What is his problem?
- Home
- Board: /pol/ - Politically Incorrect
- Reading: What is his problem?
What is his problem?
I'm an atheist, but that's the one thing that really irritates me about other atheists.
>Person has a sincere question.
>"Okay then, so if there is no god then what is the purpose of existence"
"HURR DURR U JUST DO WHATEVER THE FUCK U WANT U IGNORANT CAVEMAN"
>>78613967
I'm sure he doesn't give af about anyone's personal beliefs, but when those individuals join together and insist the same nonsense is taught in schools, that's when it's a problem.
>>78613967
Theistfags give him shit all the time and he'd feed up with them.
>>78615001
Being an atheist is suffering. I think a lot of atheists are atheists because it's part of the Internet Liberal Loot Crate and haven't really thought about all the implications that come with atheism, like some have, like you and I have.
>>78613967
>What is his problem?
He's a huckster.
>>78615696
Trust me, if it was possible to not be atheist. I would choose that in a heartbeat.
>>78615696
It's suffering to a certain degree. The only people that give me issues for being an atheist are people on the Internet that come from cesspools like Tumblr, Reddit, 4chan, 9gag, funnyjunk, and so forth. Of course, I only use 4chan out of all those sites, but I bump in to people that use those sites from time to time.
>>78615696
>like you and I have
Make sure to wipe his cum off your chin when you're done.
What scientific achievements has this man made?
>>78615696
>being an atheist is suffering.
existing is suffering, this is why religion exists. atheists just understand they'd suffer either way.
>>78613967
He is a nigger.
>>78613967
He's scared
>>78613967
He realizes to fufil the Revelation of the mark of the beast, he must shit on religion so that nobody thinks twice about uploading their brains or plugging in.
>>78613967
I was dissapointed when I finally figured out that god and most of Christianity is a myth.
>>78616173
edgy
>>78616229
[spoiler]immunity cat
>>78615001
There is no purpose to existance.
Why do you assume there should be a purpose?
Most people don't understand science at all, they just know that "science is right", and that "if a scientist said It, it must be correct".
Most people completely and utterly rely on people like Tyson to explain the world to them and read the holy scripture of science to them. It's literally no different to villages in the middle ages relying on Priests to read the Bible to them because the Priests were the only people that could read Latin
Now that's not to say I'm some fucking edgy theist-fag, I just have a great disdain for the faith that a lot of people now have in Scientists and the complete and utter reverence they have for anything that comes out of a scientists mouth.
>>78613967
he's one of those snobby kids in high school that no one wanted to talk to because he was a self absorbed nerd.
his dad further killed any chance of character development he would have had by just buying him shit he wanted as a replacement for social interaction.
Now he's just a vapid nigger with a god complex that got famous for the fact that the internet's two favorite things are blacks and science lessons aimed at 3rd graders.
You can tell hes still a loser by watching him speak as its just 0 charisma an pure snob.
He probably starts up irrelevant conversation when having sex like "fun fact do you know we are made of stars?
This man is what you get when you cross the cockiness of bill nye, the likability of a redit atheist, the genes of Treyvon Martin and the social skills of Stephen Hawking.
>>78615838
>>>78613967 (OP)
>>What is his problem?
>He's a huckster.
Kek
>>78613967
His problem is he thinks he is the smartest person on the planet. His ego makes him not even understand that he's a nigger
>>78615926
This. A meaningless existence isn't exactly what I would have chosen but I'd also just believe I was a Chad if it were so easy to believe things that are obviously untrue.
Where did this nigger even come from? Never heard of him before a few years ago when he was getting pushed hard on tv and movies.
>>78616738
It's overstated. The fedora meme brought the momentum back to the godfags, and scientism/leftism/secularism/atheism are nowhere near as powerful as redneck religious revivalists on 4chan say they are.
>>78613967
>MFW I realized I had the same level of education as these valuable members of the scientific community
>>78613967
Student of Sagan trying desperately to be like his teacher, but he lacks the Charisma.
>>78613967
But I don't argue from science. I argue from the moral consequences that result for the necessary cosmic nihilism of no god.
>>78616229
ALLAH PROTECTS ME KUFFAR
>>78616080
Holy shit how dare anyone be nice to each other! HOW DARE I NOT SHIT ALL OVER EVERYONE ALL THE TIME LIKE YOU! It's as if some people's motivation in life WASNT making everyone else around them as miserable as your average /pol/tard.
>>78615926
>>78616173
It's one of those things, you can't put the genie back in the bottle? You'd just have to lie yourself to go back to being theist and that makes it even worse.
>>78616048
I'm in Louisiana so I get shit about it in real life, I don't mention it anymore. However in recent years it hasn't been like that. I think Christfags calm down once they notice you aren't sacrificing goats to Satan like they thought you were supposed to.
>>78615001
>atheist
You should just kill yourself. What's the use of suffering anymore when you can just end it right away?
>>78617109
>but he lacks the Charisma
Don't Redguards get a natural charisma boost? Or is that just Imperials?
>>78616472
I am fully aware there is no purpose, see my other post >>78615926
I'm just saying that there's nothing wrong with allowing other people to maintain the illusion of purpose, if that is what brings them joy.
I wish I could feel joy again in my life, but I know too much now.
>>78616738
This.
Scientism (the belief in the moral significance of purporting to be scientific) is the delusion of our age.
Engineers deride the humanities, but have only ever seen thoroughly perverted Cultmarx parodies. If the humanities were taught properly, the ordinary non-scientist would be far better at reasoning, and would know historical examples of overconfidence.
>>78617307
Redguards are -1 to intellect and base charisma. Even fantasy worlds are redpilled toward niggers.
>>78613967
he's a meme scientist
>>78616738
There are a lot of people on earth, not every one of them has the time or patience to repeat what scientists have done to prove the same things themselves. That's why being a scientist is a job, they discover shit for us because that's what we're paying them to do.
>>78617291
>theist
You should just engage in extremely dangerous activities. As long as you die on accident, you'll go straight your womb paradise with sky dad!
The idea of an omnipotent being who is capable of inhabiting two or more planes of existence simultaneously is definitely far beyond our realm of comprehension but I only think it is because it's not our time or place to understand. Only five hundred years ago an actual scientific renaissance began to take place and for the last hundred we have made leaps and bounds that make our grandfather's way of life look primitive. I don't know whats out there but I feel it's foolish to simply brush every old bit of human lore and belief as mere myth and superstition.
>>78617600
I just want people to question things more and stop being smug and self-righteous about their beliefs
>>78616952
To be fair, in most religions the "meaning" of existence is pretty shit.
>he pisses off religious
>is a scientist
He's doing his job.
>>78617681
Seems legit. I guess we'll see. Problem is the people who act like they know right now because some guy told them stories about a book that was started about 3,000 years ago.
>>78613967
He's an annoying pop scientist, fedora tipper that Redditors quote to sound smart. I absolutely despise him.
>>78617472
Why live then? 'Nothing is Real.' That's what the liberal media singer said after all. Who cares?
>>78617719
so basically you want people to doubt everything.
t.Satan
>>78616738
I think it's an appeal to authority too. Everyone wants to "win" the argument so liberals resort to using scientists, as the fallacy goes to associate their opinion with someone commonly thought of as smart.
Funny though, if you truly believe in science you know it's all about questioning everything, even established theories. Somehow this gets lost when invoking science to back up their unreasonable, unlogical bullshit spewing.
>>78617079
Exactly.
4chan points to itself saying everyone is a NEET right? Well take that for true for a second and think about how much of this site just gets 100% of their information from the Internet. Because there are more atheist-liberal types active on these places, they somehow postulate/project that's what the "majority" is and hence, the contrarian swing into flat-earth-style-Christ-fagism.
The sample size is the Internet, not reality for most of 4chan's observations.
>>78617732
True, I never understood why people get such a kick out of the idea that they were literally created to worship a superior being.
>>78613967
Science is in an ever receding pocket of reality. It's based on deduction. The only product of science is how not why something happens.
>>78617754
Moron.
All of the greatest scientists were theists. Majority of those were Christian.
>>78617307
Sagan was a weed smoking jew who loved the stars, name one something more charismatic, especially for people in the 60's-70's.
>>78613967
his only claim to fame is being a black scientist.
>>78617661
>You should just engage in extremely dangerous activities.
But those have no purpose if they weren't meant for me.
>>78613967
I don't like him very much, but this quote really is out of context.
>Does it mean, if you don’t understand something, and the community of physicists don’t understand it, that means God did it?
>Is that how you want to play this game?
>Because if it is, here’s a list of things in the past that the physicists at the time didn’t understand [and now we do understand] [...].
>If that’s how you want to invoke your evidence for God, then God is an ever-receding pocket of scientific ignorance that’s getting smaller and smaller and smaller as time moves on.
>So just be ready for that to happen, if that’s how you want to come at the problem.
Although I don't really know that many people who, when confronted with something science doesn't understand yet, automatically say it's proof of God, which is what he seems to be arguing against.
>>78618046
>all
Someone's biased!
>>78618046
>all of the greatest scientists were theists
False.
It's not even an argument.
>>78613967
im not a godfag but im not arrogant enough to think i know where we go after death
>>78618188
the fuck
>>78617903
>person you don't like says something
>something is false because I don't like him
Logic.
As annoying as these meme scientists are, it does not change the fact that religion is preposterous.
You don't need anything greater than a high school education and some simple logic to put over 9k holes in any religion.
Not to mention burden of proof...
>>78617933
Why are you so worried about my meaningless opinions that you responded to me twice?
>>78617719
What you're really asking is for these faggots to stop being assured in the science based on the notion that they're right and to actually read a book so they can comprehend what it's brought to them.
>>78613967
He scores political points by being an atheist, even though many many many scientists in his field acknowledge that the idea of some sort of creator is feasible and in many situation arguable. Sure, arguing in support of a specific religion opens you up to criticism, but denying the existence of any sort of creative force is ridiculous. Even the most staunch atheist should be able to acknowledge even a basic idea that the sun is like a god in the way it is the foundation of all life. Thats not a very deep example of how far science can take you on this topic but its a basic starting point.
We need a scientist as a public figure that starts diving deeper in to how AI and quantum sciences could bring us closer to understanding "god". That would be awesome.
>>78613967
He is Euphoric because looking at space balls through a telescope.
>>78613967
he mad that morality cannot be objectively determined by science.
>>78618356
The best approach to science is agnosticism buddy, it's understandable why some say atheism is better.
>>78618356
Or maybe it is turtles all the way down...
>>78613967
He didn't say "Allah", someone should correct the image and spread it.
>>78618275
It wasn't meant for me to engage in because God didn't give me any inclination to take me through that. Why don't you do it instead? It doesn't matter to you.
makes you think hih?
>>78615001
Do not identify yourself as atheist just live your life kid.
>>78618514
Fucking turtles
>>78618287
I never claimed religions and spirituality work the way the churches claim. But to act like any of his science discredits religion or spirituality in anyway is preposterous too.
>>78613967
When did the lead singer of Earth Wind and Fire turn into such a fedora tipper?
>>78617964
I guess it's an ode to the comfort of being taken care of, except when you dig deep into the fundamentals of the religion it becomes a love for worship in of itself rather than the initial idea that the lord will provide for you in heaven, which is where it falls apart.
Not to pull a Nietzche but it's essentially slave morality, the enjoyment in comfort and certainty of being controlled.
>>78618338
Literally everything any atheist scientist has ever said, and every experiment that even remotely contradicted the notion of God, could be 100% verifiably wrong and you wouldn't even be an inch closer to proving that God exists.
The Big Bang Theory could be total horseshit, any theories or supposed facts regarding evolution could be complete garbage, and you'd still be standing there with absolutely no evidence that God exists.
So really, the validity of scientists or modern scientific achievements really has nothing to do with whether or not there's a God.
>>78615926
>>78615926
this
I'd like god to exist the same way that I want :
>father christmas to be real
>the tooth fairy to be real
>narnia to be real
>star wars to be real
Maybe there is a god, maybe we are living in a computer simulation. Who fucking knows?
Any sane and logical person should come to the conclusion that all our present day monotheistic religions are COMPLETE AND UTTER MADE UP NONSENS.
Just lol @ literally believing in any fucking religion.
People that are "semi-spiritual" and believe in a "higher power" maybe get a get-out-of-jail-free-card from me. But anyone who literally believes the world is 6000 years old, that jesus was the son of god or any other of that allah nonsens needs their head examined
Believing in KEK and meme magic makes more sense to me
>>78618481
agnosticism is intellectual cowardice. If presented with an unfounded claim (especially such a far fetched claim) you must assume it is false until evidence is presented. It isn't like there hasn't been plenty of time for some proof to surface...
>>78618356
I really love this quote. It explains so much about the "educated" generation.
>>78615926
I still like this pic, because that Russian bro had it saved and posted it when Russia was banned, and the thought of someone not being able to post on 4chan and sent a drastic last cal in the form of a thread, is endearing.
>>78613967
Didn't reddit pay him thousands of dollars for a speech and he was a douchebag through and through? This fucker hasn't even actually contributed shit to science
>>78618356
He actually denies being an atheist and claims to be an agnostic. I personally don't think there's much of a difference unless you're splitting hairs or playing at an agenda, but yea he's one of those faggots.
>>78613967
WTF does God have to do with science?
Thats like saying God is an ever receding pocket of gastronomic ignorance.
Does that make any sense at all.
Tyson was just a coattailing negro who was found to be a useful apparatchik for the cultural marxists.
He should have been shamed off the scene years ago when he started talking shit about things he has no knowledge of.
>>78613967
He's a cock sucker and a hypocrite who knows nothing about anything. Why, if you were to ask this cock sucker,this, tyson chap if he has observable testable recreate able proof of his god, the magical singularity that appeared from nowhere, he'd so some shit about some mathematical whatsit theorized to have happened which would still be a fantasy because by this cock sucker's own admission, the first four seconds of the universe is unknowable, and yet, everything came into existence 10 to the exponent 32 times faster than a fraction of a second. Oh how very convenient.
I blame Christians for not killing every single atheist when they had the chance.
>>78618643
Science doesn't have to discredit anything. In fact it is literally impossible to discredit something that does not exist.
That is why we have something called burden of proof.
Let me give you a simple example.
Santa Claus is real. Prove me wrong.
>>78618670
There is no god in science until you can prove he exists, until then he's just a theory.
God has no place in science because he himself cannot survive the scientific method. Even theist scientists understand this.
Throwing the bible around just makes you look ignorant, telling you that to help you.
>>78613967
even a nigger is right sometimes
>>78618929
Sounds like you're just repeating what I just said in less words.
>>78618684
>intellectual cowardice
Lmao, it's the only logical approach to something that is (as of yet) impossible to disprove.
Don't be retarded.
>>78617276
Wow, I need to set up to shitpost like this. Thanks for the idea.
>>78618356
Polls Ive seen show that most scientists are atheists. I think its like 90% plus.
>>78613967
#TOKENSCIENCENIGGER
>>78618924
>Science doesn't have to discredit anything
Exactly. That's why the tweet in the OP's pic is wrong.
>>78613967
He's a fucking retarded nigger just read his Twitter
>>78619082
I was agreeing, i could have worded it better though.
>>78616964
He's the Garret Morgan of current year.
>>78619083
Did you even read the rest of my post?
>>78618924
Please prove that Santa doesn't exist and I'll become an agnostic.
>>78617282
Actually I went from being atheist to believing in God.
I started with the simple proposition: what if God is Love?
The funny thing is, I know I wasn't wrong to be atheist before. Whatever I believed back then, I still believe.
The problem is... you hear me say "atheist" and you believe something in your head about it.
You hear other people talk about "God" and you have something in your head which you use to generalize such topics.
Forget all that shit. God is Love, Peace, Non-violence, all these things. God is Just. God is infinite.
I'm just giving you the axioms. You have to build up your beliefs within yourself. Fuck the haters and the hate; it doesn't matter that the Crusades or the religious wars happened, Westboro Baptists, scientologists, all that stuff is irrelevant.
>>78613967
>DUDE HUMANS ARE CAPABLE OF UNDERSTANDING WHEN THEY HAVE ATTAINED ALL THE KNOWLEDGE IN THE UNIVERSE OUTSIDE OF THEIR SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTION AND COGNITIVE ABILITIES LMAO
>>78618296
I only responded once, friend. The other response must have been your other friend...
Are you aware of the One True God yet? Kek.
He's pissed god made him a smart appearing nigger, its literally a joke.
>>78619201
He actually has a point because religion around the world loves to make pretty absurd claims.
Do protestants even believe in dinosaurs?
>>78613967
he's a dumb nigger who realized SCIENCE! and gaytheism is a way easier gig than doing research
>>78615001
>Okay then, so if there is no god then what is the purpose of existence"
What the fuck does one thing got to do with another? you deserved the ad hominem.
>>78619319
You seem to be under the impression using logic is cowardice, I'm not sure engaging you in a logical conversation is even possible.
Agnosticism is running off what science can and cannot currently do.
>>78613967
He isn't a problem. He's just being somewhat logical.
He's also defining GOD as the things we don't know rather then everything that we do when classical philosophy clearly defined all of reality as eminating out of the will of the LOGOS; reality literally defined as the will of GOD.
The term University literally arises from the desire to study the will and thought of the great Monad from which we emanate.
Uni: One
Verse: Speak
>>78613967
His mama prolly beat his lil heathen nigga ass
>>78616738
It's Christphobes
Even Tyson is referring to the capital G God, the God of Abraham and Moses. Not Goddess, not some pan god being, not even le spaghetti monster.
It's easy to be mad at idiots on 4chan but the people who are loud about this in person are people who obviously have been shunned before and are seeking refuge. Jesus was supposed to be that refuge. Our materialism really doesn't help the rampant narcissism and vanity of some folk and it turns away people.
>>78619330
So you don't believe in "god" you believe in love...
Problem solved.
I've heard this type of spinoza "god is the universe" bullshit before.
It is an unnecessary circle jerk of semantics.
You don't believe in "god" you believe in something that you are assigning the word "god" to.
>>78618046
>All the [people who are held in high regard by society] were [the larger group I'm a part of]. Majority of those were [specific group I'm part of].
>>78619558
>university is called after the will to study god.
We've grown up now.
>>78617879
True but the smug cunts who choose not to believe in those books are insufferable. Granted they're not as detrimental but anyone who claims enlightenment by "not" believing that there is a magic sky wizard watching your every move is like a child thinking they're the smartest kid in school for not believing in Santa.
>>78613967
>Christian priest says atheists are dumb.
>/pol/: "OMFG SO FUGGING BASED!"
>Scientist, person, or some random dude says that he doesnt believe in god.
>/pol/: "WHAT THE FUCK IS HIS PROBLEM? WHY LIVE IF YOU DONT BELIEVE THAT LIFE IS JUST SUFFERING?! ALL ATHEISTS ARE NIHILIST AND LIVE SHITTY LIFES! ALL THE ATHEIST I KNOW HAVE SHITTY JOBS AND ARE ALWAYS SAD! OH GOOOD IM SO DENSE."
>>78619746
>comparing god to santa
About accurate.
>>78613967
Didn't he get caught fabricating fake quotes and bullshit statistics a bunch?
He's only popular because of leddit and their hard on for meme scientists like him and Bill Nye. Whatever credibility he had as a researcher was stripped once he began his political pandering.
>>78619403
I want you to show me something as complex as the universe and life self creating. Oh wait, that's too hard. Let's do something simpler, grab some bread, mayo, etc and watch your sandwich self make. since the universe and life could self make, a simpler thing like your sandwich self making should be a breeze.
>>78613967
He gets more Reddit fanboys for saying shit like this.
>>78619861
Sure, study physics. Not hard for me, it's hard for you.
>>78613967
He's a superficial, banal thinker. Pic related for contrast
>>78618670
Scientists don't believe in god because there is no reason to, they can't reach a being so abstract and away from anything they can gather using the scientific method. it's just as frivolous as any other claim based on nothing.
They can't disprove him either, so when you can neither prove or disprove something with no so much a single hypothetical approach to proving/disproving it is essentially meaningless.
In the scientific world there is no 100% certainty there is no god, they're just telling people that "Hey, since you can neither prove no disprove something there really isn't any reason to believe it" where as religion is saying there is an absolute certainty there is a god and that to believe him against all odds is a virtue he will reward, which makes it look even less credible because there is no logic in such a notion other than to keep people following the beliefs that no one can prove.
this is one of the reasons the christian god has become so abstract when he in the past used to more "tangible. Had a fatherly form, had a location. Hell used to be somewhere on earth. As people began to question shit, all those elements disappeared to the point where people now argue a god that is like the christian god in nature but lacks all the core magical elements. It now boils down to a "divine creator", an invisible spirit who arranged the universe, rather than YHWH of the judia pantheon, on his throne in the sky.
Neil PleaseGas Tyson is a nobody. He was handpicked to be a bullshit artist for pseudo science. This nigger went to a nice college, smoked a blunt, and became the world leading voice of space. Give me a break.
He like all atheists, particularly the faggot Dawkins, are just angry at God. They know he exists and they can't disprove Him. But they are in the pocket of the satanic evolution nonsense agenda.
>>78619083
Please don't fall into this retarded debate. The only difference between an atheist and an agnostic is a difference of opinion on what the word "atheist" actually means.
While there are certainly "convinced atheists" who feel certain they "know" there is no God, the majority of atheists are agnostic.
In other words, if asked the question, "Do you believe God exists?" I would answer, "No." This would make me an atheist. If asked the question, "Do you know whether God does or doesn't exist?" I would answer, "No." This makes me an agnostic.
An agnostic is merely someone who hasn't reached a definite conclusion on the existence of God. Most atheists actually fall into this bucket. I readily concede that a God MAY exist. Hell, 500 Gods may exist. And for that matter, we may be living in a simulated reality. And in this simulated reality, there may be actual unicorns and elves and vampires and ghosts. I don't know one way or the other. But until I've seen some convincing evidence of any of those things, I don't believe in them.
The poster you're responding to is saying that agnostics are moral cowards because they usually avoid the term "atheism" because it carries a heavy social stigma and they're unwilling to be judged for their lack of faith, spirituality, or religion. So they say ESSENTIALLY the same thing as atheists ("I'm not religious and I don't really believe in God") but they also hedge their position in the caveat, "But I don't know! I'm an agnostic!"
This annoys most people who identify as atheists because it implies that we DO claim to know, that we claim to actually KNOW whether or not a God can or does exist. Of course we don't know, of course we aren't certain. We merely don't require any certainty of a thing's nonexistence to withhold a positive belief in its existence.
I don't need to be 100% certain that Santa Clause DOESN'T exist in order to NOT believe that he does.
>>78613967
He never said this. I don't even have to verify. Neil never makes bluntly controversial statements like this. Only edgy teenage atheists do.
>>78619527
nigga what?
I don't even understand how you can't understand how burden of fucking proof is.
How can you claim a sky fairy for thousands of years and not one single shred of evidence pops up to support your claim yet you be like "hur dur maybe science isn't ready to discover god hur dur"
If the nigga was real we would fucking know it by now don't you think?
You realize that no matter how fucking advanced science gets IT WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO DISPROVE A FUCKING NEGATIVE YOU HALFWIT
Jesus those american public schools are shit.
>>78616472
You can't say that there isn't one either.
>>78615001
I don't get it. What is supposed to be the correct answer?
If someone's asking me that is to get my opinion as an atheist so why wouldn't i answer accordingly?
Biologically the point is to reproduce other than that just be as happy as you can for the little time you're alive. Without hurting anyone of course.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_of_the_gaps?wprov=sfla1
>>78616229
FUCK.
>>78620028
Sounds about right.
>>78619861
See my previous comment about turtles...
If you don't understand try google.
>>78618248
Newton, Bacon, Copernicus, Kepler, Descartes, Pascal, Galileo, Plank, Kelvin, Haller, Liebnetz... all Christian.
You've got Tyson, Einstein (kinda), and maybe some Greeks? They were probably theists though...
>>78617681
I've always found it utterly ridiculous that people think evolution and God are anti thesis to one another.
If we had tens of thousands of years to develop, and we are having this conversation NOW, what stops the other billions of years from having someone "pull the veil"?
>>78618682
No argument. Sad!
>>78620221
I literally just said that.
>the majority of atheists are agnostic.
>>78619334
Wrong, knowledge breeds sorrow in a HUMAN. You Are 3lbs of brain, that brain can't raid. Have fun with sorrow m8
>>78613967
He kind of reminds me of the "scientists" in Atlas Shrugged
>>78620532
KEK
Dude takes 5 seconds to skim my post, tells me I'm full of nonsense, realizes he's retarded, and deletes his post. Bravo, anon.
>>78620367
>scientists from a time when it was literally illegal to not believe in god.
Stephan Hawking, Alan Turing, Rosalind Franklin, Alfred Kinsey, Andrei Sakharov, Thomas Edison, Sigmung Freud.
Just a few who were agnostic/atheist.
>>78618924
Santa Claus Is an amalgamam based off of many gift giving people through different times in Europe.
The red, white and black character who passes for Santa these days was an advertising icon painted by Haddon Sundblom for the coca cola company.
See he is in the coca cola colors or red and white.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVsAcwWTOsU
Good thread. Good subject. I'm to tired. So I'll just leave this here.
>>78620683
i did, i misread it.
:((((
>>78618356
>I can't explain X
>Therefore, God
When will this meme die
>>78617661
>>78618275
>>78616952
>>78617291
>>This. A meaningless existence isn't exactly what I would have chosen but I'd also just believe I was a Chad if it were so easy to believe things that are obviously untrue.
>implies existence is meaningless
>anon tells you to kys since your life is meaningless
>witty reply
>reply ignores the fact that anon never implied his life was meaningless and thus still has a purpose for living
Holy shit you're fucking retarded. I see you've also taken it upon yourself to play master in this thread by personally approving or disapproving every fucking opinion posted. Take the anon's advice, kys
>>78619861
Don't worry, you will be mocked in the last days. This isn't unexpected.
>>78613967
Being a theist is way easier when you don't deny the fact of evolution.
>>78615926
/fucking this
I wish I loved sports and was religious.
>>78619970
>>>
Liar, liar pants on fire; THE BIG BANG, has nothing to do with ACTUAL physics because it's not real. Never happened. It's fantasy, a fairy tail. Prove me wrong, show the the physics of the big bang. But that won't do because all the lot of you has ever had was make believe and conjecture and theoretical equations that are as real as the imaginations they're formed in. What we'll need is proof of singularity nursery---what is a singularity though, is it like a binary file that unzips into universe with infinitesimally microscopic systems already designed that unfurled like a seed might into a gargantuan tree? We're going to need testable, observable evidence of this singularity of yours.
>>78620358
Stephen L Wolfe, another hypocritical atheist in his book chemical and molecular biology said in his treatiese, the early earth, said that God isn't real because he cannot be proven or recreated in observable conditions, then he went on to lie out of his ass like atheist always do of how a russian theorist and a british theorist reasoned in 1926 that the early earth was a magical place where things could have just happened because they were prone to happen because that time they existed in was SPECIAL.
Ha. show us proof of your god the big bang, show us from where it came and show us as to why another big bang hasn't happened seeing as how the first one arrived without reason.
>>78620752
So you provided evidence that suggests Santa Claus is an imaginary character.
Thanks?
>>78620113
You're right mostly.
the thing is we discover new things everyday, science cannot answer all questions yet, when it can then that's the only time you can prove something that doesn't exist actually doesn't exist, because science will have defined everything and god will have nowhere left to hide.
>>78620802
>:((((
You have to go.
>>78617933
Life is a beautiful accident that stumbled its way onto this incredibly fortunate planet. Nobody put it here, nobody is watching us, nobody cares, nothing happens after you die.
We live on what from all current observations is the only planet with intelligent life on it. We are the only thing that we can currently find that has figured out how to split an atom, the microchip, radio waves. You can speculate that there may be a god, or some aliens might be out somewhere far away.
We are a bunch of apes that had a few freak mutations, and we started stealing other animal's pelts to go where we were never meant to live. Some men figured out how to till the soil, others learned how to predict the eclipse, gathering the tribes under the guise of a connection to the divine, mysterious forces of the world. We fed the masses, built walls no beast could climb. Forged weapons of bronze, then iron, then steel. Our cannons ringed through the night louder than any longbow.
I could go on, but the point is that the fact that we ever got this far i through a lot of accidents, and a lot of willpower. Its nice to think someone was helping, and watching over us. That any of these means something to anyone but us.
We are the only ones that care what happens to this little rock delicately balanced on the point where it can sustain life. It could all end from a freak accident just as quickly as it began.
We made up those rules, and morals. Nobody brought them to us. We said that you could not kill a man, or steal his bread. A group of men wrote those words, and we carried them because we wanted to believe in them.
No all mighty figure is going to bring justice to those who have wronged you. Nothing happened as a part of any grand plan, it happened either on accident, or because a person made it happen.
>TL;DR : God does not exist. Humans are the only intelligent life anywhere near earth. Life means something because we want it to.
>>78616229
Longcat protects.
>>78621082
You clearly don't understand physics because you compared how the universe came to be how it is currently to someone making a sandwich.
Nothing you say about physics anyone should take seriously because you don't know what you're talking about and you've proven that.
If you actually understand origin theories you wouldn't be making such incredible allusions to try and explain your nonsense.
>>78620377
I'm sure there must be a formal refutation to this (I'm not a fedora though).
We can't think about potential and causes and changes at the very beginning of the universe because spacetime itself "spawned" somehow and it is beyond our reasoning. It is beyond our third brain circuit, so to speak.
>>78620888
Not sure what the fuck you're even trying to say except the part about me posting a lot in this thread. Please organize your thoughts.
>>78621082
This must be bait right?
>>78621129
I guess you are right in a sense but when we consider the "evidence of absence" as well as the "absence of evidence" we can safely conclude that god has already ran out of places big enough to hide a god.
Much like a doctor who scans your body and doesn't find cancer can safely say that you don't have cancer without checking every cell under a microscope.
>>78621240
Bullshit. the very dna you have in your body as is, is the most complicated purposeful information ever. It has well over three billion tiers of purposeful information, windows ten has well over forty three million lines of purposeful information and that took decades, thousands of people, lots of money and tens of thousands of hours, and know hows and technologies. as is humanity with purposeful technology cannot replicate human dna nor create life but you're of he mind that random bumping, brownian motion did just that.
ALL WITHOUT ANY ACTUAL OBSERVABLE TESTABLE PROOF. Post bacteria evolving or some such shit i will find you and stick you with a needle. Unless of course you have proof we evolved from bacteria then no, showing bacteria changing is only proof bacteria can change as they were MADE to do.
show an amino acid become a fish unto a man and all other creatures OR IT IS FANTASY FOREVERMORE.
that's all rhetorical because there is no proof. You atheist are some of the sickest trolls there ever were, surpassed by Satan, if that even.
Christians make it hard for themselves when they try to claim that God (sacred) is the answer to scientific (profane) questions. The Creator is the origin of the laws and fabric of the universe. religion is about a group of people using their own la gauge and customs to attempt to venerate the divine (the creator) as well as to understand their place as individuals within the world. Science tries to figure out how laws and processes have caused the universe to develop over time- you don't need to fill in any gaps with God because God is above and prior to what is physical.
>believing that nothing is responsible for everything
ayy. What a sad and pointless existence that must be.
>>78615001
But that has nothing to do with whether God is real or not. 'purpose' is manmade. The purpose of life is whatever you ascribe the purpose to be.
>>78613967
>What is his problem?
Stupid people. I mean, just look at half the replies in this: verbose ignoramancy.
>>78621637
I agree.
Just like to point out science isn't perfect, it's possible to miss Cancer, there are documented cases of this.
But i do lean towards agreeing with you, burden of proof is very important, because it has to be.
>>78620888
My reply didn't ignore the fact that anon never implied his life was meaningless. My reply didn't imply that anon implied his life was meaningless. My reply had nothing to do with meaninglessness.
My reply was a rephrased repetition of the same sentiment (KYS).
I should kill myself because life is meaningless (IE: there's no God or predestination, therefore life is meaningless)
He should kill himself (on accident) because life IS MEANINGFUL, and the ostensible MEANING of life is to get it over with so you can be with God for the rest of eternity.
It was just me repeating his same, silly, purposefully farcical argument with the theist spin applied. Get it?
>>78621389
All of Aquina's five ways boil down to
*****God is totes excempt from this breh*****
Also even if you were to concede that a God does exists, you still have no reason to believe it is the one from the bible.
>>78621389
Once again back to turtles...
And what I mean by turtles is
IF GOD MADE EVERYTHING, WHO MADE GOD?
Once you have an infinite number of gods making gods you realize that the real answer is none.
>>78616738
Also, if you worked in science as an actual scientist (as opossed to a big-bang-theory baboozzzaaa kind of researcher) you'd find that the prevailing standard at which all current science is done is incredibly lame.
I know it's a meme song written by retards but right after the "fucking magnets, how do they work?" there's "And I don't want to talk to no scientist, they are all fucking lying and getting me pissed"... that's actually quite true.
Some of the most retarded people I've ever met in my life are actually graduates from MIT and Harvard. They've coauthored Nature and Science papers on bioinformatics, yet they see the Linux terminal as something from another world. How's that possible? Because their fucking analyses were done through a fucking program that opens up a big bright button which says "Click here to perform you analysis", also, that software is usually on a $20,000/year license.
The most striking example I encountered was some idiot woman I've met at Max Planck. I was showing her a graph that I made with a MATLAB script and she wanted to see things here and there, I was basically the fucking interface between his brain and the computer mouse. I told her I could just send her the script and she could open it and explore (it literally is "double-click this file"). She told me, I shit you now, "Oh no anon, I couldn't do that. I'm not qualified to operate MATLAB. Thankfully we have you here atm." I have never, in my entire life, went to a class or something related to a qualification to "operate" MATLAB, whatever that fucking shit means.
Every time I hear someone from outside saying something like "scientists say it so it must be true" I immediately think of how fucking pathetic their existence is, being told what to do by people who don't have a better idea of what they're doing themselves. Oh yeah, "but at least I don't believe in magical creatures that live in heaven, ha ha ha, am I rite guys??? XD".
>>78620734
There were notable atheists in Medieval times.
You've got the pop-physicist, who unironically believes in AI.
Turing is pretty based.
Franklin is cool.
A pedophile liar who used prisoner-stats to extrapolate about the general population.
Soviet nuke scientist
Patent thief/discount Tesla
And a smart psychologist who was an idiot on most other subjects.
Yeah, I'll take my group.
>>78621356
Yup!
>>78620088
He said it while talking about bill oreilly and Richard Dawkins.
Idiot.
>>78620734
>(((Kinsey)))
>(((Freud)))
>"""scientists"""
>>78613967
Seems to me like the church of fedora is always coming around to what the creator originally claimed.
>>78621971
Am I bearing witness to an actual Mexican Intellectual?
>>78621971
>comparing science as a discipline to lab monkies
lol
>>78613967
God didn't stop his plagiarism from being made apparent.
>>78621982
okay.
Literally no reason to point out how many of the "scientists" you listed barely qualify and did a lot of nonsense because you're under the impression you're already correct.
>>78621982
Franklin was a deist. I guess that makes him not a theist. And depending on who you ask, that would make him an atheist. But generally speaking, there's still a difference between a deist and an atheist.
>>78621960
calm down ya ras il ayr. Do you not understand the concept of being eternal? Lay of that hasheesh and realise that there's an intelligence responsible for the near perfect conditions that govern our existence.
>>78621910
>no reason to believe
Jesus told us
in the Bible
And he lived what he preached, and died for it
>>78620113
Fatima is proof.
>>78621637
>Because we already know 80%+ of everything that exists.
I can't tell if retarded or just ignorant.
>>78621711
>The Creator is the origin of the laws and fabric of the universe.
the idea that the creator and creation are separate is an illusion
>Science tries to figure out how laws
ejecting the lawmaker for a "fully automatic" universe but keeping the law, physics, biology and chemistry are another trinity
both these law obsessed viewpoints fail to approach the concept of God,
God is an actor or he plays the universe into existence
there is no difference between the game and the player
>>78622173
i just listed 8, theres an entire wikipedia page of them.
Point is saying all great scientists were Christians is just plain false.
>>78613967
Thing is...he believes in the theory that we all exist within an uber advanced alien supercomputer simulation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgSZA3NPpBs
>>78613967
He obviously lacks an understanding of God and Science. Poor guy, I pity him.
>>78613967
ONE POST BY THIS ID
>>78622337
I don't think you know what a "scientist" is, or what an "argument" is either...
>>78622386
Really makes you think huh...
>>78622193
This is sad... I could cherry pick lines out of George RR Martin and correlate them to things to make a point as well but that doesn't actually work in the big boy world.
I bet you think global warming is a lie, Jesus rode a dinosaur and donald trump is actually a conservative.
>>78622387
It was a lie started by some children who broke curfew. Even the "news" stories that preceded it were lies.
>>78622452
this. My undertsanding of God does not correlate with his. He has no understanding so he can never believe the driving force of my faith.
>>78622401
>physics, biology and chemistry are another trinity
>>78618924
>burden of proof
>religion has been around way longer than modernized scientific study yet the burden of proof is on the religion to prove itself instead of the science to disprove the religion
>>78622527
Not arguing with you.
Nice strawman though.
>>78621971
>worked psych lab running matlab experiments
>create arbitrary boring computer game
>collect data
>make arbitrary changes to the sample size, take or add a second or two to certain conditions, increase screen size by 1cm, etc
>wait for a statistically significant result
>prepare method and results section
>professor speculates wildly on how this is an evolved trait in intro and discussion
>publish paper, repeat
I am in the acknowledgment of a dozen papers. I lost my faith in science that year, at least in psychology
>>78622337
Pretty obvious he was being sarcastic, no?
>>78622584
False equivalence.
>>78615001
Dawkins/Black Science Man/Harris are to atheism what fundamentalist baptists in the backwoods are to Christianity
>>78621240
Being an atheist does not make you a scientist, mate.
Tell me, without confirmation one way or the other regarding the existence of God, wouldn't the statement "God does not exist" be a belief?
The problem with atheists is that they tend to confuse the concept of a creator with some sort of organized religion. Believe me when I say that the concept of a creator is not necessarily a religious one; in my case, I approach said concept through a series of logical progression. Without the sculptor, a statue does not carve itself. This statement is not about evolution, rather about creation.
That brings us to the central question, the very root of all questions: what is reality? Reality follows a basic set of laws and rules, obviously, but why do they exist? Order implies intelligence. That leads to a logical paradox, however; what created God?
If there is a God, then he has always existed. If there is no God, then the underlying laws of reality have always existed. Both are illogical, and impossible... so where do we come from? You can also assume that the true nature of existence is above our perception - the problem with that is this: from a materialistic standpoint, what could possibly be above our perception?
>Agnosticism is the one and only rational, logical standpoint. "I don't know" is a more sound standing point than belief one way or the other - think about reality, ponder it, but don't make conclusions
>>78622199
I'm working on a modified form of concrete which would allow us to deliver the wall at a fraction of the projected cost. Then we plan to spend the surplus money in beers and mariachi.
>>78622203
Honestly, you don't know what you're talking about.
>>78622575
"It was all lies!"
Is not an argument.
>>78621711
well how, you've just out done yourself haven't you. Not saying God but you'd be hard pressed to even dream of saying Someone smarter than us and better than us didn't do it for all things you've observed that's remotely complex and purposeful was made by us. To say otherwise would be hypocritical
>>78621960
.See my above statement, liar liar pants on fire; at the very least you have no choice but to admit some one more complex and powerful than us, did it. To say otherwise would mean that your sandwich and your bed should have the wherewithal to self make. I think eventually you atheist are going to see just how stupid a self making universe is and claim that in some far off future we made ourselves.
The fact that /pol/ is still arguing whether an ethereal sky father exists is a testament to how backwards and retarded this board is. The Bible is a myth, get your shit together
>>78622651
When it comes to Christians...no, it's not easy to tell sorry.
>>78616757
>He probably starts up irrelevant conversation when having sex like "fun fact do you know we are made of stars?
>>78621356
Praise longcat
>>78622614
I don't think you know what a strawman is either...
>>78613967
He is a nigger, that's his problem
>>78622361
Lol knowing 3 words in a foreign language and then making an argument from ignorance is such hamburger logic.
The god of the gaps is dead buddy.
Oh by the way I spent 8 years in the US doing my undergrad and masters and I know for a fact that the education in most states is not shitty enough for you to be this intellectually gimped.
>>78622692
What is burden of proof?
>>78622711
It was a lie exposed dummy. It's not even debatable.
>>78616229
YOU CANT TOUCH THIS
>>78622562
>I could cherry pick lines out of George RR Martin and correlate them to things to make a point as well
by all means do so. Can you cherry pick when george rr martin preicted the destruction of tyre or the return of the jews to Jerusalem as well? Among literally hundreds of other correct prophecies? Just coincidences huh Abou ziki?
>>78620734
>Stephan Hawking
>Scientist
>>78622707
I actually do, I've studied at a university for years, under various different types of scientists, i can tell the difference between a lab monkey and a doctor doing his own research.
>>78622836
literally atheists getting mad that they cant disprove religion so they created a term in science called "burden of proof" and applied it to religion saying "lol well your religion doesnt exist until you prove it exists what now christians haha *dib dib dib :D*"
>>78621646
I can give you the full course on every step of the way on the theory of evolution. I can show you a great deal of case studies, I can point to carrots, I can point to albinos. I can point to the differences between humans around the world. That won't convince you of anything. You have a bulletproof argument in the claim that a all powerful, and all knowing being orchestrated all of these events, and is controlling even my own actions at this very second. I hope you know that you are not a Christian, Muslim or a Jew though. Nowhere in any of these holy texts does it attribute omnipotence to your one true god. They all reference him as being a being of great power, but none claim that he controls everything. The closest you have to that is the whole judging your life thing, which mind you does not equate to being all powerful, just being able to see what someone did after they die. Moving on from that sticky point there, how do you expect anyone to disprove your claim if you are going to refute any findings made? Your mention of how complicated DNA is made to be is a bit off. We actually have recorded the entity of a great number of people's DNA. Its complicated, sure. Though there is a hell of a lot more code, and information floating around on the net. Keep in mind that windows 10 is a operating system that is meant to be compatible with a lot of stuff, and while complicated, is not anywhere near the sheer number of information people have made. There is no way to convince you if you are just going to say that a omnipotent all powerful figure made the universe, and made all this fake evidence last Tuesday for fun.
>>78615926
This mang
I swear fucking theists think we fucking chose to see things objectively. You can't change your beliefs about something and very little other than basically god coming down and doing something pretty undeniable would change my beliefs. It would be so comforting to "know" there is a god instead of knowing that all religion is most likely bullshit.
>>78622759
Classic atheist elitism
>>78622792
>erects another strawman
whatever you say anon. I'm not interested in arguing with you.
>>78622886
When did this happen?
Got any sources?
>>78618682
The tooth fairy can't be logically established by Aristotelian metaphysics. Even if Aristotle/Aquinas are wrong, brushing away the argument without any study is ignorant.
>>78622953
>burden of proof is a conspiracy by scientists against Christians
>>78622826
that's not an argument. 7ash tetmanyak and provide a real argument ya ibn il sharmoota.
>Atheists think they have it rough
Can't make this shit up.
>>78622953
No, it's literally a fundamental concept that you can't ignore.
He wishes he was white but he'll always be a nigger.
lol science needs to updates its books and shit every year acting like they know everything then going back on their findings all like "You know hat thing we laughed at you for challenging, turns out it wasn't right so we fixed it". The motherfuckers don't even know basic shit about our body or brain, but yeah, they know for a fact that god doesn't exist. Please, science is full of pseudo intelligent bitches. The bible doesn't need a fucking volume 2, that shit is on lock, straight truth whether you like it or not.
Science one day maybe in thousands of years will be able to study the moment the universe was created and will be all "Shit how did we get the universe from nothing"? Duh bumblefucks, somebody created something out of nothing, a creator, a god. Science is just going to get to the same conclusion just so much later than believers.
>>78613967
Start trolling his Twitter by roleplaying as an Islamist and calling him an infidel who has insulted Allah and the Prophet.
>>78622692
You apparent definition of "atheism" seems to preclude the possibility of an agnostic atheist.
If that's the case, the issue here is merely the fact that the definition of "atheism" is hazy.
I consider myself an atheist for no other reason than I do not positively affirm the existence of God, whereas my counterpart, the theist, positively affirms the existence of God.
I require no certainty to withhold this positive affirmation. I am an atheist until the very moment that I see theism demonstrated as true.
>>78615926
Do you get shit for being an atheist in real life? Literally the only place where that's a problem is on /pol/ or at my 92 year old grandmother's house.
>>78622897
Tyre was destroyed dozens of times so yeah that was easy
Jews returned to Jerusalem was wishful thinking.
Now tell about all those predictions that didn't happen....
Oh wait they didn't happen yet right?
I just need to be patient.
Listen if it gives you comfort then by all means believe what you want but don't act like the rest of us are the ignorant ones for not following your circular logic.
>>78623049
see you point it out and question it
>>78623100
and this happens
Atheists are bullies, they won't accept God and let his laws rule over them
>>78623020
Not really, I've just seen some absurd claims so i assume nothing.
>>78622615
It is a very tedious process, but those in /sci/ say they get their kicks from speculating with like minded people
I think that's the actual scientist, the exchange of ideas and methods, only you need to do the actual data mining yourself, even if some asshole publishes some whimsical theory that has peculiar weak spots for more funding
>>78622615
It's the same thing in bio/pharma (I'm there), physics (have friends there) and math (ever met a mathematician that tells you "you wouldn't understand what I do", well he's not doing anything really, aside from leveling up a WoW character in school time).
Everyone that's in the field with a bare minimum amount of grey matter realizes, sooner or later, that science is just a facade for milking out grant money. It's the "better" alternative to just looking for a 9-to-5 job in a real context.
>>78613967
There is a thing called Militant Atheism. It happened during the Soviet Union and is illustrated very plainly in the communist texts. Religion is the first to go. All cultural repercussions of the 60s. Stalin would be proud.
>>78623180
It's seriously like satire that you don't see the stupidity in this.
>>78623034
>Keeps using the word strawman, even though I never tried to recast his argument, or even said what I thought his argument was, or in any way addressed his argument other than to give a rebuttal.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure you don't know what "strawman" means.
>>78622757
the big bang and the magical amino acid of life is the real fantasy here m8. show us your god, the big bang and prove to us as to why more hasn't arrived from the nowhere where the first came from. show us amino acid molecules bumping about to form dna and a trillion variations of life. show us a amino acid become a fish and a fish becoming a man in an unbreakable chain of one creature changing both genetically and skeletally.
Oh wait you can't because it's all fantasy and make believe. Try harder atheist.
Please, try again.
>>78623180
>look i'm trolling!
>>78623120
An atheist is someone who knows that there is no God.
>theist is the opposite
Agnostic is someone who says I don't know.
One way or the other, without concrete evidence for or against god, your opinion rests on belief whether you want it to or not
>>78620367
Not even the good Greeks. Some pre-Socratics and Epicurus were materialists/atheists, but Socrates/Plato/Aristotle were key influences on later theists
>>78623243
There are videos of Degrasse Tyson repudiating the term "atheist" and claiming to be an agnostic, so I think you may be referring to someone else.
>>78622923
>Ratio of real, intelligent scientists to lab monkeys with PhD: 1:1,000,000. Prob. less.
If you truly were part of this you'd knew.
>>78623328
You keep making strawmen, hoping i knock them down, but i wont.
I'm just glad you're out of the conversation, if that keeps you in a deadlock of trying to troll me I'm fine with it because I'm positive you have nothing intelligent or valuable to offer this conversation based purely on the nonsense you keep repeating..
>>78622532
It's true!
Or you can listen to the new hip prophet
https://youtu.be/-MXCCrxsWWQ
>>78623106
she's a real pretty girl, mang. If she saw me though, she'd probablyshit herself and run. i'm tall and big, and blacker than shit and uglier than sin.
>>78623167
Tyre was not destroyed dozens of times fagtron it was displaced and conquered.
>Jews returning to jerusalem was wishful thinking
Actually in the old hebrew texts its listed as fact not "hope". Therefore to raise the possibility of "lol they were just hoping for it" then by that same extent we must also raise that possiblity to every other piece of literature.
>>78623314
you completely neuter the atheist when you tell them that the burden of proof is on the argument not the defender. christianity has been around longer than modern science, its on science to disprove christianity not the other way around.
>>78623346
>not an argument
>>78622605
The scientific method is simply a method of inquiry. It is not inherently at odds with religion.
>claim oto move an amazing atheist
>can't even explain how the universe was created
Wow you guys sure are smart
>>78623458
i do know, i can tell the difference. I'm telling you anon.
>>78623073
>Theists think they have it rough
Never met a theist who doesn't act like they're being persecuted everytime an atheist is within 10 feet of them.
>>78623069
Holy shit you still don't understand how burden of proof works.
If you read my earlier posts I kind of provide enough of an argument to make my point.
but once again:
I can't prove that god doesn't exist because he doesn't exist.
The lack of proof strongly suggests that he doesn't exist.
Anybody making a claim must support that claim with evidence, not the other way around.
The bible is not evidence of anything so don't even start with quotes and shit.
Throwing around profanity doesn't make you sound smart.
>>78623167
Some 400 years before crucifixion was invented, both Israel's King David and the prophet Zechariah described the Messiah's death in words that perfectly depict that mode of execution. Further, they said that the body would be pierced and that none of the bones would be broken, contrary to customary procedure in cases of crucifixion (Psalm 22 and 34:20; Zechariah 12:10). Again, historians and New Testament writers confirm the fulfillment: Jesus of Nazareth died on a Roman cross, and his extraordinarily quick death eliminated the need for the usual breaking of bones. A spear was thrust into his side to verify that he was, indeed, dead.
(Probability of chance fulfillment = 1 in 1013)
please tell me where george rr martin could predict something like that ya ayre.
>>78622692
I get sick of spirituality getting lumped in with organized religion.
A lot of atheists like to think that all who believe in a higher power picture said higher power as a bearded man/sentient being/humanoid. But a "god" is most likely something you cannot comprehend fully as a human being. All we know is that we exist and their must be a reason we came to existence. That reason could be considered "god". The universe having a perfect balance of light and dark matter that keeps things from being ripped apart, and thus allows further destruction/rebirth could be "god". Just because you can prove something with the scientific method doesn't mean it's not a higher power or something greater than yourself.
>>78623458
>Some Mexican on 4chan is telling me that one in a million Doctors aren't equivalent to lab monkeys
Is anyone else here for the humor of observing high strength retardation?
NGT isn't even a real scientist, not that scientists are all that well known for being good philosophers. A Demon Haunted World? Pure popsci drivel. The Selfish Gene? More like the simplistic idea constructed in a vacuum of thought, covering ground that has been well-trodden by people who actually bothered to read the ideas of others in the field.
>>78623573
which im completely fine with, its just obnoxious and off putting when pseudo scientists on 4chan repeat the phrase burden of proof over and over jerking themselves off to the thought of disproving God despite the fact theyve offered zero evidence to the contrary
>>78623373
As I said, the definition of atheist is somewhat hazy.
This is what you get when you type "define atheist" in Google:
a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods.
To "lack belief" in something is not quite the same as to "know something is not true".
I lack belief in God. I don't KNOW that God doesn't exist. It's possible for these conditions to exist simultaneously.
>>78616229
O-okay
>>78613967
this guy is a fucking joke. i've seen him try to interview the brilliant minds of today and he can barely keep up with his questions.
affirmative action science experiment gone wrong.
>>78623503
Dipshit, a "strawman argument" is where I knock down the strawman of your arguments. Not where I erect strawman arguments for you to knock down...
In fact, why the fuck would anyone ever do that? Has anyone ever used that "version" of the strawman argument?
Like, I'm not even sure what you're talking about. Strawmen for you to knock down? What the fuck are you talking about?
>>78623573
yet most religious claims can't survive it, which is where the conflict comes from.
Scientist makes claims, then that upsets Christians and they try to invent their own science to keep God in the picture.
>>78620155
cosmicism
>>78621389
There are formal refutations, they're just wrong. Too complicated to explain on 4chan
>>78623524
Zeus was around before Christianity...
I'm going to sleep. I can't handle the level of autism in here right now.
Autism. And much like most fedora/atheist crowd they lack self awareness and emotional intelligence
>>78623887
You're just a bear troll and you use strawmen.
Literally all you do, I'm glad you've targeted me, I'm far outside of your intellectual capacity and i can handle it.
You have nothing to offer this conversation but deluded arguments.
>>78623635
gud retort.
All these atheists acting like the idea of a creator is a religious one
>>78623961
>zeus was around before Christianity
and the bible talks about paganism in depth
>>78623618
>>78623674
Enjoy your shitty worldview then. Buy the latest electric cock from Elon Musk™ and shove it up your ass while you listen to your Intelligent Dance Music tracks. :^)
The more stupid you are, the better I fare in this field anyway.
>>78622966
All of your case studies, all of your proofs are not reality nor are they based in reality. They're shit put together by atheist, endless conjecture that has no actual in life events or proofs to give any of them credence. You read the bible right because if you had he rest of what you said you wouldn't have said.
Firstly, that hell of a lot of information is as purposeful of a code to a dictionary, Windows 10 and a dictionary are both purposeful pieces of information but one creates something that's life like and the other's just purposeful words and meanings. that's like saying the cure for aids and a vitamin shot are one in the same.
that information however that's online is knowable to people and yet the very life code of beings is unknowable to them and remains just out of reach, even with modern contrivances. and yet you're of the mind we self made. HA.
>>78623986
Tell me about your emotional intelligence, random dude on a fascist pro genocide and extremely sexist 4chan board.
>>78624034
*tips fedora*
>>78623335
I got your proof right here pal
https://youtu.be/RNWvDxY1oIE
>>78623635
because you people are literally vegan-tier
you walk around and the first thing a new person knows about you is your name and the second is that you partake in fine hattery
>>78623641
>nothing combined with nothing in absolutely no medium and created everything
>including a planet that provides all the basic necessities to maintain life, should it somehow be created by nothing, again, for absolutely no reason
the process through which life was created and maintained is enough evidence for me to conclude that it was more then the product of nothing but rather through a thinker, a creater, A God.
>>78623666
Read up on Spanish Catholic Mysticism. Both Spirituality and Organized Religion for the price of one!
I became a christian because I went to the doctor with this horrible electric pain shooting through my foot every 15 seconds - 2 minutes and it lasted for hours.
The doctor said the nerves keep getting the signal to spasm and it could be caused by new shoes. It was my shoes, but what converted me was this doctor, scientist of health, couldn't tell me why my nerves were firing at these intervals, why the produced the amount of pain they did, why they decided to start at a certain time then stop at a certain time. He just injected my foot 4 times with numbing crap and sent me home.
But these assholes know there's no god.
Made me laugh and swear of science as truth for the rest of my life.
>>78624034
I'll Western Union you $20 right now if you can show me ANY logician or logic textbook that defines the strawmen argument as:
"When you erect a strawman argument for your opponent to knock down."
>>78622826
>>78623069
Sod ne3ak, ya seyib. I wanna see arguments from both sides.
>>78623511
That's it now I'm a #GodProd
>>78624093
you clearly don't have a worldview of science though.
>>78613967
He's a lying Satanic Freemason
>>78624126
eXTREME BAIT
>>78623652
So a character in a book predicts something and another character does it later on... sounds like every fantasy or science fiction book.
You cannot use the bible as evidence because it is largely not corroborated in history.
You are probably some insecure maronite kid living with his parents with an angry Lebanese Forces dad who is always complaining about muslims and liberals.
When you get to college try taking a philosophy course or two.
>>78615001
to be your own master, cuck
>>78613967
>black intellectual
Lol ok
>>78624216
Sure, you owe me 20$
I've already proven it ITT
>>78613967
>What is his problem?
same problem as everyone and IQ above 90 -- they want all godtards dead
>>78624165
Humor me bud, what if you just don't understand what they're telling you, and what you perceive to be their version of events and perspective is very skewed by your complete inability to wrap your head around the concepts that they present to you.
Stay with me here, they aren't wrong, you are just too stupid to get what they're telling you.
>>78624126
You tell them, gentlesir.
>>78624204
its saddening to realize we made the most scientific achievement when it was from men who knew that science was the way to study and explain God, not disprove him
>>78624322
Source?
>>78621102
No his current image is based on real people and an advertising design.
I said image.
Whoo the fuck uses a proxy from Lebanon?
>>78624187
kek, I will do that
Atheism is organized delusion, resting chiefly on emotion - just like religion. In fact, I would go so far as to claim that atheism is religion in it's own right
>>78624390
Yeah man, I don't think discriminatory sexism to really exists in real life very often, but it definitely exists on this board.
>>78624434
This thread
>>78613967
Why do you care what a dumb nigger says?
>>78620113
Based Phoenician.
>>78613967
If he changed God to Allah he'd already be dead.
I hate these fools that rag on Christianity when they should be denigrating Islam.
When Islam is as pacified as Christianity, THEN you can start ragging on Christianity again.
Until then anyone who gets their jimmies rustled by Christianity and not Islam is just a faggot.
>>78624416
Bit of a leap to suggest that all, or even most, atheist scientists are trying to disprove God.
I would assume most sensible atheist scientists, or even atheist non-scientists, recognize that "God" is neither verifiable nor falsifiable.
The issue with most organized religion is it has to pray on peoples feelings to keep going. It's very difficult for people to put trust in God and believe if you try to do the right thing he will look after you.
If you want to know a good person to listen to try Andy Stanley, he talks about the bible.
>>78624365
thanks
>>78624446
so we agree that santa doesn't exist right?
not proxy. Sadly i work here now.
>>78624365
But you're not? Listen pal, watching YouTube videos about the Big bang and the Science Chanel doesn't make you intellectually superior to anyone, retard, despite what you think
>>78624492
Nice bait m8! Took me a while to catch on.
Cheers!
>>78618924
Religion is proven with metaphysical arguments (which are not Protestant-tier God of The Gaps shit). If Santa Claus could likewise be proven with a logical metaphysical argument then yes, the burden would be on you to disprove his existence.
>>78624631
Nice Strawman.
>>78624588
if that's peoples opinion and belief on the matter i have no issue, people are entitled even by biblical standards to choose God or a different path. thats not for me to judge.
what is for me to judge is atheists actively trying to remove the choice from children in schools by completely removing spirituality from the curriculum
>>78623641
>the Bible is not evidence
People think we use the Bible as evidence, a point to make in the debate
8 times out of 10, it's more like a scripture is pointed out as an example of this 3000 year old book still holds relevance, that even through all these so called losses in translation, the message holds true
>>78624701
metaphysical arguments are not scientific evidence.
>>78624277
fuck off nigger. These have been your arguments so far
>jews return to jeursalem despite overwhelming odds?
Coincidence
>The destruction of tyre described in the bible through overwhelming detail only for every single detail to come true?
Coincidence.
>other historically proven monumentous occasions come true despite frightening and unrealistic odds.?
Lol coincidence
you have not provided any real argument what so ever so you can shove your meta mug up your fedora you "free thinker"
>>78624625
I knew enough to know your statement is wrong when I was in 7th grade, you know when we learned about the Big Bang and evolution in middle school and that you somehow don't understand.
>>78624277
The bible, young one, says the earth was round and that God hangs the earth upon nothing, it even describes the rain cycle. Not even the greeks did any of the above. But you atheist and your never to ever be proven big bangs AREN'T YOU SCARED SHITLESS, MANG?
I mean the first singularity arrived without provocation or reason, what's preventing another one, and another one, and another one, and another one, and another one, and another one, and another one, and another one, and another one, and one after that, and another one after than one that was before this one, and that one's kid brother, and the other one's grand papa? And so on and so forth, and so on, and so forth.......on to infinity.
Don't just say why, prove why.
>athiests everywhere
RELIGION IS IRRATIONAL
Ill...ILLOGICAL!!! NOT LOGICAL!!!
WATCH SCIENCE CHANEL THEN YOU'LL SEE!!111!
>>78624732
Nah, this one would be more like "ad hominem" because I'm basically calling you a troll.
Though I suppose this would be closer to "strawman" than anything else you've said, lol
>>78618929
>A thing is only real if it's existence has been proven using the scientific method.
Can you prove this statement using the scientific method?
(Protip: no.)
>>78624701
Let me guess... Ex nihilo nihil fit?
>>78624786
>all these predictions are coincidence despite no country ever being destroyed going back and reforming in all of history
>>78624765
plenty of old books still hold relevance, not just the bible.
The bible is not unique or special in it's ability to teach people fables.
>>78624701
>Religion is proved with metaphysical arguments
>metaphysical arguments
>metaphysical
>meta
gtfo
>>78624874
lol
The fact that current scientific theory states there was a beginning to our universe means a debate on the existence of god is ineveitable, given the natural causal mindset.
The only debate left after that is direct influence and/or meddling in life, which I'd argue a 4th or above dimensional being could easily accomplish (vis a vis angels).
Now for motherfuckers going on creationism and intelligent design, that's just dumb. Pure dumbfuckery. But if you teach the scientific principle, purely, and never bring the word God into it, then kids will naturally place a creator somewhere along their chain of knowledge.
>>78623137
It's not about getting shit it's the comfort of "knowing" there is a god.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h5WrWncDZw
Skip to 4:56 yeah it's so easy to start believing in a specific religion out of thousands.
>>78621646
This is your mind on drugs.
Key and Peele did a pretty good skit on him. Shame it's literally wiped from the internet.
>>78624753
First amendment fuckface.
If you want to teach your kid about christ and his pet raptor mary magdelene then go ahead but I won't pay for it.
>>78624877
If something doesn't survive the scientific method why should anyone believe it exists?
>>78624967
Come on man, it doesn't take that many years before you learn to live with it.
>>78624365
>what you perceive to be their version of events
who's "their" what the fuck are you talking about you incredibly gifted intellectual? The miracle of life and all the tools we're given to sustain it is enough proof that "lol le random nothing exploded and created ebryting" is by no means rational and there's a bigger picture at hand.
>>78623641
>"The Bible is not evidence!"
And here, Ladies and Gentlemen, we have yet another atheist who doesn't know what "evidence" means. He thinks it means "irrefutable proof!" but he's wrong.
For future reference, the Bible IS evidence. Whether or not you think it's compelling evidence, or good evidence, or enough evidence, is up to you.
But it is evidence.
>>78624786
Dude the Jews returned to Israel numerous times in their own book.
One of them even had an Iranian (aryan) rebuild their temple.
>>78625036
Probably because these aren't the people that are even capable of understanding why the scientific method is the most objective method of determining the reality of our universe.
>>78625073
You don't know what evidence means, there is a difference between gathering enough evidence to postulate a hypothesis and evidence which points to a fact.
Something you clearly don't understand. The bible is enough evidence to support a hypothesis on various claims, very little in there can point to actual facts.
>>78624784
Who cares? The point is they are logical and rational.
You are aware that Scientism (google it) is inherently self-refuting, right?
>>78615001
Who said there had to be a purpose.
>>78624855
Absolutely everywhere because it's not logical.
First you start with a crazy premise:
>there might be an omniscient and omnipotent being that is hard to notice
LOGICAL LEAP TO
>this being created us all, loves us all (bonus points if your g-d thinks your group of people is the best group of noses-er I mean people)
LOGICAL LEAP TO
>this being is exactly as this scripture describes it and no other scripture on Earth is right except this one
>everyone but me is going to hell
>>78625028
YOU DONT LIVE IN AMERICA FUCK OFF
1ST AMENDMENT APPLIES TO FUCKING AMERICAN CITIZENS
Not only that but first amendment doesn't make certain knowledge or teachings illegal, it makes all teachings legal. Therfore you will pay for children to learn about faith in schools, because of the first amendment not in spite of it. You're welcome to remove your kid and put them in a pro-atheist school.
>>78624801
You have no confirmation on anything. Scientests, your preists, are not infallable. And since when did Richard Dawkins and Neil D.Tyson count as scientests?
Tthe only thing you have to do to be considered a scientest by filthy, fat, fedora wearers is to write a shity book and to star in a TV show agreeing with your opinions? Is that not irrational?
>4Chan is for adults, kid
>>78624753
I think you need to be more specific as to how you believe "spirituality" should be included in an academic curriculum. Spirituality isn't something that you "teach" someone, is it? And I'm fairly sure that there are millions upon millions of people who remain or become "spiritual" regardless of whether or not they were taught to be so in the classroom.
If by "spirituality", you mean "religious lore" then I would posit there are indeed elective places where people can go to learn all about it, namely churches.
>>78625065
Your description of the Big Bang is enough to prove my point. You don't know what it means even at a basic middle school level.
>>78625196
Most lies are logical and rational.
What is your point?
>>78621982
>Turing is pretty based
>a raging faggot who had his balls destroyed
>based
>>78625028
you probably don't pay for anything. At all. ever. Like most of you intellectuals do. You spend your life raving about God that you never get anything done. Meanwhile christians today are 6/10 of all scientists alive while you free thinkers are barely 2/10.
>>78625073
I believe in God. But you realize parts of the Bible were straight up decided by a vote?
Was jesus a virgin birth? Voted on. By men.
Was jesus the son of god or a prophet? Voted on.
Who was in his following? Voted on.
And a fuck ton more.
There was a bible that was legit but all this just makes it really shaky.
>>78625237
I don't go to Neil or Richard Dawkins for my science. I'm talking about basic facts of our reality that we have learned from scientific study of our universe that you are incapable of understanding.
>>78625186
I'm literally using the definition of evidence.
There is no such thing as "evidence that (doesn't) point to a fact." All evidence "points to a fact."
Proof if the word you're looking for. Or I suppose "compelling evidence" would also work.
>>78625226
Because no American ever lived anywhere but Texas...
>>78625202
Again, typical Atheist thinking that Catholicism is:
A. The only religion
B. The only concept of God
Please, expand your horizons before calling everyone who disagrees with you illogical.
>>78624900
the big bang's a fable though. always had been and always will be. stop calling the bible a fable; it got the earth being round right and it got it right that the earth hangs in empty space. no one got that right. But you atheist.
>>78625006
I just have sense enough to know I was made. And that's because I'm not a hypocrite. I am evil. But I'm not a hypocrite. Every house was made by some one but He who made all things is God. You're of the mind that we self created and you can't prove it, nor will you ever, prove it.
>>78624956
Hypocrite speaks out of his ass. Delusional or hypocritical, which is it? You're deluded; deluded out of your ass. Everything remotely complicated that you've seen was made but us and the lives around us, even the universe and its laws which surpasses any complexities we've managed thousands of times self created but the very machine you're using had to have been made and didn't, self create?
You people are insane.
i like to live without the thought of religion or non-religion like my great ancestors before they turned to praising the sun. life is not a gift, it is life. that's why it's called life and not gift.
>>78625402
I know you're using the definition, but you clearly don't know why the scientific method exists.
If all evidence pointed to fact then there would be no need for court rooms.
>>78625325
>ignore the part where he cracked the enigma code and helped the allies win WWII
It's a shame that people can't be civil in these threads, and discuss religion/atheism/spirituality on a respectful, philsophical level.
Nope. People just use fedora memes and insult each other, I particularly find it strange how Christians claim to despise arrogance, yet in all these types of threads, they are by far the loudest and most arrogant in the discussions.
>>78625335
gr8 b8 m8
>>78625489
You're mistaking "points to a fact" with "proves the fact."
Evidence, by definition, points to a fact. That's what makes it "evidence".
>>78625343
That's an extreme oversimplification.
>>78625247
No, churches are places of worship, schools are places of learning. The argument that people can become spiritual without schooling in it isn't an argument. I can become a master of the piano without education but it's not suggested and not the norm. I'm not speaking from a theocracy standpoint i'm saying from people who advocate "freedom of knowledge" you guys want to completely remove the prospect of alternate living choices of your own being taught in public schools. You expect scientific lore to be taught as fact despite a myriad of "factual" theories being disproven in the last 10 years alone.
>>78625262
I know plenty about the big bang. Now answer my other questions.
>>78625443
The bible is a fable, it's a collection of stories, that is literally what it is. There might be truth in there, but it's flimsy with absolutely no scientific backing.
The Greeks knew the Earth was round long before the bible was written by using mathematics.
>>78625046
I've been living with it since I was fucking around 8 and I'm 29 now. Learning to live with it is not as good as people who haven't even bothered to question anything they've been taught.
This should be on that "privilege" checklist cause life is definitely harder living while knowing most likely you'll be in nothingness just like how you were in nothingness before you were born.
>>78624468
Religion = delusion
Atheism = delusion
Wtf are you? Agnostic?
>>78625390
What is with your atheist superiority complex? For someone so informed, you seem to be forgetting that the concept of a fact is contrary to the scientific method which claims that EVERYTHING is a theory. Some, like the theory that when you drop something - it will fall down, are supported by evidence. Others are not.
If this sounds retarded to you ignorant atheists, then please google it.
>>78625443
You didn't address any of my points. I agree with you on all of those, and on the creations of humanity.
Problem is, the scope of your can't imagine anything beyond what directly measurable, in your face, or unknown to science as of yet.
I know science, and I know the vast pool of unknown in science. And even that's not where I place my god.
>>78625578
Not all evidence points to fact, that's twisting a definition, but at least you're admitting there is a difference which is where all of your claims fall apart fundamentally.
Nothing is factual or proven by evidence alone.
i certainly don't believe in the Abrahamic god, but i don't find it impossible for there to be something, maybe older religions, which are more spiritual and personal are more accurate. but we don't know either way.
>>78625697
No shit
>>78625697
99% of Atheists are Agnostic.
Most people use the term Atheist because they follow no religion or deity.
>>78625528
really? Because atheists tend to be by far the most obnoxious people I've ever met with a superiority complex you would not believe.
>>78625670
>I know plenty about the big bang.
You think you do, but you don't.
>>78625744
Theory and fact in science don't mean what they mean colloquially. You'd know that if you were qualified to have this discussion. If you're going to be ignorant of the things you're discussing while we're on the internet, I'm going to just assume you're an idiot and treat you like one.
>>78625672
>The bible is a fable
>Literature proving the stories of Jesus other than the bible including letters from the legate stationed in Judea and the 300 people who frantically ran about the country telling people they saw the risen savior must be thrown out the window a long with every other piece of non-horses mouth evidence.
>>78624900
Yes but the Bible, as shown in this thread, is under scrutiny over its claims of Jesus and his divinity and the implications behind that
So when this sort of argument comes up, and someone quotes a scripture that already touches the subject, that is to show that the Bible has valid logic already in its pages. It's not the same as bringing up the fox and the sour grapes. It's exactly the same as when the other side quotes, say, Nietzsche.
>>78625672
So you just over looked that part about the earth being round and of it hanging upon nothing and of how many historians who dismissed it had to eat crow as people who they swore never existed up to and including Pilot, was proven to exist. The greeks never said the earth was round. But I see you're stuck on stupid like most atheist are. that's fine, as you were young one.
>>78625528
Too right.
I think you'll find a lot of people who think they have the definitive answer to a philosophical question behave this way.
>>78625744
Lol middle school called. They want their definition of a theory back....
My buddy Russell let me borrow his Teapot.
I'm going to brew myself some straight up street knowledge and then go to bed.
>>78625928
>proving
no it does not.
Also the Greeks knew the Earth was round, just repeating myself to point out the flaws in your knowledge.
>>78617515
That's funny.
>>78625442
>catholicism
>thinks I'm talking about one religion or one concept of God
Dude I think you quoted the wrong post.
>>78625846
Jesus, it's just like people making up genders.
If you know there is no God, you are an Atheist.
If you know that there is a God, you are a Theist.
If you don't know, you are an Agnostic.
Now, you may be more inclined to favor the Atheist side, however; if you still don't know one way or the other, you are an Atheist-inclined Agnostic.
How is this hard?
>>78625899
Thank you!! THANK YOU!!!!
>>78625959
>The greeks never said the earth was round
Nobody should take you seriously anymore.
!!! READ THIS !!!
I'm posting this because I see a few people here that doesn't buy into the fedora atheist meme and actually tries to find an explanation to things like religion, god, etc...
Check out this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51IoQOJ0SfY
It's well worth the time. I can agree with many of the things he says and I hope you'll enjoy it as well. Don't forget to lift brehs.
>>78625528
>thread generally starts off with
>2016
>still believing in a kike on a stick
>expects people to not get upset
>>78626046
>its proof when we do it though
>>78619330
Yeah one of my problems with theist God is that it's a conscious being. Like of course conscious beings are going to assume a BIGGER conscious being created them. Or that in Abrahamic religions it's a man. God wouldn't need a gender or even a penis, what is he reproducing with? Does he have to pee? That's why I always see God as an It instead if It existed.
The narrow conceptualizing of God is a turn off. You basically just came up with your own concept and believed that. Nothing wrong with that as long as you, as you did, define what you mean by it.
(((Google))) is pushing their agenda with another propaganda video, but this time they decided to censor all comments from the beginning. You don't have to watch the dreadful thing, just remember to give it a downvote.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oDLqmM2BPw
>>78625905
but I do. I've read all the theories in exquisite detail. I only undermine the theory because atheists always make le sky fairy argument. Now answer the other questions I had written down.
>>78625905
>>78626011
Please, continue proving your ignorance.
If you see something happen again and again, then it is logical to assume that it will happen once more.
This is the nature of the Scientific Meathod - there are NO facts, there are only theories supported by evidence. The only way that there can ever be a fact in Science would be if every single iota of space in all of existence has been documented.
Fucking google it
>>78625634
Scientific fact is taught as fact. I doubt you have a problem with this when children are being taught about the states of matter, the rock cycle, or any other easily acceptable scientific fact.
Regarding evolution, it is a fact. Life evolves and has been observed to do so. The theory of evolution by natural selection is a theory that supports all the available evidence, but it is still taught as a theory and not a fact.
The Big Bang Theory is also aptly taught as a theory, when it's even taught at all. It usually isn't taught to children at all, but to college-level adults, and still as a theoretical model.
Surely you agree that the Bible doesn't belong in a SCIENCE class.
Maybe it could be taught in a literature class, or maybe there could even be a "theology" class, although its practical application for children and young adults strikes me as dubious. There's also the question of why the Bible would be taught and not the Quran or the Vedas.
>>78625528
In case you hadn't noticed, the only people shouting IGNORANCE!!! err.... IRRATIONAL!!!! would be the atheists
>>78626485
God can't even survive simple logical processes though, let alone the scientific method.
>>78616229
what
>>78625202
>everyone but me goes to hell
Mathew 7:13
>Enter in at the narrow gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leads to destruction, and many there be who go in there
>21“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22Many will say to me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles?’ 23Then I will tell them plainly, ‘I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!’
Perfect example for what I was saying
>>78625929
Scriptures are usually to show how some points are already answered. Not everyone who says they are Christian get a free pass to Heaven.
>>78622193
>mom look at all the coincidences that correspond with today's science
I hope you realise that this is some serious bullshit
>>78626469
Describe the Big Bang Theory to me, and I'll tell you why you're wrong. If you don't want to be told that you're wrong, research the theory yourself, learn what it really means, and then explain it to me. Then we can continue with this conversation. If you think you can talk to me about my understanding of the universe and you are making up your own story for the creation of our universe, you're going to need to go back to the drawing board.
>>78626485
Name me some facts anon. What does fact mean to you?
>>78626114
atheist
ˈeJθJJst/Submit
noun
a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods
The dictionary disagrees with your definition, sorry.
Theism and atheism are questions of belief, not knowledge. There is a difference. Agnosticism is a question of knowledge.
One can believe and not know or believe and know. One can not believe and know or not believe and not know.
>>78626485
The word theory used scientifically is not the same as theory as used Law and Order SVU.
They usually teach you the difference in high school biology but they probably don't teach that in texas or whatever shithole you crawled out of.
Since you are all about the google try googling Russell's Teapot. I tried to leave it in as a subtle clue but I assumed too much of you.
>>78626651
It takes some serious cherry picking to get those """"""""quotes"""""""""" out of the bible lol.
