, that's not allowed :^))
>>78782299
The data on that 1st graph is still wrong.
>>78769186
Someone put this on youtube
>>78769186
Someone make youtube vid this
>>78784132
Search before posting...
https://petition.parliament.uk/#petitions-with-debated-outcome
>>78784160
Break it down in a way they can understand and get someone like Breitbart to pick it up.
![[CRACK].png](https://i.imgur.com/1Mwi537.png "[CRACK].png")
>/pol/'s own tactics - spamming polls and petitions - are now getting used against them and getting international media and news coverage
>/pol/ are crying about it
It's like pottery.
Question:
why are you guys botting this petition that would've been useless even without bots?
>>78776891
>Being retarded
>we now live in the world where I agree with Piers Morgan
Brexit has literally opened a wormhole in the fabric of spacetime
https://twitter.com/piersmorgan/status/746771580064235520
>>78784470
>Due to the overwhelming success of the online petition, there will indeed be a second referendum.
>/pol/'s face when
>>78782980
Here's a (You) for that pic
>>78769010
britfags, mail this shit to your MPs, to city council members, to your fucking local zoo if you have to.
raise awareness, they can't keep getting away with this
>>78769010
I've witnessed a jump from ~350k to 2 million in a heartbeat
Also bump
>>78784213
How so?
>>78784741
Well, I'll be damned.
Why are you all so worried about some silly little online petition?
I thought you were all supposed to be laughing at the idea of remainers signing a petition, remember? But now you're all panicking and crying over it like little babies :^) Hahahaha
>>78770418
The best part about this is that it likely face discussion, in front of a new government made up of brexit mp's.
>>78770718
Yeah it was posted last night.
http://pastebin.com/rgiiPbww
Shows the legitimacy of our media, when this petition is on a lot of front pages today.
>>78784799
>implying
Do you really think /pol/ is the only group of people that know about the fraud made in online petitions?
>>78774397
install de python IDE and get the freemail script. it's all explained in the code.
>>78785041
I am making one with the correct values, don't worry.
>>78782642
>>78782642
>>78782642
You do realise that each time here is fucked right? Why does it say these results are for "16:35" when it says in the .json that the current data was last updated at 15:34?
On top of that the real number of GB votes can only be obtained by combineing the totals from each Constituency as the total you are getting from the GB line is no longer being updated. Trust me I ran into the same problem you did with the number 2401768, Just look at the mistake I made before the fix.
>>78774316
The "explosion" as OP points out was debunked in another thread.
>>78785714
Wayback Machine is set at GMT, UK is at BST which is GMT + 1
Pic related is the simple info-graphic I promised from yesterday:
>>78743356
Spam this picture everywhere. This has both undeniable proof of bot fraud and someone tampering with the data file.
>>78785909
Fucking read the thread mate...
>>78786099
Ah shit, I just read the end part.
I only just woke up.
I agree, the best method is probably to just inform people about botting rather than file modification.
Also >>78764248 seems to make some pretty good points.
>>78785842
I understand that but why is he not using the time on the actual .json. Everyone who wants to see the data will look at the .json whereas not everyone is going to see the wayback machine times as they can be linked straight past it.
>>78785496
Im really unsure as to what I did wrong, I converted the .jsons to spreadsheet and summed up the Constituaries to get the actual GB vote. I did this for each of my archives.
>>78771557
>>78773655
might be the R language
>>78784277
>>78784323
Here you go:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tuW0zDJObA
>>78769010
When I checked it petition had 3 millions signatures with 3,6 only from UK.
Really makes you think.
>>78788052
404 not found??? EU COVER UPS REEEE
>>78769010
Well, looks like someone hates democracy and at no point or under any circumstances wants a second referendum, which is justified from statistical mechanics and democratic process.
Tampering with website's data is a no-no. And considering that far-right alligned individuals did tamper with it, in order to misrepresent data as a fraud so as to make it look like a fraud... it is just that: the LEAVE voters, or atleast the far-right section, are afraid of losing it should an actual democratic process be invoked.
LEAVE stands no chance on the second referendum. And this tampering is the prime example of massive anguish and desperation that they are experiencing.
Violation of democratic process is unacceptable.
It is quite interesting as to why such a negative reaction occurs. Afterall, both referendums are legally non-binding and have only and advisory effect.
Why such a reaction?
>>78770977
Heh heh
>>78769010
>{"name":"Australia","code":"AU","signature_count":12737}
>{"name":"Canada","code":"CA","signature_count":4375}
>{"name":"Italy","code":"IT","signature_count":2680}
>{"name":"Vatican City","code":"VA","signature_count":41667}
>41667
whew, those tens of thousands of cardinals sure care about the issue a lot!
Sorry about removing the last graph, I noticed a mistake with it.
>>78788688
Stopped reading at justified.
> its not justified if I lose
>>78788688
>LEAVE stands no chance on the second referendum
>second referendum
>second
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
>>78788916
oh sorry I meant 41744
>one minute later
41756
>another minute later
41780
>another minute later
41811
wtf it's accelerating
>>78788966
Im guessing my mistake was using the GB total and Total that was given to me on the .json instead of suming up my own from the rest of the database.
I also assumed stats were right befor they did the 2.1mil update.
So if im right.
GB results are the combination of Constituaries for the GB. And total results are the combination of all countrys combined including the UK.
>>78789264
Now now goym. It's just all those british tourists.
>>78789264
Of course it is, there is a funny guy around here doing that to Vatican and North Korea.
>>78789330
If not then im not sure where I went wrong on the total.
>>78789330
Exactly, except not using the GB Value from the "signatures_by_country".
Being reported in the Telegraph ...http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/06/26/concern-as-online-call-for-second-brexit-vote-gains-more-than-39/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
>>78788688
Wasted Hitler dubs
>implying its not about the lulz
Moron back to >>>/r/eddit
Btw, I got that last json file that I used to get the results when I made the graph.
Does anyone want it?
>>78789597
Post it already
>>78789448
Yeah I see what you mean. Why the hell give us those values if they are incorrect. I mean I know the system is under stress, that must be the only reason.
>>78789597
Well if you saved it on Wayback Machine its auto added to the history along with mine and anyone elses.
This thread is legendary.
Dear fucktards who are spamming to bury this, please understand that your shitty spreading this FUD about 'muh fake online poll' shit is basically going to bring more normalfags to sign this shit legit so even if all the fake 'signatures' get removed they'll achieve the purpose of bringing this up in parliament.
But yeah keep circle jerking and making infographics, you're totally going to stuff that genie back in the bottle.
>>78788978
There is simply a too big margin of error to declare a clear victory. 1 million difference with more than 8 million of those who did not vote. More than the quater of population did not vote or did not have a chance to vote. That is unacceptable.
Besides, almost everyone misses the small-print of these referendums:
THEY HAVE NO LEGISLATIVE or LEGAL POWER BEHIND THEM. THEY ARE NON-BINDING.
Referendum allows you to have your say. It does not allow you to make your vote final and legal.
>stopped reading there
Ofcourse, your brain could not handle that volume of information.
>>78789877
>they'll achieve the purpose of bringing this up in parliament.
>>78790162
You only need 100k signatures for a petition for the parliament to be forced to debate it.
>>78789831
Unfortunately I didn't
Will update graph with the last save.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160626115356/https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/131215.json
>>78769010
Bump
>>78789877
Shills have no personal agency, always remember that.
>>78790312
I will be keeping the times the same as the rest of my tables. So I have abit of work. However I will also be keeping archives every few hours so I can always make another.
>>78789583
Politics is too much of an important thing to fuck around with. That is something you, retarded child, cannot comprehend.
>for lulz
That is the reason why overwheling majority of /pol/ act like drooling morons. It was never about actual politics, or reasoning, or desire for improvement, or any virtuous aspirations. It was only for one thing - laughs, a childish notion. And children have no place in politics or decision-making.
Now with the json backed up in the archive,
>>78789877
The petition has already succeeded. Despite all of the tampering. Its only impediment is that it is not being widely advertised.
>>78790843
You don't need to advertise it, it's already succeeded, any tampering right now is basically fuckery and ammunition for the remain team. 99% of normalfags don't give a shit about what the fuck json is, the retards that voted brexit in the first place didn't even know they'll be worse off in the first place.
Reminder that the very guy who created the petition is probably one of us. I suspect he wanted to crush any attempt at a re-vote by showing the absurdity of it.
>>78791073
I concur.
>>78791273
Eh, then it would be ironic because it would achieve the opposite effect.
So shouldn't they stick to their own rules?
Second referendum will only come into effect if 60% approve it with a 75% turnout.
>>78791273
>Asbergers
Kek
Okay so after many fuck ups by me how does this look?
>>78784453
>I can't read
>>78792590
>An anonymous hacker boosted petition votes in order to present that evidence of tampering as a fraud, in order to discredit petition.
I suppose this could not be any worse for leavers: tampering with voting.
Pathetic.
The idiots who hacked this petition have done nothing but strengthen the establishment's resolve to stop democracy. You thought you would be laughing, but the truth is the media here is utterly corrupt and biased. They won't backtrack and will play dumb. Once it is 'out there' (their propaganda) their work is done.
>>78792590
Now it appears correct :)
>>78793197
It was already being manipulated, we just made that transparent.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36634407
>The House of Commons petitions committee has said it is investigating allegations of fraud in connection with a petition calling for a second EU referendum.
>>78769010
Why is the text so fucking tiny
>>78783822
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-eu-referendum-36634407
>>78770049
That's pretty much what they did in Ireland after we voted against austerity.
These leftists claim they're voting against 'fascism', they have no idea.
Did signature just reduced a little or is it just my imagination?
>>78769010
>second referendum
this isn't best two out of three
>>78769186
Record 1 hour of this and post it on youtube.
>>78774397
>open cmd.exe or a bash shell
pip install temp-mail
>hit enter
pip install mechanize
>hit enter
>navigate to the directory with the python script
python petition.py
>hit enter
>profit
>>78795848
This.
Anons can then share the vid on social media and the lieks
Again, here is the vote checker. I will soon add the ability to navigate the archived json files as well.
http://codepen.io/ayylmaom80/pen/xOgWPZ
>>78796692
Keep up the good work
>>78769010
http://yle.fi/uutiset/britanniaan_uutta_eu-kansanaanestysta_vaativa_vetoomus_paisuu__allekirjoitus_helppo_vaarentaa/8984425
AWW YEAH BOYS
THIS REFERENDUM IS DUN GOOFED
>>78797968
Fraud found votes removed keks had
>>78777037
>Country: Ireland
>Issue: Nice treaty
>it's city in france
why can't you read portugal?
Apparently some votes were deleted.
BUMP
>>78798893
Whats stopping the botters from just revoting?
>>78800319
Did they stop voting?
And I don't know how they spotted these bots.
Updated Graph
>>78798150
Get slid faggot
>>78793196
>Thinking cock is a delicious treat
Disgusting
>>78769010
You really thought it was real?
Pic related.
>>78802470
>>78802540
>>78802571
Why are lefties so stupid?
>>78798893
How many total votes came from Vatican City? Something like 37k were reported at one point.
The population is around 800.
>>78791273
>tfw my sister is going to De Montford this September for a BA in Health Studies
>>78769865
No, the government will just ignore them and Brexiters won't do shit because they're the kind of morons that voted to destroy their own country.
>>78802752
Because they are immature whiners.
Let the voters decide the fate of the country, not special interest groups.
>>78786717
Thanks!
send this to milo
http://archive.is/8DY4Z
saved this thread
>>78796635
>>78769186
>>78784323
has this been done yet?
>>78802840
G column stands for the last count from json file I got at 2016-06-26T12:50:39.363Z,
and invisible B column stands for the previous count from json file at 2016-06-26T13:02:57.396Z
H column shows the difference of them.
So it was 33 at the moment and 42k votes seem to be removed from Vatican City.
Bumpuru
>>78804771
REEEE THEY SWITCH THEM OVER TO UK VOTES!!! ALL OF THOSE NORTH KOREA, VATICAN, ANTARCTICA OR SOUTH SANDWICH ONES!!! REVOLT!!!
SEE BELOW
>>78782980
>>78805289
Doesn't matter. the bomb is set. Social media are going crazy
>>78772226
If you want to be objective, not really. Especially when considering that citizens of the UK that were living in the EU for over 15(?) years were not allowed to vote.
>>78777777
>>78770719
damn
Obviously there are Brits outside of Britain. You morons are pretty low iq.
>>78812913
Obviously there are 40 thousands Brits in Vatican. You morons are pretty low iq.
>>78770971
Does anyone else think it's extremely unlikely that the US genuinely has only 11k votes?
>>78771685
People are fucking morons if they think UK will actually leave EU. This is all just a setup to make us think we have a choice.
>>78769010
Tell the world, brave young man
>>78802752
That's one condition to be a leftard: Being a full-of-him/herself moron
FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT ONLY 36% OF MILLENNIALS WERE VOTING! ONLY 36% OF ALL MILLENIALS VOTED!
THEY ONLY HAVE THEMSELVES TO BLAME FOR NOT VOTING!
