[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo

Does /pol/ believe in evolution?


Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 3

File: le monke chart.jpg (41KB, 620x387px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
le monke chart.jpg
41KB, 620x387px
Does /pol/ believe in evolution?
>>
>>78705592
Yes.
I believe niggers evolved from apes.
>>
>>78705592
No
>>
File: 1440544194083-1.png (329KB, 1113x711px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
1440544194083-1.png
329KB, 1113x711px
>>78705592
yes
>>
>>78706914
Looks like a Turk
>>
>>78707234
>Implying Ashkenazi "jews" aren't turks
>>
>>78705592
It would be the contrarian thing to think. Its jewish hoax to enslave white man.
>>
Nah
>>
>>78705592

Living things change over time. How can anyone refute this?
>>
>>78705592
evolution is a complex topic. no yes or no answer
>>
File: gYK2meM.png (181KB, 480x437px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]
gYK2meM.png
181KB, 480x437px
>>78705592
Yes
>>
Of course.

>inb4 the devil placed fossils to trick us
>>
>>78706914
Keko
>>
Also, it's not about "believing", it's about understanding. With evidence, you don't have to believe. Whatever you believe, you can't change the evidence/facts.
>>
>>78708196
So you don't believe evolution?
>>
>>78705592
>does /pol/ believe in pseudoscience?

No.
>>
>>78705592

evolution is an extremely ambiguous word, one look at the talk page of wikipedia on the evolution article will pretty much tell you this is true.

small changes over time is something that has been observed, in fact reproduction produces a sort of evolution by creating novelty.

It's the idea of Common Ancestry/Descent that has no real scientific basis, they use phylogeny and comparison to construct a tree of life that is not founded upon scientific methodology but of cum hoc and post hoc fallacies. No matter how objective they claim cladistics is, the fundamental error will always be in the assumption that similarity inherently implies causation or similarity is a cause in and of itself.

if the scientific method was not used, it is not science.
>>
>>78705592
Not without some divine guidance.
>>
>>78708196
this guy gets it
Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 3
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y / ] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
If a post contains illegal content, please click on its [Report] button and follow the instructions.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need information for a Poster - you need to contact them.
This website shows only archived content and is not affiliated with 4chan in any way.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoin at 1XVgDnu36zCj97gLdeSwHMdiJaBkqhtMK